Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1991 Jun;57(6):1764–1769. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.6.1764-1769.1991

Effect of propionate toxicity on methanogen-enriched sludge, Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanospirillum hungatii at different pH values.

M S Barredo 1, L M Evison 1
PMCID: PMC183465  PMID: 1872605

Abstract

The effect of propionate toxicity at different pH values (6.5, 7.0, and 8.0) on methanogen-enriched sludge. Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanospirillum hungatii was studied. Organisms were grown in Balch medium 3 in Hungate tubes, and toxicity was characterized by a decrease in production of methane and in bacterial numbers. Propionate inhibited bacterial growth and cumulative methane production at concentrations as low as 20 mM. In the absence of propionate, the methanogen-enriched sludge and M. smithii showed better cumulative methane production at pH 6.5 and 7.0 than at pH 8.0. However, in the presence of propionate, these organisms showed better cumulative methane production at pH 8.0. M. hungatii differed in its behavior; the best values of cumulative methane production for this organism occurred at pH 7.0. Bacterial numbers reflected the microbial response to the presence of propionate. The highest counts of methanogenic bacteria were observed at pH 6.5 and 8.0. The numbers of methanogens were affected by the presence of propionate even at concentrations as low as 20 or 30 mM; at propionate concentrations above 80 mM, the methanogen count was affected by at least 2 orders of magnitude. Upon comparison of the responses of the pure cultures and the methanogen-enriched sludge to increasing propionate concentrations, it was found that the sensitivity of the pure cultures was similar to that of the methanogens in the sludge.

Full text

PDF
1764

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balch W. E., Fox G. E., Magrum L. J., Woese C. R., Wolfe R. S. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev. 1979 Jun;43(2):260–296. doi: 10.1128/mr.43.2.260-296.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beaty P. S., Wofford N. Q., McInerney M. J. Separation of Syntrophomonas wolfei from Methanospirillum hungatii in Syntrophic Cocultures by Using Percoll Gradients. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):1183–1185. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.1183-1185.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boone D. R., Bryant M. P. Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Sep;40(3):626–632. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.3.626-632.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boone D. R. Propionate exchange reactions in methanogenic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Oct;48(4):863–864. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.4.863-864.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boone D. R., Xun L. Effects of pH, Temperature, and Nutrients on Propionate Degradation by a Methanogenic Enrichment Culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jul;53(7):1589–1592. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.7.1589-1592.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant M. P., Campbell L. L., Reddy C. A., Crabill M. R. Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1162–1169. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1162-1169.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bryant M. P. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferry J. G., Wolfe R. S. Nutritional and biochemical characterization of Methanospirillum hungatii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Oct;34(4):371–376. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.4.371-376.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fox G. E., Stackebrandt E., Hespell R. B., Gibson J., Maniloff J., Dyer T. A., Wolfe R. S., Balch W. E., Tanner R. S., Magrum L. J. The phylogeny of prokaryotes. Science. 1980 Jul 25;209(4455):457–463. doi: 10.1126/science.6771870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutchins S. R., Tomson M. B., Wilson J. T., Ward C. H. Anaerobic inhibition of trace organic compound removal during rapid infiltration of wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Nov;48(5):1046–1048. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.5.1046-1048.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mathrani I. M., Boone D. R., Mah R. A., Fox G. E., Lau P. P. Methanohalophilus zhilinae sp. nov., an alkaliphilic, halophilic, methylotrophic methanogen. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1988 Apr;38(2):139–142. doi: 10.1099/00207713-38-2-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STADTMAN T. C., BARKER H. A. Studies on the methane fermentation. X. A new formate-decomposing bacterium, Methanococcus vannielii. J Bacteriol. 1951 Sep;62(3):269–280. doi: 10.1128/jb.62.3.269-280.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woese C. R., Magrum L. J., Fox G. E. Archaebacteria. J Mol Evol. 1978 Aug 2;11(3):245–251. doi: 10.1007/BF01734485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zeikus J. G., Bowen V. G. Fine structure of Methanospirillum hungatii. J Bacteriol. 1975 Jan;121(1):373–380. doi: 10.1128/jb.121.1.373-380.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES