Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1990 May;56(5):1229–1234. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1229-1234.1990

Antigenic nature of the chloride-stimulated cellobiosidase and other cellulases of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 and related fresh isolates.

L Huang 1, M McGavin 1, C W Forsberg 1, J S Lam 1, K J Cheng 1
PMCID: PMC184387  PMID: 1692677

Abstract

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to the Cl-stimulated cellobiosidase of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 reacted with numerous proteins of both higher and lower molecular weights from F. succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85, but not with Escherichia coli proteins, and only one protein each from Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Ruminococcus albus. Different profiles were observed for Western blots (immunoblots) of peptide digests of both the purified enzyme from F. succinogenes and immunoreactive proteins of higher and lower molecular weights, demonstrating that they were different proteins. Therefore, F. succinogenes appeared to produce numerous proteins with one or more common antigenic determinants. However, with the exception of Cl-stimulated cellobiosidase, none were cellulases that have been characterized. An affinity-purified polyclonal antibody to Cl-stimulated cellobiosidase reacted with numerous proteins in cells of each of three fresh isolates of F. succinogenes subsp. succinogenes and one of F. succinogenes subsp. elongata when analyzed by Western blotting. Antibodies to periplasmic cellodextrinase, endoglucanase 2 (EG2), and EG3, when reacted in Western blots with the various cellulases, including Cl-stimulated cellobiosidase, revealed limited antigenic similarity among the different proteins and none with either B. fibrisolvens or R. albus proteins. The periplasmic cellodextrinase antibody reacted with an antigen with a size corresponding to cellodextrinase in each of the three F. succinogenes subsp. succinogenes isolates but not with any antigens from the F. succinogenes subsp. elongata isolate. The anti-EG2 antibody reacted with single antigens in each of the four isolates, while the anti-EG3 antibody reacted with only one of the four isolates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleveland D. W., Fischer S. G., Kirschner M. W., Laemmli U. K. Peptide mapping by limited proteolysis in sodium dodecyl sulfate and analysis by gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1977 Feb 10;252(3):1102–1106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forsberg C. W., Lam K. Use of adenosine 5'-triphosphate as an indicator of the microbiota biomass in rumen contents. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Mar;33(3):528–537. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.3.528-537.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freeze H. H., Mierendorf R. C., Wunderlich R., Dimond R. L. Sulfated oligosaccharides block antibodies to many Dictyostelium discoideum acid hydrolases. J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10641–10643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Groleau D., Forsberg C. W. Cellulolytic activity of the rumen bacterium Bacteroides succinogenes. Can J Microbiol. 1981 May;27(5):517–530. doi: 10.1139/m81-077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hitchcock P. J., Brown T. M. Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. J Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;154(1):269–277. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.269-277.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang L., Forsberg C. W. Cellulose digestion and cellulase regulation and distribution in Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1221–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1221-1228.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang L., Forsberg C. W. Isolation of a Cellodextrinase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):1034–1041. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.1034-1041.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang L., Forsberg C. W. Purification and Comparison of the Periplasmic and Extracellular Forms of the Cellodextrinase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1488–1493. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.6.1488-1493.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang L., Forsberg C. W., Thomas D. Y. Purification and characterization of a chloride-stimulated cellobiosidase from Bacteroides succinogenes S85. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jul;170(7):2923–2932. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.7.2923-2932.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Knecht D. A., Dimond R. L., Wheeler S., Loomis W. F. Antigenic determinants shared by lysosomal proteins of Dictyostelium discoideum. Characterization using monoclonal antibodies and isolation of mutations affecting the determinant. J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10633–10640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Knecht D. A., Mierendorf R. C., Jr, Dimond R. L. Immunological recognition of modifications on functionally related proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1983;98:159–166. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98146-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lam J. S., Lam M. Y., MacDonald L. A., Hancock R. E. Visualization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O antigens by using a protein A-dextran-colloidal gold conjugate with both immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M monoclonal antibodies. J Bacteriol. 1987 Aug;169(8):3531–3538. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.8.3531-3538.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lane D., Koprowski H. Molecular recognition and the future of monoclonal antibodies. Nature. 1982 Mar 18;296(5854):200–202. doi: 10.1038/296200a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGavin M. J., Forsberg C. W., Crosby B., Bell A. W., Dignard D., Thomas D. Y. Structure of the cel-3 gene from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and characteristics of the encoded gene product, endoglucanase 3. J Bacteriol. 1989 Oct;171(10):5587–5595. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.10.5587-5595.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McGavin M., Forsberg C. W. Catalytic and substrate-binding domains of endoglucanase 2 from Bacteroides succinogenes. J Bacteriol. 1989 Jun;171(6):3310–3315. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.6.3310-3315.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McGavin M., Forsberg C. W. Isolation and characterization of endoglucanases 1 and 2 from Bacteroides succinogenes S85. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jul;170(7):2914–2922. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.7.2914-2922.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McGavin M., Lam J., Forsberg C. W. Regulation and distribution of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 endoglucanases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1235–1244. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1235-1244.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Olmsted J. B. Analysis of cytoskeletal structures using blot-purified monospecific antibodies. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:467–472. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SCOTT H. W., DEHORITY B. A. VITAMIN REQUIREMENTS OF SEVERAL CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA. J Bacteriol. 1965 May;89:1169–1175. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1169-1175.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stewart C. S., Paniagua C., Dinsdale D., Cheng K. J., Garrow S. H. Selective isolation and characteristics of Bacteriodes succinogenes from the rumen of a cow. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):504–510. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.504-510.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES