Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1992 Oct;58(10):3292–3296. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.10.3292-3296.1992

Electrical Energy Changes Conductivity and Determines Optimal Electrotransformation Frequency in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Benjamin A Bowen 1,2,*, Renee M Kosslak 2
PMCID: PMC183093  PMID: 16348786

Abstract

In many bacterial electrotransformation protocols, pulse time is related to the time constant for a capacitor discharging across a sample of fixed resistance. Using an electroporator which controls pulse time independently of the capacitor time constant, we found that the resistance of bacterial suspensions fluctuates widely during capacitor discharge. With three gram-negative species of bacteria, electrotransformation frequency and survival could be more simply related to the electrical energy delivered in each pulse than to component parameters, such as initial field strength, capacitance, and pulse time. In each case, the number of transformants per survivor increased exponentially and leveled off when more than 0.5 to 1.0 J of electrical energy was delivered. An inverse log-linear relationship between survival and energy delivered was also observed for all three species.

Full text

PDF
3292

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Calvin N. M., Hanawalt P. C. High-efficiency transformation of bacterial cells by electroporation. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun;170(6):2796–2801. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2796-2801.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dower W. J., Miller J. F., Ragsdale C. W. High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jul 11;16(13):6127–6145. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.13.6127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kahn M., Kolter R., Thomas C., Figurski D., Meyer R., Remaut E., Helinski D. R. Plasmid cloning vehicles derived from plasmids ColE1, F, R6K, and RK2. Methods Enzymol. 1979;68:268–280. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)68019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kubiniec R. T., Liang H., Hui S. W. Effects of pulse length and pulse strength on transfection by electroporation. Biotechniques. 1990 Jan;8(1):16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Murray M. G., Paaren H. E. Nucleic acid quantitation by continuous flow fluorometry. Anal Biochem. 1986 May 1;154(2):638–642. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shigekawa K., Dower W. J. Electroporation of eukaryotes and prokaryotes: a general approach to the introduction of macromolecules into cells. Biotechniques. 1988 Sep;6(8):742–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Solioz M., Bienz D. Bacterial genetics by electric shock. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 May;15(5):175–177. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES