Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1989 Oct 21;299(6706):1010–1012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6706.1010

Dipstick haematuria and bladder cancer in men over 60: results of a community study.

J P Britton 1, A C Dowell 1, P Whelan 1
PMCID: PMC1837876  PMID: 2511941

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the prevalence and relevance of dipstick haematuria in a group of men in the community. DESIGN--Prospective study of elderly men invited to attend a health centre for urine screening as part of a health check. SETTING--An inner city health centre in Leeds. SUBJECTS--578 Of 855 men aged 60-85 responding to an invitation to participate. INTERVENTIONS--The subjects had their urine tested with a dipstick (Multistix) for the presence of blood and then tested their urine once a week for the next 10 weeks. Those with one or more positive test results were offered full urological investigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--The prevalence of urological disease in those subjects with dipstick haematuria. RESULTS--78 Men (13%) had dipstick haematuria on a single test and a further 54 (9%) had evidence of dipstick haematuria when testing their urine once a week during a subsequent 10 week period. Investigation of 87 men disclosed urological disease in 45, including four with a bladder tumour and seven with epithelial dysplasia. CONCLUSION--Dipstick haematuria is a common incidental finding in men over 60 and is associated with appreciable urological disease. The introduction of less invasive methods of investigation, particularly flexible cystoscopy and ultrasonography, has made investigation of these patients simple and safe and makes screening for bladder cancer in the community more feasible.

Full text

PDF
1010

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bullock N. Asymptomatic microscopic haematuria. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 8;292(6521):645–645. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6521.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carson C. C., 3rd, Segura J. W., Greene L. F. Clinical importance of microhematuria. JAMA. 1979 Jan 12;241(2):149–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corwin H. L., Silverstein M. D. The diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria: a decision analysis. J Urol. 1988 May;139(5):1002–1006. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42747-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flannigan G. M., Gelister J. S., Noble J. G., Milroy E. J. Rigid versus flexible cystoscopy. A controlled trial of patient tolerance. Br J Urol. 1988 Dec;62(6):537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GREENE L. F., O'SHAUGHNESSY E. J., Jr, HENDRICKS E. D. Study of five hundred patients with asymptomatic microhematuria. J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Jun 16;161(7):610–613. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970070042011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Golin A. L., Howard R. S. Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. J Urol. 1980 Sep;124(3):389–391. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55461-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haug K., Bakke A., Daae L. N., Göthlin J., Willassen Y. Screening for hematuria, glucosuria and proteinuria in people aged 55-64. Technical, clinical and cost-benefit experience from a pilot study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1985 Feb;3(1):31–34. doi: 10.3109/02813438509017734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jameson R. M. Early detection of urinary-tractmalignancy by urine testing withreagent strips. Lancet. 1969 Jun 7;1(7606):1164–1164. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91694-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kassirer J. P. The wild goose chase and the elephant's relevance. JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):256–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lock S. NHS 1948-88: less ideology, more humanity. BMJ. 1988 Jul 2;297(6640):1–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6640.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mariani A. J., Luangphinith S., Loo S., Scottolini A., Hodges C. V. Dipstick chemical urinalysis: an accurate cost-effective screening test. J Urol. 1984 Jul;132(1):64–66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49465-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Messing E. M., Young T. B., Hunt V. B., Emoto S. E., Wehbie J. M. The significance of asymptomatic microhematuria in men 50 or more years old: findings of a home screening study using urinary dipsticks. J Urol. 1987 May;137(5):919–922. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44294-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mohr D. N., Offord K. P., Owen R. A., Melton L. J., 3rd Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologic disease. A population-based study. JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):224–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Powell P. H., Manohar V., Ramsden P. D., Hall R. R. A flexible cystoscope. Br J Urol. 1984 Dec;56(6):622–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb06131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ritchie C. D., Bevan E. A., Collier S. J. Importance of occult haematuria found at screening. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 8;292(6521):681–683. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6521.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson I. M. The evaluation of microscopic hematuria: a population-based study. J Urol. 1987 Nov;138(5):1189–1190. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43545-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES