Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1991 May;57(5):1528–1534. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1528-1534.1991

Comparative study of commercial 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide preparations with the Standard Methods membrane filtration fecal coliform test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water samples.

D L Clark 1, B B Milner 1, M H Stewart 1, R L Wolfe 1, B H Olson 1
PMCID: PMC182980  PMID: 1854205

Abstract

The performance capabilities of two commercial 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide preparations were evaluated for the detection of Escherichia coli from water samples. Eighty-three water samples were collected from a treated water reservoir, and 32 samples were collected from untreated surface water. There was a statistically significant difference between the two commercial preparations compared with the Standard Methods membrane filtration fecal coliform (MFC) method for the detection of E. coli from treated water samples. However, there was no difference between the two methods and the MFC test for E. coli detection from the untreated surface water samples. The disagreement between the two commercial products and the MFC method was primarily due to the occurrence of false-negative results with the two commercial products. The data indicate that the occurrence of false-negative samples could be attributed to impaired substrate specificity and sensitivity of the two tests for E. coli detection. There was no apparent relationship between the occurrence of false-negative results and heterotrophic plate counts in samples.

Full text

PDF
1528

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chang G. W., Brill J., Lum R. Proportion of beta-D-glucuronidase-negative Escherichia coli in human fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Feb;55(2):335–339. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.2.335-339.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Covert T. C., Shadix L. C., Rice E. W., Haines J. R., Freyberg R. W. Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Oct;55(10):2443–2447. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.10.2443-2447.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B., Kriz N. J. Enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from source water by the defined substrate technology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Feb;56(2):366–369. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.2.366-369.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1595–1601. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.6.1595-1601.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edberg S. C., Edberg M. M. A defined substrate technology for the enumeration of microbial indicators of environmental pollution. Yale J Biol Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;61(5):389–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freier T. A., Hartman P. A. Improved membrane filtration media for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from sewage and surface waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jun;53(6):1246–1250. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1246-1250.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Green B. L., Clausen E. M., Litsky W. Two-temperature membrane filter method for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria from chlorinated effluents. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jun;33(6):1259–1264. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.6.1259-1264.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewis C. M., Mak J. L. Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Dec;55(12):3091–3094. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.12.3091-3094.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mates A., Shaffer M. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989 Sep;67(3):343–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb02503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moberg L. J. Fluorogenic assay for rapid detection of Escherichia coli in food. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Dec;50(6):1383–1387. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.6.1383-1387.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nastasi A., Massenti M. F., Scarlata G. Glucuronidase activity in Escherichia coli. Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1982;61(5):441–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olson B. H., Clark D. L., Milner B. B., Stewart M. H., Wolfe R. L. Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1535–1539. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1535-1539.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Raghubeer E. V., Matches J. R. Temperature range for growth of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 and selected coliforms in E. coli medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Apr;28(4):803–805. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.4.803-805.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES