Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Dec 21;127(50):17626–17627. doi: 10.1021/ja056977r

Mass Spectrometry Assisted Assignment of NMR Resonances in Reductively 13C-Methylated Proteins

Megan A Macnaughtan 1, Austin M Kane 1,, James H Prestegard 1,*
PMCID: PMC1847388  NIHMSID: NIHMS13902  PMID: 16351091

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful tool for studying protein structure and dynamics, but in most cases, it relies on extensive incorporation of stable magnetic isotopes to aid in resolution and assignment. Typically, overexpression in a bacterial host is used to uniformly incorporate 13C, 15N, and 2H into a protein. For eukaryotic proteins that are less amenable to bacterial host expression (membrane proteins or glycosylated proteins), labeling through over-expression in eukaryotic hosts can be difficult and expensive. An alternate approach is to isotopically label proteins post-expression via chemical methods. Chemical modification of proteins is an established field of science with highly selective reactions for certain amino acids.1 In many cases the products also mimic those produced by natural post-translational modifications. One protein modification that has already been used successfully with NMR and x-ray crystallography is reductive methylation of lysines. In principle, for NMR, the signals from 13C methyls introduced in this way can be sensitive probes of protein-protein interactions and easily observable sites for collection of distance restraints from paramagnetic perturbations.2 However, assignment of resonances is a prerequisite for these applications and this has always been a problem. In this communication we offer a solution to that problem.

Reductive methylation of proteins was introduced by Means and Feeney in 1968.3 Under mild reaction conditions, the lysine ε-NH2 and N-terminal α-NH2 can be selectively methylated using 13C labeled formaldehyde and a reducing agent such as dimethylamine borane to produce the dimethylated amine. Since its introduction it has been used a number of times to introduce probes of both dynamic and structural properties.2,4,5Assignment approaches have varied, but for the most part these have relied on small numbers of sites, known structural properties of proteins, or extensive genetic modification. For example, Zhang and Vogel studied reductively 13C-methylated calmodulin and demonstrated the complete assignment of the dimethylamine signals through site-directed mutagenesis.6 In 2000, Fisher et al. used MALDI-TOF to identify partially methylated lysines of trypsin-digested human MIP-1α by correlating disappearance of unmodified peptide masses in MS with the appearance of mono- and dimethylamine signals observed in a 2D 1H-13C NMR spectrum.7 Here we present a general method for assigning dimethyllysine and dimethylamine resonances in 2D 1H-13C NMR spectra without prior knowledge of the protein's structure or properties other than the amino acid sequence. This method builds on the previous use of mass spectrometry, but introduces isotope ratio measurements that make quantitation and more extensive assignments possible.

Reductive methylation of hen egg white lysozyme with 13C-formaldehyde was carried out following the procedure described by Rayment.8 Dimethylamine borane complex was used as the reducing agent and various amounts of 13C-formaldehyde were used to reductively methylate aliquots of lysozyme at pH 7.5 in phosphate buffer at 4 °C. Four partially 13C-labeled samples were prepared with molar ratios of 13C-formaldehyde to primary amine of 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 5:1. These samples were subsequently reacted with excess natural abundance formaldehyde to complete the reductive methylation and produce homogeneously modified protein samples. An additional sample was prepared using excess 13C-formaldehyde and was used as a normalization reference for the NMR and MS data.

2D 1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy (HSQC) NMR and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) were used to analyze all reductively methylated lysozyme samples. An NMR spectrum of the fully 13C-labeled lysozyme sample is shown in Figure 1. The 7 expected dimethylamine resonances are observed with high sensitivity and good resolution in the 41-43 ppm 13C chemical shift range. As expected, the monomethylamine region around 32 ppm (not shown) did not show any resonances. Complete reductive methylation of the protein is essential for both quality NMR spectra and quantitative analysis of spectra. Incomplete methylation gives both dimethylamine and monomethylamine resonances. These are resolved in themselves; however, effects of differential methylation of proximate sites perturbs chemical shifts leading to poor quality spectra.5,9

Figure 1.

Figure 1

1H-13C HSQC of 13C-dimethylated lysozyme (120 μM) at pH 8.1 acquired on a 600 MHz spectrometer in approximately 5 minutes.

Assignment of the dimethylamine NMR peaks was accomplished by correlating the amount of 13C incorporation into each dimethylamine group for the four partially 13C-labeled samples. In the NMR spectra, each peak was integrated and normalized to the reference 13C-dimethylamine lysozyme sample. Table 1 lists the 13C incorporation percentage for each peak and each sample. As expected, the amount of 13C incorporated at each site (lysine or N-terminal amine) increased with increasing moles of 13C-formaldehyde used in the reaction mixture. More importantly, for most ratios, the extent of 13C incorporation at each site differed indicating that the individual chemical environments play a role in the reaction and the dimethylamine groups can be distinguished on this basis.

Table 1.

Normalized peak volumes from 1H-13C HSQC spectra of the four partially 13C-labeled samples.

NMR peak 0.5:1 sample 1:1 sample 2:1 sample 5:1 sample
1 9.9 18.0 33.7 71.4
2 8.8 12.8 25.3 61.1
3 11.6 17.3 32.0 70.3
4 5.2 7.5 15.4 38.6
5 8.8 11.9 26.1 60.0
6 --- --- 10.7 30.2
7 19.9 21.5 34.7 78.3

MALDI-TOF MS using a α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid/acetonitrile matrix was then used to measure levels of 13C incorporation in specifically identified peptide sequences. A small aliquot from each sample was proteolyzed with trypsin (trypsin does not cleave efficiently at dimethyllysine, so primarily arginine sites were cleaved). Figure 2 shows the MALDI-TOF data from the peptide containing lysine 13 for every sample. The average mass in the profile shifts by 2 mass units as the amount of 13C-formaldehyde used is increased; this limit corresponds to the final addition of 2 13C's in the methyl groups. For each peptide containing a dimethylamine group, the average mass was calculated at each reaction ratio. The reference 13C-dimethylamine lysozyme sample was used to correct for natural abundance contributions at non-methyl sites and to normalize the data to give the percentages of 13C incorporation listed in Table 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MS isotope profiles for the tryptic peptide containing a single dimethyllysine (Res. #6-14 CELAAAMKR) at various reaction stoichiometries. The reaction conditions in moles of 13C formaldehyde relative to the moles of reactive amines are listed along with the normalized percentages of 13C incorporation calculated from the profiles.

Table 2.

The normalized percentages of 13C incorporation for each peptide containing either one or two dimethylamines.

Lysine/amine in peptide 0.5:1 sample 1:1 sample 2:1 sample 5:1 sample
N-terminal amine, K1 15.4 14.1 17.9 44.8
K13 12.1 17.7 33.6 71.5
K33 10.5 11.5 27.6 64.5
K96, K97 --- 13.2 23.0 52.1
K97 15.5 19.8 36.0 81.8
K116 5.5 11.0 24.2 56.9
K96 (back-calculated) --- 4.7 11.2 23.7

Analysis of differential levels of isotope incorporation is superior to simply monitoring the disappearance of unmodified or monomethylated peptides. The intensities of signals from different chemical species in MS are not directly related to concentration, but related to ionization efficiencies and other factors, and the intensities of peaks from nonmethylated lysine, monomethylated lysine, and dimethylated lysine, could not easily be used to calculate the percent of modification. Completing the reductive methylation on partially 13C-labeled samples with natural abundance formaldehyde also produces homogeneous protein samples that facilitate analysis of both NMR and MS data.

Assignment of the NMR peaks can be made by comparing the NMR and MS percentages of 13C incorporation in Tables 1 and 2. While all reaction ratios can contribute to assignment, we illustrate this with data from the 5:1 reaction. The four peptides containing single lysines, including K13, K33, K97, and K116, are simplest to analyze. The fastest methylating lysine is K97 (81.8% 13C incorporation) and can be assigned to NMR peak 7 with 78.3% incorporation. Peaks 1 and 3 have very similar incorporation values of 71.4% and 70.3%, respectively, and either can be assigned to K13 (71.5%). Likewise, the values for peaks 2 and 5 are comparable (61.1% and 60.0%) and can be assigned to either K33 (64.5%) or K116 (56.9%).

MS data for K96 occurs only in combination with K97. Since trypsin is not efficient at cleaving at dimethyllysine, these lysines remain together in the dominant tryptic peptide and their MS data are an average of the two sites. As it turns out, a small percentage of unmethylated and mono-methylated sites do exist in the protein and a small amount of cleaved peptide is actually present giving data separately for K97. The value for K96 can, therefore, be back-calculated using MS data for K97 and the K96-K97 pair. K96 turns out to be the slowest methylating site with 23.7% 13C incorporation, and can be assigned to peak 6 (30.2%). By process of elimination, the N-terminal amine and K1 must be assigned to peak 4 and one of the peaks 1 or 3. The N-terminal dimethylamine peak can be distinguished from the other peaks by the presence of a strong NOE to the Hα of the N-terminal amino acid (data not shown). On the basis of the appearance of such an NOE, peak 4 can be assigned to the N-terminal dimethylamine and peaks 1 or 3 to K1. Hence, we have been able to make definitive assignments for three of the seven peaks and reduce ambiguities to a pairwise assignment for the remaining four. It is possible that running the methylation reaction at a different pH could remove this final ambiguity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Research Resources, RR005351.

References

  • (1).Lundblad RL. Chemical reagents for protein modification; CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) Moore GR, Cox MC, Crowe D, Osborne MJ, Rosell FI, Bujons J, Barker PD, Mauk MR, Mauk AG. Biochem. J. 1998;332:439–449. doi: 10.1042/bj3320439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dick LR, Geraldes CFGC, Sherry AD, Gray CW, Gray DM. Biochem. 1989;28:7896–7904. doi: 10.1021/bi00445a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Means GE, Feeney RE. Biochem. 1968;7:2192–2201. doi: 10.1021/bi00846a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) Brown LR, Bradbury JH. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975;54:219–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb04131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jentoft JE, Gerken TA, Jentoft N, Dearborn DG. J. Biol. Chem. 1981;256:231–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Goux WJ, Teherani J, Sherry AD. Biophys. Chem. 1984;19:363–373. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(84)87019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Dick LR, Sherry AD, Newkirk MM, Gray DM. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:18864–188872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Jentoft JE. Methods in Enzymol. 1991;203:261–274. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)03014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Sparks DL, Phillips MC, Lund-Katz S. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:25830–25838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Gerken TA, Jentoft JE, Jentoft N, Dearborn DG. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;257:2894–2900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Zhang M, Vogel HJ. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:22420–22428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Ashfield JT, Meyers T, Lowne D, Varley PG, Arnold JRP, Tan P, Yang J-C, Czaplewski LG, Dudgeon T, Fisher J. Protein Science. 2000;9:2047–2053. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.10.2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Rayment I. Methods in Enzymol. 1997;276:171–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9). Chemical shift changes with the extent of methylation were observed for peaks 6 and 7 for partially reductively 13C-methylated lysozyme samples not described in this paper.

RESOURCES