Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1990 Sep;56(9):2618–2622. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.9.2618-2622.1990

Interactions between Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and Fathead Minnows, Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, under Laboratory Conditions

Virginia M Snarski 1
PMCID: PMC184810  PMID: 16348271

Abstract

Interactions between Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, were studied in laboratory exposures to two commercial formulations, Vectobac-G and Mosquito Attack. Mortality among fatheads exposed to 2.0 × 106 to 6.5 × 106 CFU/ml with both formulations was attributed to severe dissolved oxygen depletion due to formulation ingredients rather than to direct toxicity from the parasporal crystal. No adverse effects were observed at 6.4 × 105 CFU/ml and below. Fathead minnows rapidly accumulated high numbers of spores with 1 h of exposure to 2.2 × 105 CFU of Mosquito Attack per ml, producing whole-body counts of 4.0 × 106 CFU per fish. Comparison of counts on gastrointestinal tract samples and whole-body samples and high numbers of spores in feces indicated that ingestion was the major route of exposure. B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis spore counts decreased rapidly after transfer of fish to clean water, with a drop of over 3 orders of magnitude in 1 day. Spores were rarely detected in fish after 8 days but were detectable in feces for over 2 weeks. These findings suggest that fish could influence the dissemination of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and possibly other microbial agents, in the aquatic environment.

Full text

PDF
2618

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brazner J. C., Anderson R. L. Ingestion and Adsorption of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis by Gammarus lacustris in the Laboratory. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Dec;52(6):1386–1390. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.6.1386-1390.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GLANTZ P. J., KRANTZ G. E. ESCHERICHIA COLI SEROTYPES ISOLATED FROM FISH AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT. Health Lab Sci. 1965 Jan;2:54–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Geldreich E. E., Clarke N. A. Bacterial pollution indicators in the intestinal tract of freshwater fish. Appl Microbiol. 1966 May;14(3):429–437. doi: 10.1128/am.14.3.429-437.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller L. K., Lingg A. J., Bulla L. A., Jr Bacterial, viral, and fungal insecticides. Science. 1983 Feb 11;219(4585):715–721. doi: 10.1126/science.219.4585.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohana B., Margalit J., Barak Z. Fate of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis under Simulated Field Conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Apr;53(4):828–831. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.828-831.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Trust T. J. Bacteria associated with the gills of salmonid fishes in freshwater. J Appl Bacteriol. 1975 Jun;38(3):225–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1975.tb00527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Trust T. J., Sparrow R. A. The bacterial flora in the alimentary tract of freshwater salmonid fishes. Can J Microbiol. 1974 Sep;20(9):1219–1228. doi: 10.1139/m74-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES