Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Apr;25(4):411–412. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.411

Comparative in vitro activities of teichomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and aminoglycosides against staphylococci and enterococci.

C U Tuazon, H Miller
PMCID: PMC185541  PMID: 6233934

Abstract

The activity of teichomycin A2 was compared with that of vancomycin in vitro against clinical isolates of staphylococci and enterococci. Teichomycin A2 was more active than vancomycin active against all isolates tested. Synergistic studies also demonstrated that teichomycin A2 combined with rifampin is more active than vancomycin combined with rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Teichomycin A2, either singly or in combination with an aminoglycoside, was more active against Streptococcus faecalis isolates.

Full text

PDF
411

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andriole V. T. Antibiotic synergy in experimental infection with Pseudomonas. II. The effect of carbenicillin, cephalothin, or cephanone combined with tobramycin or gentamicin. J Infect Dis. 1974 Feb;129(2):124–133. doi: 10.1093/infdis/129.2.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Christensen G. D., Bisno A. L., Parisi J. T., McLaughlin B., Hester M. G., Luther R. W. Nosocomial septicemia due to multiply antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):1–10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook F. V., Farrar W. E., Jr Vancomycin revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Jun;88(6):813–818. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-6-813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cynamon M. H., Granato P. A. Comparison of the in vitro activities of teichomycin A2 and vancomycin against staphylococci and enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Mar;21(3):504–505. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.3.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fainstein V., LeBlanc B., Bodey G. P. Comparative in vitro study of teichomycin A2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Mar;23(3):497–499. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.3.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hook E. W., 3rd, Johnson W. D., Jr Vancomycin therapy of bacterial endocarditis. Am J Med. 1978 Sep;65(3):411–415. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90766-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marymont J. H., Jr, Wentz R. M. Serial dilution antibiotic sensitivity testing with the microtitrator system. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 May;45(5):548–551. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.5.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Parenti F., Beretta G., Berti M., Arioli V. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus Nov. Sp. I. Description of the producer strain, fermentation studies and biological properties. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1978 Apr;31(4):276–283. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peacock J. E., Jr, Marsik F. J., Wenzel R. P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: introduction and spread within a hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Oct;93(4):526–532. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-4-526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Saravolatz L. D., Markowitz N., Arking L., Pohlod D., Fisher E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic observations during a community-acquired outbreak. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):11–16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Varaldo P. E., Debbia E., Schito G. C. In vitro activity of teichomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Mar;23(3):402–406. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.3.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES