Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1989 Jan;55(1):100–105. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.1.100-105.1989

Microbial colonization of injured cactus tissue (Stenocereus gummosus) and its relationship to the ecology of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis.

J C Fogleman 1, J L Foster 1
PMCID: PMC184061  PMID: 2705763

Abstract

Necrotic tissue of agria cactus (Stenocereus gummosus) serves as a feeding and breeding substrate for Drosophila mojavensis. This fly species is one of the four endemic Drosophila species in the Sonoran Desert. Freeze injuries were created in arms of agria cactus in Mexico to study the events of microbial colonization. Facultative anaerobic bacteria were the first microbes to be detected, and the exclusion of large arthropods by covering the injuries with netting did not affect bacterial colonization. Yeast growth lagged behind bacterial growth by 2 days, and excluding arthropods delayed the detection of yeasts by an additional 2 days. Thus, insects (such as Drosophila species) and other arthropods do play a role in the colonization of agria rots by yeasts. All injuries were attractive to D. mojavensis within 5 days, and these flies were shown to be carrying significant densities of both bacteria and yeasts. Analysis of the volatile compounds present in the developing rots over time indicated that the volatile pattern is dynamic. Ethanol and acetic acid were the two volatile substances most likely responsible for the initial attraction of the injuries for Drosophila species.

Full text

PDF
100

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Batterham P., Gritz E., Starmer W. T., Sullivan D. T. Biochemical characterization of the products of the Adh loci of Drosophila mojavensis. Biochem Genet. 1983 Oct;21(9-10):871–883. doi: 10.1007/BF00483946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavener D. Preference for ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism. Behav Genet. 1979 Sep;9(5):359–365. doi: 10.1007/BF01066974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gelfand L. J., McDonald J. F. Relationship between ADH activity and behavioral response to environmental alcohol in Drosophila. Behav Genet. 1980 May;10(3):237–249. doi: 10.1007/BF01067770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Starmer W. T., Barker J. S., Phaff H. J., Fogleman J. C. Adaptations of Drosophila and yeasts: their interactions with the volatile 2-propanol in the cactus-microorganism-Drosophila model system. Aust J Biol Sci. 1986;39(1):69–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Starmer W. T., Heed W. B., Rockwood-Sluss E. S. Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jan;74(1):387–391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES