Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Apr;25(4):408–410. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.408

Comparative efficacies of mezlocillin and ampicillin alone or in combination with gentamicin in the treatment of Streptococcus faecalis endocarditis in rabbits.

R J Fass, C A Wright
PMCID: PMC185540  PMID: 6428306

Abstract

The in vitro and in vivo activities of mezlocillin and ampicillin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, against Streptococcus faecalis were compared. In vitro, relative bactericidal and activities for 10 strains of S. faecalis were as follows: mezlocillin plus gentamicin greater than ampicillin plus gentamicin (P is not significant) greater than mezlocillin (P less than 0.01) greater than ampicillin (P less than 0.01) greater than gentamicin (P less than 0.01) greater than control (P less than 0.01). One of the strains was used to induce endocarditis in rabbits. Infected rabbits were treated by random selection with ampicillin, mezlocillin, ampicillin plus gentamicin, mezlocillin plus gentamicin, or saline (control) for 7 days. Among antibiotic-treated rabbits, survival rates were the same, but ampicillin was less effective than the other regimens in sterilizing both blood cultures (P less than 0.001 on day 4) and cardiac vegetations (P less than 0.05 on day 7). Differences in quantitative vegetation cultures among rabbits treated with mezlocillin, mezlocillin plus gentamicin, or ampicillin plus gentamicin and sacrificed on day 7 were not significantly different. Peak inhibitory and bactericidal antibacterial activity titers in serum determined during treatment were higher with mezlocillin (with or without gentamicin) than with ampicillin (with or without gentamicin) (P less than 0.01). Mezlocillin may be more effective than ampicillin in the treatment of S. faecalis infections in humans.

Full text

PDF
408

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Durack D. T., Beeson P. B. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. I. Colonization of a sterile vegetation. Br J Exp Pathol. 1972 Feb;53(1):44–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fass R. J. In vitro activities of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics. A comparative study of 20 parenterally administered drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Jun;140(6):763–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gutschik E., Jepsen O. B., Mortensen I. Effect of combinations of penicillin and aminoglycosides on Streptococcus faecalis: a comparative study of seven aminoglycoside antibiotics. J Infect Dis. 1977 May;135(5):832–836. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.5.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUNTER T. H. Speculations on the mechanism of cure of bacterial endocarditis. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 Oct 14;144(7):524–527. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02920070012004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jawetz E., Gunnison J. B., Coleman V. R. The Combined Action of Penicillin with Streptomycin or Chloromycetin on Enterococci in Vitro. Science. 1950 Mar 10;111(2880):254–256. doi: 10.1126/science.111.2880.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaye D. Enterococci. Biologic and epidemiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Oct 25;142(11):2006–2009. doi: 10.1001/archinte.142.11.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Libke R. D., Regamey C., Clarke J. T., Kirby W. M. Synergism of carbenicillin and gentamicin against enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Nov;4(5):564–568. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.5.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perlman B. B., Freedman L. R. Experimental endocarditis. II. Staphylococcal infection of the aortic valve following placement of a polyethylene catheter in the left side of the heart. Yale J Biol Med. 1971 Oct;44(2):206–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES