Abstract
New rpoB gene primers for detecting Rifr in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria achieved 100% specificity and 88% (fresh sputa) and 92% (ethanol-preserved sputa) diagnostic sensitivity and detected up to 4 CFU/sample. Of the 99 Rifr isolates examined, 97% had mutations within cluster I, 2% at codon 176, and 1% at codon 497.
Molecular detection of rifampin-resistant (Rifr) Mycobacterium tuberculosis usually relies on amplification of the hotspot zone for resistance-conferring mutations (cluster I, covering codons 432 to 458 according to the M. tuberculosis nomenclature) (7) of the rpoB gene (4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 17). Previous studies have shown that 94 to 98% of Rifr M. tuberculosis strains show a mutation in cluster I (10, 11, 14, 15). Resistance-associated mutations have also been described for cluster II (codons 496 and 497) and for codons 176, 486, 558, and 598 (1, 6, 7).
We describe and evaluate new primers, covering the entire region with all currently known significant mutations in a single assay.
Oligonucleotides were designed on the basis of an alignment of the rpoB gene sequence from the H37Rv M. tuberculosis reference strain (NC 000962; NCBI bank), some relevant nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and nonmycobacterial species using ClustalX (version 1.83.1) software. Amplify software (version 1.2; University of Wisconsin—Madison) was used to estimate the stabilities and binding capacities of the selected oligonucleotides and to simulate PCRs. Figure 1 shows the relative locations of the selected primers.
FIG. 1.
Location of the newly developed primers on the M. tuberculosis rpoB gene relevant to previously used primers for nested PCR (15) and relevant to the currently known mutations conferring rifampin resistance. Codon designation is in accordance with the M. tuberculosis nomenclature (7). Cl., cluster.
A single PCR with primers rpoBgeneSA (5′-GGTTCGCCGCGCTGGCGCGAAT-3′) and rpoBgeneRB (5′-GACCTCCTCGATGACGCCGCTTTCT-3′) was used for bacterial suspensions, whereas a nested PCR with primers rpoBgeneSAnew (5′-GCAAAACAGCCGCTAGTCCTAGTCCGA-3′) and rpoBgeneRA (5′-GCGCCATCTCGCCGTCGTCAGTACAG-3′) for the first run, and rpoBgeneSA and rpoBgeneRB as inner primers, was used to amplify clinical specimens.
The first run of the nested PCR was performed with a final volume of 50 μl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.6), 50 mM KCl, 1.65 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 12.5 pmol of each primer, 1.5 U Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), and 5 μl of DNA extract from clinical specimens. PCR was performed using a PTC 100 MJResearch thermocycler (Whaltham, MA) as follows: a hot start (90°C) followed by 5 min at 94°C; 45 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 1 min 30 s at 66°C, and 45 s at 72°C; and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The second run was performed with a final volume of 25 μl enzyme mixture with 0.5 U Taq polymerase and 0.25 μl of the first PCR amplicon as follows: a hot start (90°C) followed by 5 min at 94°C, 29 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 1 min 45 s at 72°C (annealing and extension), and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. For bacterial suspensions, a single PCR was run under similar conditions but using a 50-μl enzyme mixture and 45 cycles. Amplicons were analyzed with a 2% (wt/vol) agarose gel.
DNA was extracted from sputum by an adapted Boom extraction method (16) and from bacterial suspensions in 1× TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 1 mM EDTA) by boiling it for 5 min. The extracted DNA was analyzed immediately or stored at <−18°C.
A set of well-documented mycobacterial isolates (4 M. tuberculosis complex isolates and 67 NTM isolates belonging to 20 different species) was used to evaluate the specificities of the primers (Table 1) . In addition, 99 Rifr and 117 rifampin-susceptible (Rifs) M. tuberculosis isolates, which will form part of the World Health Organization-Tropical Disease Research (WHO-TDR) M. tuberculosis strain bank in November 2006, were included. A set of 18 nonmycobacterial isolates of genera closely related to the genus Mycobacterium was tested as well. None of the nonmycobacterial or NTM strains tested were amplified, whereas all M. tuberculosis complex isolates yielded good-quality amplicons (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
M. tuberculosis complex, NTM, and nonmycobacterial isolates tested with the new rpoB primer combinations
| Species | Remark | No. of isolates tested | No. of isolates with a positive PCR using:
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outer primers | Inner primers | |||
| M. abscessus | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. africanum | M. tuberculosis complex | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| M. avium | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. bovis | M. tuberculosis complex | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| M. canetti | M. tuberculosis complex | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| M. celatum | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. chelonae | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. fortuitum | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. gastri | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. genavense | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. gordonae | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. haempohilum | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. intracellulare | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. kansasii | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. malmoense | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. marinum | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. microti | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. peregrinum | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. scrofulaceum | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. simiae | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. smegmatis | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. tuberculosis | M. tuberculosis complex | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 216 | NTa | 216 | ||
| M. ulcerans | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. xenopi | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nocardia spp. | N. asteroides, N. brasililiensis, N. farcinica, N. nova | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Rhodococcus equi | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Corynebacterium spp. | C. diphtheriae, C. equi, C. flaccumfaciens, C. huayni, C. pyogenes, C. xerosis | 11 | 0 | 0 |
NT, not tested.
The detection sensitivities as determined by analysis of the logarithmic dilutions of the positive PCR controls reached 0.08 picograms of DNA or about 10 acid-fast bacilli (AFB)/reaction. The performance of the nested PCR on a set of 12 spiked sputum specimens collected from the 2005 round of the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnosis organization (QCMD MTBDNA05; European Society for Clinical Virology and the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) showed a detection limit of 4.0 CFU/sample.
The likely field performance of the PCR was evaluated for 211 smear-positive sputum specimens from Bangladesh (Table 2) that were preserved in ethanol (final concentration, 50%; total volume, 1.5 ml) at an ambient temperature for 5 to 24 months. Of the 211 specimens tested, 195 (92.4%) yielded good-quality amplicons with the nested PCR. This is comparable to the sensitivity reported for the Rifoligotyping assay using stained sputum slides (16) and the 95% sensitivity for smear-positive sputum specimens using the Genotype MTBDR assay (2). The INNO-LIPA Rif TB assay showed a 98.3% sensitivity for culture-positive specimens (5) and 92.9% for all sputum specimens (15), using a nested-PCR system, whereas it reached only 78.3% for both smear-negative and smear-positive specimens after a single PCR (9). The negative results in our study might be due to the long-term storage at the ambient temperature, with the gradual breakdown of our large target sequence into smaller fragments, as suggested by the fact that 12 (75%) of the 16 negative specimens reacted positive in a nested PCR using the old β-pol primers targeting cluster I of the rpoB gene (amplicon size of 257 bp) (15) and/or our in-house 16S diagnostic PCR (amplicon size of 271 bp).
TABLE 2.
Nested-PCR results for ethanol-preserved sputum specimens broken down by quantitative smear microscopy results
| Smear microscopy group | No. of specimens with indicated nested-PCR result
|
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rpoB positivea | rpoB negative | ||
| 1-9 AFB/100 fields | 9 (90) | 1 | 10 |
| 10-99 AFB/100 fields | 35 (87.5) | 5 | 40 |
| 1-10 AFB/field | 70 (89.7) | 8 | 78 |
| >10 AFB/field | 81 (97.6) | 2 | 83 |
| Total | 195 (92.4) | 16 | 211 |
Values in parentheses are percentages.
For the WHO-TDR strain bank, phenotypic resistance to RIF was determined by the proportion method (3) with Löwenstein-Jensen medium, using multiple drug concentrations (10, 20, 30, 40, and 80 μg/ml; cutoff at 40 μg/ml). Direct double-strand sequencing of the rpoB amplicons was done using a capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA analyzer) in combination with an ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit. The innermost primers, rpoBgeneS (5′-ATGACGTACGCGGCTCCACTG-3′) and rpoBgeneR1 (5′-CAGCGGGGCCTCGCTAC-3′), were used for sense and reverse sequencing, respectively. The ClustalX program (version 1.83.1) and Genedoc software (version 2.100) were used to analyze the final nucleotide sequences in comparison to the M. tuberculosis H37Rv wild-type sequence. All M. tuberculosis isolates resulted in nucleotide sequences between 750 and 1,000 bp. Sequencing agreed with the phenotypic results for all isolates tested. Only single-nucleotide mutations were identified. Two of the Rifr isolates showed mutations at codon 176 (GTC176TTC resulting in Val176Phe), and one isolate had a mutation at codon 497 (ATC497TTC or Ile497Phe), whereas the remaining 96 Rifr isolates had mutations within cluster I.
Of the amplicons obtained from sputum specimens for which cultures were not available, 34 showed Rifr mutations, in agreement with the clinical picture (treatment failure) of the respective patients.
Since the primer combinations described herein proved to be M. tuberculosis complex-specific, with good sensitivities and clear sequencing results from clinical specimens (using nested PCR), our assay is suitable for direct application on smear-positive sputum specimens. This allows rapid individual diagnosis of Rifr M. tuberculosis complex diseases as well as epidemiological studies of RIF resistance in settings where culture and DST are not widely available. If needed, storage at room temperature and referral to a distant laboratory are easy for ethanol-preserved sputum specimens, offering important additional advantages.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Damien Foundation (Brussels, Belgium), the UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO-TDR), and the Fund for Scientific Research of Flanders (grant no. G.0471.03N; Brussels, Belgium). O.N. received a scholarship from the Directorate General for Development and Co-operation (Brussels, Belgium).
We express special thanks to the Laboratory of Bacteriology at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, which provided us with the nonmycobacterial isolates, to the staff and patients of the Damien Foundation projects in Bangladesh, and to Isidore Chola Shamputa for critical reading of the paper.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 8 November 2006.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ahmad, S., and E. Mokaddas. 2005. The occurrence of rare rpoB mutations in rifampicin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Kuwait. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 26:205-212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bang, D., A. B. Andersen, and V. O. Thomsen. 2006. Rapid genotypic detection of rifampin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2605-2608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Canetti, G., W. Fox, A. Khomenko, H. T. Mahler, N. K. Menon, D. A. Mitschison, N. Rist, and N. A. Smelev. 1969. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull. W. H. O. 41:21-43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Beenhouwer, H., Z. Lhiang, G. Jannes, W. Mijs, L. Machtelinckx, R. Rossau, H. Traore, and F. Portaels. 1995. Rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in sputum and biopsy specimens from tuberculosis patients by PCR and line probe assay. Tuber. Lung Dis. 76:425-430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gamboa, F., P. J. Cardona, J. M. Manterola, J. Lonea, L. Matas, E. Padilla, J. R. Monzano, and V. Auxina. 1998. Evaluation of a commercial probe assay for detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical samples. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:189-192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heep, M., U. Rieger, D. Beck, and N. Lehn. 2000. Mutations in the beginning of the rpoB gene can induce resistance to rifamycins in both Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1075-1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heep, M., B. Brandstätter, U. Rieger, N. Lehn, E. Richter, S. Rüsch-Gerdes, and S. Niemann. 2001. Frequency of rpoB mutations inside and outside the cluster I region in rifampin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:107-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hillemann, D., M. Weizenegger, T. Kubica, E. Richter, and S. Niemann. 2005. Use of the genotype MTBDR assay for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3699-3703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johansen, I. S., B. Lundgren, A. Sosnovskaja, and V. O. Thomsen. 2003. Direct detection of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens in low- and high-incidence countries by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4454-4456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Makinen, J., H. J. Marttila, M. Marjamaki, M. K. Viljanen, and H. Soini. 2006. Comparison of two commercially available DNA line probe assays for detection of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:350-352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Piersimoni, C., and C. Scarparo. 2003. Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5355-5365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rossau, R., H. Traore, H. De Beenhouwer, W. Mijs, G. Jannes, P. De Rijk, and F. Portaels. 1997. Evaluation of the INNO-LIPA Rif. TB assay, a reverse hybridization assay for the simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2093-2098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Senna, S. G., H. M. Gomes, M. O. Ribeiro, A. L. Kristki, M. L. Rossetti, and P. N. Suffys. 2006. In house reverse line hybridization assay for rapid detection of susceptibility to rifampicin in isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Microbiol. Methods 67:385-389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Traore, H., K. Fissette, I. Bastian, M. Devleeschouwer, and F. Portaels. 2000. Detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse countries by a commercial line probe assay as an initial indicator of multidrug resistance. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4:481-484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Traore, H., A. Van Deun, I. C. Shamputa, L. Rigouts, and F. Portaels. 2006. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA and rifampin resistance in clinical specimens from tuberculosis patients by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4384-4388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Van Der Zanden, A. G., E. M. Te Koppele-Vije, N. Vijaya Bhanu, D. Van Soolingen, and L. M. Schouls. 2003. Use of DNA extracts from Ziehl-Neelsen-stained slides for molecular detection of rifampin resistance and spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1101-1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Watterson, S. A., S. M. Wilson, M. D. Yates, and F. A. Drobniewski. 1998. Comparison of three molecular assays for rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1969-1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

