Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006 Dec 21;17(5):1160–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.12.042

Opioids and Efflux Transporters. 1. P-Glycoprotein Substrate Activity of N-Substituted Analogs of Meperidine.

Susan L Mercer 1, Christopher W Cunningham 1, Hazem Hassan 1, Natalie D Eddington 1, Andrew Coop 1,*
PMCID: PMC1850229  NIHMSID: NIHMS19161  PMID: 17251015

Abstract

P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter which is up-regulated at the blood brain barrier in both morphine and oxycodone tolerant rats. Numerous studies have shown that many clinically employed opioid analgesics are substrates for P-gp, suggesting that up-regulation of P-gp may contribute to the development of central tolerance to opioids. The studies herein focus on the development of SAR for P-gp substrate activity in the meperidine series of compounds, and show that a meperidine analog of greater potency, N-phenylbutyl-N-normeperidine, has low activity as a P-gp substrate and has the potential to be utilized as a tool to study the contribution of P-gp on the development of central tolerance to opioids.


The development of improved agents for the treatment of chronic pain remains an important goal in public health1. The vast majority of currently employed agents for the treatment of severe chronic pain are opioid analgesics, which act as agonists at mu opioid receptors in the CNS.2 Unfortunately, clinically employed opioid analgesics suffer from the development of tolerance, necessitating escalating doses to maintain the patient in a pain-free state3, thereby leading to escalated side-effects such as constipation4, 5. Numerous mechanisms at the receptor and cellular level have been indicated in the development of tolerance to mu opioid receptor agonists6, but recent reports have suggested that efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may also contribute towards the development of central tolerance7, 8. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter which is located in numerous tissues9, and its function at the BBB is to actively remove xenobiotics from the CNS9. Two commonly employed opioid analgesics, morphine (1) and oxycodone (2) (Figure 1), are known substrates for this transporter and rats tolerant to both morphine8 and oxycodone7 show up-regulation in P-gp level at the BBB Thus, on chronic administration, the up-regulated P-gp would be expected to result in lower brain concentrations of opioid thereby exacerbating tolerance to the central analgesic effects. P-gp knockout animals are available and offer a useful model to study the effects of P-gp on opioids10, but an alternative approach in wild-type animals is the development of mu opioid receptor agonists which are not substrates for P-gp. These compounds would allow a full investigation of the contribution of up-regulated P-gp to opioid tolerance as full cross-tolerance between morphine and the opioid with no P-gp substrate activity would not be anticipated to occur, and also potentially be developed into opioid analgesics with lower degrees of tolerance.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Morphine (1) and oxycodone (2)

The mu opioid analgesic meperidine (3) has been shown to possess low activity as a P-gp substrate11, but only moderate antinociceptive activity in vivo12, 13, thus initial investigations described herein are focused on delineating the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of the N-substituent in this class for low P-gp substrate activity, while increasing mu opioid potency based on known SAR for potency in this series13.

A range of previously reported and novel N-substituted analogs of meperidine were prepared from nitrile 4 (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc), via alkylation with alkyl halides in DMF in the presence of K2CO3, followed by hydrolysis of the nitrile to the ethyl esters (5–14) through treatment with H2SO4 and EtOH14 (Scheme 1). The alkyl substituents were chosen based on known active merperidine analogs and also following a series as previously described for other classes of opioids15, and include arylalky, alkyl, and branched alkyl groups (Table 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Table 1.

Compounds prepared, salt form, yield, and melting points. Citations reference previously known compounds.

R Ester Salt, Yield, mp
CH3 314 Oxalate, 7%, 190–192°C
(CH2)2(C6H5) 516 Oxalate, 33%, 205–20°C
(CH2)3(C6H5) 617 Oxalate, 14%, 225°C
(CH2)4(C6H5) 717 Oxalate, 25%, 170°C
CH2(C6H5) 814 Oxalate, 46%, 204–205°C
CH2CH=CH2 918 Oxalate, 40%, 213–214°C
(CH2)2CH3 1019 Oxalate, 57%, 215–216°C
CH2CH=CHCH3 11 Oxalate, 67%, 173–177°C
(CH2)3CH3 1219 Oxalate, 24%, 190–192°C
CH2C(CH3)=CH2 13 Oxalate, 35%, 180–181°C
CH2CH(CH3)2 14 Oxalate, 55%, 165–167°C

All esters were converted to oxalate salts (Scheme 1). Drug stimulated P-gp ATPase activity was estimated by Pgp-Glo assay system20 (Promega, Madison, WI) and the results were shown in Figure 2. This method relies on the ATP dependence of the light-generating reaction of firefly luciferase where ATP consumption is detected as a decrease in luminescence, the greater the decrease in signal the higher the P-gp activity. Sodium orthovanadate was used as a P-gp ATPase inhibitor, whereas verapamil was used as a positive control. Test compounds (all tested at 200 μM) which are significantly lower than the control (NT) are P-gp substrates, whereas test compounds significantly higher than the NT are P-gp inhibitors. Compounds which are not significantly different from the NT are neither P-gp substrates nor inhibitors.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results of compounds and standards in the Pgp-Glo assay system; all compounds assayed at 200 μM. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n=4). * indicates significant difference from the control at p <0.05 as indicated by t-test.

The P-gp substrate activity of the esters showed differences depending on the nature of the N-substituent. Most analogs were substrates for P-gp like verapermil, with the exception of meperidine itself and N-phenylbutyl-N-normeperidine (7). These results show a distinct SAR for P-gp substrate activity in this series as N-phenylalkyl analogs of shorter length (phenethyl (5), phenylpropyl (6)) were substrates.

Previous studies have shown that 7 has twice the antinociceptive activity as meperidine13. Thus 7 has the profile of low P-gp substrate activity and greater potency than meperidine required for use as a tool to study the contribution of P-gp upregulation on the development of opioid tolerance and cross tolerance between opioids with P-gp substrate activity and opioids that are not P-gp substrates. Studies on this compound are currently underway, and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (NIDA, NIH) for financial support (DA-13583), and also the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy for partial support. AC is supported by an Independent Scientist Award (K02 DA019634).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Tabakian HM. Mo Med. 2005;102:456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pasternak GW. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47:312. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zieglgansberger W, Tolle T, Zimprich A, Hollt V, Spanagel R. Pain and the Brain. 1995;22:439. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McNicol E, Horowicz-Mehler N, Fisk RA, Bennett K, Gialeli-Goudas M, Chew PW, Lau J, Carr D. J Pain. 2003;4:231. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00556-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Luca A, Coupar IM. Pharmacol Ther. 1996;69:103. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(95)02053-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kieffer BL, Evans CJ. Cell. 2002;108:587. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hassan HE, Myers AL, Lee IJ, Coop A, Eddington ND. J Pharm Sci. 2006 accepted. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ambudkar SV, Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Sauna ZE, Gottesman MM. Oncogene. 2003;22:7468. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aquilante CL, Letrent SP, Pollack GM, Brouwer KL. Life Sci. 2000;66:47. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00599-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie R, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, de Boer AG, de Lange EC. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:563. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dagenais C, Graff CL, Pollack GM. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;67:269. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Janssen PAJ, Eddy NB. J Med Pharm Chem. 1960;2:31. doi: 10.1021/jm50008a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Casy AF, Parfitt RT. Opioid Analgesics: Chemistry and Receptors. Plenum Press; New York: 1986. Chapter 6. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eisleb O. Chem Ber. 1941;74:1433. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McLamore S, Ullrich T, Rothman RB, Xu H, Dersch C, Coop A, Davis P, Porreca F, Jacobson AE, Rice KC. J Med Chem. 2001;44:1471. doi: 10.1021/jm000511w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perrine TD, Eddy NB. J Org Chem. 1956;21:125. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elpern B, Gardner LN, Grumbach L. J Am Chem Soc. 1957;79:1951. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thorp RH, Walton E. J Chem Soc. 1947:559. doi: 10.1039/jr9480000559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Walton E, Green MB. J Chem Soc. 1945:315. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ambudkar SV, Dey S, Hrycyna CA, Ramachandra M, Pastan I, Gottesman MM. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;39:361. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES