Abstract
The modified broth-disk susceptibility test was used to assess the incidence of clindamycin resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group. Over a 34-month period, 544 isolates were tested, 21 (4%) of which were found to be resistant. There was no significant difference in resistance among the six species, and resistance did not increase with time. In a 12-disk assay, the concentrations of clindamycin achieved approximated the concentrations expected (expected breakpoint, 4.8 micrograms/ml).
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Acar J. F., Goldstein F. W., Kitzis M. D., Eyquem M. T. Resistance pattern of anaerobic bacteria isolated in a general hospital during a two-year period. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):9–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bawdon R. E., Rozmiej E., Palchaudhuri S., Krakowiak J. Variability in the susceptibility pattern of Bacteroides fragilis in four Detroit area hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):664–666. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blazevic D. J. Antibiotic susceptibility of the subspecies of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Mar;9(3):481–484. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuchural G., Jacobus N., Gorbach S. L., Tally F. P. A survey of Bacteroides susceptibility in the United States. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):27–31. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drulak M. W., Chow A. W. Comparative in vitro activity of ceftizoxime, cefoperazone, and cefoxitin against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Nov;20(5):683–685. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.5.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubois J., Pechère J. C., Turgeon P. Activity of ten antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978 Jul;4(4):329–334. doi: 10.1093/jac/4.4.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edson R. S., Rosenblatt J. E., Lee D. T., McVey E. A., 3rd Recent experience with antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria: increasing resistance to penicillin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1982 Dec;57(12):737–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins S. G., Birk R. J., Zabransky R. J. Differences in susceptibilities of species of the Bacteroides fragilis group to several beta-lactam antibiotics: indole production as an indicator of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):628–634. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.4.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Fuchs P. C. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of 250 Bacteriodes fragilis subspecies tested by broth microdilution methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):719–721. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.4.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurzynski T. A., Yrios J. W., Helstad A. G., Field C. R. Aerobically incubated thioglycolate broth disk method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):727–732. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macrina F. L., Mays T. K., Smith C. J., Welch R. A. Non-plasmid associated transfer of antibiotic resistance in Bacteroides. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):77–86. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mays T. D., Smith C. J., Welch R. A., Delfini C., Macrina F. L. Novel antibiotic resistance transfer in Bacteroides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jan;21(1):110–118. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.1.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips I., Warren C., Taylor E., Timewell R., Eykyn S. The antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in a London teaching hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):17–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenblatt J. E., Murray P. R., Sonnenwirth A. C., Joyce J. L. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351–355. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sosa A., Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L. Bacteroides fragilis resistance to clindamycin in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):771–774. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.5.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Barry A. L., Wilkins T. D., Zabransky R. J. Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):495–502. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.4.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Snydman D. R., Shimell M. J., Malamy M. H. Characterization of pBFTM10, a clindamycin-erythromycin resistance transfer factor from Bacteroides fragilis. J Bacteriol. 1982 Aug;151(2):686–691. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.2.686-691.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Sosa A., Jacobus N. V., Malamy M. H. Clindamycin resistance in Bacteroides fragilis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):43–48. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins T. D., Thiel T. Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):350–356. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.3.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yee M. H., Guiney D. G., Hasegawa P., Davis C. E. The clinical significance of clindamycin-resistant Bacteroides fragilis. JAMA. 1982 Oct 15;248(15):1860–1861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
