Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2006 Dec 4;75(2):753–759. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01386-06

Chlamydia pneumoniae-Induced Macrophage Foam Cell Formation Is Mediated by Toll-Like Receptor 2

Fei Cao 1, Antonio Castrillo 2,, Peter Tontonoz 2, Fabio Re 1, Gerald I Byrne 1,*
PMCID: PMC1828523  PMID: 17145941

Abstract

Chlamydia pneumoniae induces macrophage foam cell formation, a hallmark of early atherosclerosis, in the presence of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). This study examined the role that Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 may play in pathogen-induced foam cell formation. Murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells either infected with C. pneumoniae or treated with the TLR4 ligand E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or the TLR2 ligand Pam3-Cys-Ala-Gly-OH (Pam) became Oil Red O-stained foam cells and showed increased cholesteryl ester (CE) content when cocultured with LDL. In macrophages from TLR2−/− mice, foam cells were induced by Escherichia coli LPS but not by C. pneumoniae or Pam. Conversely, C. pneumoniae or Pam, but not E. coli LPS, induced foam cells in the TLR4-deficient GG2EE macrophage cell line, suggesting that C. pneumoniae elicits foam cell formation predominantly via TLR2. Enhancing cholesterol efflux using the liver X receptor (LXR) agonist GW3965 significantly decreased the CE content of cells exposed to each of the three TLR ligands (C. pneumoniae, Pam, and E. coli LPS). Overall, our results suggest that activation of the LXR signaling pathway may affect potentially atherogenic processes modulated by the TLR ligands.


Chlamydia pneumoniae causes community-acquired pneumonia, bronchitis, and other respiratory tract diseases (21). Infection also is strongly associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases by a variety of studies. Seroepidemiological studies have indicated that patients with coronary artery disease have higher titers of anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies compared to healthy population controls (42). Pathology studies have detected the organism within atherosclerotic lesions but not in adjacent normal tissue by immunohistochemistry, PCR, and electron microscopy (19), and the pathogen has been isolated from atherosclerotic lesions and propagated in vitro (4, 19, 27). Cell biology studies have suggested that the organism can be detected in circulating leukocytes, has the capacity to infect all atheroma cell types (13, 28, 34), and can induce the expression of inflammatory cytokines, procoagulants, matrix metalloproteinase, and adhesion molecules (8, 9, 12). Animal model studies have shown that C. pneumoniae can cause arterial inflammation in normolipidemic mice and rabbits and initiate lesion development or contribute to exacerbation of lesions in rabbits or mice, respectively (29, 33). Despite the numerous indications of C. pneumoniae's role in atherosclerosis, human secondary prevention antibiotic treatment trials have failed to benefit heart disease patients (6, 16, 35). Although this may suggest that C. pneumoniae is not causally associated with atherosclerosis or heart disease, it is more likely that other reasons account for the lack of secondary prevention antibiotic efficacy. For example, all secondary prevention trial participants had advanced heart disease, making successful antibiotic intervention difficult to achieve because of substantial preexisting cardiovascular damage. In addition, a nonproductive (persistent) chlamydial growth state is possible during chronic diseases and antibiotics are not eradicative for this specific form of the pathogen (14). Finally, none of the major trials established conclusively if the antibiotics achieved appropriate penetration at the site of chlamydial infection. If this pathogen plays a causal role in the atherosclerotic process, standard chemotherapeutic measures in unselected heart disease patient populations are unlikely to reduce pathological consequences of infection, making a better understanding of the role of C. pneumoniae in cardiovascular pathophysiology an important public health objective.

Foam cell accumulation is a key event in early atherosclerosis (41), and it is known that C. pneumoniae induces human and murine macrophage foam cell formation, at least in part, by stimulating enhanced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) binding and entry (23). Furthermore, C. pneumoniae induces monocytes to oxidize lipoproteins, making them atherogenic (24, 25). One possible mechanism for increased LDL uptake is up-regulation of scavenger receptors (such as SR-A, CD36, etc.), which can internalize modified LDL without feedback inhibition, resulting in the accumulation of cholesterol and cholesteryl esters (CEs) in cytoplasmic storage vesicles (10). Normal cellular cholesterol homeostasis, however, involves not only specific trafficking of lipid storage vesicles but also processing of excess intracellular cholesterol such that it is effluxed from the cell via a transporter coupled to the production of high-density lipoprotein. The liver X receptors (LXRs) activate the expression of genes involved in cholesterol efflux such as ABCA1, ABCG1, etc. (48). LXRs are expressed and activated by endogenous or synthetic ligands such as GW3965, which has been shown to have potent antiatherogenic activity in modified LDL-loaded macrophages in vitro, as well as in the aortas of hyperlipidemic mice, by inducing the cholesterol efflux genes ABCA1 and ABCG1 (20).

Induction of LXR-activated genes also has been shown to influence pathogen pattern recognition Toll-like receptor 3/4 (TLR3/4) activity (5). The discovery of mammalian TLRs as critical sensors of the innate immune system provides a mechanistic link among infection, inflammation, and atherosclerosis (31). Studies have shown the expression of TLR1, -2, and -4 in human atherosclerotic lesions (11, 49). Animal studies (2, 18, 32) have shown that the loss of TLR4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), the common TLR signaling adaptor molecule, reduces disease severity in atherosclerosis-prone, apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE−/−) mice (32).

Recent studies also have indicated a proatherogenic effect of local TLR2 activation (44) and established a clear role for TLR2 in modulating the severity of experimental atherosclerosis in mice, where complete loss of TLR2 results in decreased lesion size whereas systemic exposure to an exogenous TLR2 agonist dramatically exacerbated atherosclerosis (36), providing insight into a potential mechanism by which recurrent microbial infections might influence disease severity. TLR2 detects a large range of microbial components, such as gram-positive organism-derived lipoteichoic acid, bacterial lipoproteins, and zymosan (1). Of the 11 characterized TLRs, TLR2 is unique by virtue of its ability to heterodimerize with TLR1 or TLR6 (38), resulting in a relatively broad ligand specificity (45, 46). The recent discovery of CD36 as a coreceptor for TLR2 raises the prospect that a novel proinflammatory pathway exists between endogenously derived lipids and activation of innate immunity (17).

Chlamydiae express a variety of ligands that could serve as potential TLR ligands. For example, both TLR2 and TLR4 are involved in the recognition of C. pneumoniae by host cells, although host cell activation occurs predominantly via TLR2 (39). Several studies have reported that chlamydial heat shock protein 60 activates TLR2 and/or TLR4 (7, 26, 37, 39, 47) and that chlamydial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces macrophage foam cell formation in the presence of LDL (22). The objectives of the present study were to determine the role that TLR2 or TLR4 may play in C. pneumoniae-induced foam cell formation and to initiate an investigation of the cross talk between LXRs and TLRs in C. pneumoniae-induced foam cell formation.

(Part of this work was presented at the 11th International Symposium on Human Chlamydial Infections, 18 to 23 June 2006, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and growth of C. pneumoniae.

The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA) and grown in RPMI 1640 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; BioWhittaker), 50 μg of vancomycin per ml, and 10 μg of gentamicin per ml. Cells were maintained in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator and subcultured every 2 days by gentle scraping. The murine macrophage TLR4-mutant cell line GG2EE, derived from C3H/HeJ mice, expresses a TLR4 containing a proline-to-histidine mutation at amino acid residue 714 (3) and was grown in the same medium as RAW 264.7. C. pneumoniae strain AR-39 (ATCC) was propagated in HEp-2 cells (ATCC) and purified by Renografin gradient centrifugation as previously described (6). Purified organisms were suspended in sucrose-phosphate-glutamic acid buffer (0.22 M sucrose, 3.8 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM l-glutamic acid; pH 7.4) and stored in stock suspensions at −80°C until they were used. Chlamydia titers were determined by infecting HEp-2 cells with 10-fold dilutions of thawed stock, incubating them for 36 h, fixing the cells with methanol, and fluorescent staining chlamydial inclusions with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-chlamydial LPS antibody (Fitzgerald Industries International Inc., Concord, MA). Titers are reported as multiplicities of infection (MOI), where an MOI of 1 equals one infectious Chlamydia organism per HEp-2 cell.

Infection and culture of macrophages.

Macrophages were plated at a density of 2 × 105/well in 24-well plates (1.9-cm2 growth area; Corning Costar Corporation, Cambridge, MA) and incubated overnight prior to infection. Macrophages were infected with C. pneumoniae (MOI = 1) or treated with the TLR2 ligand Pam (Pam3-Cys-Ala-Gly-OH, a synthetic lipopeptide, 2 μg/ml; BACHEM) or the TLR4 ligand Escherichia coli LPS (500 ng/ml) in 500 μl of RPMI 1640 to 10% FBS in the presence or absence of LDL (100 μg/ml; INTRACEL) for 24 h at 35°C, 5% CO2. In some experiments, macrophages were cultured with LDL in the presence or absence of the synthetic LXR agonist GW3965 (1 or 2 μM). Trypan blue staining showed that none of the treatments affected macrophage viability at 24 h (>95% of the macrophages were viable).

Staining and quantitation of foam cells.

Macrophages were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed for 15 min in 2% paraformaldehyde (in PBS), and stained for 30 min in 1% Oil Red O (in 60% isopropanol). Cells were then washed three times with PBS and examined by light microscopy (magnification, ×200; Diaphot 200 or Optiphot microscope; Nikon, Garden City, NY) (23). Foam cells were defined as cells with ≥10 Oil Red O-positive droplets (43). Alternatively, staining with Nile Red, a fluorescent dye for neutral lipid bodies, was used. After fixation (the same as described above), cells were stained with Nile Red (3 μg/ml; Molecular Probes N-1142, dissolved in 70% ethanol, diluted in PBS) for 3 min, washed three times with PBS, and then examined by fluorescence microscopy.

Quantitation of macrophage CE content.

Macrophage CE content was quantitated by the Amplex Red Cholesterol Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Macrophages were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed three times with PBS, and incubated with 200 μl/well of absolute ethanol for 30 min at 4°C to extract cellular lipids. Cholesterol content was determined by incubating 20 μl of ethanol-extracted lipids diluted in 30 μl of 1× reaction buffer (0.1 M K2HPO4, pH 7.4, 0.05 M NaCl, 5 mM cholic acid, 0.1% Triton X-100) with 50 μl of assay solution (total cholesterol) or 50 μl of assay solution lacking cholesterol esterase (free cholesterol), for 30 min at 37°C in the dark and then measuring fluorescence (HTS-7000 microplate fluorometer; 535-nm excitation, 595-nm emission). The total and free cholesterol contents of each sample were calculated by using a cholesterol standard. CE content was calculated by subtracting free cholesterol from total cholesterol for each sample. Lipid-extracted cells were dissolved in 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate-0.1 M NaOH for 30 min, and total cell protein was determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay. CE levels under different treatments were normalized to total cellular protein content.

Animals and preparation of peritoneal macrophages.

Six-week-old male C57BL/6J and B6.129-TLR2tm1kir/J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). These mice were maintained on a standard diet in an IACUC-approved facility. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 3 ml of 10% proteose peptone (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD). Three days later, mice were euthanized and peritoneal exudate cells were harvested by lavage from the peritoneal cavity with ice-cold Hanks' balanced salt solution (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY). Cells were cultured for 24 h and washed with Hanks' balanced salt solution to remove nonadherent cells. Adherent cells were cultured for 3 days before use. Peritoneal macrophages (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS.

RESULTS

C. pneumoniae induced foam cell formation and CE accumulation in RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence of LDL.

The RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with LDL or infected with C. pneumoniae in the presence or absence of LDL, and foam cell formation was measured by assessment of Oil Red O staining. Lipid accumulation, a hallmark of foam cell formation, was observed only in cells infected with C. pneumoniae plus LDL but not in the other treatments (Fig. 1). This phenomenon occurred in a dose-dependent manner (data not shown). These observations were consistent with a previous report (22) and verified the effect of C. pneumoniae on foam cell formation in the presence of exogenous LDL.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

C. pneumoniae induces foam cell formation and CE accumulation in RAW 264.7 macrophages when cocultured with LDL. (A, B) Micrographs of Oil Red O-stained macrophages treated with LDL (100 μg/ml) (A) or infected with C. pneumoniae (C. pn; MOI = 1) in the presence of LDL for 24 h (B) (magnification, ×300; light microscopy). (C) Lipid droplet levels were quantified in uninfected (open bars) and infected (solid bars) cells. Cells were incubated with LDL (100 μg/ml) for 24 h. Lipid droplet levels were normalized to cell numbers. (D) CE levels were determined after the same treatment described for panel C. CE levels were normalized to protein content. The data are representative of three experiments and are means of triplicates with standard deviations. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with uninfected samples cultured with LDL (P < 0.05; t test).

C. pneumoniae-induced macrophage foam cell formation is dependent on TLR2 but not TLR4.

It is known that C. pneumoniae is capable of activating both TLR2 and TLR4. To determine if TLR2 and/or TLR4 are involved in C. pneumoniae-induced foam cell formation, peritoneal macrophages from TLR2−/− mice were studied. In this cell type, foam cell formation was induced by the TLR4 ligand E. coli LPS but not by C. pneumoniae or the TLR2 ligand Pam in the presence of LDL (Fig. 2B). In contrast, C. pneumoniae or Pam retained the ability to induce foam cells in the TLR4-deficient macrophage cell line GG2EE. As expected, E. coli LPS cultured with LDL was unable to induce foam cell formation in this cell line (Fig. 3). Taken together, these data suggest that C. pneumoniae-induced foam cell formation is dependent on TLR2 and does not require TLR4.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

C. pneumoniae fails to induce foam cell formation in peritoneal macrophages from TLR2−/− mice. Lipid droplet levels in peritoneal macrophages from wild-type (WT) (A) and TLR2−/− (B) mice were enumerated. Cells were left untreated (open bars), infected with C. pneumoniae (C. pn; MOI = 1) (solid bars), or treated with the TLR4 ligand E. coli LPS (500 ng/ml) (diagonal bars) or the TLR2 ligand Pam (2 μg/ml) (gray bars) in the presence or absence of LDL (100 μg/ml) for 24 h. Lipid droplet levels were normalized to cell numbers. The data are representative of three experiments and are means of triplicates with standard deviations. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with uninfected samples cultured with LDL (P < 0.05; t test).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

C. pneumoniae induces foam cell formation in the TLR4-mutant murine macrophage GG2EE cell line. Lipid droplet levels in untreated GG2EE cells (open bars) or cells treated with the TLR4 ligand E. coli LPS (500 ng/ml) (diagonal bars) or the TLR2 ligand Pam (2 μg/ml) (grey bars) or cells infected with C. pneumoniae (C. pn; MOI = 1) (solid bars) are represented. Cells were incubated with or without LDL (100 μg/ml) for 24 h. Lipid droplet levels were normalized to cell numbers. The data are representative of three experiments and are means of triplicates with standard deviations. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with uninfected samples cultured with LDL (P < 0.05; t test).

Effect of LXR agonist on foam cell formation and CE accumulation.

Since cholesterol homeostasis involves not only cholesterol uptake but also cholesterol efflux, foam cell formation may be influenced by enhanced cholesterol uptake coupled with decreased cholesterol efflux. In response to lipid loading, the LXR expressed in macrophages activates a compensatory pathway for cholesterol efflux. To examine whether activation of the LXR pathway could reverse foam cell formation, the LXR agonist GW3965 was added to RAW 264.7 macrophages infected with C. pneumoniae or treated with Pam or E. coli LPS in the presence of LDL. GW3965 treatment drastically decreased the number of lipid droplets in cells treated with E. coli LPS and to a lesser extent in cells exposed to C. pneumoniae or Pam (Fig. 4A). In addition, GW3965 treatment inhibited CE accumulation in cells exposed to each of the three ligands (E. coli LPS, C. pneumoniae, and Pam) in the presence of LDL (Fig. 4B). Microscopic examination of cells confirmed the ability of GW3965 to inhibit foam cell formation induced by E. coli LPS (Fig. 4D), and, to a lesser degree, by C. pneumoniae or Pam (Fig. 4E). Taken together, these data suggest that activation of the LXR signaling pathway inhibits foam cell formation induced by TLR2 and TLR4.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Effects of GW3965 on foam cell formation in RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A) Lipid droplet levels in untreated RAW264.7 macrophages (open bars) or cells treated with the TLR4 ligand E. coli LPS (500 ng/ml) (diagonal bars) or the TLR2 ligand Pam (2 μg/ml) (gray bars) or infected with C. pneumoniae (C. pn; MOI = 1) (solid bars). Cells were incubated with or without LDL (100 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of 2 μM GW3965 (GW) for 24 h. Lipid droplet levels were normalized to cell numbers. Levels of inhibition are shown. The data are representative of three experiments and are reported as means of triplicates with standard deviations. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with C. pneumoniae-infected or Pam-treated samples cultured with LDL (P < 0.05; t test). Double asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference compared with E. coli LPS-treated samples cultured with LDL (P < 0.01; t test). (B) CE levels in untreated (open bars), TLR4 ligand E. coli LPS (500 ng/ml)-treated (diagonal bars), C. pneumoniae (MOI = 1)-infected (solid bars), and TLR2 ligand Pam (2 μg/ml)-treated (gray bars) RAW 264.7 macrophages. Cells were incubated with or without LDL (100 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of 1 or 2 μM GW3965 (GW1 or GW2) for 24 h. CE levels were normalized to protein content. The data shown are representative of three experiments and are means of triplicates with standard deviations. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with foam cells induced by E. coli LPS, C. pneumoniae, and Pam when cultured with LDL, respectively (P < 0.05; t test). (C to E) Micrographs of Oil Red O-stained macrophages containing cytoplasmic neutral lipid droplets (magnification, ×300; light microscopy). (C) Cells infected with C. pneumoniae plus LDL. (D) Cells treated with E. coli LPS plus LDL in the presence of 2 μM GW3965. (E) Cells treated with C. pneumoniae plus LDL in the presence of 2 μM GW3965. The arrow indicates lipid droplets stained by Oil Red O.

DISCUSSION

Atherosclerosis is a disorder of lipid metabolism and a chronic inflammation (40), indicating that infectious agents may contribute to atherogenesis and heart disease. Macrophages play a key role in both lipid metabolism and immune responses (15, 30). Macrophage foam cell formation in the arterial intima is the hallmark of early atherosclerosis (41), and important steps in foam cell formation include excessive cholesterol uptake from high levels of serum LDL, accumulation of intracellular triglycerides, and reduced cholesterol efflux via the ATP-binding cassette transporter pumps (ABCA1, ABCG1, etc.).

Previous studies have shown that C. pneumoniae induces macrophage foam cell formation in the presence of LDL (23), consistent with a causal role for the organism in atherogenesis. Several mechanisms may account for the ability of C. pneumoniae to induce macrophage foam cell formation. It is known that C. pneumoniae can cause macrophage activation, resulting in LDL oxidation and scavenger receptor up-regulation (24), which in turn may lead to an increase in the uptake of the oxidized LDL by macrophages. Cell activation by C. pneumoniae has been demonstrated to be mediated by TLR2 or TLR4 (7, 26, 37, 39, 47), although TLR2 seems to play the predominant role. In data reported here, we showed that foam cell formation induced by C. pneumoniae is mediated by TLR2 but not TLR4, although pure agonists of both receptors are equally able to trigger foam cell formation and CE accumulation in the presence of LDL. Interestingly, in animal models of atherosclerosis, TLR2 activation has been shown to be proatherogenic (44). Loss of TLR2 was reported to result in decreased atherosclerotic lesion size, whereas systemic exposure to a TLR2 ligand was found to dramatically increase lesion severity (36), establishing a clear role for TLR2 in modulating the severity of experimental atherosclerosis in mice. A role for TLR4 in modulating atherosclerosis has also been proposed (32). Other studies have shown that C. pneumoniae also affects metabolism in murine macrophages via TLR2 but not TLR4 (50). Our results reinforce this notion and link C. pneumoniae's ability to induce foam cell formation in a TLR2-dependent fashion and the proven role of TLR2 in atherogenesis.

LXRs are highly expressed in macrophages. Activation of LXR induces cholesterol efflux from lipid-loaded macrophages (48), and a synthetic LXR agonist, GW3965, has been shown to decrease atherosclerotic lesions by 50% in both LDLR−/− and apoE−/− mice (20). Viral and bacterial pathogens have been reported to antagonize LXR transcriptional activity and cholesterol efflux through activation of TLR3/4 (5). The LXR and TLR cross signaling represents a direct link between innate immunity and macrophage cholesterol metabolism and is a potential way for pathogens to contribute to cardiovascular disease (5). As shown in our data, GW3965 treatment reduced the CE content of foam cells induced by C. pneumoniae infection or Pam or E. coli LPS treatment to the same extent. Despite stimulating cholesterol efflux to the same degree in all cell populations, GW3965 inhibited lipid droplet content more prominently in cells treated with E. coli LPS than in cells infected with C. pneumoniae or treated with Pam. The reason for this difference is unclear.

Overall, our results suggest that activation of the LXR signaling pathway may affect potentially atherogenic processes modulated by the TLR ligands. Interestingly, LXR-induced genes affect not only cholesterol efflux but also fatty acid synthesis. It is possible that C. pneumoniae infection and TLR activation may differentially affect genes of the LXR-induced response. This process will be investigated by quantitatively measuring LXR-induced transcription in infected and uninfected cells to further our understanding of the role of this important human pathogen in atherogenic events.

Acknowledgments

We thank Steve Mizel for kindly providing the GG2EE cell line, A. T. V. Reddy for help with the animal work, Sadia Mahdi and Isao Miyairi for providing advice, Tim Higgins for help with artwork, and Scot Ouellette for help with microscopy.

P.T. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This work was supported by NIH grants AI42790 (G.I.B.) and HL66088 (P.T.).

We have no commercial associations (i.e., pharmaceutical stock ownership, consultancy, advisory board membership, or relevant patents) that might pose a conflict of interest.

Editor: J. N. Weiser

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 4 December 2006.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akira, S., and K. Takeda. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:499-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Björkbacka, H., V. V. Kunjathoor, K. J. Moore, S. Koehn, C. M. Ordija, M. A. Lee, T. Means, K. Halmen, A. D. Luster, D. T. Golenbock, and M. W. Freeman. 2004. Reduced atherosclerosis in MyD88-null mice links elevated serum cholesterol levels to activation of innate immunity signaling pathways. Nat. Med. 10:416-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blasi, E., D. Radzioch, S. K. Durum, and L. Varesio. 1987. A murine macrophage cell line, immortalized by v-raf and v-myc oncogenes, exhibits normal macrophage functions. Eur. J. Immunol. 17:1491-1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boman, J., and C. A. Gaydos. 2000. Polymerase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in circulating white blood cells. J. Infect. Dis. 181:S452-S454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Castrillo, A., S. B. Joseph, S. A. Vaidya, M. Haverland, A. M. Fogelman, G. Cheng, and P. Tontonoz. 2003. Crosstalk between LXR and Toll-like receptor signaling mediates bacterial and viral antagonism of cholesterol metabolism. Mol. Cell 12:805-816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cleland, J. G., P. Huan Loh, N. Freemantle, A. L. Clark, and A. P. Coletta. 2004. Clinical trials update from the European Society of Cardiology: SENIORS, ACES, PROVE-IT, ACTION, and the HF-ACTION trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 6:787-791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Costa, C. P., C. J. Kirschning, D. Busch, S. Durr, L. Jennen, U. Heinzmann, S. Prebeck, H. Wagner, and T. Miethke. 2002. Role of chlamydial heat shock protein 60 in the stimulation of innate immune cells by Chlamydia pneumoniae. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:2460-2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Da Costa, C. U., N. Wantia, C. J. Kirschning, D. H. Busch, N. Rodriguez, H. Wagner, and T. Miethke. 2004. Heat shock protein 60 from Chlamydia pneumoniae elicits an unusual set of inflammatory responses via Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:2874-2884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dechend, R., M. Maass, J. Gieffers, R. Dietz, C. Scheidereit, A. Leutz, and D. C. Gulba. 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells activates NF-κB and induces tissue factor and PAI-1 expression: a potential link to accelerated arteriosclerosis. Circulation 100:1369-1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Villiers, W. J., and E. J. Smart. 1999. Macrophage scavenger receptors and foam cell formation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 66:740-746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edfeldt, K., J. Swedenborg, G. K. Hansson, and Z. Q. Yan. 2002. Expression of Toll-like receptors in human atherosclerotic lesions: a possible pathway for plaque activation. Circulation 105:1158-1161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fryer, R. H., E. P. Schwobe, M. L. Woods, and G. M. Rodgers. 1997. Chlamydia species infect human vascular endothelial cells and induce procoagulant activity. J. Investig. Med. 45:168-174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaydos, C. A., J. T. Summersgill, N. N. Sahney, J. A. Ramirez, and T. C. Quinn. 1996. Replication of Chlamydia pneumoniae in vitro in human macrophages, endothelial cells, and aortic artery smooth muscle cells. Infect. Immun. 64:1614-1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gieffers, J., H. Fullgraf, J. Jahn, M. Klinger, K. Dalhoff, H. A. Katus, W. Solbach, and M. Maass. 2001. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in circulating human monocytes is refractory to antibiotic treatment. Circulation 103:351-356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Glass, C. K., and J. L. Witztum. 2001. Atherosclerosis. The road ahead. Cell 104:503-516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grayston, J. T. 1999. Antibiotic treatment trials for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease events. Circulation 99:1538-1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoebe, K., P. Georgel, S. Rutschmann, X. Du, S. Mudd, K. Crozat, S. Sovath, L. Shamel, T. Hartung, U. Zahringer, and B. Beutler. 2005. CD36 is a sensor of diacylglycerides. Nature 433:523-527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hollestelle, S. C., M. R. De Vries, J. K. Van Keulen, A. H. Schoneveld, A. Vink, C. F. Strijder, B. J. Van Middelaar, G. Pasterkamp, P. H. Quax, and D. P. De Kleijn. 2004. Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in outward arterial remodeling. Circulation 109:393-398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jackson, L. A., L. A. Campbell, C.-C. Kuo, D. I. Rodriquez, A. Lee, and J. T. Grayston. 1997. Isolation of Chlamydia pneumoniae from carotid endarterectomy specimen. J. Infect. Dis. 176:292-295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Joseph, S. B., E. McKilligin, L. Pei, M. A. Watson, A. R. Collins, B. A. Laffitte, M. Chen, G. Noh, J. Goodman, G. N. Hagger, J. Tran, T. K. Tippin, X. Wang, A. J. Lusis, W. A. Hsueh, R. E. Law, J. L. Collins, T. M. Willson, and P. Tontonoz. 2002. Synthetic LXR ligand inhibits the development of atherosclerosis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7604-7609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kalayoglu, M., D. Hahn, and G. I. Byrne. 1999. Chlamydia infection and pneumonia, p. 302. In L. J. Paradise, H. Friedman, and M. Bendinelli (ed.), Opportunistic intracellular bacteria and immunity: infectious agents and pathogenesis. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
  • 22.Kalayoglu, M. V., and G. I. Byrne. 1998. A Chlamydia pneumoniae component that induces macrophage foam cell formation is chlamydial lipopolysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 66:5067-5072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalayoglu, M. V., and G. I. Byrne. 1998. Induction of macrophage foam cell formation by Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Infect. Dis. 177:725-729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kalayoglu, M. V., B. Hoerneman, D. LaVerda, S. G. Morrison, R. P. Morrison, and G. I. Byrne. 1999. Cellular oxidation of low-density lipoprotein by Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Infect. Dis. 180:780-790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kalayoglu, M. V., Indrawati, R. P. Morrison, S. G. Morrison, Y. Yuan, and G. I. Byrne. 2000. Chlamydial virulence determinants in atherogenesis: the role of chlamydial lipopolysaccharide and heat shock protein 60 in macrophage-lipoprotein interactions. J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl.)3:S483-S489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kol, A., A. H. Lichtman, R. W. Finberg, P. Libby, and E. A. Kurt-Jones. 2000. Cutting edge: heat shock protein (HSP) 60 activates the innate immune response: CD14 is an essential receptor for HSP60 activation of mononuclear cells. J. Immunol. 164:13-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuo, C. C., A. Shor, L. A. Campbell, H. Fukushi, D. L. Patton, and J. T. Grayston. 1993. Demonstration of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. J. Infect. Dis. 167:841-849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lin, T.-M., L. A. Campbell, M. E. Rosenfeld, and C.-C. Kuo. 2000. Monocyte-endothelial cell coculture enhances infection of endothelial cells with Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1096-1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu, L., H. Hu, H. Ji, A. D. Murdin, G. N. Pierce, and G. Zhong. 2000. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection significantly exacerbates aortic atherosclerosis in an LDLR−/− mouse model within six months. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 215:123-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lusis, A. J. 2000. Atherosclerosis. Nature 407:233-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Medzhitov, R. 2001. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 1:135-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Michelsen, K. S., M. H. Wong, P. K. Shah, W. Zhang, J. Yano, T. M. Doherty, S. Akira, T. B. Rajavashisth, and M. Arditi. 2004. Lack of Toll-like receptor 4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque phenotype in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10679-10684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moazed, T. C., L. A. Campbell, M. E. Rosenfeld, J. T. Grayston, and C.-C. Kuo. 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J. Infect. Dis. 180:238-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moazed, T. C., L. A. Campbell, M. E. Rosenfeld, J. T. Grayston, and C.-C. Kuo. 1998. Evidence of systemic dissemination of Chlamydia pneumoniae via macrophages in the mouse. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1322-1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Muhlestein, J. B., J. L. Anderson, J. F. Carlquist, K. Salunkhe, B. D. Horne, R. R. Pearson, T. J. Bunch, A. Allen, S. Trehan, and C. Nielson. 2000. Randomized secondary prevention trial of azithromycin in patients with coronary artery disease: primary clinical results of the ACADEMIC study. Circulation 102:1755-1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mullick, A. E., P. S. Tobias, and L. K. Curtiss. 2005. Modulation of atherosclerosis in mice by Toll-like receptor 2. J. Clin. Investig. 115:3149-3156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ohashi, K., V. Burkart, S. Flohe, and H. Kolb. 2000. Cutting edge: heat shock protein 60 is a putative endogenous ligand of the Toll-like receptor-4 complex. J. Immunol. 164:558-561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ozinsky, A., D. M. Underhill, J. D. Fontenot, A. M. Hajjar, K. D. Smith, C. B. Wilson, L. Schroeder, and A. Aderem. 2000. The repertoire for pattern recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system is defined by cooperation between Toll-like receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13766-13771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prebeck, S., C. Kirschning, S. Durr, C. da Costa, B. Donath, K. Brand, V. Redecke, H. Wagner, and T. Miethke. 2001. Predominant role of Toll-like receptor 2 versus 4 in Chlamydia pneumoniae-induced activation of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 167:3316-3323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ross, R. 1999. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:115-126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ross, R. 1993. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 362:801-809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saikku, P., M. Leinonen, L. Tenkanen, E. Linnanmaki, M. R. Ekman, V. Manninen, M. Manttari, M. H. Frick, and J. K. Huttunen. 1992. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 116:273-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schaffner, T., K. Taylor, E. J. Bartucci, K. Fischer-Dzoga, J. H. Beeson, S. Glagov, and R. W. Wissler. 1980. Arterial foam cells with distinctive immunomorphologic and histochemical features of macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 100:57-80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schoneveld, A. H., M. M. Oude Nijhuis, B. van Middelaar, J. D. Laman, D. P. de Kleijn, and G. Pasterkamp. 2005. Toll-like receptor 2 stimulation induces intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerotic lesion development. Cardiovasc. Res. 66:162-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Takeuchi, O., K. Hoshino, and S. Akira. 2000. Cutting edge: TLR2-deficient and MyD88-deficient mice are highly susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus infection. J. Immunol. 165:5392-5396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Takeuchi, O., T. Kawai, P. F. Muhlradt, M. Morr, J. D. Radolf, A. Zychlinsky, K. Takeda, and S. Akira. 2001. Discrimination of bacterial lipoproteins by Toll-like receptor 6. Int. Immunol. 13:933-940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vabulas, R. M., P. Ahmad-Nejad, C. da Costa, T. Miethke, C. J. Kirschning, H. Hacker, and H. Wagner. 2001. Endocytosed HSP60s use Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 to activate the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor signaling pathway in innate immune cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:31332-31339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Venkateswaran, A., B. A. Laffitte, S. B. Joseph, P. A. Mark, D. C. Wilpitz, P. A. Edwards, and P. Tontonoz. 2000. Control of cellular cholesterol efflux by the nuclear oxysterol receptor LXRα. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:12097-12102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu, X. H., P. K. Shah, E. Faure, O. Equils, L. Thomas, M. C. Fishbein, D. Luthringer, X. P. Xu, T. B. Rajavashisth, J. Yano, S. Kaul, and M. Arditi. 2001. Toll-like receptor-4 is expressed by macrophages in murine and human lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques and upregulated by oxidized LDL. Circulation 104:3103-3108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yaraei, K., L. A. Campbell, X. Zhu, W. C. Liles, C. C. Kuo, and M. E. Rosenfeld. 2005. Effect of Chlamydia pneumoniae on cellular ATP content in mouse macrophages: role of Toll-like receptor 2. Infect. Immun. 73:4323-4326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES