Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 May;25(5):612–617. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.612

In vitro activity of fludalanine combined with pentizidone compared with those of other agents.

R Wise, J M Andrews
PMCID: PMC185598  PMID: 6610389

Abstract

The in vitro activity of fludalanine ( MK641 ) combined with pentizidone ( MK642 ) so as to give a fludalanine /D-cycloserine ratio of 1:1 was compared with the activities of ampicillin, ticarcillin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, and trimethoprim against 452 recent isolates and known beta-lactam- and trimethoprim-resistant strains. In addition, the in vitro activity of fludalanine - pentizidone on four different media, including a defined medium ( DFN -2), was studied. The MIC of fludalanine - pentizidone against 90% of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Providencia stuartii, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Staphylococcus aureus, and fecal streptococci was 4 micrograms or less per ml on DFN -2, and activity was somewhat reduced on the other media. Proteus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (90% MIC, less than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml) and Bacteroides spp. (90% MIC, 16 micrograms/ml) were less susceptible. Generally, fludalanine - pentizidone was less active than ceftazidime and comparable in activity to cefuroxime. beta-Lactamase-producing and trimethoprim-resistant strains tended to be susceptible to fludalanine - pentidizone . In the absence of human serum, the MBC of fludalanine - pentizidone was similar to the MIC. In the presence of increasing concentrations of human serum, there tended to be a greater difference between the MIC and MBC.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. G., Atherton F. R., Hall M. J., Hassall C. H., Holmes S. W., Lambert R. W., Nisbet L. J., Ringrose P. S. Phosphonopeptides as antibacterial agents: alaphosphin and related phosphonopeptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 May;15(5):684–695. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.5.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. G., Atherton F. R., Hall M. J., Hassall C. H., Holmes S. W., Lambert R. W., Nisbet L. J., Ringrose P. S. Phosphonopeptides, a new class of synthetic antibacterial agents. Nature. 1978 Mar 2;272(5648):56–58. doi: 10.1038/272056a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews J. M., Baquero F., Beltran J. M., Canton E., Crokaert F., Gobernado M., Gomez-Ius R., Loza E., Navarro M., Olay T. International collaborative study on standardization of bacterial sensitivity to fosfomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Oct;12(4):357–361. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kahan F. M., Kahan J. S., Cassidy P. J., Kropp H. The mechanism of action of fosfomycin (phosphonomycin). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 May 10;235(0):364–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb43277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Woodruff H. B., Mata J. M., Hernández S., Mochales S., Rodríguez A., Stapley E. O., Wallick H., Miller A. K., Hendlin D. Fosfomycin: Laboratory studies. Chemotherapy. 1977;23 (Suppl 1):1–22. doi: 10.1159/000222020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES