Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Apr;25(4):427–432. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.427

Pharmacokinetics and bacteriological efficacy of mezlocillin in experimental Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes meningitis.

C Odio, M L Thomas, G H McCracken Jr
PMCID: PMC185545  PMID: 6375552

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and bacteriological effect of mezlocillin in experimental meningitis caused by Listeria monocytogenes and two Escherichia coli strains. The half-life of mezlocillin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was approximately twice that in serum of experimentally infected animals, and the penetration of drug into CSF was 5 to 15% after a single dose and 5 to 20% after continuous-infusion experiments. The bactericidal titer in CSF for both susceptible E. coli and L. monocytogenes was 1:8, whereas for the resistant E. coli strain, titers were less than 1:2 after single doses of 50 or 100 mg of mezlocillin per kg and 1:4 with continuous infusion. After single-dose and continuous-infusion experiments, the bacteriological effect of mezlocillin in experimental L. monocytogenes infections was similar to that of ampicillin. Mezlocillin reduced the colony counts of of susceptible E. coli in CSF by 90% or more after a single dose or continuous infusion but had no appreciable effect on resistant E. coli after a single dose of 50 mg/kg. In contrast, a single dose of 100 mg of mezlocillin per kg eradicated the resistant strain from CSF, despite a bactericidal titer in CSF of less than 1:2. This unexpected finding prompted us to evaluate the effect of serum on the in vitro susceptibilities of selected coliforms to mezlocillin. The activity of mezlocillin against one susceptible and four resistant strains of gram-negative, enteric bacilli was enhanced manyfold by the addition of fresh rabbit serum; this effect was abolished by heating the serum at 56 degrees C for 30 min. This interaction of mezlocillin and serum against coliform bacteria should be examined in a larger number of experimentally infected animals and in specimens obtained from mezlocillin-treated infants.

Full text

PDF
427

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berenbaum M. C. A method for testing for synergy with any number of agents. J Infect Dis. 1978 Feb;137(2):122–130. doi: 10.1093/infdis/137.2.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dacey R. G., Sande M. A. Effect of probenecid on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of penicillin and cephalosporin derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Oct;6(4):437–441. doi: 10.1128/aac.6.4.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dutcher B. S., Reynard A. M., Beck M. E., Cunningham R. K. Potentiation of antibiotic bactericidal activity by normal human serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 May;13(5):820–826. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.5.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu K. P., Neu H. C. Azlocillin and mezlocillin: new ureido penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):930–938. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.6.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hodges G. R., Worley S. E. Comparative penetration of azlocillin and mezlocillin into cerebrospinal fluid of normal rabbits and rabbits with experimentally induced Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):909–911. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.5.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marymont J. H., Jr, Wentz R. M. Serial dilution antibiotic sensitivity testing with the microtitrator system. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 May;45(5):548–551. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.5.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCracken G. H., Jr, Nelson J. D., Grimm L. Pharmacokinetics and bacteriological efficacy of cefoperazone, ceftriaxone, and moxalactam in experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Feb;21(2):262–267. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.2.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Myers M. G., Roberts R. J., Mirhij N. J. Effects of gestational age, birth weight, and hypoxemia on pharmacokinetics of amikacin in serum of infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jun;11(6):1027–1032. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.6.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakata Y., Boccazzi A., McCracken G. H., Jr Pharmacokinetics and bacteriological effect of ceftazidime in experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Escherichia coli meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Feb;23(2):213–217. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sakata Y., McCracken G. H., Jr, Thomas M. L., Olsen K. D. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of imipenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone in experimental meningitis due to an ampicillin- and chloramphenicol-resistant strain of Haemophilus influenzae type b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jan;25(1):29–32. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schaad U. B., McCracken G. H., Jr, Loock C. A., Thomas M. L. Pharmacokinetics and bacteriological efficacy of moxalactam (LY127935), netilmicin, and ampicillin in experimental gram-negative enteric bacillary meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):406–411. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.3.406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Scheld W. M., Brodeur J. P., Keeley J. M. Evaluation of mezlocillin in discriminative animal models of infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Jan;9 (Suppl A):51–64. doi: 10.1093/jac/9.suppl_a.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scheld W. M., Fletcher D. D., Fink F. N., Sande M. A. Response to therapy in an experimental rabbit model of meningitis due to Listeria monocytogenes. J Infect Dis. 1979 Sep;140(3):287–294. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Siegel J. D., McCracken G. H., Jr Sepsis neonatorum. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):642–647. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wise R., Andrews J. M. Activity of mezlocillin against gram-negative and gram-positive organisms: comparison with other penicillins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Jan;9 (Suppl A):1–9. doi: 10.1093/jac/9.suppl_a.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES