Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 2002 May;160(5):1705–1715. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61117-0

The Role of Hepatic Stellate Cells and Transforming Growth Factor-β1 in Cystic Fibrosis Liver Disease

Peter J Lewindon *†, Tamara N Pereira , Anita C Hoskins , Kim R Bridle , Richard M Williamson , Ross W Shepherd §, Grant A Ramm
PMCID: PMC1850885  PMID: 12000722

Abstract

Liver disease causes significant morbidity and mortality from multilobular cirrhosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Abnormal bile transport and biliary fibrosis implicate abnormal biliary physiology in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis-associated liver disease (CFLD), yet the mediators linking biliary events to fibrosis remain unknown. Activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the pre-eminent mediators of fibrosis in a range of hepatic disorders. The dominant stimulus for matrix production by HSCs is the cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1. In CFLD, the role of HSCs and the source of TGF-β1 have not been evaluated. Liver biopsy tissue obtained from 38 children with CFLD was analyzed. Activated HSCs, identified by co-localization of procollagen α1(I) mRNA and α-smooth muscle actin, were demonstrated as the cellular source of excess collagen production in the fibrosis surrounding the bile ducts and the advancing edge of scar tissue. TGF-β protein and TGF-β1 mRNA expression were shown to be predominantly expressed by bile duct epithelial cells. TGF-β1 expression was significantly correlated with both hepatic fibrosis and the percentage of portal tracts showing histological abnormalities associated with CFLD. This study demonstrates a definitive role for HSCs in fibrogenesis associated with CFLD and establishes a potential mechanism for the induction of HSC collagen gene expression through the production of TGF-β1 by bile duct epithelial cells.


Hepatobiliary fibrosis is the most clinically relevant liver complication of cystic fibrosis (CF) and was responsible for 5% of deaths in the CF population before the advent of liver transplantation. Significant morbidity from liver disease occurs in ∼20% of patients with CF 1 and develops during childhood, usually before or around puberty. 2 Despite significant medical and scientific advances in the field of CF, our understanding of the clinical significance, pathogenesis, and management of liver disease in these patients is only just emerging. The localization by Cohn and colleagues, 3 of the CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) to the apical domain of bile duct epithelial cells (BDECs) supports the prevailing hypothesis of abnormal biliary physiology leading to inflammation and focal biliary fibrosis. The common ultrastructural finding of periductular collagen deposition further supports this hypothesis 4 without providing clues to the mechanisms by which this may occur. The link between biliary CFTR defect, cholestasis, and the development and progression of fibrosis is still missing.

The hepatic stellate cell (HSC) is widely regarded as the key fibrogenic cell co-ordinating hepatic extracellular matrix formation. HSC activation, and maintenance in the active state is the basic prerequisite for hepatic fibrosis. 5 Indeed, the role of HSCs in hepatic fibrosis has been well documented by our group and others in a range of fibrosing conditions of the liver. 6-9 Yet the role of HSCs in CF-associated liver disease (CFLD) has not been characterized. Activated HSCs express an intracellular microfilament protein, α-smooth muscle actin (SMA), widely used as a marker protein of the activated phenotype. Activated HSCs also express a number of different cytokine receptors including transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) receptor. TGF-β is a pleotrophic cytokine involved in tissue growth, differentiation, and the immune response. 10 TGF-β1 is recognized as the dominant stimulus to extracellular matrix production by HSCs. 5 The cellular source of this vital stimulus to collagen production by HSCs can vary in different disease states. 10 We have previously shown that in biliary atresia, an example of accelerated biliary fibrosis in childhood, TGF-β1 is produced by hepatocytes, HSCs, and BDECs. 6 The present study was designed to demonstrate whether activated HSCs are indeed the cellular source of increased collagen production in children with CFLD and to establish a potential mechanism for fibrogenesis by establishing the primary source of the profibrogenic cytokine TGF-β1.

Materials and Methods

Patient Details and Biopsy Collection

Thirty-eight children (14 males, 24 females; median age, 10.9 years; range, 1.0 to 18.7 years) with CF confirmed by sweat test were suspected as having CFLD. All children had evidence of chronic liver disease with at least two of the following: 1) clinical hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly; 2) persistent elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT >1 × upper limit normal) longer than 6 months; 3) abnormal ultrasound scan with abnormal echogenicity or nodular edge suggestive of cirrhosis. No child had end-stage disease and all had normal synthetic function. Only one child was pancreatic sufficient, the others were on replacement enzymes in recommended doses. None had undergone hepatobiliary surgery. There was clinical evidence of hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly in 24 (63%) children; definite portal hypertension in 13 (34%); a history of meconium ileus at birth in 12 (32%); and 6 were insulin-dependent. Subnormal serum vitamin A levels were detected in 15 (45%) of 33 tested. Genotyping was available in 22 patients revealing 14 (63%) df508 homozygotes, 7 (32%) df508 heterozygotes, and 1 untypable. All children were from families of northern European decent. Clinicopathological details are summarized in Table 1 .

Table 1.

Patient Clinical and Histopathological Details

Patient no. Sex Age years Meconium Ileus? Insulin dependent? Clinical hepato-splenomegaly? Portal hypertension? Scheuer fibrosis score LPD (0–3) %PTI
1 f 7.9 0 0 0
2 f 6.5 0 0 0
3 f 6.7 0 0 0
4 m 18.7 0 0 0
5 f 8.9 *0 0 0
6 m 10.8 Yes Yes *0 0 0
7 f 11.3 Yes Yes *0 0 0
8 f 15.6 Yes *0 0 0
9 f 17 Yes Yes *0 0 0
10 f 2.4 Yes 1 0 0
11 f 10.5 Yes 1 0 0
12 m 10 Yes 1 1 100
13 m 2.7 Yes 1 1 10
14 m 9.1 Yes 1 0 0
15 f 8.7 1 2 50
16 f 15 Yes Yes 1 0 0
17 f 14 2 2 100
18 f 9 2 2 60
19 f 1 2 3 100
20 f 11.4 Yes Yes 2 0 0
21 m 1.3 2 1 100
22 m 13.4 Yes Yes Yes 2 1 100
23 m 12.1 Yes Yes 2 1 30
24 f 10.9 2 1 25
25 m 15.9 2 2 30
26 m 9.9 Yes Yes 2 1 60
27 m 15.4 Yes Yes 2 2 40
28 f 8.9 Yes Yes Yes 2 2 100
29 m 12 Yes Yes Yes 3 1 100
30 f 11 Yes Yes Yes 3 1 75
31 f 16 Yes Yes 3 3 20
32 f 14.8 Yes Yes 3 2 100
33 m 15.6 Yes Yes 3 1 66
34 f 9.2 Yes Yes 3 3 100
35 f 9.9 Yes Yes 3 2 30
36 m 8.4 Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 2 50
37 f 16.4 Yes Yes Yes 4 1 66
38 f 15.6 Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 1 100

LPD, limiting plate disruption; an assessment of LPD in the most affected portal tract as a marker of disease severity: % PTI, the percentage of portal tracts involved in the histological abnormalities associated with CFLD.

*, Indicates those with steatosis as the only histopathological abnormality.

Control tissue was not available from children with CF and no liver disease. Normal control tissue was available from two transplantation donor livers (one male, 13 years; one female, 10 years) and from the healthy margin of a liver resection for epithelioid cyst from a 10-year-old male. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

All children underwent percutaneous liver biopsy under general anesthetic. It has been recent practice to perform an ultrasound scan before biopsy to confirm a safe site and this was performed in 31 of the 38 patients. All children with evidence of fibrosis on biopsy were subsequently offered ursodeoxycholic acid (20 mg/kg/day).

Histological Assessment

All 38 liver biopsies were assessed for histopathological changes. Liver tissue was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. At least 10 levels of each biopsy were examined after staining with hematoxylin and eosin, hematoxylin/van Gieson, Perls’, periodic acid-Schiff-diastase, orcin, and a silver-impregnated method for reticulin fibers. All specimens had at least six (range, 6 to 13) portal tracts available for assessment. Severity of fibrosis was assessed using the grading system of Scheuer. 11 A semiqualitative assessment of ongoing hepatic injury was performed by assessing limiting plate disruption by bile duct proliferation with associated inflammation. 11 Limiting plate disruption was modified for use in CFLD in recognition of the variability in severity within the same tissue core, by scoring the worst affected portal tract. A score of 1 to 3 was assigned based on whether the limiting plate was disrupted less than one-third of the circumference of the portal tract/septa (score 1), between one- to two-thirds of the circumference (score 2), or more than two-thirds of the circumference (score 3). All portal tracts in the liver biopsy were assessed and the percentage of portal tracts involved (%PTI) in the histological abnormalities associated with CFLD (including bile ductular proliferation, inflammation, limiting plate disruption, and fibrosis) was calculated.

Immunohistochemistry

SMA

To evaluate whether activated HSCs were present in CFLD, liver sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry for SMA. All 38 liver sections were deparaffinized in xylol and rehydrated by gradient alcohol before exposure to 3% hydrogen peroxide in water to quench endogenous peroxidases. They were then incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti-α-SMA primary antibody (1:400, clone 1A4; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO). The secondary antibody was a biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin (1:400; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) as previously described. 6 The detection system used was a streptavidin-biotin complex/horseradish peroxidase kit (DAKO) and the chromogenic substrate was 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma Fast DAB; Sigma Chemical Co.). The negative control used was nonimmune mouse IgG (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Sections were counterstained with eosin.

TGF-β

Liver tissue sections were available from 30 of the 38 patients enrolled in the study. Liver sections were subjected to antigen retrieval by heating in a microwave oven on high power for 8 minutes in a 0.01 mol/L trisodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) then blocked in 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.6) for 20 minutes at room temperature. The primary antibody was an anti-TGF-β1,-2,-3 antibody (150 μg/ml; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) for the cellular localization of TGF-β protein. 6 The negative control used was nonimmune mouse IgG (1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The sections were then subjected to the same detection methodology as for SMA.

Cytokeratin-19

To confirm the cellular localization of TGF-β, the expression of a specific marker for BDECs, cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Nonspecific binding was blocked in liver sections by 3% H2O2 for 10 minutes. Antigen retrieval was performed by incubating sections in 50 mg/ml of Protease type VIII (Sigma Chemical Co.) for 5 minutes at 37°C. Sections were incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody to CK-19 (1:150, clone b170, IgG1, Novocastra NCL-CK19; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by 30 minutes in DAKO Envision+ (goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin-peroxidase conjugate, DAKO). The DAKO AEC+ high-sensitivity substrate-chromogen detection system was applied for 15 minutes. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

In Situ Hybridization

To identify whether activated HSCs are the cellular source of increased type I collagen production, liver sections were subjected to in situ hybridization for procollagen α1(I) mRNA followed by immunohistochemistry for SMA as previously described. 6

For detection of procollagen α1(I) mRNA, a 1500-bp fragment of human procollagen α1(I) cDNA was subcloned into pGEM 11Z vector (Promega, Madison, WI). For detection of TGF-β1 mRNA, a 308-bp fragment was generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nested primers, which added the transcription initiation sites Sp6 and T7 to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the PCR product, respectively.

Digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes for sense (control) and anti-sense were produced for both procollagen α1(I) and TGF-β1 by in vitro transcription with SP6 and T7 polymerases. In situ hybridization was performed on 5-μm human liver sections as previously described. 6 Unbound complex was removed by washing and sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry for SMA as previously described to co-localize procollagen α1(I), mRNA to activated HSCs.

Quantitation of TGF-β Protein: Correlation with Histopathological Changes

Because of the focal nature of the disease process in CFLD and the consequent nonhomogeneous expression of both TGF-β protein and mRNA, it was difficult to adequately quantitate TGF-β levels. We have used a semiquantitative scoring system to assess the immunohistochemical expression of TGF-β protein in BDECs. This scoring system was similar to that used to assess the percentage of portal tracts involved in the histological abnormalities associated with CFLD (see Histological Assessment). The percentage of portal tracts in each biopsy, which demonstrated positive staining for TGF-β protein within either established bile ducts and/or proliferating bile ductules, was calculated (TGF-β %PTI). This parameter was then correlated to %PTI to demonstrate an association between bile duct TGF-β expression and biliary injury in CFLD.

Quantitation of TGF-β1 mRNA by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

To assess the involvement of TGF-β1 in the cholestatic injury associated with CFLD, we quantitated the expression of TGF-β1 mRNA using real-time RT-PCR technology and correlated expression with fibrosis in CFLD patients. Frozen liver tissue was available from 11 patients with CFLD. These patients consisted of three with grade 0 fibrosis, three grade 1, two grade 2, one grade 3, and two grade 4 fibrosis. At the time of biopsy a small 3- to 4-mm piece of liver was cut from the core and immediately snap-frozen in dry-ice. RNA was extracted from frozen sections using Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Advanced Biotechnologies Ltd., Surrey, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Control RNA was also extracted from age-matched donor liver tissue (n = 2). RNA integrity was assessed by ethidium bromide staining and OD260 nm/OD280 nm absorption ratio >1.8.

Two μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) using oligo dT primers, as described by the manufacturer. The resulting cDNA was diluted 2.5-fold before PCR amplification.

Primer Design

Primers for the analysis of human TGF-β1 and the housekeeping gene β-actin, were designed using Primer Express software (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA). The TGF-β1 forward primer was TCACCATAGCAACACTCTGAGATG and the reverse primer was CCTTAACCTCTCTGGGCTTGTTT, resulting in an amplicon 84 bp in length. The β-actin forward primer was CAGGCACCAGGGCGTTG and the reverse primer was GCCCACATAGGAATCCTTCTGA, resulting in an amplicon 52 bp in length.

Real-time RT-PCR

Real time PCR was performed using a Rotorgene thermal cycler (Corbett Research, Sydney Australia). Reactions were performed in a 20-μl volume with 1 μmol/L of forward primer, 1 μmol/L of reverse primer, and 2 μl of cDNA. Nucleotides, MgCl2, Taq polymerase, and SYBR green were included in the SYBR Green PCR master mix (Perkin Elmer). Additional SYBR Green (Fisher Biotech, Perth, Australia) was added at 1:1000 dilution. Each sample was amplified in triplicate. The PCR conditions included incubating at 50°C for 5 minutes to activate uracil-N-glycosylase (UNGase), which removes any carry-over contamination from previous PCR products, followed by a denaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes. Amplification was performed for 40 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 15 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds). Detection of the fluorescent product was measured at the end of the 72°C-annealing step. Cycling was followed by a melt curve analysis (50 to 90°C with a heating rate of 1°C per second) to confirm the amplification of specific PCR products (either TGF-β1 or β-actin) and the absence of nonspecific amplification or primer dimer.

The expression of TGF-β1 mRNA was standardized to the expression of the housekeeping gene β-actin in each CFLD biopsy and control liver specimen in triplicate. The mean standardized TGF-β1 mRNA expression for each CFLD biopsy was then expressed relative to the TGF-β1 mRNA in controls. TGF-β1 mRNA expression was then correlated with fibrosis in each CFLD patient.

Statistical Analysis

Correlations between TGF-β %PTI and %PTI were determined using Pearson rank correlation. Correlations between TGF-β1 mRNA expression and the grade of histological fibrosis were determined using Spearman rank correlation for discontinuous variables. For all statistical analyses, a P value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Histopathological Assessment of CFLD

Histopathological findings for each of the 38 patients are listed in Table 1 . Nine biopsies scored zero for fibrosis, of which five revealed steatosis only (indicated with an asterisk). The remainder revealed the usual spectrum of cholestasis, bile duct proliferation, steatosis, portal inflammation, and fibrosis ranging from Scheuer grades 1 to 4 (Figure 1A) . Nineteen patients (50%) had fibrosis of moderate severity (Scheuer grades 1 to 2) and 10 patients had severe fibrosis (Scheuer grades 3 to 4). The severity of limiting plate disruption was variable and was not associated with the severity of established fibrosis. The predominant inflammatory cells present were neutrophils and accompanied the proliferating bile ductules indicative of biliary obstruction. No other histopathological diagnoses were found to account for the liver disease in these patients. The control tissue was histologically normal.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Serial sections of liver tissue from a child with CFLD and biliary fibrosis demonstrating activated HSCs as the cellular source of collagen production. A: Hematoxylin/van Gieson stain demonstrating a portal tract with bile duct proliferation and fibrosis (pink) extending into the parenchyma. B: Immunohistochemistry for SMA (brown) and in situ hybridization using the anti-sense probe for procollagen α1(I) mRNA (blue) demonstrating activated HSCs around bile ducts and in the advancing edge of the fibrosis. C: Immunohistochemistry for SMA (brown) and in situ hybridization using the sense (control) probe for procollagen α1(I) mRNA, confirming specificity of in situ hybridization seen in B. Activated HSCs (brown) are more clearly seen around bile ducts and in the advancing fibrosis. D: Co-localization of procollagen α1(I) mRNA expression (blue) to SMA-positive-activated HSCs (brown), showing stellate-shaped morphology of HSCs. Original magnifications: ×200 (A–C); ×1000 (D).

Identification of Activated HSCs

Cellular Source of Procollagen α1(I) mRNA Expression

Activated stellate cells were demonstrated by the expression of SMA and increased expression of SMA was detected in all CFLD biopsies. SMA expression ranged in distribution from mild-periportal to pan-lobular. Activated HSCs were seen particularly in the extracellular matrix surrounding both portal tracts and hyperplastic bile ducts, and within fibrous septa bridging between portal tracts (Figure 1; A to C ). Furthermore procollagen α1(I) mRNA expression was shown to co-localize to SMA-positive HSCs (Figure 1, B and D , and Figure 2A ) demonstrating that activated HSCs are the cellular source of increased collagen leading to hepatic fibrosis in CFLD. Of interest, the predominant area of HSC procollagen α1(I) mRNA expression was at the growing margin of the scar tissue formation, where the stellate-shaped morphology of HSCs is clearly seen (Figure 1D) . Procollagen α1(I) mRNA expression was not seen in hepatocytes, BDECs, smooth muscle cells, or the portal tract vasculature. Procollagen α1(I) mRNA signal specificity was demonstrated by the absence of signal in SMA-positive HSCs, using the sense probe (Figure 1C) . There was no significant expression of either perisinusoidal or periportal SMA or procollagen α1(I) mRNA in normal control liver biopsies (results not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Activated HSCs in the presence of periductal fibrosis (A and B) and in the absence of histological fibrosis (C and D). Serial sections of liver tissue from a child with CFLD demonstrating fibrogenic activity and fibrosis around a bile duct viewed at high power. A: Activated HSCs demonstrated by immunohistochemistry for SMA (brown) surrounding an expanded bile duct. Current fibrogenic activity is seen in an activated HSC demonstrated by co-localization of SMA (brown) and procollagen α1(I) mRNA (blue) (asterisk). B: Hematoxylin/van Gieson staining of a serial section demonstrating collagen deposition (pink) co-localized to the area of activated HSCs surrounding the expanded bile duct. HSCs expressing procollagen α1(I) mRNA in A is identified (asterisk). C: Increased expression of SMA was also observed in CFLD liver without histological evidence of fibrosis. Perisinusoidal-activated HSCs demonstrated by immunohistochemistry for SMA (brown). D: Serial section stained with hematoxylin/van Gieson graded zero for fibrosis. Original magnifications: ×1000 (A, B); ×100 (C, D).

Co-Localization of Activated HSCs and Increased Collagen Protein Deposition

Liver biopsies were examined histologically for collagen protein deposition using hematoxylin/van Gieson stain. Figure 2B demonstrates an enlarged bile duct surrounded by excessive collagen protein deposition. Figure 2A demonstrates increased numbers of activated HSCs surrounding the same enlarged bile duct, showing co-localization of SMA and procollagen α1(I) mRNA in the identical region of increased collagen protein deposition.

Presence of Activated HSCs in CFLD without Histological Fibrosis

Increased expression of SMA was also observed in the nine CFLD biopsies without evidence of histological fibrosis (Figure 2, C versus D). This suggests that the presence of activated HSCs may be an early marker for the development of hepatic fibrosis in these patients.

Cellular Source of TGF-β1 in CFLD

Immunohistochemistry for TGF-β

Immunohistochemistry for TGF-β protein revealed increased expression in 19 of 30 (63%) liver biopsies assessed. Expression was seen predominantly in BDECs within both established bile ducts (whether surrounded by fibrosis or not) and hyperplastic bile ductules, and also by occasional HSCs within the periportal regions of the acinus (Figure 3A) . TGF-β expression was also demonstrated in hepatocytes within the regenerative nodule and at the scar interface (Figure 3, C and D) . Significant TGF-β expression was demonstrated in 2 of 5 (40%) biopsies graded zero for fibrosis, 9 of 16 (56%) biopsies graded 1 to 2, and 8 of 9 (89%) biopsies graded 3 to 4. There was no TGF-β expression detected in negative controls using nonimmune IgG as the primary antibody (results not shown) or in normal control liver biopsies (Figure 3B) .

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Sections of liver tissue from a child with CFLD demonstrating TGF-β1 expression most prominently in BDECs and to a lesser degree by hepatocytes at the scar interface. Immunohistochemistry for TGF-β protein expression (brown) in BDECs (A), and along the fibrous edge of a regenerative nodule in hepatocytes (C) and BDECs (D). B: No significant expression of TGF-β protein was seen in control liver tissue. E: In situ hybridization for TGF-β1 mRNA expression (blue) demonstrated in BDECs using the anti-sense probe. F: In situ hybridization control using the TGF-β1 mRNA sense probe, confirming specificity seen in C. Original magnifications: ×400 (A, D); ×200 (B, C, E, F).

In Situ Hybridization for TGF-β1

In situ hybridization demonstrated that TGF-β1 mRNA was predominantly expressed in BDECs within hyperplastic ducts and also by occasional HSCs within the scar (Figure 3E) . TGF-β1 mRNA signal specificity was demonstrated using the sense (control) probe (Figure 3F) . There was no significant TGF-β1 mRNA expression in normal control liver biopsies (results not shown).

CK-19 Staining

Using immunohistochemistry, we have demonstrated that TGF-β was expressed in BDECs (Figure 4, A and C) identified by the expression of CK-19 in serial liver sections (Figure 4, B and D) . When detected, TGF-β expression was present in both established bile ducts (Figure 4A) , whether surrounded by fibrosis or not, and also in hyperplastic bile ductules (Figure 4C) .

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Serial liver sections from a child with CFLD demonstrating that CK-19-positive BDECs are responsible for the increased expression of TGF-β protein in expanded portal tracts. Immunohistochemistry for TGF-β protein expression (brown) in BDECs within established bile ducts surrounded by areas of fibrosis (A) and hyperplastic bile ductules in expanded portal tracts and at the growing margin of the scar tissue formation (C). Immunohistochemistry for CK-19 expression (red) in serial liver sections of A and C, respectively, in BDECs within established bile ducts surrounded by areas of fibrosis (B) and hyperplastic bile ductules in expanded portal tracts and at the growing margin of the scar tissue formation (D). Original magnifications, ×200.

Role of TGF-β1 in Biliary Fibrosis

Correlation Between TGF-β Protein Expression and Histopathological Parameters of Injury

Because of the focal nature of the disease process in CFLD and the consequent nonhomogeneous expression of both TGF-β protein and mRNA, it was difficult to adequately quantitate TGF-β levels in the liver. Of the 19 biopsies that demonstrated TGF-β expression, 12 showed TGF-β immunohistochemistry within BDECs. We have used a semiquantitative scoring system (see Materials and Methods section for TGF-β immunohistochemistry) to assess the percentage of portal tracts in each biopsy that demonstrated positive staining for TGF-β protein (TGF-β %PTI) within either established bile ducts and/or proliferating bile ductules. TGF-β %PTI was significantly correlated with %PTI, the percentage of portal tracts showing histological abnormalities associated with CFLD (r = 0.65, P < 0.03; Figure 5 ). This suggests that TGF-β protein is most likely to be expressed in BDECs in portal tracts showing histological abnormalities and thus correlates with markers of disease activity.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Correlation between the percentage of portal tracts that demonstrated positive staining for TGF-β protein within BDECs (TGF-β %PTI) and the percentage of portals tracts involved (%PTI) in the histological abnormalities associated with CFLD. TGF-β %PTI was significantly correlated with %PTI (r = 0.65, P < 0.03; n = 12).

Correlation Between TGF-β1 mRNA Expression and Fibrosis

TGF-β1 mRNA expression was quantitated in snap-frozen liver tissue that was available from biopsies from 11 patients with CFLD and 2 controls. TGF-β1 mRNA expression was significantly increased by 8.2 ± 3.4-fold in CFLD patients compared to controls (P = 0.05). In addition, there was a significant correlation between TGF-β1 mRNA expression and the histological grade of fibrosis (r = 0.78, P < 0.005), demonstrating a definitive role for TGF-β1 in the pathogenesis associated with CFLD (Figure 6) .

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Quantitation of TGF-β1 mRNA expression in CFLD and correlation with the histological grade of hepatic fibrosis. TGF-β1 mRNA expression was standardized to the expression of the housekeeping gene, β-actin, in each of the CFLD biopsies and controls. The expression of TGF-β1 mRNA in each CFLD biopsy was then expressed as a -fold increase versus controls. TGF-β1 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with the histological grade of fibrosis (r = 0.78, P < 0.005; n = 11).

Discussion

This study has demonstrated that activated HSCs produce the increased type I collagen seen in the fibrotic liver disease associated with CF. This study has also shown that the predominant source of the profibrogenic cytokine TGF-β1 in CFLD is bile duct epithelium and that hepatocytes also produce increased levels of TGF-β within the regenerative nodule and at the scar interface.

The progression of CFLD is often slow, irregular in timing, and nonhomogeneous. Consequently, the demonstration of TGF-β in CFLD in our study was variable in both distribution and levels of expression. This is in contrast to our findings in accelerated models of fibrosis such as biliary atresia 6 in which biliary inflammation and consequent fibrogenesis can progress rapidly and TGF-β staining is much more intense and homogeneous, reflecting protein quantum. However, in the present study we have demonstrated a significant correlation between the percentage of portal tracts showing histological abnormalities and the percentage of portal tracts demonstrating increased expression of TGF-β protein in BDECs. This confirms TGF-β protein is most likely to be expressed in portal tracts showing histological evidence of current disease activity. Further to these results, we have demonstrated a strong correlation between the expression of TGF-β1 mRNA, by real-time RT-PCR, and the histological grade of fibrosis. These observations provide strong evidence for a definitive role for TGF-β1 in the fibrogenesis associated with CFLD.

In this study, we demonstrated that a number of liver biopsies showed no histological evidence of hepatic fibrosis, however, increased numbers of activated HSCs were present in all of these biopsies. Although it was not possible to obtain liver from CF patients without liver disease as a comparison, it is tempting to speculate that the presence of activated HSCs in CFLD may have a potential role as a marker for the earliest evidence of fibrogenesis. However, the significance of this finding requires long-term follow-up in these same patients.

The development and progression of CFLD remains an enigma. There is no correlation with CFTR genotype 12 or any other current clinical marker. 2 More recently, workers have postulated development of CFLD to be modulated by genetic factors different from the CFTR region. 13 The contribution of co-morbid genes to phenotypic expression was highlighted by the discovery of the CF modifier locus predisposing for the complication of meconium ileus on chromosome 19q14. 14 The role of co-morbid genes in CFLD has been strengthened by the association of allelic variants for mannose-binding lectin, an immunoregulatory protein, with development of liver cirrhosis. 15 Since the earliest pathological descriptions of biliary fibrosis in CFLD, 16 the subsequent localization of the aberrant CFTR to cholangiocytes by Cohn and colleagues 3 and the further demonstration of aberrant cytoplasmic immunolocalization of CFTR in BDECs of patients with CFLD by Kinman and colleagues, 17 the challenge remains to link biliary events to the development of fibrosis. Current theories of pathogenesis in CFLD hold that abnormal biliary chloride transport causes defective hydration of bile, impaired bile flow, and the resulting cholestasis initiates fibrogenesis. The CFTR chloride channel is the principal transporter creating an electrochemical gradient to facilitate flux of sodium ions. The resulting osmotic gradient facilitates the hydration of luminal contents. The normal CFTR channel also provides chloride ions to exchange with bicarbonate ions for the alkalinization of bile. Various mechanisms have been proposed to connect abnormal hydration and pH of bile to the development of liver disease in CF. Workers have tried, unsuccessfully, to link this bile acid transport defect to liver damage via a change in the bile acid pool per se. 18 Others have postulated that accumulation of toxic bile acids, with an increased glycine conjugation, in bile ducts blocked with inspissated bile may mediate CFLD. 19 In vitro studies demonstrate that bile acids can cause hepatocyte apoptosis 20 and can be implicated in cholangiocyte dysfunction. 21 Structural abnormalities of the biliary tree, both intrahepatic and extrahepatic, have been noted in patients with CF 22 both with and without liver disease and it is not known how significantly they contribute to the pathogenesis of CFLD.

The present study has established a link between biliary events and the expression of procollagen α1(I) mRNA by activated HSCs in patients with CFLD, namely the production of the profibrogenic cytokine TGF-β1 by BDECs and its correlation with histological fibrosis. Further elucidation of the role of TGF-β1 in CFLD is particularly pertinent. Respiratory physicians caring for patients with CF have become interested in TGF-β in light of the recent demonstration that certain TGF-β1 genotypes are associated with more rapid deterioration in lung fibrosis and function. 23 TGF-β is a multifunctional peptide growth factor with a wide range of effects on growth, differentiation, extracellular matrix deposition, and the immune response. 10 It is the dominant stimulus to extracellular matrix deposition in a wide variety of fibrosing liver disorders, 5 including cholestasis, by stimulating collagen gene expression at the level of transcription in activated HSCs. 24 It also has an important role in cholestatic liver disease by causing apoptosis of hepatocytes 25 and apoptosis of HSCs in resolution of biliary fibrosis in rat models. 26 The key role of TGF-β1 in liver fibrosis is highlighted by the finding that inflammatory responses in the liver do not lead to fibrogenic stimuli and collagen deposition in the absence of TGF up-regulation. 27 In studies of cirrhotic human liver tissue, mRNA for both TGF-β1 and connective tissue growth factor, a recently identified downstream mediator of TGF-β, were localized to activated stellate cells, endothelial cells, and BDECs, and the degree of expression was shown to correlate with severity of fibrosis. 28 The role of TGF-β in pediatric cholestatic liver disease was first addressed by our group demonstrating that TGF-β1 expression was particularly localized to the BDECs in biliary atresia. 6 Subsequently, Rosenweig and colleagues 29 demonstrated that the hepatic expression of TGF-β1 protein, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, is increased in children with hepatic fibrosis secondary to CF and biliary atresia in contrast to normal liver tissue. However, this study did not examine the cellular localization of TGF-β1. Our study has not only confirmed increased TGF-β expression, but has demonstrated that BDECs are the predominant cellular source of TGF-β1 in CFLD. In this respect it is similar to biliary atresia, highlighting the cholestatic influence on pathogenesis. It remains to be determined whether the mechanism that stimulates BDECs to produce TGF-β1 occurs via retention of hydrophobic bile salts, via co-stimulation by infectious agents in the context of impaired immune modulation, or via another as yet undefined stimulus.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sonia Greco and Nancy Blanch for their expert technical assistance in CK-19 immunohistochemistry and in the generation of the procollagen α1(I) mRNA riboprobe, respectively.

Footnotes

Address reprint requests to Dr. Grant A. Ramm, Head, Hepatic Fibrosis Group, The Queensland Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, QLD., 4029, Australia. E-mail: grantr@qimr.edu.au.

Supported by a Major Research Project grant (no. 913-005 to P. J. L., R. W. S., G. A. R.) from the Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation, Brisbane, Australia.

References

  • 1.Sokol RJ, Durie PR: Recommendations for management of liver and biliary tract disease in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999, 28(Suppl 1):S1-S13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lindblad A, Glaumann H, Strandvik B: Natural history of liver disease in cystic fibrosis. Hepatology 1999, 30:1151-1158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cohn JA, Strong TV, Ticciotto MR, Nairn AC, Collins FS, Fitzgerald JG: Localization of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in human bile duct epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 1993, 105:1857-1864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lindblad A, Hultcrantz R, Strandvik B: Bile duct destruction and collagen deposition: a prominent ultrastructural feature of the liver in cystic fibrosis. Hepatology 1992, 16:372-381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Friedman SL: Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis, an integrated cellular response to tissue injury. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:2247-2250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramm GA, Nair VG, Bridle KR, Shepherd RW, Crawford DHG: Contribution of hepatic parenchymal cells and nonparenchymal cells to hepatic fibrogenesis in biliary atresia. Am J Pathol 1998, 153:527-535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedman SL: Hepatic stellate cells. Prog Liver Dis 1996, 14:101-130 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Enzan H, Himeno H, Iwamura S, Saibara T, Onishi S, Yamamoto Y, Miyazaki E, Hara H: Sequential changes in human Ito cells and their relation to postnecrotic liver fibrosis in massive and submassive hepatic necrosis. Virchows Arch 1995, 426:95-101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramm GA, Crawford DH, Powell LW, Walker NI, Fletcher LM, Halliday JW: Hepatic stellate cell activation in genetic hemochromatosis. Lobular distribution, effect of increasing hepatic iron and response to phlebotomy. J Hepatol 1997, 26:584-592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wells RG: Fibrogenesis. V. TGF-beta signaling pathways. Am J Physiol 2000, 279:G845-G850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scheuer PJ: Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. J Hepatol 1991, 13:372-374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duthie A, Doherty DG, Williams C, Scott-Jupp R, Warner JO, Tanner MS, Williamson R, Mowat AP: Genotype analysis for delta F508, G551D and R553X mutations in children and young adults with cystic fibrosis with and without chronic liver disease. Hepatology 1992, 15:660-664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Castaldo G, Fuccio A, Salvatore D, Raia V, Santostasi T, Leonardi S, Lizzi N, La Rosa M, Rigillo N, Salvatore F: Liver expression in cystic fibrosis could be modulated by genetic factors different from the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator genotype. Am J Med Genet 2001, 98:294-297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zielenski J, Corey M, Rozmahel R, Markiewicz D, Aznarez I, Casals T, Larriba S, Mercier B, Cutting GR, Krebsova A, Macek M, Jr, Langfelder-Schwind E, Marshall BC, DeCelie-Germana J, Claustres M, Palacio A, Bal J, Nowakowska A, Ferec C, Estivill X, Durie P, Tsui LC: Detection of a cystic fibrosis modifier locus for meconium ileus on human chromosome 19q13. Nat Genet 1999, 22:128-129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gabolde M, Hubert D, Guilloud-Bataille M, Lenearts C, Feingold J, Besmond C: The mannose binding lectin gene influences the severity of chronic liver disease in cystic fibrosis. J Med Genet 2001, 38:310-311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vawter GF, Shwachman H: Cystic fibrosis in adults. An autopsy study. Pathol Annu 1979, 14:357-382 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kinman N, Lindblad A, Housset C, Buentke E, Scheynius A, Strandvik B, Hultcrantz R: Expression of cystic fibrosis membrane conductance regulator in liver tissue from patients with cystic fibrosis. Hepatology 2000, 32:334-340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakagawa M, Colombo C, Setchell KD: Comprehensive study of the biliary bile acid composition of patients with cystic fibrosis and associated liver disease before and after UDCA administration. Hepatology 1990, 12:322-334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robb TA, Davidson GP, Kirubakaran C: Conjugated bile acids in serum and secretions in response to cholecystokinin/secretin stimulation in children with cystic fibrosis. Gut 1985, 26:1246-1256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sodeman T, Bronk SF, Roberts PJ, Miyoshi H, Gores GJ: Bile salts mediate hepatocyte apoptosis by increasing cell surface trafficking of Fas. Am J Physiol 2000, 278:G992-G999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Que FG, Phan VA, Phan VH, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ: GUDC inhibits cytochrome c release from human cholangiocyte mitochondria. J Surg Res 1999, 83:100-105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gaskin KJ, Waters DLM, Howman-Giles R, De Silva M, Earl JW, Martin H, Kan AE, Brown JM, Dorney SFA: Liver disease and common-bile-duct stenosis in cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1988, 318:340-346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arkwright PD, Laurie S, Super M, Pravica V, Schwarz MJ, Webb AK, Hutchinson IV: TGF-beta (1) genotype and accelerated decline in lung function of patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2000, 55:459-462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Inagaki Y, Mamura M, Kanamaru Y, Greenwel P, Nemoto T, Takehara K, Ten Dijke P, Nakao A: Constitutive phosphorylation and nuclear localization of Smad3 are correlated with increased collagen gene transcription in activated hepatic stellate cells. J Cell Physiol 2001, 187:117-123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neuman MG: Apoptosis in diseases of the liver. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2001, 38:109-166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Issa R, Williams E, Trim N, Kendall T, Arthur MJ, Riechen J, Benyon RC, Iredale JP: Apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells: involvement in resolution of biliary fibrosis and regulation by soluble growth factors. Gut 2001, 48:548-557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nieto N, Dominguez-Rosales JA, Fontana L, Salazar A, Armendariz-Borunda J, Greenwel P, Rojkind M: Rat hepatic stellate cells contribute to the acute phase response with increased expression of alpha1 (I) and alpha (IV) collagens, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and matrix-metalloproteinase-2 messenger RNAs. Hepatology 2001, 33:597-607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abou-Shady M, Friess H, Zimmerhamm A, di Mola FF, Guo XZ, Baer HU, Buchjelr MW: Connective tissue growth factor in human liver cirrhosis. Liver 2000, 20:296-304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rosensweig JN, Omori M, Page K, Potter CJ, Perlman EJ, Thorgeirsson SS, Schwarz KB: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in plasma and liver of children with liver disease. Pediatr Res 1998, 44:402-409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES