Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):569–570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6648.569

Holding back the tide of caesareans.

J Lomas
PMCID: PMC1834499  PMID: 3139214

Full text

PDF
569

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies? Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Feb 1;132(3):253-6, 259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergsjø P., Schmidt E., Pusch D. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Jul;90(7):628–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb09279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berki S. E. The design of case-based hospital payment systems. Med Care. 1983 Jan;21(1):1–13. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198301000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodmer B., Benjamin A., McLean F. H., Usher R. H. Has use of cesarean section reduced the risks of delivery in the preterm breech presentation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;154(2):244–250. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90648-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collea J. V., Chein C., Quilligan E. J. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May 15;137(2):235–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90780-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feldman G. B., Freiman J. A. Prophylactic cesarean section at term? N Engl J Med. 1985 May 9;312(19):1264–1267. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198505093121926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Finley B. E., Gibbs C. E. Emergent cesarean delivery in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a transverse lower-segment scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;155(5):936–939. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90321-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs R. S. Infection after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec;28(4):697–710. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198528040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gleicher N. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980. JAMA. 1984 Dec 21;252(23):3273–3276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hurst M., Summey P. S. Childbirth and social class: the case of cesarean delivery. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(8):621–631. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kosecoff J., Kanouse D. E., Rogers W. H., McCloskey L., Winslow C. M., Brook R. H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708–2713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lomas J., Anderson G., Enkin M., Vayda E., Roberts R., MacKinnon B. The role of evidence in the consensus process. Results from a Canadian consensus exercise. JAMA. 1988 May 27;259(20):3001–3005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Notzon F. C., Placek P. J., Taffel S. M. Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 12;316(7):386–389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702123160706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paul R. H., Phelan J. P., Yeh S. Y. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):297–304. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90290-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shiono P. H., Fielden J. G., McNellis D., Rhoads G. G., Pearse W. H. Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States. JAMA. 1987 Jan 23;257(4):494–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shiono P. H., McNellis D., Rhoads G. G. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):696–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Regt R. H., Minkoff H. L., Feldman J., Schwarz R. H. Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):619–624. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES