Abstract
In the first three years of a surveillance scheme for susceptibility to rubella in women aged 15-44 the results of over 1.3 million serological tests were collected by 80 laboratories throughout the United Kingdom. Seventy eight per cent of the results, or an average of 340,000 a year, were from pregnant women, so that just under half of all pregnant women in the United Kingdom were reported on. Eighteen per cent of results were from women tested before vaccination and the remainder were from diagnostic and other tests. Pregnant women showed an overall downward trend in susceptibility to rubella (from 4.2% at the beginning of 1984 to 3.0% at the end of 1986), and a similar decline was seen in the two other categories. Regional data showed a significant negative correlation between the proportion of pregnant women aged 15-19 who were susceptible to the virus and rate of uptake of vaccine in 14 year old schoolgirls. Women aged 25-29 were least susceptible. This form of laboratory surveillance is feasible and representative; it should be continued to monitor the effect of introducing the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clarke M., Seagroatt V., Schild G. C., Pollock T. M., Miller C., Finlay S. E., Barbara J. A. Surveys of rubella antibodies in young adults and children. Lancet. 1983 Mar 26;1(8326 Pt 1):667–669. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91966-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster W. An opportunistic approach to rubella screening in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Feb;36(283):58–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilmore D., Robinson E. T., Gilmour W. H., Urquhart G. E. Effect of rubella vaccination programme in schools on rubella immunity in a general practice population. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Feb 27;284(6316):628–630. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6316.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller C. L., Miller E., Sequeira P. J., Cradock-Watson J. E., Longson M., Wiseberg E. C. Effect of selective vaccination on rubella susceptibility and infection in pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 16;291(6506):1398–1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6506.1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller C. L., Miller E., Waight P. A. Rubella susceptibility and the continuing risk of infection in pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 May 16;294(6582):1277–1278. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6582.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naish J. Rubella immunity in pregnant women in a north London practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Apr 7;288(6423):1053–1054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6423.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peckham C. S., Marshall W. C., Dudgeon J. A. Rubella vaccination of schoolgirls: factors affecting vaccine uptake. Br Med J. 1977 Mar 19;1(6063):760–761. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6063.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowlands S., Bethel R. G. Rubella vaccination: screening all women at risk. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Sep 26;283(6295):829–831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.283.6295.829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]