Skip to main content
Molecular Biology of the Cell logoLink to Molecular Biology of the Cell
. 2007 Apr;18(4):1261–1271. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-03-0236

Involvement of a Golgi-resident GPI-anchored Protein in Maintenance of the Golgi Structure

Xueyi Li *,, Dora Kaloyanova , Martin van Eijk , Ruud Eerland , Gisou van der Goot §, Viola Oorschot , Judith Klumperman , Friedrich Lottspeich , Vytaute Starkuviene #, Felix T Wieland *, J Bernd Helms *,‡,
Editor: Vivek Malhotra
PMCID: PMC1838991  PMID: 17251550

Abstract

The Golgi apparatus consists of a series of flattened cisternal membranes that are aligned in parallel to form stacks. Cytosolic-oriented Golgi-associated proteins have been identified that may coordinate or maintain the Golgi architecture. Here, we describe a novel GPI-anchored protein, Golgi-resident GPI-anchored protein (GREG) that has a brefeldin A-sensitive Golgi localization. GREG resides in the Golgi lumen as a cis-oriented homodimer, due to strong interactions between coiled-coil regions in the C termini. Dimerization of GREG as well as its Golgi localization depends on a unique tandem repeat sequence within the coiled-coil region. RNA-mediated interference of GREG expression or expression of GREG mutants reveals an essential role for GREG in maintenance of the Golgi integrity. Under these conditions, secretion of the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein protein as a marker for protein transport along the secretory pathway is inhibited, suggesting a loss of Golgi function as well. These results imply the involvement of a luminal protein in Golgi structure and function.

INTRODUCTION

In mammalian cells, the Golgi apparatus consists of a series of flattened cisternal membranes that are aligned in parallel to form stacks (Shorter and Warren, 2002). Occupying a central position along the secretory pathway, the Golgi apparatus plays a pivotal role in protein processing and sorting to various destinations (Pfeffer and Rothman, 1987; Marsh and Howell, 2002). Besides the secretory pathway, the Golgi exchanges membrane components with several other subcellular organelles, including endosomes, caveosomes, autophagosomes, and lipid droplets (Mallard et al., 1998; Legesse-Miller et al., 2000; Nichols et al., 2001; Litvak et al., 2002). An emerging role of the Golgi is its involvement in various cellular processes such as transcription, apoptosis, and mitosis via signaling pathways mediated by Ras proteins, protein kinases, and G proteins (Helms, 1995; Helms et al., 1998; DeBose-Boyd et al., 1999; Lane et al., 2002; Sutterlin et al., 2002; Bivona et al., 2003; Nardini et al., 2003; Preisinger et al., 2004).

These distinct Golgi functions operate within a structure that is unique among subcellular organelles. The structure of the Golgi is robustly retained against a large flux of lipids and proteins. Despite this high degree of organization, Golgi stacks are extremely dynamic structures and imbalances in membrane transport can result in reversible fragmentation or disappearance of the Golgi morphology, as observed for example during mitosis (Seemann et al., 2002) or experimentally induced conditions (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 1989). However, little is known about the proteins involved in maintenance of the Golgi structure and the structure–function relationship of the Golgi apparatus.

A cohort of cytosolically oriented molecules including matrix proteins (Short and Barr, 2003) and cytoskeletal elements (Allan et al., 2002) precisely coordinates the dynamic properties of the Golgi (Donaldson and Lippincott-Schwartz, 2000; Rios and Bornens, 2003). By spatial and temporal organization in membrane domains, these proteins contribute to the structural and functional properties of the organelle (Zerial and McBride, 2001). Besides protein complexes, biological membranes contain other types of microenvironments. These environments include lipid-enriched microdomains or lipid rafts that are enriched in cholesterol, sphingolipids, and a subset of proteins such as specific signaling molecules (Brown and London, 1998; Helms and Zurzolo, 2004; Mukherjee and Maxfield, 2004; Simons and Vaz, 2004). Lipid rafts are small submicroscopic domains that can cluster together to function as platforms and to execute functions in membrane trafficking and signaling (Simons and Toomre, 2000; Helms and Zurzolo, 2004). Most raft proteins found to date localize to the cytosolic face of the membrane. In contrast, at the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane, only GPI-anchored proteins and few transmembrane proteins have been identified. Little is known about the transduction of signals across membranes mediated by raft components on either site of the membrane. General properties of lipid rafts such as interactions of interdigitated lipids may contribute to coupling both membrane leaflets. However, transmembrane proteins seem necessary to efficiently couple GPI-anchored receptor signals with specific lipid-anchored signaling molecules in the inner leaflet raft (Devaux and Morris, 2004; Kusumi et al., 2004).

Many raft proteins are resistant to solubilization by the nonionic detergent Triton X-100 in a cholesterol-sensitive manner (Simons and Toomre, 2000). We previously isolated Golgi-derived low-density detergent-insoluble complexes (GICs) from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) Golgi membranes (Gkantiragas et al., 2001). Several GIC proteins localize to brefeldin A-sensitive compartments, and all the proteins identified so far have a cytosolic orientation (Gkantiragas et al., 2001; Eberle et al., 2002). Here, we report the characterization of a novel protein in Golgi-derived lipid-enriched microdomains that is involved in the structural maintenance of the Golgi apparatus. Unlike other proteins required for maintaining the Golgi architecture, this protein has a luminal orientation and is linked to the membrane by use of a GPI anchor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells, DNA Constructs, Antibodies, and Reagents

Total membranes were prepared as described previously (Helms et al., 1998). Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) treatment and phase separation with Triton X (TX)-114 (Sigma-Aldrich) were performed as described by Bordier (1981). Phosphatidylinositol glycan class L (PIG-L) deficient and recomplemented CHO cell lines were grown and maintained as described previously (Abrami et al., 2001). Cells were transfected with N-acetylglucosamine-transferase-I (NAGT-I)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimera (kindly provided by G. Warren, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New Haven, CT) (Shima et al., 1997). SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were carried out according to standard procedures. Antibodies used for Western blotting and immunofluorescence included the following: M2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) against Flag (Sigma-Aldrich), monoclonal anti-GM130 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), monoclonal anti-folate receptor (FolR) (a gift from Dr. Silvana Canevari, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Genova, Italy), polyclonal anti-Caspase-2L (C-20) and caveolin-1 (N-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), polyclonal anti-p23 antibody as described previously (Sohn et al., 1996), α-tubulin (kindly provided by Wei Yao, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany), mannosidase II (Mann II) (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA), GRASP65 (a gift from Dr. Lowe, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom) and GM130 (BD Biosciences). Primary antibody labeling was then visualized in immunofluorescence by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG or Alexa Fluor 568 anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Anisomysin was purchased from Calbiochem and 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti GFP-A6455 (polyclonal rabbit serum) was obtained from Invitrogen.

Isolation and Sequence Analysis of Golgi-Resident GPI-anchored Protein (GREG)

Based on the reported peptide sequence (Gkantiragas et al., 2001), we designed two degenerate oligonucleotides: 5′-CA (A/G)GA (A/G)CA (A/G)GA (A/G)GC (A/C/G/T)CA (A/G)AT (A/C/T)AA (A/G)-3′ and 5′-(C/T)TT (A/G/T)AT (C/T)TG (A/C/G/T)GC (C/T)TC (C/T)TG (C/T)TC (C/T)TG-3′. By polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the above-mentioned degenerate primers in combination with the vector arm primers, a 1.0-kb fragment was amplified from a CHO cDNA library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). This fragment was randomly labeled with [α-32P]dCTP (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and used as probes to screen the same cDNA library by colony hybridization. Out of 1 × 106, 40 positive clones were obtained. Screened by PCR, four clones with longer inserts were completely sequenced. All these four clones contain the same open reading frame (ORF).

GPI anchorage processing was predicted using big-PI predictor at University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria) (http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/gpi/gpi_server.html). Multiple sequence alignment was done at European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/) and decorated with BoxShade 3.21 at Swiss EMBnet node (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html).

DNA Constructs and Transfection

Constructs were cloned into the EcoRI/XhoI or EcoRI/NotI sites of expression plasmid pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). To generate GREG-Flag, a single Flag-tag was inserted between 181Q and 182N by PCR. For constructing ΔGPI-GREG and 23TM-GREG, a fragment without the C-terminal GPI-signal peptide (SP) (amino acid residue [AA] 1-183) was first amplified by PCR. This fragment was fused with either a single Flag-tag or the transmembrane domain of p23 together with a Flag-tag at the C-terminal end (RVLYFSIFSMFCLIGLATWQVFYLRiggleDYKDDDDK, residues in small cap are spacers). To generate a GPI-anchored form of both N-terminal (AA 1-110) and C-terminal (AA 109-211), GREG-Flag cDNA was digested with BstYI. The resulting two fragments were ligated with either the signal peptide of GREG (C-terminal) or the GPI-SP linked with a single Flag-tag (N-terminal). For making the ΔEQ construct, a fragment from amino acid 139-211 of GREG-Flag was amplified and ligated with the N-terminal fragment without the Flag-tagged GPI-SP. For GPI-anchored GREG-GFP (wt-GREG-GFP), a GFP fragment (XhoI/BsrGI) from pEGFP-N1 was ligated with a pair of the GPI-SP oligonucleotides (BsrGI/NotI) and ΔGPI-GREG in pcDNA3 (XhoI/NotI, thus removing the Flag-tag). To construct cc-GREG, a fragment from amino acid 50-183 of wt-GREG was amplified and cloned into pcDNA3. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. Cells were maintained in α-minimal essential medium (CHO) or DMEM (normal rat kidney [NRK]) media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 10 mg ml−1 penicillin and streptomycin, and they were transfected with the appropriate constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) per the manufacturer's instructions. Stable cell clones from CHO or NRK cells were selected with 0.6 mg ml−1 G-418 (Geneticin) (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) and maintained in appropriate media with 0.2 mg ml−1 G-418.

RNA Interference (RNAi)

We had 25-nucleotide-modified synthetic RNA probes (small interfering RNA [siRNA]) custom synthesized by Stealth RNAi Technology, Invitrogen. Primer sequences used were as follows: sense: 5′-UGGCCUUGGUUAUCCCGCUCAUCAU-3′ and antisense: 5′-AUGAUGAGCGGGAUAACCAAGGCCA-3′. As a control, scrambled oligonucleotides were used that are based on the above-mentioned sequences: sense: 5′-UGGUUGGUUUACCGCUCACUCCCAU-3′ and antisense: 5′-AUGGGAGUGAGCGGUAAACCAACCA-3′. Transient transfection of siRNA probes was achieved using the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen).

Immunofluorescence Microscope

After appropriate treatment, cells either stably or transiently transfected with the GREG constructs, treated with siRNA, were prepared for indirect immunofluorescence according to standard procedures. Briefly, cells were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 3.5% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After quenching with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% TX-100 in PBS for 10 min and subsequently blocked in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin for 1 h. Cells were stained with DAPI for 10 min immediately before mounting in Fluoromount G (Biozol, Eching, Germany). A Zeiss LSM510 with appropriate filters was used, and images were collected and processed with LSM510 software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). For cells stained with DAPI, images were taken with the use of a Zeiss inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled charge-coupled device camera. All images were adjusted with Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA) and edited with Canvas 8.0.4. PIG-L deficient and recomplemented CHO cell lines were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, and images were acquired using a 100× lens on a Zeiss Axiophot equipped with a Hamamatsu cooled camera by using the Openlab acquisition software (Improvision, Lexington, MA).

ts-O45-G Transport Assay

For assaying ts-O45-G transport, cells transfected with siRNA were incubated for 48 h and then overlaid with recombinant adenoviruses encoding ts-O45-G-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) (Keller et al., 2001). After 60 min, adenoviruses were washed away and ts-O45-G was accumulated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by incubating the cells at 39.5°C for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were shifted to 32°C to release ts-O45-G from the ER in the presence of cycloheximide. Sixty minutes after the temperature shift, cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, and ts-O45-G on the cell surface was detected by immunostaining with a VG antibody recognizing ts-O45-G at the plasma membrane (PM). Cell nuclei were labeled with Hoechst 33342 diluted to a final concentration of 0.1 μg/ml. Analogous experiment was done under the conditions of ΔGPI-GREG overexpression, except that the cells were transfected with plasmids 16 h after infection with recombinant adenoviruses and incubated for 8 h.

For the quantitative data acquisition a widefield microscope Zeiss Axiovert 200 (Carl Zeiss) was used with a 20× Fluor numerical aperture 0.75 air immersion objective. After acquisition, images were converted to an image depth of 8 bits. Quantitative evaluation of fluorescence intensities was performed in MetaMorph 4.6r5 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). For this purpose, images were processed as follows: cells were identified according their nuclei, and the area of the nuclei was dilated digitally. The average gray values relating to the total ts-O45-G-CFP and ts-O45-G-CFP at the PM were measured in this extended area in each cell individually. The transport rate of ts-O45-G-CFP was expressed as a ratio of ts-O45-G-CFP at the PM to the total amount of ts-O45-G-CFP in each cell. Average ts-O45-G-CFP transport ratios were obtained separately for the transfected and nontransfected cells and compared.

Electron Microscopy

Cells were fixed by adding 4% freshly prepared formaldehyde and 0.4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, to an equal volume of culture medium for 10 min, followed by postfixation in 2% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, without medium. Cells were stored until further processing in 1% formaldehyde at 4°C. Processing of cells for ultrathin cryosectioning and immunolabeling according to the protein A-gold method was done as described previously (Slot et al., 1991). In brief, fixed cells were washed with 0.05 M glycine in PBS, scraped gently from the dish in PBS containing 1% gelatin, and pelleted in 12% gelatin in PBS. The cell pellet was solidified on ice and cut into small blocks. For cryoprotection, blocks were infiltrated overnight with 2.3 M sucrose at 4°C and afterward mounted on aluminum pins and frozen in liquid nitrogen. To pick up ultrathin cryosections, a 1:1 mixture of 2.3 M sucrose and 1.8% methylcellulose was used (Liou et al., 1996).

Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening

Dimerization domains of GREG were identified by the LexA/transactivation yeast two-hybrid system using pLexA (pEG202) and pB42AD (pJG4-5) to generate bait and prey constructs (Matchmaker LexA two-hybrid system; Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Various GREG domains were amplified by PCR (primer sequences listed in Supplemental Table 1), and after digestion with EcoRI and XhoI they were ligated into pLexA and pB42AD. The resulting plasmids were confirmed by sequencing and used for transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EGY48 (pretransformed with pSH18-34 containing the lacZ reporter gene) by using a standard LiAc protocol (Elble, 1992). The cotransformants were plated on selective media lacking uracil, histidine, and tryptophan and incubated for 3 d at 30°C. Yeast colonies from a single plate were harvested, pooled by resuspension in H2O, and subsequently applied on selective plates containing 80 mg/l, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactoside (X-Gal), 2% (wt/vol) galactose, and 1% (wt/vol) raffinose to test for the expression of β-galactosidase (blue colonies) as an indication for positive interactions.

RESULTS

GREG Is a GPI-anchored Protein

Two peptides, K(T/Q)ALIQEQEAQIK (Gkantiragas et al., 2001) and LRTAEEASITSK, which were obtained from an unknown GIC protein with an apparent molecular mass of 45,000 (Mr 45,000) did not match any known protein or expressed sequence tag in the databases. Based on these sequences, a complete cDNA was isolated from a CHO cDNA library as described in Materials and Methods. The ORF encodes a polypeptide of 203 amino acids, which includes both peptides. The deduced protein, annotated GREG, is predicted to be an almost entirely coiled-coil protein with an N-terminal and C-terminal hydrophobic stretch. The N-terminal hydrophobic stretch represents an SP for entrance into the ER lumen (Figure 1, a and b). The C-terminal hydrophobic region is a putative signal peptide for GPI anchorage (GPI-SP). Within the coiled-coil region, two putative N-glycosylation sites and a tandem repeat of three EQEAQIK (EQ) sequences were identified (Figure 1, a and b). Sequence comparison identified bone marrow stromal cell surface gene (BST-2) as a GREG homologue. Human BST-2 shares 36% identity with GREG, whereas mouse and rat (DAMP-1) homologues share 53 and 47% identity, respectively) (Figure 1a). The EQ tandem repeat is, however, unique for the GREG protein.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

GREG is a GPI-anchored protein. (a) Sequence alignment of GREG with human, mouse, and rat BST-2. Identical amino acids are shown in black, whereas similar amino acids are in gray. (b) Schematic representation of wt-GREG. EQ, EQEAQIK; GPI-SP, GPI anchor processing signal peptide. In addition, the predicted site for GPI anchorage processing and the sites for N-glycosylation (position and residue) are indicated. (c) GPI linkage of GREG. The method is based on Bordier (1981) with only minor modifications. Briefly, Golgi membranes isolated from CHO cells stably transfected with a Flag-tagged version of GREG (see Figure 2) were extracted with 1% TX-114. After phase separation in an aqueous (A, lane 3) and detergent phase (D, lane 4), the detergent phase was treated with phospholipase C, and the phase separation was repeated (lanes 1 and 2). The samples were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies against the indicated proteins (M2 antibody for Flag-GREG and p23; see Materials and Methods). A, aqueous phase (lanes 1 and 3); D, detergent phase (lanes 2 and 4).

The domain structure of GREG (Figure 1b) predicts modification of the protein with a GPI anchor (Udenfriend and Kodukula, 1995). To determine the presence of GPI-anchored proteins in the GIC fractions, we made use of the toxin aerolysin, which specifically recognizes GPI-anchored proteins in blot overlay experiments (Hong et al., 2002). We observed that aerolysin bound to a diffuse protein band comigrating with the GREG protein (data not shown).

To directly test GPI anchorage of GREG, we treated solubilized Golgi membranes with PI-PLC followed by TX-114 phase separation (Figure 1c). GREG partitions in the detergent phase and runs as a smear from 35,000 to 60,000 on SDS-PAGE (see Figure 6a), but it can be recovered in the aqueous phase after PI-PLC treatment (Figure 1c), which specifically removes the hydrophobic GPI anchor (Ikezawa et al., 1976; Low and Finean, 1977). P23, a type I transmembrane protein (Sohn et al., 1996), partitions in the detergent phase in a PI-PLC–independent manner (Figure 1c). These data confirm that GREG is a GPI-anchored protein.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

GREG is involved in flattening of Golgi cisternae. (a) Isolated CHO Golgi membranes (15 μg) were incubated in the absence (lane 1) and presence (lane 2) of 1000 U of PNGase in detergent for 3 h at 37°C. Samples were analyzed by Western blot by using a peptide-antibody against GREG. Expression of cc-GREG. cc-GREG was cloned as described in Materials and Methods and expressed in P. pastoris cells. His-tagged cc-GREG (lane 3) was purified from the lysate (lane 4) by using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography and analyzed by SDS-PAGE stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. In the purified fraction, two bans are observed. Both bands reacted to a peptide antibody against GREG, indicating that GREG has been partially proteolytically cleaved by a protease activity in P. pastoris. (b) Yeast two-hybrid analysis of GREG. Left, schematic representation of wt-GREG and the various domains of GREG that were amplified by PCR and cloned into both bait (pLexA) and prey (pB42AD) plasmids to study mutual interactions by using the LexA-based yeast two-hybrid system; numbering refers to amino acid residues. EQ, tandem repeat 3x[EQEAQIK]. Right, EGY48 (pSH18-34) yeast strains carrying bait and prey plasmids expressing different GREG-domains. Yeast two-hybrid constructs are described in Materials and Methods. The results shown were obtained after growth for 3 d at 30°C and are representative of three independent experiments. Control constructs: POS, positive interaction (GAPR-1/GAPR-1) (Serrano et al., 2004); NEG, negative interaction (nucleolin/nucleolin).

GREG Is a Golgi-Resident Protein

The identification of a GPI-anchor came as a surprise, because most if not all GPI-anchored proteins characterized to date have a steady-state localization at the plasma membrane (Nosjean et al., 1997; Mayor and Riezman, 2004). GREG, however, was isolated from an enriched Golgi fraction, and preliminary data showed its localization to the Golgi complex (Gkantiragas et al., 2001).

To investigate the subcellular localization of GREG in more detail, we established CHO and NRK cell lines constitutively expressing a GREG-Flag construct (Figure 2a). GREG-Flag colocalizes with the Golgi marker Man II (Figure 2b). In agreement with our previous observations (Gkantiragas et al., 2001), the Golgi localization of GREG-Flag is BFA sensitive (Figure 2b). Extensive treatment of cells with cyclohexamide (8 h; 100 μg/ml) did not chase GREG out of the Golgi, suggesting that it is not in transit to the plasma membrane (Supplemental Figure 1). The Golgi localization of GREG was confirmed in subcellular fractionation studies that separated plasma membranes from endogenous membranes by Nycodenz density gradient centrifugation (Jenne et al., 2002). As shown in Figure 2c, both wt-GREG and GREG-Flag cosediment with GM130, an early Golgi marker (Nakamura et al., 1995). In contrast, FolR, a GPI-anchored protein that primarily localizes to the plasma membrane (Varma and Mayor, 1998), is found in fractions 2 and 3 of the Nycodenz gradient. The amount of FolR present in fractions 7 and 8 is due to its recycling between the plasma membrane and endosomes (Sabharanjak et al., 2002). To assess the localization of GREG at the ultrastructural level, ultrathin cryosections of wt-GREG-GFP–expressing CHO cells were immunogold labeled with anti-GFP (Figure 3). GREG was clearly found associated with the Golgi stacks (Figure 3a), in which it was homogeneously distributed over the individual cisternae and from cis- to trans-Golgi. Additional label was found in the vesicular tubular clusters (Figure 3b) that may represent a fenestrated cisternal membrane or vesicle tubular clusters between the ER and Golgi (Klumperman, 2000). The trans-Golgi network was virtually devoid of label (Figure 3c). Collectively, these data suggest that GREG resides at early Golgi compartments and does not localize to the plasma membrane.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

GREG is a Golgi resident protein. (a) Schematic representation of GREG-Flag construct. (b) Subcellular localization of GREG-Flag. Cells stably expressing GREG-Flag were treated with or without 5 μM brefeldin A for 15 min and processed for immunofluorescence by using antibodies against Flag and Man II. Images shown are representative confocal sections. (c) Biochemical analysis of GREG localization to intracellular membranes. CHO cells constitutively expressing FolR or GREG-Flag were treated with cycloheximide (50 μg ml−1) for 5 h at 37°C. Cells were homogenized in 25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, and 130 mM KCl by passing through a 25-gauge needle, and the postnuclear supernatants were fractionated on a Nycodenz velocity gradient as described previously (Jenne et al., 2002). Fractions were collected from top to bottom and analyzed by Western blotting by using antibodies against the SEA peptide, Flag, FolR, and GM130. The band observed in fraction 2 with the Flag antibody is nonspecific, because it also occurs in untransfected cells (data not shown). In addition, the molecular weight is different from GREG-Flag. A cross-reactivity of the M2 Flag antibody was also observed by others (Schafer and Braun, 1995).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

GREG localizes to the Golgi stack. CHO cells expressing GFP-GREG were labeled with anti-GFP (10-nm gold particles) for ultrastructural localization studies. (a and b) GFP-GREG is found in the Golgi complex (G) and associated membranes. Within a Golgi stack, GFP-GREG distributes from cis to trans. The asterisk in b points to a transverse section of a fenestrated cisternal membrane. (c) At the trans-side of the Golgi complex, the clathrin-coated membranes of the TGN (arrows) are devoid of GFP-GREG. E, endosome. Bars, 200 nm.

A possible Golgi-targeting motif was identified by sequence comparison with BST-2 proteins (Ishikawa et al., 1995; Ohtomo et al., 1999; Kupzig et al., 2003). Neither the human and mouse BST-2 nor DAMP-1 contains the EQ tandem repeat (Figure 1a), and both localize to the cell surface. When the tandem repeat is deleted from the protein, GREG occurs at the plasma membrane (Supplemental Fig. 2). The tandem repeat was, however, not sufficient to retain luminally expressed soluble GFP in the Golgi (data not shown).

Involvement of GREG in Maintenance of Golgi Structure

A structural role of GREG was investigated by knockdown experiments using RNA interference techniques to block the expression of GREG. On transfection of cells with double-strand RNA, GREG-Flag expression was significantly reduced in most cells, as observed by immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis (data not shown). The Golgi structure of cells that had no detectable levels of GREG-Flag was fragmented (data not shown). Fragmentation of the Golgi was also observed when GREG expression was suppressed using stabilized synthetic 25-nucleotide RNA probes (siRNA) (Figures 4a and 7a). Only in the presence of GREG-specific siRNAs, the subcellular distribution of various Golgi markers including Mann II and GM130 was affected (Figure 4a). Other Golgi markers such as COPI subunits, p24, and KDEL receptor were affected as well (data not shown). The efficiency of protein knockout was confirmed by Western blot analysis using specific and scrambled probes (Figure 4b). These results (Figures 4 and 7a) show that GREG is essential in maintaining the Golgi structure.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Involvement of GREG in maintenance of the Golgi structure. (a) wt-CHO cells were transfected with control or GREG-specific siRNA, incubated for 68 h, and subsequently analyzed by immunofluorescence by using antibodies against GM130 and mannosidase II to determine disruption of the Golgi apparatus. Nuclei were identified using DAPI. (b) Analysis of knockdown of GREG expression by Western blotting. CHO cells constitutively expressing GREG-Flag (6-well) were transfected with the indicated RNAi probes (100 pmol) for the indicated times (0, 48, and 72 h). Postnuclear supernatants (50 μg) were analyzed for the presence of GREG-Flag (bottom) and v-ATPase (top) by Western blotting by using the respective antibodies.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

GREG is required for protein transport along the secretory pathway. (a) Trafficking of ts-O45-G is inhibited under the conditions of GREG down-regulation. wtCHO cells were transfected with control or GREG-specific siRNA, incubated for 48 h, and subsequently infected with the recombinant adenoviruses encoding ts-O45-G-CFP (see Materials and Methods). After an additional 24 h of incubation at the restrictive temperature, ts-O45-G-CFP was released from the ER by the temperature shift, and its arrival to the PM was monitored by the immunostaining. In cells transfected with siRNA to down-regulate GREG, ts-O45-G arrival to the PM is markedly reduced. (b) Trafficking of ts-O45-G is inhibited under the conditions of overexpression of ΔGPI-GREG. wtCHO cells were infected with the recombinant adenoviruses encoding ts-O45-G-CFP, incubated at the restrictive temperature for 16 h and subsequently transfected with a plasmid encoding ΔGPI-GREG and incubated for 8 h. In cells expressing ΔGPI-GREG, ts-O45-G-CFP trafficking was reduced. Asterisks indicate transfected cells. (c) Quantitative evaluation of ts-O45-G-CFP trafficking under the conditions of GREG down-regulation and overexpression of ΔGPI-GREG. Secretion rate of ts-O45-G-CFP was expressed as a ratio between the fraction of protein that has reached the PM in 60 min to the total intracellular amount of ts-O45-G-CFP (y-axis) (see Materials and Methods). Transport rate of ts-O45-G-CFP in nontreated cells was assigned to be 100%. For each condition 50–200 cells were taken for analysis. Bars indicate standard deviations. Similar results were obtained with different sets of specific stealth RNAi against GREG and a mix of the different RNA probes.

Similar to other GPI-anchored proteins, GREG can be recovered in an insoluble membrane fraction in cold nonionic detergents, which are thought to represent lipid rafts or microdomains (Supplemental Fig. 3). A GREG mutant lacking the GPI-anchor (ΔGPI-GREG; Figure 5a) or with the GPI-anchor replaced for the transmembrane domain of p23, a type I transmembrane protein at the Golgi complex (Sohn et al., 1996) (23TM-GREG; Figure 4a) partitions in the detergent-soluble fraction (Supplemental Fig. 3). These data show that the GPI moiety of GREG causes association with microdomains in Golgi membranes. Expression of ΔGPI-GREG resulted in partial colocalization with the Golgi marker mannosidase II (Figure 5b). In addition, partial fragmentation of the Golgi complex was observed in cells expressing the ΔGPI-GREG construct. Expression of 23TM-GREG also generates a scattered Golgi structure (Figure 5b). Quantitative analysis demonstrates that 12 h after transfection with either GPI anchor-deficient mutant construct, ∼50% of cells revealed fragmented Golgi structures (Figure 5c). These results indicate that the GPI anchor of GREG is functionally required and that the mature protein is involved in maintenance of the Golgi structure. The disassembly of the Golgi apparatus driven by mutant GREG proteins occurs in an apoptosis-independent manner (Supplemental Fig. 4, a and b). In addition, microtubule integrity is not significantly affected in cells that express ΔGPI-GREG and fragmented Golgi structures remain preferentially associated with or in proximity to microtubules (Supplemental Fig. 4c).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Expression of GREG mutants disrupts the Golgi apparatus. (a) Schematic representation of GREG mutants. (b) CHO cells were transiently transfected with ΔGPI-GREG and 23TM-GREG for 12 h. The cells were analyzed for Flag and Mann II by immunofluorescence. (c) Quantification of cells containing punctuate Golgi structures or no Golgi signal. The percentage of cells with abnormal Golgi structures over cells under four separate scopes was plotted. Shown are the results from one of four individual experiments.

Expression of ΔGPI-GREG leads to multiple morphological changes in the Golgi region as observed by immuno-electron microscopy (EM), showing the localization of ΔGPI-GREG (10-nm gold particles) and Giantin (15-nm gold particles) as a marker for Golgi membranes (Supplemental Fig. 5). Quite remarkable is the formation of tightly stacked, sometimes circular membranes. In addition to membrane stacking, accumulations of vesicles containing ΔGPI-GREG are seen. These morphological changes support the observations made by immunofluorescence.

If a GPI-dependent membrane anchorage is essential for GREG function, then a PIG-L CHO cell line (Abrami et al., 2001), deficient in biosynthesis of the GPI-anchor, is predicted to have an altered Golgi morphology. Indeed, a dramatic increase in nonelongated Golgi structures is observed in PIG-L CHO cells (90% fragmented Golgi, compared with 50% in PIG-L recomplemented CHO cells (Supplemental Fig. 6).

Structural Requirements of GREG Localization

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of GREG revealed an apparent molecular mass of 35,000 to 60,000 (Figure 6a, lane 1), which is larger than expected. Treatment of solubilized Golgi membranes with an N-glycanase (PNGase F) resulted in a band of about 28,000 (Figure 6a, lane 2). In consideration of a theoretical Mr of 15,000 the mature protein is likely to be a (homo)dimer, resistant to SDS. In agreement with the deglycosylation results, a protein with an apparent molecular mass of 25 and 28 kDa can be purified from Pichia pastoris upon expression of a His-tagged construct with both SPs deleted (coiled-coil domain of GREG; ccGREG) (Figure 6a, lane 3).

The structural requirements for GREG dimerization were further investigated by mutational analysis of GREG by using LexA-based yeast-two-hybrid interaction system (Brent and Finley, 1997). The entire ccGREG or GREG domains (see Figure 6b, left) were fused to the LexA DNA-binding domain (bait) and the B42 transcriptional activation domain (prey). Cotransformation with bait and prey plasmids expressing ccGREG (residues N50-T178) fusion proteins resulted in strong expression of β-galactosidase as indicated by blue colonies when grown on X-Gal–containing medium (Figure 6b). These results underline that GREG interacts with itself and has an intrinsic potential to form homodimers. The area of interaction was mapped to the C-terminal half of the protein, because ccGREG interacts with CT-GREG (L116-T178) but not with NT-GREG (N50-Q118). Expression of bait and prey CT-GREG fusion proteins was sufficient to retain the interaction (Figure 6b), indicating that GREG forms cis-oriented (parallel) dimers. When the EQ-repeat was omitted from ccGREG or CT-GREG, the interaction with ccGREG and/or CT-GREG was not observed anymore, indicating an essential role of the EQ repeat in dimer formation of GREG. Because omission of the EQ-repeat results in plasma membrane localization of GREG (Supplemental Fig. 2), these data imply the involvement of dimer formation in GREG localization to the Golgi complex.

GREG Affects Protein Secretion of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Glycoprotein (VSV G) Protein to the Plasma Membrane

The structure–function relationship of the Golgi remains largely unknown and fragmentation of the Golgi in smaller units that are scattered through the cytoplasm not necessarily implies a inhibition of exocytic protein transport (Kondylis et al., 2005; Sutterlin et al., 2005).

To study a possible effect of GREG on protein secretion, CHO cells were transfected with a temperature-sensitive mutant of CFP-tagged VSV G protein (ts-O45-G), a widely used marker for visualization of the secretory pathway (Scales et al., 1997). Under permissive conditions, this protein is secreted via the secretory pathway and accumulates at the plasma membrane (Figure 7a, control). Treatment of cells with GREG-specific siRNA resulted in a strong inhibition of protein secretion through the secretory pathway, and the VSV G protein accumulates in structures that also contain mannosidase II, suggesting a block at the Golgi apparatus (Figure 7a, GREG siRNA). Cotransfection of CHO cells with Flag-tagged GREG mutants that affect the Golgi morphology, including ΔGPI-GREG, resulted in inhibition of secretion as well and a partial accumulation of VSV G protein at the perinuclear region (Figure 7b). Quantitation over a large number of cells revealed a 44% (GREG siRNA) and 23% (ΔGPI-GREG) inhibition (Figure 7c). The observed inhibition is comparable with other strong inhibitors and established effectors of the secretory pathway applied to the same assay system (Starkuviene et al., 2004). For comparison, down-regulation of established components of the secretory pathway, like β-COP, GM130, and Sec31, inhibits ts-O45-G by 50% in HeLa cells by using the same assay system (Erfle et. al., 2004). Down-regulation of β-COP and β prime-COP in 3T3 fibroblasts inhibits ts-O45-G secretion by 32 and 40% (Starkuviene, unpublished data), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Golgi Targeting of GREG

Here, we have described a Golgi resident GPI-anchored protein involved in maintenance of Golgi structure. Little is known about the targeting of proteins to the Golgi complex. The transmembrane domain (Bretscher and Munro, 1993; Yuan and Teasdale, 2002) as well as protein–protein and protein–lipid interactions (Munro, 2002, 2004) have been implicated in the dynamic Golgi localization. The GPI moiety is not expected to contribute to a Golgi localization, because all GPI-anchored proteins identified so far localize to the plasma membrane and the endosomal system (Mayor and Riezman, 2004). Therefore, GREG must be actively retained in the Golgi. We showed that the EQ repeat is essential for Golgi localization. This observation is in agreement with the finding that homologues of GREG, none of which contain the EQ-repeat, were found to be present at the plasma membrane (Ohtomo et al., 1999; Kupzig et al., 2003). Because the EQ-repeat is also essential for dimerization of GREG (Figure 6b), our data suggest that dimerization and possibly oligomerization is essential for Golgi localization. Oligomerization has been implicated in the dynamic Golgi localization of p24 proteins (Jenne et al., 2002). Oligomerization of proteins into large protein complexes (a so-called Golgi matrix) (Munro, 1998; Gillingham and Munro, 2003) has also been suggested to contribute to Golgi localization. In this respect it is interesting to note that due to its GPI-anchor, GREG has an affinity for lipid rafts. GPI-anchored proteins are able to oligomerize into high-molecular-weight complexes, affecting raft partitioning (Paladino et al., 2004). Vice versa, raft partitioning of proteins can modulate the oligomeric status of a protein (Simons and Toomre, 2000; Anderson and Jacobson, 2002; Helms and Zurzolo, 2004). Our data suggest that oligomerization may be a general mechanism of Golgi localization, applicable not only to cytosolic proteins but also to luminal proteins.

Similar to other GIC proteins, GREG redistributes in the cell 10–15 min after addition of BFA. This suggests that GIC proteins, including GREG, localize to early (cis-trans) Golgi membranes (Klausner et al., 1992) and that GREG looses its Golgi localization concomitant with the dispersal of Golgi membranes.

A Luminal and GPI-anchored Protein Involved in Golgi Structure and Function

The identification of a luminal protein involved in maintenance of Golgi structure raises the question how a luminal protein could be involved in maintenance of Golgi structure. Most likely, transmembrane signaling must occur to allow interaction(s) with the protein machinery at the cytosolic site of the membrane. A similar situation occurs at the plasma membrane where GPI-anchored receptors such as the folate receptor (Nosjean et al., 1997) have to transmit signals across the membrane, yet they span the membrane only halfway. Little is known about the coupling of outer and inner membrane leaflet components. Based on biophysical properties of lipids in model membranes, transmembrane proteins are required for efficient coupling of inner and outer membrane molecules (Devaux and Morris, 2004). Examples for functional coupling of GPI-anchored proteins with transmembrane proteins in signaling processes have been found (Schmitt-Verhulst et al., 1987; Klein et al., 1997). In lipid rafts at the Golgi complex, all proteins identified so far have a cytosolic orientation except GREG (this study) and flotillin-1 (Gkantiragas et al., 2001). The topology of flotillin-1 is not entirely clear (Morrow and Parton, 2005), but it may be suited for transmembrane signaling. An involvement of lipid rafts in GREG function is consistent with the observed fragmentation of Golgi structure when the GPI anchor of GREG has been replaced with a transmembrane anchor (Figure 5). These data suggest that lipid-enriched microdomains may play a role in maintenance of the Golgi architecture, either by its involvement in the oligomerization of GREG at the luminal leaflet of the membrane and/or by its involvement in transmembrane signaling.

From the immunofluorescence data, it seems that some of the mutant GREG protein is localized to the ER. This could be an artifact due to high overexpression and/or slow folding. Alternatively, a significant pool of mutant-GREG does reside in the ER, in contrast to wt-GREG that resides in the Golgi. This may be (as for many Golgi proteins) the result of a change in an equilibrium partitioning between the ER and Golgi. Several GIC proteins cycle in the early secretory pathway (Gkantiragas et al., 2001; Eberle et al., 2002). Therefore, it is feasible that mutant-GREG binds to wt-GREG forming a stable dimer, thus affecting its Golgi localization. Irrespective of the mechanism, mutant GREG could bind to Golgi-interacting partners, dragging these proteins out of the Golgi as well, affecting the Golgi morphology.

GREG and the Golgin Family of Proteins

Several characteristics of GREG are reminiscent of the Golgin family of proteins (Barr and Short, 2003; Gillingham and Munro, 2003). These include a Golgi localization, the involvement in maintenance of Golgi structure, the predicted long coiled-coil structure, and the presence as a parallel homodimer. Furthermore, blast searching reveals that several unknown proteins contain a stretch of similar EQ repeats (e.g., EQEEKIR in XP_496037 and XP_498421). Interestingly, these proteins share significant homology with the Golgin family of proteins containing a long coiled-coil. In contrast to Golgins identified so far, however, GREG has a luminal orientation. In addition, GREG does not contain a GRIP domain that has been identified at the C terminus of some Golgin proteins and that is involved in Golgi targeting (Barr, 1999; Kjer-Nielsen et al., 1999; Munro and Nichols, 1999).

The function of Golgins is to bind and link adjacent membranes, either in tethering of vesicles to membranes or between cisternae (Barr and Short, 2003). Therefore, a more speculative possibility to explain the involvement of GREG in Golgi structure and function may relate to its similarity to Golgin proteins. In this model, opposing membranes within a single cisterna are stabilized by the formation of protein complexes that contain GREG in a trans-configuration. In a trans-configuration, these protein complexes could either stabilize opposing membranes or act as a sensing device, monitoring the distance between opposing membranes.

Structure–Function Relationship of the Golgi

The structural organization of the Golgi varies among species. In mammalian cells, stacks of cisternae that are interconnected form a single organelle. In fly, plants, and Pichia pastoris, Golgi stacks are not interconnected and are dispersed in the cytoplasm. In S. cerevisiae, the Golgi is not stacked and single cisternae are observed. Yet, under these varying morphological conditions, the function of the Golgi in anterograde and retrograde transport along the secretory pathway is fully functional. The smallest functional unit of the Golgi remains to be determined. Expression of GREG mutants results both in fragmentation and inhibition of anterograde protein transport, suggesting that the observed fragmentation also results in loss of function of the Golgi complex and that GREG fulfills an essential function in the Golgi complex. Golgi morphology and function are, however, often strongly related and difficult to discriminate from each other. In this respect, it is interesting to note that in the GPI-deficient cell line, protein secretion must continue to stay viable. This may suggest that in these cells, the primary effect of GREG is on Golgi morphology and that GREG is not essential for protein secretion. In agreement with this is that on close inspection of the Golgi structures in the PIG-L cells that are labeled with NAGTI-GFP, many circular or ring-like structures are observed. These structures are reminiscent of the changes in Golgi structure observed in EM that are induced by expression of ΔGPI-GREG. Our results indicate that cytosolic as well as luminal proteins at the Golgi complex act in concert to maintain a unique Golgi structure. Dynamic integration of the various signals involved defines the overall Golgi structure.

The sequence shown in this article has been deposited at GenBank (accession nos. AY272060 and AAQ16301).

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental Material]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to Wei Yao and GICcers for help and discussions on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the German-Israeli Foundation for scientific research and development (to F.T.W. and J.B.H.), the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) grant HE 2705 (to J.B.H.), the EC Research Training Network HPRN-CT-2000-00077 (to J.B.H.), and the Research Council for Earth and life Sciences (NWO Aard- en Levenswetenschappen) with financial aid from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek).

Abbreviations used:

GIC

Golgi-derived detergent-insoluble complex

GREG

Golgi-resident GPI-anchored protein.

Footnotes

This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-03-0236) on January 24, 2007.

Inline graphic The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).

REFERENCES

  1. Abrami L., Fivaz M., Kobayashi T., Kinoshita T., Parton R. G., van der Goot F. G. Cross-talk between caveolae and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-rich domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:30729–30736. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102039200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan V. J., Thompson H. M., McNiven M. A. Motoring around the Golgi. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:E236–E242. doi: 10.1038/ncb1002-e236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson R. G., Jacobson K. A role for lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid domains. Science. 2002;296:1821–1825. doi: 10.1126/science.1068886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr F. A. A novel Rab6-interacting domain defines a family of Golgi-targeted coiled-coil proteins. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:381–384. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80167-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr F. A., Short B. Golgins in the structure and dynamics of the Golgi apparatus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003;15:405–413. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bivona T. G., Perez De Castro I., Ahearn I. M., Grana T. M., Chiu V. K., Lockyer P. J., Cullen P. J., Pellicer A., Cox A. D., Philips M. R. Phospholipase Cgamma activates Ras on the Golgi apparatus by means of RasGRP1. Nature. 2003;424:694–698. doi: 10.1038/nature01806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bordier C. Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution. J. Biol. Chem. 1981;256:1604–1607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brent R., Finley R. L., Jr Understanding gene and allele function with two-hybrid methods. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1997;31:663–704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bretscher M. S., Munro S. Cholesterol and the Golgi apparatus. Science. 1993;261:1280–1281. doi: 10.1126/science.8362242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown D. A., London E. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1998;14:111–136. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DeBose-Boyd R. A., Brown M. S., Li W. P., Nohturfft A., Goldstein J. L., Espenshade P. J. Transport-dependent proteolysis of SREBP: relocation of site-1 protease from Golgi to ER obviates the need for SREBP transport to Golgi. Cell. 1999;99:703–712. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81668-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devaux P. F., Morris R. Transmembrane asymmetry and lateral domains in biological membranes. Traffic. 2004;5:241–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.0170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Donaldson J. G., Lippincott-Schwartz J. Sorting and signaling at the Golgi complex. Cell. 2000;101:693–696. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80881-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eberle H. B., Serrano R. L., Fullekrug J., Schlosser A., Lehmann W. D., Lottspeich F., Kaloyanova D., Wieland F. T., Helms J. B. Identification and characterization of a novel human plant pathogenesis-related protein that localizes to lipid-enriched microdomains in the Golgi complex. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:827–838. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.4.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elble R. A simple and efficient procedure for transformation of yeasts. Biotechniques. 1992;13:18–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erfle H., Simpson J. C., Bastiaens P. I., Pepperkok R. siRNA cell arrays for high-content screening microscopy. Biotechniques. 2004;37:454–458. doi: 10.2144/04373RT01. 460, 462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillingham A. K., Munro S. Long coiled-coil proteins and membrane traffic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1641:71–85. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(03)00088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gkantiragas I., Brugger B., Stuven E., Kaloyanova D., Li X. Y., Lohr K., Lottspeich F., Wieland F. T., Helms J. B. Sphingomyelin-enriched microdomains at the Golgi complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:1819–1833. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.6.1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Helms J. B. Role of heterotrimeric GTP binding proteins in vesicular protein transport: indications for both classical and alternative G protein cycles. FEBS Lett. 1995;369:84–88. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00620-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Helms J. B., HelmsBrons D., Brugger B., Gkantiragas I., Eberle H., Nickel W., Nurnberg B., Gerdes H. H., Wieland F. T. A putative heterotrimeric G protein inhibits the fusion of COPI-coated vesicles - Segregation of heterotrimeric G proteins from COPI-coated vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:15203–15208. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.15203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Helms J. B., Zurzolo C. Lipids as targeting signals: lipid rafts and intracellular trafficking. Traffic. 2004;5:247–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.0181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hong Y., Ohishi K., Inoue N., Kang J. Y., Shime H., Horiguchi Y., van der Goot F. G., Sugimoto N., Kinoshita T. Requirement of N-glycan on GPI-anchored proteins for efficient binding of aerolysin but not Clostridium septicum alpha-toxin. EMBO J. 2002;21:5047–5056. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ikezawa H., Yamanegi M., Taguchi R., Miyashita T., Ohyabu T. Studies on phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase (phospholipase C type) of Bacillus cereus. I. purification, properties and phosphatase-releasing activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1976;450:154–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ishikawa J., et al. Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of a bone marrow stromal cell surface gene, BST2, that may be involved in pre-B-cell growth. Genomics. 1995;26:527–534. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80171-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jenne N., Frey K., Brugger B., Wieland F. T. Oligomeric state and stoichiometry of p24 proteins in the early secretory pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:46504–46511. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206989200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kjer-Nielsen L., Teasdale R. D., van Vliet C., Gleeson P. A. A novel Golgi-localisation domain shared by a class of coiled-coil peripheral membrane proteins. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:385–388. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80168-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klausner R. D., Donaldson J. G., Lippincott-Schwartz J. Brefeldin A: insights into the control of membrane traffic and organelle structure. J. Cell Biol. 1992;116:1071–1080. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein R. D., et al. A GPI-linked protein that interacts with Ret to form a candidate neurturin receptor. Nature. 1997;387:717–721. doi: 10.1038/42722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Klumperman J. Transport between ER and Golgi. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000;12:445–449. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kondylis V., Spoorendonk K. M., Rabouille C. dGRASP localization and function in the early exocytic pathway in Drosophila S2 cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:4061–4072. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kupzig S., Korolchuk V., Rollason R., Sugden A., Wilde A., Banting G. Bst-2/HM1.24 is a raft-associated apical membrane protein with an unusual topology. Traffic. 2003;4:694–709. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kusumi A., Koyama-Honda I., Suzuki K. Molecular dynamics and interactions for creation of stimulation-induced stabilized rafts from small unstable steady-state rafts. Traffic. 2004;5:213–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.0178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lane J. D., Lucocq J., Pryde J., Barr F. A., Woodman P. G., Allan V. J., Lowe M. Caspase-mediated cleavage of the stacking protein GRASP65 is required for Golgi fragmentation during apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 2002;156:495–509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200110007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Legesse-Miller A., Sagiv Y., Glozman R., Elazar Z. Aut7p, a soluble autophagic factor, participates in multiple membrane trafficking processes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:32966–32973. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000917200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liou W., Geuze H. J., Slot J. W. Improving structural integrity of cryosections for immunogold labeling. Histochem. Cell Biol. 1996;106:41–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02473201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lippincott-Schwartz J., Yuan L. C., Bonifacino J. S., Klausner R. D. Rapid redistribution of Golgi proteins into the ER in cells treated with brefeldin A: evidence for membrane cycling from Golgi to ER. Cell. 1989;56:801–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90685-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Litvak V., Shaul Y. D., Shulewitz M., Amarilio R., Carmon S., Lev S. Targeting of Nir2 to lipid droplets is regulated by a specific threonine residue within its PI-transfer domain. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1513–1518. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Low M. G., Finean J. B. Non-lytic release of acetylcholinesterase from erythrocytes by a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. FEBS Lett. 1977;82:143–146. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80905-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mallard F., Antony C., Tenza D., Salamero J., Goud B., Johannes L. Direct pathway from early/recycling endosomes to the Golgi apparatus revealed through the study of shiga toxin B-fragment transport. J. Cell Biol. 1998;143:973–990. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.4.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Marsh B. J., Howell K. E. The mammalian Golgi–complex debates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:789–795. doi: 10.1038/nrm933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mayor S., Riezman H. Sorting GPI-anchored proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;5:110–120. doi: 10.1038/nrm1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morrow I. C., Parton R. G. Flotillins and the PHB domain protein family: rafts, worms and anaesthetics. Traffic. 2005;6:725–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mukherjee S., Maxfield F. R. Membrane domains. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004;20:839–866. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.095451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Munro S. Localization of proteins to the Golgi apparatus. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:11–15. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(97)01197-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Munro S. Organelle identity and the targeting of peripheral membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002;14:506–514. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00350-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Munro S. Organelle identity and the organization of membrane traffic. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:469–472. doi: 10.1038/ncb0604-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Munro S., Nichols B. J. The GRIP domain - a novel Golgi-targeting domain found in several coiled-coil proteins. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:377–380. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80166-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nakamura N., Rabouille C., Watson R., Nilsson T., Hui N., Slusarewicz P., Kreis T. E., Warren G. Characterization of a cis Golgi matrix protein, Gm130. J. Cell Biol. 1995;131:1715–1726. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nardini M., Spano S., Cericola C., Pesce A., Massaro A., Millo E., Luini A., Corda D., Bolognesi M. CtBP/BARS: a dual-function protein involved in transcription co-repression and Golgi membrane fission. EMBO J. 2003;22:3122–3130. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nichols B. J., Kenworthy A. K., Polishchuk R. S., Lodge R., Roberts T. H., Hirschberg K., Phair R. D., Lippincott-Schwartz J. Rapid cycling of lipid raft markers between the cell surface and Golgi complex. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:529–542. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nosjean O., Briolay A., Roux B. Mammalian GPI proteins: sorting, membrane residence and functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1331:153–186. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4157(97)00005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ohtomo T., et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a surface antigen preferentially overexpressed on multiple myeloma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;258:583–591. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paladino S., Sarnataro D., Pillich R., Tivodar S., Nitsch L., Zurzolo C. Protein oligomerization modulates raft partitioning and apical sorting of GPI-anchored proteins. J. Cell Biol. 2004;167:699–709. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200407094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pfeffer S. R., Rothman J. E. Biosynthetic protein transport and sorting by the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987;56:829–852. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Preisinger C., Short B., De Corte V., Bruyneel E., Haas A., Kopajtich R., Gettemans J., Barr F. A. YSK1 is activated by the Golgi matrix protein GM130 and plays a role in cell migration through its substrate 14-3-3{zeta} J. Cell Biol. 2004;164:1009–1020. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200310061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rios R. M., Bornens M. The Golgi apparatus at the cell centre. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003;15:60–66. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sabharanjak S., Sharma P., Parton R. G., Mayor S. GPI-anchored proteins are delivered to recycling endosomes via a distinct cdc42-regulated, clathrin-independent pinocytic pathway. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:411–423. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Scales S. J., Pepperkok R., Kreis T. E. Visualization of ER-to-Golgi transport in living cells reveals a sequential mode of action for COPII and COPI. Cell. 1997;90:1137–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80379-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schafer K., Braun T. Monoclonal anti-FLAG antibodies react with a new isoform of rat Mg2+ dependent protein phosphatase beta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995;207:708–714. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schmitt-Verhulst A. M., Guimezanes A., Boyer C., Poenie M., Tsien R., Buferne M., Hua C., Leserman L. Pleiotropic loss of activation pathways in a T-cell receptor alpha-chain deletion variant of a cytolytic T-cell clone. Nature. 1987;325:628–631. doi: 10.1038/325628a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Seemann J., Pypaert M., Taguchi T., Malsam J., Warren G. Partitioning of the matrix fraction of the Golgi apparatus during mitosis in animal cells. Science. 2002;295:848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.1068064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Serrano R. L., Kuhn A., Hendricks A., Helms J. B., Sinning I., Groves M. R. Structural analysis of the human Golgi-associated plant pathogenesis related protein GAPR-1 implicates dimerization as a regulatory mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;339:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shima D. T., Haldar K., Pepperkok R., Watson R., Warren G. Partitioning of the Golgi apparatus during mitosis in living HeLa cells. J. Cell Biol. 1997;137:1211–1228. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.6.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Short B., Barr F. A. Membrane traffic: a glitch in the Golgi matrix. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:R311–R313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shorter J., Warren G. Golgi architecture and inheritance. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2002;18:379–420. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.030602.133733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Simons K., Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Simons K., Vaz W. L. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004;33:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Slot J. W., Geuze H. J., Gigengack S., Lienhard G. E., James D. E. Immuno-localization of the insulin regulatable glucose transporter in brown adipose tissue of the rat. J. Cell Biol. 1991;113:123–135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sohn K., Orci L., Ravazzola M., Amherdt M., Bremser M., Lottspeich F., Fiedler K., Helms J. B., Wieland F. T. A major transmembrane protein of Golgi derived COPI coated vesicles involved in coatomer binding. J. Cell Biol. 1996;135:1239–1248. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.5.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Starkuviene V., Liebel U., Simpson J. C., Erfle H., Poustka A., Wiemann S., Pepperkok R. High-content screening microscopy identifies novel proteins with a putative role in secretory membrane traffic. Genome Res. 2004;14:1948–1956. doi: 10.1101/gr.2658304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sutterlin C., Hsu P., Mallabiabarrena A., Malhotra V. Fragmentation and dispersal of the pericentriolar Golgi complex is required for entry into mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell. 2002;109:359–369. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00720-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sutterlin C., Polishchuk R., Pecot M., Malhotra V. The Golgi-associated protein GRASP65 regulates spindle dynamics and is essential for cell division. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:3211–3222. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Udenfriend S., Kodukula K. How glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995;64:563–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.003023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Varma R., Mayor S. GPI-anchored proteins are organized in submicron domains at the cell surface. Nature. 1998;394:798–801. doi: 10.1038/29563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yuan Z., Teasdale R. D. Prediction of Golgi Type II membrane proteins based on their transmembrane domains. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1109–1115. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.8.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zerial M., McBride H. Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001;2:107–117. doi: 10.1038/35052055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental Material]

Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

RESOURCES