Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the coverage of cervical cytology screening in one general practice surgery according to the criteria in the new Scottish general practitioner contract and to explore the difficulties of defining performance in such screening. DESIGN--Review of annual analysis of uptake of screening during 1984-8. SETTING--Suburban general practice surgery in Glasgow serving 3000 patients. PATIENTS--All women aged 35-64 registered in 1984 increasing in 1988 to all women aged 20-64. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Assessment of uptake of smear tests and reasons for smear not being taken and of the effect of these outcomes on the new general practitioner contract. RESULTS--The numbers and percentages of women having a smear test in the previous five and three years were recorded, and the reasons why a smear was not taken were defined in the remainder (hysterectomy, test not offered, risk not known, test declined, patient moved away, and patient unaccounted for). In 1988, 85% (608/719) of the women aged 30-64 and 80% (693/870) of those aged 20-64 had had a smear test in the previous five years. An appropriate or irreducible reason for the lack of a smear test was defined in all the others. CONCLUSIONS--The population studied contained a substantial number of women in whom cervical smear was unnecessary, inappropriate, or refused. These factors and the likely demographic variation in the uptake of smear tests have important implications for the setting and achieving of the government's targets for cervical cytology screening.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bowling A., Jacobson B. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers. BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):545–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraser R. C., Clayton D. G. The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jul;31(228):410–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havelock C., Edwards R., Cuzick J., Chamberlain J. The organization of cervical screening in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 May;38(310):207–211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nathoo V. Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 9;296(6628):1041–1042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6628.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols S. Women's preferences for sex of doctor: a postal survey. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Dec;37(305):540–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pennington E., Wilcox R. M. Immunization, practice records and the white paper. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Nov;38(316):515–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pill R., French J., Harding K., Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Feb;38(307):53–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sansom C. D., MacInerney J., Oliver V., Wakefield J., Yule R. Recall of women in a cervical cytology screening programme. An estimate of the true rate of response. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975 Jun;29(2):131–134. doi: 10.1136/jech.29.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldon M. G., Rector A. L., Barnes P. A. The accuracy of age-sex registers in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 May;34(262):269–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standing P., Mercer S. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):883–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]