Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Apr;25(4):497–498. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.497

Determination of aminoglycosides in rat renal tissue by enzyme immunoassay.

A P Provoost, W P Van Schalkwijk, O Adejuyigbe, W B Van Leeuwen, J H Wagenvoort
PMCID: PMC185561  PMID: 6375558

Abstract

The enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique for the determination of gentamicin or amikacin in serum was evaluated for use in rat renal tissue. After the addition of either gentamicin or amikacin to tissue homogenate, the assay of the supernatant showed a reduced recovery, depending on the amount of renal tissue present per milliliter of homogenate. The recovery was independent of the amount of aminoglycoside added. This reduction could be due to either protein binding or interference with the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique by substances released from the renal tissue. When the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique is used for aminoglycoside assay in renal tissue, care should be taken to minimize the amount of tissue present in the homogenate or to correct for the decreased recovery.

Full text

PDF
497

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carlson L. G., Delaney C. J., Plorde J. J. Potential liabilities of gentamicin homogeneous enzyme immunoassay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jan;21(1):192–194. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delaney C. J., Opheim K. E., Smith A. L., Plorde J. J. Performance characteristics of bioassay, radioenzymatic assay, homogeneous enzyme immunoassay, and high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of serum gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jan;21(1):19–25. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanson N. Q., Yasmineh W. G. On the kinetics of the Beckman enzymatic method for serum and urinary amylase. Clin Chem. 1978 May;24(5):762–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hsu C. H., Kurtz T. W., Weller J. M. In vitro uptake of gentamicin by rat renal cortical tissue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Aug;12(2):192–194. doi: 10.1128/aac.12.2.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Just M., Erdmann G., Habermann E. The renal handling of polybasic drugs. 1. Gentamicin and aprotinin in intact animals. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1977 Oct;300(1):57–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00505080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Just M., Habermann E. The renal handling of polybasic drugs. 2. In vitro studies with brush border and lysosomal preparations. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1977 Oct;300(1):67–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00505081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kunin C. M. Binding of antibiotics to tissue homogenates. J Infect Dis. 1970 Jan;121(1):55–64. doi: 10.1093/infdis/121.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ratcliff R. M., Mirelli C., Moran E., O'Leary D., White R. Comparison of five methods for the assay of serum gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Apr;19(4):508–512. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.4.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Silverblatt F. J., Kuehn C. Autoradiography of gentamicin uptake by the rat proximal tubule cell. Kidney Int. 1979 Apr;15(4):335–345. doi: 10.1038/ki.1979.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES