Skip to main content
Gut logoLink to Gut
letter
. 2006 Aug;55(8):1207.

Reduced microbial diversity in inflammatory bowel diseases

S J Ott 1, S Schreiber 1
PMCID: PMC1856277  PMID: 16849351

Intestinal microbiota have become the subject of intense investigation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over the past years after some groups demonstrated that significant alterations of the composition of enteric bacteria might be related to the underlying inflammatory process (Gut 2006;55:205–11).1,2,3,4 However, the complexity of the intestinal microbiota and the availability of a variety of different experimental approaches generated sometimes conflicting and inconsistent data. Manichanh et al (Gut 2006;55:205–11) recently published an extensive study using metagenomic libraries, a novel molecular technique allowing the recruitment of full molecular information of complex microbial habitats. In metagenomic clone libraries with more than 25 000 clones that were generated from faecal samples of healthy subjects and active Crohn's patients, significant loss of indigenous bacteria was found.

The article confirms our report that reduced bacterial diversity seems to be a hallmark of the biofilm in IBD.4 Using colonic biopsies we found loss of bacterial diversity of the mucosal microbiota in a large cohort of patients with IBD using different 16S rDNA based detection techniques.4 In contrast with Manichanh et al, the taxa of the bacterial phylotypes were determined in our study by sequence homology analysis in clone libraries and not by single strand conformational polymorphism alone.4 The metagenomic approach used by Manichanh et al is likely to be the most informative way of collecting microbial data of complex bacterial communities. Notably, this demonstrates that assessment of 16S rDNA based signals, especially when using large scale clone libraries as in our paper, has sufficient power to determine bacterial richness and diversity. This is not surprising because the taxonomical classification of metagenomic fragments is based mainly on 16S rDNA anchor genes.

In some aspects there are discrepancies between the different molecular studies. Manichanh et al only demonstrated alterations of the faecal microbiota. As previously demonstrated, different compartments in the intestine contain complex ecological systems that are distinctly different.5 Therefore, the composition of the bacterial consortia in human faeces, which contain a high number of transient bacteria, does not fully represent the mucosal microbiota.6,7 Mucosa related microbes (including intracellular microorganisms) however, seem to be a functionally relevant part of the intestinal microbiom directly interacting with the host immune system.

Generating and analyzing metagenome libraries is very expensive. Therefore, the number of patients that can be analysed will remain relatively small. Confirmation of reduced bacterial diversity however could now be followed by a deeper analysis of the functional capacities of the bacterial communities. These next steps could convert descriptive approaches into a mechanistic understanding. Manichanh et al have introduced the metagenomic approach as a novel technique of collecting data from complex human biofilms.

Supplementary Material

[Competing interest statement]

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Swidsinski A, Ladhoff A, Pernthaler A.et al Mucosal flora in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 200212244–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Seksik P, Rigottier‐Gois L, Gramet G.et al Alterations of the dominant faecal bacterial groups in patients with Crohn's disease of the colon. Gut 200352237–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prindiville T, Cantrell M, Wilson K. Ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of mucosa‐associated bacteria in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 200410824–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ott S J, Musfeldt M, Wenderoth D F.et al Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 200453685–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bignell D E, Oskarsson H, Anderson J M. Distribution and abundance of bacteria in the gut of a soil‐feeding termite Procutiermes aburiensis (Termitidae, Termitinae). J Gen Microbiol 1980117393–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zoetendal E G, von Wright A, Vilpponen‐Salmela T.et al Mucosa‐associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002683401–3407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ott S J, Musfeldt M, Timmis K N.et al In vitro alterations of intestinal bacterial microbiota in fecal samples during storage. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 200450237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Competing interest statement]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES