Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1990 Jan;56(1):54–64. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.1.54-64.1990

New screening test to determine the acceptability of 0.45-micron membrane filters for analysis of water.

K P Brenner 1, C C Rankin 1
PMCID: PMC183250  PMID: 2106827

Abstract

During routine membrane filter (MF) quality control testing, irregularities such as partial or complete inhibition of microbial growth at grid lines, abnormal spreading of colonies, growth in or along the grid lines, nonwetting areas, poor colony sheen and metallic sheen on the MF surface with mEndo agar, brittleness, decreased recovery, and severe wrinkling were observed with several lots of filters. To study these effects and to develop a more sensitive screening test for MF quality, we compared five different MFs with various types and degrees of defects by using five stock coliform cultures and five different media. Results showed that the Enterobacter aerogenes-tryptic soy agar test system detected more MF defects than any other combination did and was superior to the Escherichia coli-mFC agar American Society for Testing and Materials method for grid line inhibition. Filtered natural samples grown on the same media showed the same effects as were observed with the pure cultures. Poor colony sheen and sheen on the MF surface were best detected with Enterobacter aerogenes on mEndo agar. The use of tryptic soy agar and mEndo agar with this organism permitted the maximum detection of MF irregularities. Of the 142 MF lots tested by this method, 30% were acceptable, 10% were marginally acceptable, and 61% were unacceptable. This method provides a valuable screening test for determining the acceptability of 0.45-microm-pore-size MFs used for coliform and heterotroph analysis and may also be useful in conjunction with other methods.

Full text

PDF
54

Images in this article

56Image
on p.56
58Image
on p.58

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brodsky M. H., Ciebin B. W. Improved medium for recovery and enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from water using membrane filters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jul;36(1):36–42. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.1.36-42.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodsky M. H., Schiemann D. A. Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Nov;30(5):727–730. doi: 10.1128/am.30.5.727-730.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown O. R. Inhibition of Escherichia coli on cellulose acetate membrane filters. Microbios. 1973 Apr-May;7(28):235–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cahn R. D. Detergents in membrane filters. Science. 1967 Jan 13;155(3759):195–196. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3759.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dufour A. P., Strickland E. R., Cabelli V. J. Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1152–1158. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1152-1158.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutka B. J., Jackson M. J., Bell J. B. Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):474–480. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.474-480.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Engel F. The effect of membrane filters on cultured cells. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1982 May;34(5):283–286. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1982.tb04708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farber J. M., Sharpe A. N. Improved bacterial recovery by membrane filters in the presence of food debris. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):441–443. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.441-443.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GASPAR A. J., LEISE J. M. Inhibitory effect of grid imprints on growth of Pasteurella tularensis on membrane filters. J Bacteriol. 1956 Jun;71(6):728–731. doi: 10.1128/jb.71.6.728-731.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geldreich E. E., Jeter H. L., Winter J. A. Technical considerations in applying the membrane filter procedure. Health Lab Sci. 1967 Apr;4(2):113–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green B. L., Clausen E., Litsky W. Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):697–699. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.697-699.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klapes N. A. Comparison of Vogel-Johnson and Baird-Parker media for membrane filtration recovery of staphylococci in swimming pool water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Dec;46(6):1318–1322. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.6.1318-1322.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LeChevallier M. W., Cameron S. C., McFeters G. A. New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):484–492. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.484-492.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LeChevallier M. W., Jakanoski P. E., Camper A. K., McFeters G. A. Evaluation of m-T7 agar as a fecal coliform medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):371–375. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.371-375.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Presswood W. G., Brown L. R. Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):332–336. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.332-336.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rice E. W., Geldreich E. E., Read E. J. The presence-absence coliform test for monitoring drinking water quality. Public Health Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;104(1):54–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rose R. E., Geldreich E. E., Litsky W. Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):532–536. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.532-536.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tobin R. S., Lomax P., Kushner D. J. Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Aug;40(2):186–191. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.2.186-191.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tse K. M., Lewis C. M. Membrane filter staining method: bacterial plate counts in 24 H. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):433–434. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.433-434.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES