Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1989 Sep 16;299(6701):722–724. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6701.722

Referrals from general practice to hospital outpatient departments: a strategy for improvement.

J Emmanuel, N Walter
PMCID: PMC1837521  PMID: 2508890

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To determine the appropriateness of referrals from general practice to hospital outpatient departments. DESIGN--Prospective audit of referrals from a group practice over one year. SETTING--Six handed practice in a southern coastal town. SUBJECTS--All patients referred during the study period for whom a copy of the referral letter was available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The investigations carried out by the consultant that led to the diagnosis; the diagnosis reached; and the management. RESULTS--Of roughly 3000 patients referred during the year, 277 with various skin and soft tissue disorders could probably have been managed solely by the general practitioner. Referrals for cryotherapy (96 in this series) and diabetes (19) could probably also have been avoided by specialist training of the general practitioner. In addition, in cases of haematuria and prostatic hypertrophy (34 and 22 referrals) substantial time could have been saved for both the patient and the consultant had the general practitioner supplied the results of relevant investigations. Probably the most important outcome was the model that the study offered for other general practitioners to improve the appropriateness of referrals. CONCLUSION--This approach to determining the appropriateness of referrals benefits the general practitioners, the consultant, and the patient.

Full text

PDF
722

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Marinker M., Wilkin D., Metcalfe D. H. Referral to hospital: can we do better? BMJ. 1988 Aug 13;297(6646):461–464. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6646.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Moore A. T., Roland M. O. How much variation in referral rates among general practitioners is due to chance? BMJ. 1989 Feb 25;298(6672):500–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6672.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES