Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1989 Mar;96(3):497–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11843.x

Characterization of the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating contractions of the guinea-pig uterus.

R M Eglen 1, A D Michel 1, R L Whiting 1
PMCID: PMC1854401  PMID: 2497919

Abstract

The muscarinic receptor present on the guinea-pig uterus has been characterized by use of both functional and radioligand binding studies. The contractile responses to carbachol were antagonized by atropine, pirenzepine, methoctramine and hexamethonium with pA2 values consistent with the presence of an M2 receptor (i.e. 9.5, 7.0, 8.0 and 3.7 respectively). In binding studies, pKi values were also observed for pirenzepine, methoctramine and AF-DX 116 which were consistent with the presence of a homogeneous M2 receptor population (i.e. 6.6, 7.9 and 7.1 respectively). The uterus therefore possesses M2 receptors through which a functional contractile response is mediated and in this respect it is clearly different from other smooth muscles. M2 receptors in the uterus mediate excitatory responses, an effect in contrast to their action in other tissues.

Full text

PDF
497

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARUNLAKSHANA O., SCHILD H. O. Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1959 Mar;14(1):48–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00928.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eglen R. M., Whiting R. L. Muscarinic receptor subtypes: a critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature. J Auton Pharmacol. 1986 Dec;6(4):323–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-8673.1986.tb00661.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eltze M. Muscarinic M1- and M2-receptors mediating opposite effects on neuromuscular transmission in rabbit vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jul 7;151(2):205–221. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90801-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Giraldo E., Monferini E., Ladinsky H., Hammer R. Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity in guinea pig intestinal smooth muscle: binding studies with AF-DX 116. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987 Sep 23;141(3):475–477. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90568-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lambrecht G., Gmelin G., Rafeiner K., Strohmann C., Tacke R., Mutschler E. o-Methoxy-sila-hexocyclium: a new quaternary M1-selective muscarinic antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jun 22;151(1):155–156. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90708-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Michel A. D., Whiting R. L. Methoctramine reveals heterogeneity of M2 muscarinic receptors in longitudinal ileal smooth muscle membranes. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jan 19;145(3):305–311. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90434-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nilvebrant L., Sparf B. Receptor binding profiles of some selective muscarinic antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jun 22;151(1):83–96. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90695-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roffel A. F., Elzinga C. R., Van Amsterdam R. G., De Zeeuw R. A., Zaagsma J. Muscarinic M2 receptors in bovine tracheal smooth muscle: discrepancies between binding and function. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Aug 9;153(1):73–82. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90589-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES