Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1991 Feb;57(2):469–472. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.2.469-472.1991

Bacterial and Fungal Numbers in Ruminal and Cecal Contents of the Blue Duiker (Cephalophus monticola) †

Burk A Dehority 1,*, Gabriella A Varga 1
PMCID: PMC182734  PMID: 16348413

Abstract

Total and cellulolytic bacterial and fungal numbers were determined in ruminal and cecal contents of 20 blue duikers (Cephalophus monticola). The animals were equally divided by sex and fed two diets, either high roughage or high concentrate. The mean concentration for total bacterial numbers in the rumen was 26.0 × 108/g of contents, with values ranging from 2 × 108/g to 93 × 108/g. Cellulolytic numbers averaged 6.0 × 108/g with a range of 1.5 × 108/g to 24.0 × 108/g. No differences related to sex or diet were found. In contrast, total bacterial numbers in the cecum differed between diets (P < 0.02), i.e., 1,046 × 106 bacteria per g for animals fed the high-forage diet compared with 166 × 106/g for those fed the high-concentrate diet. Cellulolytic bacterial counts in the cecal contents averaged 3.1 and 7.0% of the total counts for the high-forage and high-concentrate diets, respectively. Low concentrations of fungi were found in both ruminal and cecal contents of some, but not all, animals. Unexpectedly, concentrations of bacteria and fungi in the rumen and cecum were highly correlated with their total numbers (concentration multiplied by total weight of contents).

Full text

PDF
469

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akin D. E., Borneman W. S., Windham W. R. Rumen fungi: morphological types from Georgia cattle and the attack on forage cell walls. Biosystems. 1988;21(3-4):385–391. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(88)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caldwell D. R., Bryant M. P. Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Sep;14(5):794–801. doi: 10.1128/am.14.5.794-801.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dehority B. A. Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jul;99(1):189–196. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.1.189-196.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dehority B. A., Tirabasso P. A., Grifo A. P., Jr Most-probable-number procedures for enumerating ruminal bacteria, including the simultaneous estimation of total and cellulolytic numbers in one medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Nov;55(11):2789–2792. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.11.2789-2792.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grenet E., Fonty G., Jamot J., Bonnemoy F. Influence of diet and monensin on development of anaerobic fungi in the rumen, duodenum, cecum, and feces of cows. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Sep;55(9):2360–2364. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.9.2360-2364.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grubb J. A., Dehority B. A. Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Feb;31(2):262–267. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.262-267.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Joblin K. N. Isolation, enumeration, and maintenance of rumen anaerobic fungi in roll tubes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Dec;42(6):1119–1122. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.6.1119-1122.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kern D. L., Slyter L. L., Leffel E. C., Weaver J. M., Oltjen R. R. Ponies vs. steers: microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta. J Anim Sci. 1974 Mar;38(3):559–564. doi: 10.2527/jas1974.383559x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leedle J. A., Bryant M. P., Hespell R. B. Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):402–412. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.2.402-412.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewis S. M., Dehority B. A. Microbiology and ration digestibility in the hindgut of the ovine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):356–363. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.356-363.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mann S. O., Orskov E. R. The effect of rumen and post-rumen feeding of carbohydrates on the caecal microflora of sheep. J Appl Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;36(3):475–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1973.tb04130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nicoletti J. M., Davis C. L., Hespell R. B., Leedle J. A. Enumeration and presumptive identification of bacteria from the small intestine of sheep. J Dairy Sci. 1984 Jun;67(6):1227–1235. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81428-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olumeyan D. B., Nagaraja T. G., Miller G. W., Frey R. A., Boyer J. E. Rumen microbial changes in cattle fed diets with or without salinomycin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):340–345. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.2.340-345.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Orpin C. G., Mathiesen S. D., Greenwood Y., Blix A. S. Seasonal changes in the ruminal microflora of the high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jul;50(1):144–151. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.1.144-151.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Theodorou M. K., Gill M., King-Spooner C., Beever D. E. Enumeration of anaerobic chytridiomycetes as thallus-forming units: novel method for quantification of fibrolytic fungal populations from the digestive tract ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Apr;56(4):1073–1078. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.4.1073-1078.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Gylswyk N. O. A comparison of two techniques for counting cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1970 Feb;60(2):191–197. doi: 10.1099/00221287-60-2-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES