Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 2002 May;160(5):1857–1865. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61132-7

Mitochondrial DNA Somatic Mutations (Point Mutations and Large Deletions) and Mitochondrial DNA Variants in Human Thyroid Pathology

A Study with Emphasis on Hürthle Cell Tumors

Valdemar Máximo *, Paula Soares *†, Jorge Lima *, José Cameselle-Teijeiro , Manuel Sobrinho-Simões *†§
PMCID: PMC1850872  PMID: 12000737

Abstract

In an attempt to progress in the understanding of the relationship of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alterations and thyroid tumorigenesis, we studied the mtDNA in 79 benign and malignant tumors (43 Hürthle and 36 non-Hürthle cell neoplasms) and respective normal parenchyma. The mtDNA common deletion (CD) was evaluated by semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction. Somatic point mutations and sequence variants of mtDNA were searched for in 66 tumors (59 patients) and adjacent parenchyma by direct sequencing of 70% of the mitochondrial genome (including all of the 13 OXPHOS system genes). We detected 57 somatic mutations, mostly transitions, in 34 tumors and 253 sequence variants in 59 patients. Follicular and papillary carcinomas carried a significantly higher prevalence of nonsilent point mutations of complex I genes than adenomas. We also detected a significantly higher prevalence of complex I and complex IV sequence variants in the normal parenchyma adjacent to the malignant tumors. Every Hürthle cell tumor displayed a relatively high percentage (up to 16%) of mtDNA CD independently of the lesion’s histotype. The percentage of deleted mtDNA molecules was significantly higher in tumors with D-loop mutations than in mtDNA stable tumors. Sequence variants of the ATPase 6 gene, one of the complex V genes thought to play a role in mtDNA maintenance and integrity in yeast, were significantly more prevalent in patients with Hürthle cell tumors than in patients with non-Hürthle cell neoplasms. We conclude that mtDNA variants and mtDNA somatic mutations of complex I and complex IV genes seem to be involved in thyroid tumorigenesis. Germline polymorphisms of the ATPase 6 gene are associated with the occurrence of mtDNA CD, the hallmark of Hürthle cell tumors.


Hürthle (oxyphil) cells are found in a minority of thyroid tumors, either benign (Hürthle cell adenoma) or malignant (Hürthle cell variants of follicular and papillary carcinoma), as well as in other types of thyroid tumors and several nonneoplastic thyroid disorders. 1,2 Hürthle cells are characterized by a large, granular, eosinophilic cytoplasm, which is filled with abnormal mitochondria. Most Hürthle cell tumors are sporadic and frequently occur in association with autoimmune thyroiditis, but their occurrence in a familial setting has also been reported. 3,4 The abundance of abnormal mitochondria makes Hürthle cell tumors a good model to study mtDNA abnormalities in human cancer.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is thought to be more susceptible than nuclear DNA to mutagen-induced damage for several reasons: mtDNA polymerase γ replicates the DNA with poor fidelity, 5 mtDNA is a naked (without histones) molecule to which chemical carcinogens can easily bind, 6,7 and mtDNA is particularly susceptible to the high concentration of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria. 8 Nuclear microsatellite instability (nMSI) is related to functional loss of mismatch repair genes, including the hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2 genes. 9,10 In the mitochondrial genome, the mismatch repair system has been found only in yeast strains in which MSH1 and MSH2 are separately involved in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA repair systems, respectively. 11 No MSH1 homologue has been found in mammalian cells and it remains uncertain whether a mismatch repair system plays a role in the maintenance of the mammalian mitochondrial genome.

The term mitochondrial microsatellite instability (mtMSI) was introduced by Habano and colleagues, 12 in a study on colorectal tumors, to describe alterations in repetitive regions of mtDNA. For the evaluation of mtMSI, Habano and colleagues 12 quantified the alterations in two simple repeat sequences in a noncoding displacement-loop (D-loop) region in mtDNA. Additional studies have addressed the issue of mtMSI in human cancers 13-17 without reaching concordant conclusions about the relationship between the instability of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. 12-17

Alterations of mtDNA have been demonstrated in various types of human cancer and include large deletions, missense mutations, frameshift mutations, and small deletions/insertions. 1,12-26 mtDNA is a hot spot for mutations in cancer as it is preferentially damaged by many carcinogens. 6,7 The role of mtDNA somatic mutations in this setting is not yet understood. 14,21-23

We have previously detected the mitochondrial common deletion (mtDNA CD) in a small series of thyroid tumors composed of Hürthle (oxyphil) cells, as well as in some nonneoplastic thyroid lesions with incipient Hürthle cell changes. 18,24 The mtDNA CD has also been detected in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis displaying oxyphilic cells. 1

Very few studies analyzing mtDNA mutations in thyroid have been published to date. 1,18,23,24,26,27 Such studies were limited by the small size of the samples and the small percentage of mtDNA analyzed per case. 1,18,23,24,26,27 In an attempt to progress in the understanding of the putative relationship between mtDNA alterations in thyroid tumors in general, and Hürthle cell tumors in particular, we searched for mtDNA alterations in a large series of thyroid tumors, including both benign and malignant lesions, paying a special attention to the different histotypes of Hürthle cell neoplasms. In each case we have also analyzed the mtDNA of normal adjacent parenchyma in an attempt to find sequence variants of mtDNA putatively associated with the occurrence of Hürthle cell tumors.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Seventy-nine thyroid tumors from 68 patients were studied. In 11 patients there were two distinct lesions that were separately studied. The 79 lesions were classified according to Hedinger and colleagues 28 and Rosai and colleagues 29 as follicular adenoma (n = 15), follicular Hürthle cell adenoma (n = 20), follicular carcinoma (n = 5), follicular Hürthle cell carcinoma (n = 13), papillary carcinoma (n = 16), and papillary Hürthle cell carcinoma (n = 10). Samples from 32 lesions were obtained at the time of surgery, together with the corresponding normal adjacent tissues; these samples were carefully dissected by expert pathologists and snap-frozen. In 47 cases, microdissected paraffin-embedded material was used for the screening of mtDNA mutations because of the absence of representative tumor tissue in the frozen samples.

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from microdissected frozen and/or paraffin-embedded pathological and normal thyroid tissue pairs using the NucleoSpin Tissue Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany).

Screening of mtDNA CD by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The detection of mtDNA CD was performed using two sets of primers: Mitout-F and Mitout-R (outside the deletion region) and Mitin-F and Mitin-R (within the deletion region). 16,18 In the wild-type mtDNA only the Mitin primer set gives a PCR product with 142 bp. In cases with the mtDNA CD, Mitin primers amplify a 142-bp target sequence and Mitout primers an aberrant PCR product with 214 bp. 16 PCR amplifications were performed in a 25-μl volume containing 200 μmol/L of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol of each of the forward and reverse primers, 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, (pH 9.0), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Biosciences, Lda, Buckinghamshire, England). Cycling conditions were a single predenaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 20 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 20 seconds, and a final incubation at 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR products were inspected by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels.

Semiquantitative PCR

For the quantitation of the percentage of mtDNA molecules deleted in each sample, PCR co-amplification of two fragments of mtDNA (one within and the other outside the deletion region) were performed. PCR co-amplifications were performed in a 25-μl volume containing 200 μmol/L of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol of each of the forward and reverse of both sets of primers, 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, (pH 9.0), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Biosciences, Lda). Cycling conditions were a single predenaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes followed by 18 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 62°C for 20 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 20 seconds, and a final incubation at 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR products were inspected by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. The optimal number of cycles of amplification to allow quantitation of the two PCR products was determined using three samples of normal thyroid. Two hundred ng of each DNA sample were subjected to a number of amplification cycles ranging from 10 to 25 cycles. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The intensity of the fluorescence was automatically measured and integrated with the genescan software Image Master (Amersham Biosciences, Lda). A close to exponential increase in the amount of PCR product was obtained between 15 and 23 cycles for both fragment products. In every semiquantitative PCR experiment 18 cycles were used. The determination of the optimal annealing temperature of the two sets of primers was performed using the same three samples of DNA of normal thyroid samples used in the determination of the optimal number of cycles for amplification. PCR triplicates of 200 ng of DNA of each sample were used for co-amplification of both fragments. Cycling conditions were a single predenaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes followed by 18 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 seconds, annealing varying between 54°C and 65°C for 20 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 20 seconds, and a final incubation at 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR products were inspected by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. At 62°C the amount of PCR products of both fragments was similar. In all quantitation analyses, 18 cycles of PCR amplification and an annealing temperature of 62°C were used.

Screening of mtDNA Somatic Mutations and mtDNA Variants by Direct Sequencing

By PCR/direct sequencing we analyzed 66 thyroid tumors and the respective adjacent normal thyroid tissue, surgically excised from 59 patients. In the remaining 13 tumors the study could not be performed for technical reasons. In seven cases (patients 52 to 58) blood samples were also analyzed. Using fragments varying from 0.6 to 1.4 kb we have screened 70% of the mitochondrial genome: all mtDNA coding genes, 46% of tRNA genes (tRNAPhe, Gly, Lys, Asp, Leu1, Ser1, His, Leu2, Ile, Ser2, Glu, Arg) and 52% of D-loop region. Details of PCR primers and sequencing primers are available on request from the authors. All PCR amplifications were performed in a 25-μl volume containing 200 μmol/L of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol of each of the forward and reverse primers, 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, (pH 9.0), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Biosciences Lda). Cycling conditions were a single predenaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 58°C for 20 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 1 minute, and a final incubation at 72°C for 5 minutes. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels and purified using the NucleoSpin Extract Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Sequencing analysis was then performed on purified products using the ABI Prism dGTP BigDye Terminator Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA) and an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). Both strands were screened using the original primers. Sequences were compared against a comprehensive mitochondrial databank (MITOMAP: A Human Mitochondrial Genome Database. Center for Molecular Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. http://www.gen.emory.edu/mitomap.html, 2000). All mtDNA-altered samples were subjected to an additional complete analysis.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the chi-square test with the Yates correction, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test. A nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney) was also used whenever appropriate. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MtDNA CD Screening

The overall results are summarized in Table 1 . The mtDNA CD was found in all Hürthle cell tumors (100%, n = 43), in 5 of 15 (33.3%) adenomas, and in 3 of 16 (18.8%) papillary carcinomas without Hürthle cell features. The occurrence of mtDNA CD was significantly associated (P < 0.001) with Hürthle cell tumors. The mtDNA CD was also detected at very low levels in the normal adjacent thyroid tissue of some cases (Table 1) . The histological study of the specimens in which mtDNA CD was observed, including the positive peritumoral tissues, revealed either typical Hürthle cells or follicular cells with relatively abundant, granular, oxyphilic cytoplasm of a kind we have previously designated as incipient Hürthle cell transformation. 2,18

Table 1.

Screening and Evaluation of the mtDNA CD in Seventy-Nine Tumors and in the Corresponding Adjacent Parenchyma*

Diagnosis No. of cases Percentage of cases showing the mtDNA CD, % Percentage of deleted mtDNA (mean ± SD), %
AP 15 0 0
A 15 33.3 0.5 ± 0.7
AP 20 25.0 0.3 ± 1.0
HCA 20 100 4.3 ± 1.6
AP 5 0 0
FC 5 0 0
AP 12 33.3 0.3 ± 0.4
HCFC 13 100 7.4 ± 2.2
AP 16 12.5 0.04 ± 0.2
PC 16 18.8 0.2 ± 0.3
AP 9 33.3 0.1 ± 0.3
HCPC 10 100 4.3 ± 1.6

*In two cases there was no adjacent parenchyma available for study.

AP, Adjacent parenchyma; A, adenoma; HCA, Hürthle cell adenoma; FC, follicular carcinoma; HCFC, Hürthle cell follicular carcinoma; PC, papillary carcinoma; HCPC, Hürthle cell papillary carcinoma.

Percentage of mtDNA CD

The average percentage and the SD of mtDNA CD in the lesions of each group are summarized in Table 1 . The amount of mtDNA CD was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in Hürthle cell tumors than in non-Hürthle cell tumors independently of the benignity or malignancy of the lesions. The percentage of mtDNA CD was significantly higher (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0012, respectively) in Hürthle cell follicular carcinomas (7.4 ± 2.2%) than in Hürthle cell adenomas (4.3 ± 1.6%) and Hürthle cell papillary carcinomas (4.3 ± 1.6%) (Table 1) .

MtDNA Somatic Point Mutations

D-Loop Region

The results of the screening of D-loop somatic mutations are summarized in Table 2 . Most of the mutations found in the D-loop region were located in repetitive regions. Following Habano and colleagues 20 we classified the tumors displaying somatic mutations in repetitive regions (variations in the number of repetitive units) as lesions with mtDNA D-loop instability. MtDNA D-loop instability was detected in 32 of 66 (48.5%) tumors (Table 2) . By tumor type, mtDNA D-loop instability was found in 3 of 10 (30.0%) adenomas, 12 of 20 (60.0%) Hürthle cell adenomas, 1 of 4 (25.0%) follicular carcinomas, 7 of 13 (53.9%) Hürthle cell follicular carcinomas, 5 of 12 (41.7%) papillary carcinomas, and in 4 of 7 (57.1%) Hürthle cell papillary carcinomas. The percentage of tumors with D-loop instability is similar (P = 0.822) in benign (50.0%, 15 of 30) and in malignant tumors (47.2%, 17 of 36). The percentage of Hürthle cell tumors with mtDNA D-loop instability (57.5%, 23 of 40) is higher, although not significantly (P = 0.069), than the percentage of non-Hürthle cell tumors with mtDNA D-loop instability (34.6%, 9 of 26).

Table 2.

Summary of mtDNA D-Loop Alterations in Sixty-Six Tumors

Case Age Diagnosis Nucleotide position Nucleotide change
1 57 PC 514 CA7 → CA4
2 51 HCFC 303 C6 → C6,7
497 C → T
499 G → A
3 32 HCFC 303 C6 → C8,9
325 C → T
514 CA5 → CA6
568 C6 → C8
4 39 HCFC 568 C6 → C8–10
5 33 HCFC 460 T → C
514 CA5 → CA7
6 76 HCFC 514 CA5 → CA6
7 62 HCPC 303 C7 → C8
514 CA5 → CA6
9 49 HCA 303 C6 → C8
10A 63 PC 303 C7 → C8
10B 63 HCA 195 T → C
303 C7 → C8
12A 45 HCA 303 C6 → C8
481 C → T
14 34 HCA 303 C7 → C9,10
15 59 HCA 303 C7 → C8
16A 67 HCA 303 C7 → C8
456 C → T
16B 67 HCA 303 C7 → C8,9
17 57 HCA 462 C → T
303 C7 → C8
18 38 HCA 207 G → A
303 C7 → C8,9
568 C6 → C7
19 54 HCFC 115 T → C
514 CA5 → CA6
21 8 HCPC 185 G → A
514 CA4 → CA4–6
22 46 HCPC 303 C7 → C8
514 CA5 → CA6
27 48 HCFC 514 CA5 → CA6
28 42 A 303 C7 → C9,10
32 32 HCPC 303 C7 → C9,10
39 53 PC 514 CA5 → CA8
549 C → T
40 77 HCA 514 CA5 → CA6,7
41 40 FC 150 C → T
303 C7 → C8–10
46 67 A 514 CA7 → CA6
51 54 PC 303 C7 → C8–12
325 C → T
514 CA5 → CA6,7
53 37 A 98 C del
514 CA4 → CA5
54 56 HCA 303 C7 → C8
57 34 HCA 73 A → G
107 G del
303 C7 → C8,9
60 56 PC 150 C → T
514 CA5 → CA6

Coding Genes/tRNAs

The results of the screening of mtDNA somatic mutations in coding genes, including tRNAs genes, are summarized in Tables 3 4, and 5 . We detected 57 mtDNA somatic mutations in 34 of the 66 (51.5%) tumors (Table 3) . These somatic mutations include three deletions [one of 15 bp in the CytB gene (patient 3) and two in the COII gene, one of 573 bp (patient 3) and another of 569 bp (patient 9)]; three tRNA somatic point mutations, one in the tRNASer2 (patient 14), another in the tRNAAla (patient 30), and another in tRNAIle (patient 41); and 51 point mutations in the OXPHOS system genes (Table 3) . From these 51 point mutations, 25 (49.0%) were silent mutations and 26 (51.0%) were missense mutations (Table 3) ; 44 of the 54 (81.5%) somatic point mutations (3 in tRNAs and 51 in OXPHOS system genes) were transitions. The technique we have used (automated direct sequencing) does not allow to decide with certainty if the mtDNA somatic mutations are homoplasmic or not, because it is not as sensitive as the manual sequencing. It is likely, however, that most somatic mutations are homoplasmic or near homoplasmic, because we have detected only a single signal in all but five cases in which two signals could be individualized. The same is also true for almost all mtDNA variants (see below). The results of the automated sequencing were confirmed in some samples using manual sequencing. The comparison of the prevalence of mutations in coding genes of the OXPHOS system in benign and malignant tumors did not yield any significant difference, but for the higher prevalence (P = 0.015) of missense point mutations in genes of the complex I in carcinomas than in adenomas (Table 4) ; the aforementioned missense mutations were detected in six of the seven genes of complex I (ND1, ND3, ND4, ND4L, ND5, and ND6) without any apparent concentration in a single gene (Table 3) . The comparison of the prevalence of mutations in coding genes of the OXPHOS system in non-Hürthle cell and Hürthle cell tumors did not yield any significant differences (Table 5) . There was however a trend (P = 0.096) toward a higher prevalence of missense point mutations in complex V genes in Hürthle cell tumors (Table 5) ; all of the missense mutations detected in complex V (n = 4) involved ATPase 6 gene (Table 3) .

Table 3.

Summary of mtDNA Somatic Mutations in Sixty-Six Tumors

Case Diagnostic Age Nucleotide position Gene/region Protein
1 PC 57 C15280T* CytB/CpIII Silent
3 HCFC 32 (14927–14941) del* CytB/CpIII 5aa (TAFSS)
(7631–8203) del* COII/CpIV 191aa (16–206)
4 HCFC 39 A6650C* COI/CpIV Silent
G9477T COIII/CpIV V91F
5 HCFC 33 T14498A* ND6/CpI Y59F
6 HCFC 76 G8697A ATPase6/CpV Silent
A8701G ATPase6/CpV T59A
C10272T* ND3/CpI L272F
7 HCPC 62 G9746A* COIII/CpIV Silent
8 HCA 60 G9477A COIII/CpIV V91I
9 HCA 49 A8701G ATPase6/CpV T59A
(7627–8195) del* COII/CpIV Stop Codon
10A PC 63 C4940T* ND2/CpI Silent
T7785C* COII/CpIV I67T
10B HCA 63 T9137C* ATPase6/CpV I204T
11 HCA 67 C12918T* ND5/CpI Silent
C6473T* COI/CpIV Silent
12B PC 45 C9030T* ATPase6/CpV Silent
G9575C COIII/CpIV Silent
14 HCA 34 G12236A MTTS2
15 HCA 59 C7873T* COII/CpIV Silent
G8697A ATPase6/CpV Silent
A8706G* ATPase6/CpV Silent
16A HCA 67 C7873T* COII/CpIV Silent
17 HCA 57 A15182G* CytB/CpIII I146V
A4985G ND2/CpI Silent
18 HCA 38 A8716G* ATPase6/CpV K64E
20 HCPC 73 C11332T ND4/CpI Silent
G7775A* COII/CpIV V64I
22 HCPC 46 G9655A COIII/CpIV S150N
23 HCFC 71 C10269T* ND3/CpI L271F
G14560T* ND6/CpI Silent
25 HCPC 8 A4613G* ND2/CpI Silent
G9477A COIII/CpIV V91I
27 HCFC 48 C3992T* ND1/CpI T229M
C13943T* ND5/CpI T536M
28 A 42 C10793T* ND4//CpI L212L1 (Silent)
30 A 54 C5633T MTTA
C7819A* COII/CpIV Silent
31 A 62 C9691T* COIII/CpIV A162V
C7103T* COI/CpIV Silent
35 HCFC 69 G10197C* ND3/CpI A47P
40 HCA 77 G11016A* ND4/CpI S286N
A10639G ND4L/CpI N57S2
41 FC 40 C4312T MTTI
C10691G* ND4L/CpI Silent
44 FC 35 G3910A* ND1/CpI E202K
46 A 67 T15312G* CytB/CpIII I189S2
51 PC 54 C3594T* ND1/CpI Silent
G10320A* ND3/CpI V88I
C11840T* ND4/CpI L2361L1 (Silent)
56 A 46 C9296T COIII/CpIV Silent
C10181T ND3/CpI Silent
59 PC 40 G3526A* ND1/CpI A74T
C13943T* ND5/CpI T536M
62 FC 54 A12967C* ND5/CpI T211P

*Unpublished sequence variants, (MITOMAP: A Human Mitochondrial Genome Database. Center for Molecular Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. http://www.gen.emory.edu/mitomap.html, 2000).

Table 4.

Summary of the mtDNA Somatic Point Mutations in Coding Genes of the OXPHOS System in Benign and Malignant Tumors

Diagnosis CpI CpIII CpIV CpV
Total point mutations
    Benign 5/30 (16.7%) P = 0.077 2/30 (6.7%) P = 0.450 7/30 (23.3%) P = 0.700 4/30 (13.3%) P = 0.274
    Malignant 13/36 (36.1%) 1/36 (2.8%) 7/36 (19.4%) 2/36 (5.6%)
Missense point mutations
    Benign 1/30 (3.3%) P = 0.015 2/30 (6.7%) P = 0.116 2/30 (6.7%) P = 0.343 3/30 (10.0%) P = 0.221
    Malignant 9/36 (25.0%) 0/36 (0.0%) 5/36 (13.9%) 1/36 (2.8%)

Cp, Complex of the OXPHOS system.

Table 5.

Summary of the mtDNA Somatic Point Mutations in Coding Genes of the OXPHOS System in Non-Hürthle and Hürthle Cell Tumors

Diagnosis CpI CpIII CpIV CpV
Total point mutations
    Non-Hürthle 8/26 (30.8%) P = 0.607 2/26 (7.7%) P = 0.322 5/26 (19.2%) P = 0.751 1/26 (3.8%) P = 0.232
    Hürthle 10/40 (25.0%) 1/40 (2.5%) 9/40 (22.5%) 5/40 (12.5%)
Missense point mutations
    Non-Hürthle 4/26 (15.4%) P = 0.966 1/26 (3.8%) P = 0.755 2/26 (7.7%) P = 0.535 0/26 (0.0%) P = 0.096
    Hürthle 6/40 (15.0%) 1/40 (2.5%) 5/40 (12.5%) 4/40 (10.0%)

Cp, Complex of the OXPHOS system.

Mutations in D-Loop Region Versus Prevalence of mtDNA CD and Mutations in Coding Genes

The percentage of tumors with mtDNA CD was higher, although not significantly (P = 0.148), in the group of tumors with D-loop instability (78.1%, 25 of 32) than in the group without D-loop instability (61.8%, 21 of 34). The amount (mean ± SD) of mtDNA CD was significantly higher (P = 0.045) in tumors with D-loop instability (4.1 ± 3.2%) than in tumors without D-loop instability (2.6 ± 2.8%). The percentage of tumors with mtDNA somatic mutations was significantly higher (P = 0.026) in tumors with D-loop instability (65.6%, 21 of 32) than in tumors without D-loop instability (38.2%, 13 of 34).

MtDNA Variants

The results of the study of mtDNA variants in the adjacent parenchyma of the tumors are summarized in Table 6 . In the seven patients from whom blood samples were available the mtDNA variants detected in the normal adjacent parenchyma were also present in blood samples (data not shown); the mtDNA sequence variants detected in normal adjacent parenchyma were thus considered as germinal mtDNA variants.

Table 6.

Number Per Case (Mean ± SD) of the mtDNA Variants in the Normal Adjacent Parenchyma of Patients with Benign and Malignant Thyroid Tumors and in the Normal Adjacent Parenchyma of Patients with Non-Hürthle and Hürthle Cell Thyroid Tumors, by OXPHOS System Complex

Diagnosis Number of cases Total variants mean ± SD Complex I variants mean ± SD Complex III variants mean ± SD Complex IV variants mean ± SD Complex V variants mean ± SD
Benign 30 3.2 ± 1.6 1.4 ± 0.9 0.4 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.6
Malignant 36 4.4 ± 1.4 P = 0.002 2.2 ± 0.9 P = 0.001 0.4 ± 0.5 P = 0.750 1.1 ± 0.6 P = 0.005 0.7 ± 0.6 P = 0.628
Non-Hürthle 26 3.6 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.5
Hürthle 40 4.0 ± 1.7 P = 0.378 1.8 ± 1.0 P = 0.601 0.4 ± 0.5 P = 0.557 0.9 ± 0.8 P = 0.830 0.9 ± 0.6 P < 0.001

We detected 253 sequence variants mtDNA in the normal parenchyma of the 59 patients; 112 of such mtDNA variants have not been previously published (data not shown). The distribution of the mtDNA variants by complex of the OXPHOS system is the following: complex I, 119; complex III, 26; complex IV, 60; and complex V, 48.

The comparison of the prevalence of mtDNA variants in patients with benign and malignant tumors shows a significant higher prevalence (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively) of complex I and complex IV variants in patients with malignant tumors than in patients with benign tumors (Table 6) . Complex V variants were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) in patients with Hürthle cell tumors than in patients with tumors without Hürthle cell features (Table 6) .

Almost all of the variants detected in complex V genes of patients with Hürthle cell tumors involved the ATPase 6 gene (91.9%, 34 of 37) and most of them were nonsilent (79.4%, 27 of 34). The same does not hold true regarding the variants detected in patients with non-Hürthle cell tumors [8 of 11 (72.7%) involved ATPase6; 2 (25.0%) were nonsilent and 6 (75.0%) were silent].

Discussion

The occurrence of mtDNA CD had been previously reported in Hürthle cell lesions of the thyroid 1,18,24,26 and in tumors of other organs, 16,17,25,26,30 namely those composed of oxyphilic cells such as the Warthin’s tumor of the salivary glands. 25 The present study confirms the presence and abundance of mtDNA CD in Hürthle cell tumors regardless of their benign or malignant nature and their histotype. The mtDNA CD was also found, usually in extremely low levels, in the normal adjacent thyroid tissue of some tumors, thus supporting the concept that mtDNA CD precedes oxyphilic changes. 1,18,25,31

The increased number of mitochondria and the mitochondrial structural abnormalities observed in Hürthle cell tumors mimic those detected in the cells of patients with several mitochondrial diseases and myopathies. 32-36 There is oxyphilic transformation of epithelial cells of the choroid plexus in mitochondrial encephalopathies (because of mtDNA alterations), 34 and oxyphilic changes associated to mtDNA alterations have been described in Leigh syndrome 35 and mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS). 36

It has been suggested that mtDNA large deletions may reflect a deletion-prone region of mtDNA that is thought to be structural. 31,37 Such deletions would result in most instances from the action of reactive oxygen species over the mtDNA. 6,7 This assumption is supported by the results of the present study: 81.5% of the mtDNA somatic point mutations were transitions. The presence of mtDNA deletions in normal thyroid tissue may be the result of an age-related accumulation effect of endogenous oxidative damage, aggression of lymphocytes in autoimmune thyroid diseases, or, as observed in some mitochondrial degenerative diseases, the result of alterations in a nuclear gene, or genes, affecting the mitochondrial biogenesis. 3,38,39 The oxidative pressure that results from tumor development can also produce reactive oxygen species and mtDNA damage in some lesions. 6-8,21

The cause of mitochondrial proliferation in Hürthle cell tumors associated with mtDNA damage is unknown, although there is evidence of a decline in oxidative phosphorylation, and a higher requirement by the mitochondria for cytosolic ATP because of OXPHOS deficiency, which is accompanied by an induction of nuclear and mtDNA OXPHOS system gene transcriptions. 31 These findings suggest a defect in the energy production machinery of the cell and indicate that the increased mitochondrial content may be compensatory, putatively because of the involvement of nuclear genes controlling mitochondrial number through a sort of a feed-back mechanism. 40 Recently, Savagner and colleagues 41 showed that ATP production is deficient in a series of Hürthle cell tumors, mainly because of a coupling defect in mitochondria; this defect might be related to a twofold increase in UCP2 (uncoupling protein 2) expression. 41 Savagner and colleagues 41 suggested that mitochondrial proliferation could therefore be an adaptative response to the UCP2 overexpression or, alternatively, the UCP2 overexpression might be a response to the proliferation of mitochondria compensating for the decreased mitochondrial ATP synthesis because of OXPHOS abnormalities. The results we have obtained fit better with the latter hypothesis.

The trend to an association between D-loop instability and occurrence and amount of mtDNA CD may be a consequence of the mtDNA CD rather than its cause. Taking into consideration that the mtDNA CD leads to a higher replicative rate as a sort of compensatory effect, 34,42 it is possible that the instability in mtDNA may result from the high rate of mtDNA replication. Alternatively, it has been suggested that D-loop instability indicates the existence of a deficient repair mechanism of mtDNA alterations; 11,12,14 such deficiency might explain the concurrent existence of mtDNA point mutations and mtDNA large deletions in tumors with D-loop instability. 11,12,14 Most of the mtDNA point mutations are the result of mtDNA aggression by environmental factors, namely by reactive oxygen species, 6,7,21,43,44 whereas insertions/deletions could occur via a slipped replication mechanism. 45

No mechanism related with nuclear mismatch repair genes has been found to be active in human mtDNA repair to date. In contrast with the results of Habano and colleagues 14 our data do not support the assumption that the instability in mitochondrial D-loop region is related with nMSI, because the level of mtDNA instability detected in the present study (48.5%) is much higher than the nMSI found in any type of thyroid tumor. 46-49 Furthermore, the histotypes with higher levels of mtDNA instability are those displaying Hürthle cell features in which nMSI was not detected. 49 Nuclear microsatellite instability was also not detected in any of the 12 cases in the present series that were analyzed previously (data not shown).

Our study documents a large number of somatic mtDNA mutations in all tumor histotypes. This high frequency is probably because of the high susceptibility of mtDNA to damage by mutagens. 5-8 Homoplasmic mtDNA mutations may reflect a replicative advantage for mutated mtDNA copies, 14,21,22 a growth advantage for a cell containing certain mtDNA mutations, 21,22 and/or tumorigenic properties of mtDNA mutations. 21,23 Coller and colleagues 50 and Jones and colleagues 51 have recently shown, by a mathematical approach, that these mutations could also arise by chance without any physiological advantage or tumorigenic requirement; this possibility is difficult to reconciliate with the occurrence of selection of mtDNA-specific variants in several disease models. 21,52-56

The aforementioned hypotheses do not apply equally to silent and nonsilent mutations. The former, which represent almost half of the mtDNA mutations detected in our series (49%, 25 of 51), may have arisen by chance. 50,51 However, the same does not hold true for nonsilent mutations. The high frequency of mtDNA somatic mutations in the malignant tumors of our series, namely in complex I genes, suggests a role for these mutations in thyroid cancer. It has been advanced the presence of functionally relevant mtDNA mutations in some types of human tumors. 21,23,57 Cell fusion experiment showed that some mtDNA mutations, namely complex I mutations, are dominant, able to replace recipient mtDNA, and achieve homoplasmy in tissue culture quite rapidly. 21 These findings fit with the observation that most of the mtDNA somatic mutations described in human cancers are located in complex I genes. 14,22

Yeh and colleagues 23 reported an association of complex I variants and homoplasmic mtDNA mutations and the occurrence of thyroid papillary carcinomas. Follicular and papillary carcinomas of our series carried a significantly higher prevalence of nonsilent mtDNA point mutations of complex I genes than adenomas. We also detected a significantly higher prevalence of complex I and complex IV sequence variants in the normal parenchyma adjacent to the malignant tumors. Our data thus support the hypothesis advanced by Yeh and colleagues 23 that the accumulation of some mtDNA variants and mtDNA somatic mutations seem to be involved in thyroid tumorigenesis.

Our results on the detection of mtDNA sequence variants suggest the existence of an association between germline polymorphisms of ATPase 6 and the occurrence of Hürthle cell tumors. In man, complex V (ATP synthase) of the mitochondrion comprises 10 to 16 subunits encoded by nuclear DNA and two subunits (ATPase 6 and ATPase 8) encoded by mtDNA. 42 ATP synthase complex, at least in yeast, is involved in mtDNA genome maintenance and ATPase 6 seems to be one of the most important elements in this phenomenon. 39,58-60 In yeast, mutations that abrogate the synthesis of any of the ATPase subunits, even those that are unclearly encoded, cause the same phenotype, ie, high production of petites variants [variants having mtDNA deleted molecules (rho) or no mtDNA at all (rho0)]. 39,59

The role of ATP synthase genes in mtDNA maintenance may contribute to explain our findings. It is tempting to suggest that, like in yeast, ATPase 6 may have a role in mtDNA maintenance in humans. The polymorphisms of ATPase 6 could lead to a less efficient mtDNA replication and to mtDNA abnormalities that could contribute to the occurrence of mtDNA CD and Hürthle cell tumors. A larger series is needed to confirm this hypothesis and to find whether or not mutations in ATPase 6 gene can be used as a tool to follow Hürthle cell transformation.

Footnotes

Address reprint requests to Dr. M. Sobrinho-Simões, IPATIMUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: ssimoes@ipatimup.pt.

Supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (POCTI/NSE/41055/2001).

References

  • 1.Müller-Höcker J, Jacob U, Seibel P: Hashimoto thyroiditis is associated with defects of cytochrome-c oxidase in oxyphil Askanazy cells and with the common deletion (4,977) of mitochondrial DNA. Ultrastruct Pathol 1998, 22:91-100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Máximo V, Sobrinho-Simões M: Hurthle cell tumours of the thyroid. A review with emphasis on mitochondrial abnormalities with clinical relevance. Virchows Arch 2000, 437:107-115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Katoh R, Harach HR, Williams ED: Solitary, multiple, and familial oxyphil tumours of the thyroid gland. J Pathol 1998, 186:292-299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Canzian F, Amati P, Harach HR, Kraimps JL, Lesueur F, Barbier J, Levillain P, Romeo G, Bonneau D: A gene predisposing to familial thyroid tumors with cell oxyphilia maps to chromosome 19p13.2. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:1743-1748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kunkel TA, Loeb LA: Fidelity of mammalian DNA polymerases. Science 1981, 213:765-767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Backer JM, Weinstein IB: Mitochondrial DNA is a major cellular target for a dihydrodiol-epoxide derivative of benzo[a]pyrene. Science 1980, 209:297-299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Allen JA, Coombs MM: Covalent binding of polycyclic aromatic compounds to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nature 1980, 287:244-245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oberley LW, Buettner GR: Role of superoxide dismutase in cancer: a review. Cancer Res 1979, 39:1141-1149 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parsons R, Li GM, Longley MJ, Fang WH, Papadopoulos N, Jen J, de la Chapelle A, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Modrich P: Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells. Cell 1993, 75:1227-1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boyer JC, Umar A, Risinger JI, Lipford JR, Kane M, Yin S, Barrett JC, Kolodner RD, Kunkel TA: Microsatellite instability, mismatch repair deficiency, and genetic defects in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1995, 55:6063-6070 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reenan RA, Kolodner RD: Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics 1992, 132:975-985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Habano W, Nakamura S, Sugai T: Microsatellite instability in the mitochondrial DNA of colorectal carcinomas: evidence for mismatch repair systems in mitochondrial genome. Oncogene 1998, 17:1931-1937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tamura G, Nishizuka S, Maesawa C, Suzuki Y, Iwaya T, Sakata K, Endoh Y, Motoyama T: Mutations in mitochondrial control region DNA in gastric tumours of Japanese patients. Eur J Cancer 1999, 35:316-319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Habano W, Sugai T, Nakamura SI, Uesugi N, Yoshida T, Sasou S: Microsatellite instability and mutation of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2000, 118:835-841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Richard SM, Bailliet G, Paez GL, Bianchi MS, Peltomaki P, Bianchi NO: Nuclear and mitochondrial genome instability in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2000, 60:4231-4237 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Máximo V, Soares P, Seruca R, Sobrinho-Simoẽs M: Comments on mutations in mitochondrial control region DNA in gastric tumours of Japanese patients. Eur J Cancer 1999, 35:1407-1408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Máximo V, Soares P, Seruca R, Rocha AS, Castro P, Sobrinho-Simões M: Microsatellite instability, mitochondrial DNA large deletions, and mitochondrial DNA mutations in gastric carcinoma. Genes Chromosom Cancer 2001, 32:136-143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Máximo V, Soares P, Rocha AS, Sobrinho-Simões M: The common deletion of mitochondrial DNA is found in goitres and thyroid tumors with and without oxyphil cell change. Ultrastruct Pathol 1998, 22:271-273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burgart LJ, Zheng J, Shu Q, Strickler JG, Shibata D: Somatic mitochondrial mutation in gastric cancer. Am J Pathol 1995, 147:1105-1111 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Habano W, Sugai T, Yoshida T, Nakamura S: Mitochondrial gene mutation, but not large-scale deletion, is a feature of colorectal carcinomas with mitochondrial microsatellite instability. Int J Cancer 1999, 83:625-629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Polyak K, Li Y, Zhu H, Lengauer C, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, Trush MA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumours. Nat Genet 1998, 20:291-293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fliss MS, Usadel H, Caballero OL, Wu L, Buta MR, Eleff SM, Jen J, Sidransky D: Facile detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in tumors and bodily fluids. Science 2000, 287:2017-2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yeh JJ, Lunetta KL, van Orsouw NJ, Moore FD, Mutter GL, Vijg J, Dahia PL, Eng C: Somatic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in papillary thyroid carcinomas and differential mtDNA sequence variants in cases with thyroid tumours. Oncogene 2000, 19:2060-2066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Máximo V, Sobrinho-Simões M: Mitochondrial DNA ‘common’ deletion in Hurthle cell lesions of the thyroid. J Pathol 2000, 192:561-562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lewis PD, Baxter P, Paul Griffiths A, Parry JM, Skibinski DO: Detection of damage to the mitochondrial genome in the oncocytic cells of Warthin’s tumour. J Pathol 2000, 191:274-281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tallini G, Ladanyi M, Rosai J, Jhanwar SC: Analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA alterations in thyroid and renal oncocytic tumors. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1994, 66:253-259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ebner D, Rodel G, Pavenstaedt I, Haferkamp O: Functional and molecular analysis of mitochondria in thyroid oncocytoma. Virchows Arch 1991, 60:139-144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hedinger CE, Williams ED, Sobin LH: Histological typing of thyroid tumors. International Histological Classification of Tumours, 1988, vol 11. Springer-Verlag, Edited by CE Hedinger. Berlin
  • 29.Rosai J, Carcangiu ML, DeLellis RA: Tumors of the thyroid gland. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 3rd series. 1992, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington
  • 30.Fukushima S, Honda K, Awane M, Yamamoto E, Takeda R, Kaneko I, Tanaka A, Morimoto T, Tanaka K, Yamaoka Y: The frequency of 4977 base pair deletion of mitochondrial DNA in various types of liver disease and in normal liver. Hepatology 1995, 21:1547-1551 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Heddi A, Faure-Vigny H, Wallace DC, Stepien G: Coordinate expression of nuclear and mitochondrial genes involved in energy production in carcinoma and oncocytoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996, 1316:203-209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sengers RC, Stadhouders AM, Trijbels JM: Mitochondrial myopathies. Clinical, morphological and biochemical aspects. Eur J Pediatr 1984, 141:192-207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lindal S, Lund I, Torbergsen T, Aasly J, Mellgren SI, Borud O, Monstad P: Mitochondrial diseases and myopathies: a series of muscle biopsy specimens with ultrastructural changes in the mitochondria. Ultrastruct Pathol 1992, 16:263-275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tanji K, Schon EA, DiMauro S, Bonilla E: Kearns-Sayre syndrome: oncocytic transformation of choroid plexus epithelium. J Neurol Sci 2000, 178:29-36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kepes JJ: Oncocytic transformation of choroid plexus epithelium. Acta Neuropathol 1983, 62:145-148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ohama E, Ikuta F: Involvement of choroid plexus in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy (MELAS). Acta Neuropathol 1987, 75:1-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hou JH, Wei YH: The unusual structures of the hot-regions flanking large-scale deletions in human mitochondrial DNA. Biochem J 1996, 318:1065-1070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nishino I, Spinazzola A, Hirano M: Thymidine phosphorylase gene mutations in MNGIE, a human mitochondrial disorder. Science 1999, 283:689-692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Contamine V, Picard M: Maintenance and integrity of the mitochondrial genome: a plethora of nuclear genes in the budding yeast. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000, 64:281-315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Attardi G, Yoneda M, Chomyn A: Complementation and segregation behavior of disease-causing mitochondrial DNA mutations in cellular model systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1995, 1271:241-248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Savagner F, Franc B, Guyetant S, Rodien P, Reynier P, Malthiery Y: Defective mitochondrial ATP synthesis in oxyphilic thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001, 86:4920-4925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wallace DC: Mitochondrial genetics: a paradigm for aging and degenerative diseases? Science 1992, 256:628-632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Adelman R, Saul RL, Ames BN: Oxidative damage to DNA: relation to species metabolic rate and life span. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:2706-2708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM: Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:7915-7922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shoffner JM, Lott MT, Voljavec AS, Soueidan SA, Costigan DA, Wallace DC: Spontaneous Kearns-Sayre/chronic external ophthalmoplegia plus syndrome associated with a mitochondrial DNA deletion: a slip-replication model and metabolic therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86:7952-7956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vermiglio F, Schlumberger M, Lazar V, Lefrere I, Bressac B: Absence of microsatellite instability in thyroid carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 1995, 31:128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soares P, dos Santos NR, Seruca R, Lothe RA, Sobrinho-Simoes M: Benign and malignant thyroid lesions show instability at microsatellite loci. Eur J Cancer 1997, 33:293-296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova M, Fagin JA: Prevalence of minisatellite and microsatellite instability in radiation-induced post-Chernobyl pediatric thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene 1998, 17:1983-1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lazzereschi D, Palmirotta R, Ranieri A, Ottini L, Veri MC, Cama A, Cetta F, Nardi F, Colletta G, Mariani-Costantini R: Microsatellite instability in thyroid tumours and tumour-like lesions. Br J Cancer 1999, 79:340-345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Coller HA, Khrapko K, Bodyak ND, Nekhaeva E, Herrero-Jimenez P, Thilly WG: High frequency of homoplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human tumors can be explained without selection. Nat Genet 2001, 28:147-150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jones JB, Song JJ, Hempen PM, Parmigiani G, Hruban RH, Kern SE: Detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in pancreatic cancer offers a “mass”-ive advantage over detection of nuclear DNA mutations. Cancer Res 2001, 61:1299-1304 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dunbar DR, Moonie PA, Jacobs HT, Holt IJ: Different cellular backgrounds confer a marked advantage to either mutant or wild-type mitochondrial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:6562-6566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hao H, Morrison LE, Moraes CT: Suppression of a mitochondrial tRNA gene mutation phenotype associated with changes in the nuclear background. Hum Mol Genet 1999, 8:1117-1124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Holt IJ, Harding AE, Morgan-Hughes JA: Deletions of muscle mitochondrial DNA in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Nature 1988, 331:717-719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jenuth JP, Peterson AC, Shoubridge EA: Tissue-specific selection for different mtDNA genotypes in heteroplasmic mice. Nat Genet 1997, 16:93-95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yoneda M, Chomyn A, Martinuzzi A, Hurko O, Attardi G: Marked replicative advantage of human mtDNA carrying a point mutation that causes the MELAS encephalomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:11164-11168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sanchez-Cespedes M, Parrella P, Nomoto S, Cohen D, Xiao Y, Esteller M, Jeronimo C, Jordan RC, Nicol T, Koch WM, Schoenberg M, Mazzarelli P, Fazio VM, Sidransky D: Identification of a mononucleotide repeat as a major target for mitochondrial DNA alterations in human tumors. Cancer Res 2001, 61:7015-7019 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nagley P, Farrell LB, Gearing DP, Nero D, Meltzer S, Devenish RJ: Assembly of functional proton-translocating ATPase complex in yeast mitochondria with cytoplasmically synthesized subunit 8, a polypeptide normally encoded within the organelle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:2091-2095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Foury F, Tzagoloff A: Localization on mitochondrial DNA of mutations leading to a loss of rutamycin-sensitive adenosine triphosphatase. Eur J Biochem 1976, 68:113-119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guidot DM, McCord JM, Wright RM, Repine JE: Absence of electron transport (Rho0 state) restores growth of a manganese-superoxide dismutase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae in hyperoxia. Evidence for electron transport as a major source of superoxide generation in vivo. J Biol Chem 1993, 268:26699-26703 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES