Abstract
In vitro studies were performed comparing ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867) and norfloxacin with three related organic acids. Ciprofloxacin was two to eight times more active than norfloxacin against 658 bacterial isolates representing 30 species. For all species tested, ciprofloxacin MICs for 90% inhibition were less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms ml. Additional tests with 5,994 isolates detected only 37 (0.6%) strains resistant to 2.0 micrograms of ciprofloxacin per ml and 106 (1.8%) resistant to 1.0 micrograms/ml. Only 6 (0.1%) of the 5,994 strains were resistant to 16 micrograms of norfloxacin per ml, and 129 (2.1%) were resistant to 4.0 micrograms/ml. The majority of resistant strains were streptococci or Pseudomonas spp. Resistance among the Enterobacteriaceae was extremely rare (i.e., greater than 99.8% susceptible to both drugs.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bauernfeind A., Petermüller C. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;2(2):111–115. doi: 10.1007/BF02001575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crump B., Wise R., Dent J. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Nov;24(5):784–786. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.5.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fass R. J. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Oct;24(4):568–574. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.4.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Barry A. L. Norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715): in vitro activity and cross-resistance with other organic acids including quality control limits for disk diffusion testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):165–172. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muytjens H. L., van der Ros-van de Repe J., van Veldhuizen G. Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867), norfloxacin, pipemidic acid, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Aug;24(2):302–304. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.2.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C., Labthavikul P. In vitro activity of norfloxacin, a quinolinecarboxylic acid, compared with that of beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jul;22(1):23–27. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shungu D. L., Weinberg E., Gadebusch H. H. Tentative interpretive standards for disk diffusion susceptibility testing with norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Feb;23(2):256–260. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise R., Andrews J. M., Edwards L. J. In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):559–564. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]