Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1990 Jun;56(6):1851–1857. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1851-1857.1990

Differential Rates of Digestion of Bacteria by Freshwater and Marine Phagotrophic Protozoa

Juan M González 1,*, Juan Iriberri 1, Luis Egea 1, Isabel Barcina 1
PMCID: PMC184521  PMID: 16348225

Abstract

Differential decreases over time of two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, in a freshwater and a marine ecosystem were observed and explained by a differential rate of digestion of these bacteria by phagotrophic flagellates and ciliates. For this purpose, fluorescence-labeled bacteria (FLB) were used and prepared from the two species cited above. The number of FLB was observed for 5 days in fresh and marine waters in the presence or absence (0.2-μm-pore-size-filtered water) of natural microbiota. These experiments showed a longer persistence of Enterococcus faecalis FLB as opposed to Escherichia coli FLB in the presence of natural microbiota. Removal of FLB was due to protozoan grazing because no decrease of FLB number was observed in the absence of natural microbiota. In short-term (about 40 min) ingestion experiments, we found similar clearance rates of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis FLB by assemblages of flagellates from the freshwater and the marine ecosystem and by cultured assemblages of ciliates from the marine ecosystem. Clearance rates of Enterococcus faecalis FLB were greater than those of Escherichia coli FLB for assemblages of ciliates from the freshwater ecosystem. Comparison of rates of ingestion and digestion of FLB by protozoa showed that Escherichia coli FLB were digested and ingested at similar rates. However, Enterococcus faecalis FLB were digested slower than they were ingested. These results suggest that a longer persistence of Enterococcus faecalis as opposed to Escherichia coli can be explained by a differential digestion by flagellates and ciliates in aquatic ecosystems. Moreover, rates of ingestion and digestion were strongly correlated for both FLB types.

Full text

PDF
1851

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergh O., Børsheim K. Y., Bratbak G., Heldal M. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature. 1989 Aug 10;340(6233):467–468. doi: 10.1038/340467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloem J., Starink M., Bär-Gilissen M. J., Cappenberg T. E. Protozoan grazing, bacterial activity, and mineralization in two-stage continuous cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3113–3121. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3113-3121.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CARLUCCI A. F., PRAMER D. An evaluation of factors affecting the survival of Escherichia coli in sea water. IV. Bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol. 1960 Jul;8:254–256. doi: 10.1128/am.8.4.254-256.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caron D. A., Goldman J. C., Dennett M. R. Effect of temperature on growth, respiration, and nutrient regeneration by an omnivorous microflagellate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Dec;52(6):1340–1347. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.6.1340-1347.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Enzinger R. M., Cooper R. C. Role of bacteria and protozoa in the removal of Escherichia coli from estuarine waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 May;31(5):758–763. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.5.758-763.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flint K. P. The long-term survival of Escherichia coli in river water. J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Sep;63(3):261–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb04945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fok A. K., Valin E. L. Effects of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) on the digestive-lysosomal system in Paramecium caudatum. Eur J Cell Biol. 1983 Nov;32(1):45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gonzalez J. M., Sherr E. B., Sherr B. F. Size-selective grazing on bacteria by natural assemblages of estuarine flagellates and ciliates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar;56(3):583–589. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.3.583-589.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grimes D. J., Atwell R. W., Brayton P. R., Palmer L. M., Rollins D. M., Roszak D. B., Singleton F. L., Tamplin M. L., Colwell R. R. The fate of enteric pathogenic bacteria in estuarine and marine environments. Microbiol Sci. 1986 Nov;3(11):324–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guélin A., Lépine P., Lamblin D. Pouvoir bactéricide des eaux polluées et role de Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1967 Oct;113(4):660–665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hobbie J. E., Daley R. J., Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. King C. H., Shotts E. B., Jr, Wooley R. E., Porter K. G. Survival of coliforms and bacterial pathogens within protozoa during chlorination. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3023–3033. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3023-3033.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCambridge J., McMeekin T. A. Relative effects of bacterial and protozoan predators on survival of Escherichia coli in estuarine water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Nov;40(5):907–911. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.5.907-911.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pettibone G. W., Sullivan S. A., Shiaris M. P. Comparative survival of antibiotic-resistant and -sensitive fecal indicator bacteria in estuarine water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jun;53(6):1241–1245. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1241-1245.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roszak D. B., Colwell R. R. Metabolic activity of bacterial cells enumerated by direct viable count. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2889–2893. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2889-2893.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sherr B. F., Sherr E. B., Berman T. Grazing, growth, and ammonium excretion rates of a heterotrophic microflagellate fed with four species of bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Apr;45(4):1196–1201. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.4.1196-1201.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sherr B. F., Sherr E. B., Fallon R. D. Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):958–965. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.958-965.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sherr B. F., Sherr E. B., Rassoulzadegan F. Rates of digestion of bacteria by marine phagotrophic protozoa: temperature dependence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 May;54(5):1091–1095. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.5.1091-1095.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Starr M. P., Seidler R. J. The Bdellovibros. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:649–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.003245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES