Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 2006 Nov;244(5):750–757. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225097.60142.68

Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrence After Surgical Treatment

A Multicenter Prospective Study

Jean-Jacques Duron *, Nathalie Jourdan-Da Silva , Sophie Tezenas du Montcel , Anne Berger , Fabrice Muscari §, Henri Hennet , Michel Veyrieres , Jean Marie Hay **
PMCID: PMC1856591  PMID: 17060768

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of the present study was to determine the cumulative incidence and the risk factors of recurrence in patients operated on for an adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO).

Summary Background Data:

Postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions, or bands, resulting from any type of abdominal surgery, are the main cause of adhesive postoperative small bowel obstructions, which represent a life-long issue. Recurrences after operated adhesive postoperative SBO are a threatening potentiality for patients and a difficult problem facing any surgeon. Today the cumulative incidence and the risk factors of recurrence have been retrospectively reported but have never been prospectively evaluated in a multicenter study.

Methods:

From January 1997 to January 2002, we enrolled 286 patients operated on for an adhesive postoperative SBO in a prospective multicenter trial. A systematic follow-up was carried out and ended in April 2003. Studied factors for recurrent adhesive postoperative SBO were as follows: age, gender, ASA status, number and sites of previous operations, previous operation for adhesive postoperative SBO, elapsed time from the latest operation, surgical approach, number and type of obstructive structures, site and mechanism of obstruction, final operations, and postoperative surgical and medical complications. They were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to determine the independent risk factor of recurrence.

Results:

The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 1–75 months). The cumulative incidence of overall recurrence was 15.9%, and for surgically managed recurrence 5.8%. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for the overall recurrences were age <40 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; confidence interval [CI], 1.48–5.94), adhesion or matted adhesion (HR, 3.79; CI, 1.84–7.78) and, for the surgically managed: adhesions or matted adhesions (HR, 3.64; CI, 1.12–11.84), and postoperative surgical complications (HR, 5.63; CI, 1.73–18.28).

Conclusion:

Operated adhesive postoperative SBO is a clinical entity with a high recurrence rate and specific risk factors of recurrences. Thus, the patients operated on for adhesive postoperative SBO may be candidates for the preventive use of anti-adhesion agents, particularly when a risk factor of recurrence is present.


Over 5 years, 286 patients operated on for an adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) were enrolled in a prospective multicenter study to determine the rate and risk factors of recurrence. Operated adhesive postoperative SBO is associated with high incidence of recurrence (15.9%). Three independent risk factors of recurrence were highlighted: age <40 years, presence of adhesion or matted adhesion, and postoperative surgical complications.

Opening the peritoneal cavity, in whatever type of surgery, leads to the formation of potentially obstructive structures (adhesions or bands) in almost 95% of patients.1 Today, with the increased incidence of abdominal surgery,1 these structures are the most frequent cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO).3–5 Since 1990, it has been reported that adhesive SBO occurs in 3% of all laparotomies, 1% during the first postoperative year.6,7 After operated adhesive postoperative SBO, a risk of recurrence remains and the literature reported a wide ranging rate of overall recurrence (range, 8.7%–53%) at 3 years and more.3,8–11 These variations may be due to the retrospective type of the studies,3,8–11 commonly inducing missing data, incomplete follow-up leading to missing patients, and to the monocenter design of the studies entailing selection bias.12 Only one study used a multivariate analysis,10 the best way to highlight independent risk factors.12 For these reasons, in patients operated on for an adhesive postoperative SBO, we conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the cumulative incidence and the risk factors of recurrence using a multivariate analysis.

METHODS

From January 1, 1997 to January 1, 2002 (5 years; end of enrollment), 286 patients (186 women, mean age, 55.8 years; SD 21.2 years; range, 16–99 years), were operated on for an adhesive postoperative SBO. The study was conducted in 20 gastrointestinal surgical units (8 university, 8 general, and 4 private hospitals). The centers initiated and ended the study at different times. Once a center entered the study, all consecutive eligible patients were included. Each center entered a median number of 14 patients (range, 1–44 patients). The median inclusion time was 40 months (range, 1–55 patients).

Eligibility Criteria

Patients operated on for an adhesive postoperative SBO were eligible for our study. A total of 188 patients (66%) were operated on within the 24 postadmission hours, the others after this period. The operating surgeon was free to choose technical points like intraoperative lavages, sutures, type of anastomosis, and drainage. Antiadhesion agents were never used.

Noneligibility Criteria

Patients under 16 years old, foreigners without French residency, patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, associated abdominal cancer, peritoneal infection (abscess, peritonitis), or a past history of abdominopelvic irradiation were excluded. Patients with a SBO during the first postoperative month, corresponding to a possible “early postoperative obstruction,” were also excluded.13–15

Data Collection

All the demographic, medical, and follow-up data were collected by the operating surgeon with a standardized data collection form.

Follow-up

Patients were systematically followed up by the operating surgeon at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months through a consultation and at the end of the follow-up (April 2003) (6 years 3 months, or 75 months) through a consultation or a phone call. The data about the date and type of recurrence managed in the same or in another surgical unit were collected. The follow-up included the postoperative period (hospital stay and the month after hospital discharge) and the long-term follow-up.

Endpoint

The endpoint was dates of recurrences. The recurrence was strictly defined as a readmission with a clinical presentation of SBO: ileus with symptoms requiring a nasogastric drainage, a plain abdominal radiograph showing liquid levels, a small bowel dilatation, and no gas in the large bowel. At this moment, two groups were individualized as follows: 1) patients featuring a resolving medically managed SBO followed by the absence of other obstructive pathologic event etiologically different 1 month after hospital discharge; and 2) patients surgically treated, either urgently (continuous pain, peritoneal irritation, fever, metabolic disorders) or because of worsening symptoms and signs or a failure to resolve.8,9,16

In that way, two different points were considered: overall recurrence including operated and nonoperated recurrences and the surgical recurrences solely including the operated one.

Risk Factors

Preoperative risk factors (n = 7) were as follows: age, gender, ASA status,17 number and sites of previous operations according to a classification already reported1: mid and hind gut (abdominal wall, small intestine, appendix, rectum, colon), foregut and other abdominal organs (stomach, gall bladder, pancreas, kidney, bladder, hernias), and female reproductive tract. A previous operation for adhesive postoperative SBO and the elapsed time from the latest operation to the inclusion adhesive postoperative SBO operation were also noted.

Intraoperative risk factors (n = 8) included surgical approach whether conventional or laparoscopic, obstructive structures defined as bands (>1 cm long and <1 cm diameter), simple adhesions (<1 cm long and >1 cm diameter) and matted adhesion (dense, multiple, and tangled),4,10 site of obstruction (operative field, incision, other organs), number of intraperitoneal pathologic structures divided for obstruction release, obstruction mechanism (strangulation, volvulus >360° of rotation of the obstructed intestinal loop or mixed), obstructed organs (duodenojejunum, ileum), and intestinal status (viable, reversible ischemia, necrosis with or without bowel perforation). The final operations were classified according to their presumed increasing degree of severity: band section, lysis of simple adhesion, lysis of matted adhesion, extensive adhesiolysis,18 sutured or not serosal defect or sutured accidental enterotomy, and bowel resection whatever the previously mentioned procedure.

Postoperative risk factors (n = 2) included medical and surgical complications. We also recorded duration of in-hospital stay, postoperative deaths, and deaths reported during the follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

Survival time was calculated from the date of the operation for adhesive postoperative SBO to the date of recurrence or the date on which the data were censored if a patient died, was still alive at the end of the follow-up, was lost to follow-up, or had nonsurgical recurrence in the analysis of surgical recurrence.

Cumulative event rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were assessed with the log-rank test. Age was categorized by quartiles. The fully adjusted multivariable Cox regression model was built using stepwise procedure with variables with P ≤ 0.10 in univariate analysis. Relative risks were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Patients lost to follow-up were compared with those not lost to followup using χ2 test (or Fisher exact test when appropriate). All statistical tests were two-tailed. In all analyses P ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (version 8.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Postoperative Outcomes and Follow-up of Patients

Median duration of in-hospital stay was 10 days (range, 2–69 days). The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 1–75 months; 3 years 5 months). Twenty-seven patients (9%) were lost to follow-up at the end of the study (one third over 2 years of follow-up).

During the postoperative period, 39 (14%) patients sustained 40 (14%) postoperative complications. Twenty-three (8%) were medical complications: 19 cardiac or pulmonary, 2 urinary, 1 diabetic complications, and 1 deep venous thrombosis. Seventeen (6%) were surgical complications: 12 wound sepsis, 5 intraperitoneal complications. These latter were 3 postoperative intestinal necroses due to a misjudgement of an “apparent” reversible ischemia followed by 2 reoperations and 1 necropsy, 1 operated intraperitoneal abscess, and 1 nonoperated persisting ileus. One patient had both 1 urinary complication and 1 wound sepsis.

Eight patients (3%) (median age, 86 years; range, 76–98 years) died, each with a complication: 7 cardiac or pulmonary complications and 1 of 3 postoperative intestinal necrosis. They suffered significantly more complications (P < 0.001) than the 278 alive patients who sustained 31 complications (11%).

During the long-term follow-up of the 278 patients, 19 other patients (7%) (median age, 78 years; range, 38–89 years) died, none with a recurrent adhesive postoperative SBO. These patients had previously sustained 6 postoperative complications (2 surgical: 1 wound infection, persisting ileus; and 4 medical: 3 pulmonary and 1 diabetic complication) (31.5%) compared with 25 (10%) in the 259 patients who were alive (P = 0.012).

Finally, in the postoperative period and long-term follow-up, 27 patients (10%) died. These patients suffered significantly more postoperative complications (n = 14; 52%) than the 259 patients who were still alive (n = 26; 10%) (P < 0.0001).

Recurrences

Incidence and Risk Factors of Overall Recurrence

Incidence: There were 33 (12%) primary recurrences: 22 (two thirds) medically treated and 11 (one third) surgically treated. Six were secondary recurrences (18%): 4 surgically treated and 2 medically treated. The rate of secondary recurrences was the same after the primary medically (4 of 22) or surgically treated recurrences (2 of 11).

Globally, 33 patients sustained 39 recurrences: 24 medically and 15 surgically managed (Fig. 1). There were no third recurrences.

graphic file with name 20FF1.jpg

FIGURE 1. Distribution of recurrences according to their medical or surgical types.

The cumulative incidence of overall recurrences was: at 1 year 5.5% ± 1.4%, at 3 years 11.3% ± 2%, at 5 years 13.5% ± 2.3%, and 15.9% ± 3.3% at the end of the study (Fig. 2).

graphic file with name 20FF2.jpg

FIGURE 2. Cumulative rates of overall and surgical recurrence of ASPBO (Kaplan-Meier estimates) (n = 286).

In the univariate analysis, 7 factors were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) (Tables 1, 2): age <40 years (range, 16–40 years) (Fig. 3), adhesion, matted adhesion, number of adhesions or bands ≥2, absence of bowel resection, other treatments, and latest operation for adhesive postoperative SBO. The latest operation was for adhesive postoperative SBO in 30 (10.5%) patients. Overall, 35 (12%) patients underwent 39 operations for SBO before inclusion.

TABLE 1. Preoperative Risk Factors of Recurrence After Operated Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO): Univariate Analysis

graphic file with name 20TT1.jpg

TABLE 2. Intraoperative or Postoperative Risk Factors of Recurrence After Operated Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Univariate Analysis

graphic file with name 20TT2.jpg

graphic file with name 20FF3.jpg

FIGURE 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall recurrences according to the patients’ age. Patients under 40 years had significantly more recurrences than older patients (P < 0.02).

Three other factors with a P value >0.05 and ≤0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis: strangulation, viable intestinal status, and postoperative surgical complications.

The other factors with a P value >0.10 were not included in the multivariate analysis (Tables 1, 2), particularly the number of previous operations (60% of the patients underwent 2 or more operations including 22% with 3 or more) and the site of latest operation. For this item, there is no difference in the recurrence rate between appendectomies, accounting for 20% of previous operations, and gynecologic operations (respectively, 11% and 9% recurrences). The laparoscopic approach, with a conversion rate of 31%, did not influence the recurrence rate whether this risk factor was analyzed in intention-to-treat or after eliminating the conversion cases. Regarding the statistically significant risk factors, there was no difference between patients completing the whole follow-up and those lost during follow-up.

In the multivariate analysis, two independent factors were statistically significant (Table 3): patients <40 years old (HR, 2.7; CI, 1.48–5.94) and adhesions or matted adhesions (HR, 3.79; CI, 1.84–7.78). Adhesions and matted adhesions were jointly studied in the multivariate analysis model because of their close rates of recurrence in univariate analysis (Table 2).

TABLE 3. Independent Risk Factors of Recurrence After Operated Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Multivariate Analysis

graphic file with name 20TT3.jpg

Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Recurrences

The cumulative incidence of surgical recurrences were: at 1 year 3.7% ± 4.0%, at 3 years 4.8% ± 1.3%, at 5 years 5.8% ± 1.6%, and 5.8% ± 1.6% at the end of the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the centers. Two factors were statistically significant in univariate analysis and remained independent in multivariate analysis: adhesions or matted adhesions (3.64; CI, 1.12–11.84) and surgical complications (HR, 5.63; CI, 1.73–18.28) (Tables 2, 3). Conversely, there was no recurrence in patients with postoperative medical complications.

Treatments and Outcomes of Patients With Independent Risk Factors of Recurrence

Forty-five patients (16%) underwent an intestinal resection. Thirty-seven were mandatory because of necrosis in 27 patients with bands and 10 patients with adhesions or matted adhesions. Eight intestinal resections were performed in patients with reversible ischemia or serosal defect or accidental enterotomy associated or isolated, corresponding to 6 patients with bands and 2 patients with adhesions or matted adhesions. We entitled this set of patients the “debatable resection group.”

Intestinal resection was not judged necessary for 241 patients. This group included 173 patients with a viable intestine and 68 patients of the “debatable resection group,” corresponding to 51 patients with bands and 17 patients with adhesions or matted adhesions.

Age <40 Years (n = 76)

In this group of 76 patients, 14 (18%) recurred. Nine patients (12%) were resected with no recurrence (0%), no complication and no death. Sixty-seven patients (88%) were not resected and 14 recurred (21%) with 2 complications and no death. Among the recurring patients we counted 8 patients (57%) of “debatable resection group.”

Adhesions or Matted Adhesions

In this group of 106 patients, 21 (20%) recurred. Twelve patients (11%) were resected and 1 (10%) recurred. Ninety-four patients (89%) were not resected and 20 (21%) recurred with 3 complications and no death. Among the 20 recurring patients, we counted 8 (40%) patients of the “debatable resection group.”

Postoperative Surgical Complications (n = 17)

In this group of 17 patients, 4 (23.5%) recurred. Four patients (23.5%) were resected with no recurrences (0%). Thirteen patients (76.5%) were not resected and 4 recurred (31%) with 1 death. Among the recurring patients we counted 3 patients (3 of 4) belonging to the “debatable resection group.”

It is noteworthy that an apparent reversible ischemia due to bands led to 3 postoperative necroses (2 reoperations) and 1 death.

DISCUSSION

The present study provides for the first time a multicenter and a prospective estimate of the overall and surgical cumulative incidence (15.9% and 5.8%, respectively) and of the risk factors of recurrence following an operated adhesive postoperative SBO: age <40 years, adhesions or matted adhesions, and postoperative surgical complications (Table 3).

Our death rate (3%) and complication rate (14%) are consistent with those reported in recent studies: death rate between 0% and 3.8% and complication rate between 0% and 27%.10,19 In our series, all the patients who died were over 75 years old (median age, 86 years; range, 76–98 years). Our early and long-term deaths are linked to the rate of postoperative complications (10% in living patients group vs. 31.5% in the deceased patients, P = 0.012). These results confirm those recently published stressing the deleterious effects of postoperative complications on early and late survival.20

Recurrences were the core of our study. Their precise definition is a major issue. The obstructive etiology of the surgically treated recurrent SBO is indisputable. Conversely, taking account of the “medically” treated recurrent SBO may be confusing even though overall recurrence is commonly reported in the literature.8,9,11 That is why we adopted stringent criteria of recurrence (used in all the centers), adding to the general definition of medical recurrence,10,19 the absence of any other obstructive pathologic event etiologically different during the postadmission month.

With regards to our cumulative overall recurrence (15.9% ± 3.3% at the end of the study), Fevang et al10 reported a rate of 29% at 25 years, 50% appearing during the 5 first years, ie, 14.5% at 5 years consistent with our results. Higher rates (33%–55%) were reported by others.8,9,11 This difference may be due to their overall long-term (10–12.8 years) readmissions and especially to their wider inclusion criteria (nonoperated adhesive postoperative SBO, past history of irradiation, cancer, other bowel obstruction),8,9 or to the lower number of included patients (n = 90).11 Probably for these latter reasons, Mucha3 reported a higher surgical recurrence rate of 8.5% at 3 years (vs. 4.8% in our series). However, our results are reinforced by the low final rate (9%) of patients lost to follow-up. In other studies, the number of patients lost to follow-up was not reported. Our follow-up features a realistic length (6 years 3 months) for a prospective study,8–11 even if the potential onset of recurrences has been highlighted in the very long term.10 Unlike Fevang et al,10 we did not record any third recurrence. That may be related to our strict inclusion criteria eliminating the early postoperative SBO with inflammatory phenomena and so possibly more prone to recurrence.15 The shorter length of our follow-up (median, 3.4 years vs. 11 years) also makes a third recurrence less probable.

The present study clearly confirms that operated adhesive postoperative SBO may be classified as a high-risk recurrence procedure.5,6 Thus, our overall and surgical recurrence rates (15.9% and 5.8%) may also compare with those reported in high risk surgical procedures of adhesive postoperative SBO, like colorectal surgery. Indeed, for this type of surgery, overall adhesive postoperative SBO ranges from 7% to 26% and surgically managed from 2.6% to 6.7% at 2 to 10 years.21–25

If not related to chance or to other unstudied factors, the fact that age lower than 40 years appeared in our multivariate analysis as an independent risk factor of recurrence raised question. This factor was not found as independent in the sole multivariate analysis of the literature,10 probably because it was analyzed as a continuous and not a categorized variable as recommended.26 In other studies, it was merely evoked8 or not analyzed.9,11 Pathophysiologic explanation of the role of young age in the onset of recurrences are rare. There is no study dedicated to the potential specificity of the peritoneal healing in the young adult. Only a quicker peritoneal regeneration in the immature rat has been experimentally described.27 As well, a higher frequency of adhesive postoperative SBO after abdominal surgery in early life, especially in the neonatal period, was reported.28 Likewise, the possible role of the decrease of gastrointestinal tract mobility with aging in postoperative adhesion formation,29,30 has never been investigated. Besides the high recurrence rates of these patients <40 years of age, the postoperative mortality of our patients was zero and the morbidity low (2 complications) in agreement with Fevang et al19 who reported a mortality and a morbidity rates close to zero in the 1990–1995 group of patients <60 years old. Our rates of secondary surgical recurrences following surgically and medically treated primary recurrences (3 of 22 vs. 1 of 11) are quite similar. Consequently, in the absence of symptoms of intestinal necrosis, our results may suggest in this group of patients, a general more sensible conservative approach of adhesive postoperative SBO as already recommended.16 On the other hand, in our operated patients <40 years of age, the high number of recurrences (21%), encompassing 57% of patients belonging to the “debatable resection group” may favor more resections.

Adhesions or matted adhesions were already reported as a risk factor of recurrence.9,10 The magnitude of the surgical peritoneal trauma, due to the frequently difficult division of this type of obstructive structures, logically produces attendant inflammatory reaction. The resulting decrease of the intraperitoneal fibrinolytic activity31–33 may favor adhesion formation and recurrence. In this group, the number of recurring patients (21%) in absence of resection is patent. That may argue in favor of more bowel resections, especially for the patients belonging to the “debatable resection group.” The beneficial effect of intestinal resection might relate to the decrease of the traumatized intestinal serosa area. In this way, it may be hypothesized that adhesive postoperative SBO frequency is linked to the extent of both the parietal peritoneal trauma (incision and site) and the intestinal serosa.

A laparoscopic approach has been proposed to decrease the incisional trauma and to lower the rate of recurrence.34–36 The present study included more than one third initial laparoscopic procedures with a conversion rate of 31%, close to the rates of other series (32.2%–40.9%).35,36 It resulted in a slightly higher but nonstatistically significant (P = 0.9; power 4%) rate of recurrences in the laparoscopic approach. Probably, further several different even smaller incisions and a mandatory identical parietal and visceral adhesiolysis as laparotomy do not decrease the magnitude of the peritoneal trauma. In relation with the low power of the test (4%), statistical evidence would require a substantially larger number of patients.

Postoperative surgical complications as a factor of surgical recurrence was already evoked, albeit not asserted.10 This factor may be linked to the previously reported increased number of adhesions resulting from postoperative surgical complications, incisional or intraabdominal, whatever the initial operation.37 The distribution of recurrences after the postoperative surgical complications (4 patients recurred after conservative treatment vs. none after resection) may also lead to more resections especially among patients of the “debatable resection group.” This attitude is particularly justified in patients sustaining an “apparent” intestinal reversible ischemia due to bands, complicated in our series by 3 postoperative necroses (2 reoperations) and 1 death.

The number of previous operations does not appear as a risk factor of recurrence in contrast with the results of other univariate and multivariate analyses.9,10 This difference may be due to the higher rate of previous operations in our patients (22% sustained 3 or more previous operations compared with 6% and 11%, respectively, in the Fevang et al10,19 and Miller et al9 series), possibly weakening their results. Furthermore, our results do not highlight any specific category of previous operations entailing a higher rate of recurrence. This is consistent with the global findings of Fevang et al10 who used a slightly different classification. However, our study did not confirm their reported higher rate of recurrences after appendectomies when compared with gynecologic operations. That may be due to our already mentioned stringent eligibility and noneligibility criteria, warranting a strict adhesive etiology.13–15

CONCLUSION

Today, operated adhesive postoperative SBO proves to be a clinical entity with high incidence and specific risk factors of recurrence: age <40 years, presence of adhesion or matted adhesion, and postoperative surgical complications. These results render patients undergoing operated adhesive postoperative SBO candidates for the preventive use of antiadhesion agents,1,34,38 particularly when a risk factor of recurrence is present.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the following clinical centers and local surgical coordinators for the enrollement and follow-up of patients: Bondy: G. Champault, C. Barrat; Paris: P. Le Picard; Cholet: X. Fabre; Colombes: J. M. Hay; Compiègne: P. Peyrrard; Corbeil: G. Kohlmann; Gap: J. Atger; Creteil: P. L. Fagniez; Paris: A. Berger; Lagny: D. Picard; Paris: H. Levard; Pau: Y. Laborde; Paris: J. J. Duron; Poissy: A. Fingerhut; Pontoise: M. Veyrieres; Romorantin: H. Henet; Rouen: P. Teniere; Saint Etienne: J. Porcheron; Toulouse: G. Fourtanier, I. Fontes Dislaire. The authors also thank Professor Harold Ellis for his assistance in the review of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Reprints: Jean Jacques Duron, MD, PhD, Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hopital de la Pitié Salpetriere, 83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. E-mail: jean-jacques.duron@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1476–1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu JH, Etzioni DA, O'Connell JB, et al. Inpatient surgery in California: 1990–2000. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1106–1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mucha P Jr. Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 1987;67:597–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, et al. Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2000;180:33–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cox MR, Gunn IF, Eastman MC, et al. The operative aetiology and types of adhesions causing small bowel obstruction. Aust NZ J Surg. 1993;63:848–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:60–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Menzies D. Peritoneal adhesions: incidence, cause, and prevention. Surg Annu. 1992;24:27–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Landercasper J, Cogbill TH, Merry WH, et al. Long-term outcome after hospitalization for small-bowel obstruction. Arch Surg. 1993;128:765–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, et al. Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1240–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fevang BT, Fevang J, Lie SA, et al. Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 2004;240:193–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barkan H, Webster S, Ozeran S. Factors predicting the recurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 1995;170:361–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32:51–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, et al. Readmission for small-bowel obstruction in the early postoperative period: etiology and outcome. Can J Surg. 2002;45:255–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sajja SB, Schein M. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2004;91:683–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stewart RM, Page CP, Brender J, et al. The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction: a cohort study. Am J Surg. 1987;154:643–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fevang BT, Jensen D, Svanes K, et al. Early operation or conservative management of patients with small bowel obstruction? Eur J Surg. 2002;168:475–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. Jama. 1961;178:261–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fabri PJ, Rosemurgy A. Reoperation for small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71:131–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fevang BT, Fevang J, Stangeland L, et al. Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: a 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg. 2000;231:529–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR, et al. Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:241–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Kuijpers JH, et al. Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1242–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.MacLean AR, Cohen Z, MacRae HM, et al. Risk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2002;235:200–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, et al. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:822–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222:120–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mazumdar M, Smith A, Bacik J. Methods for categorizing a prognostic variable in a multivariable setting. Stat Med. 2003;22:559–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raftery AT. Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum in the immature animal: a light and electron microscopical study. Br J Surg. 1973;60:969–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Devens K. Recurrent intestinal obstruction in the neonatal period. Arch Dis Child. 1963;38:118–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Evers BM, Townsend CM Jr, Thompson JC. Organ physiology of aging. Surg Clin North Am. 1994;74:23–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Firth M, Prather CM. Gastrointestinal motility problems in the elderly patient. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1688–1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vipond MN, Whawell SA, Thompson JN, et al. Peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intra-abdominal adhesions. Lancet. 1990;335:1120–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scott-Coombes D, Whawell S, Vipond MN, et al. Human intraperitoneal fibrinolytic response to elective surgery. Br J Surg. 1995;82:414–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ivarsson ML, Falk P, Holmdahl L. Response of visceral peritoneum to abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:148–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Becker JM, Stucchi AF. Intra-abdominal adhesion prevention: are we getting any closer? Ann Surg. 2004;240:202–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fischer CP, Doherty D. Laparoscopic approach to small bowel obstruction. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002;9:40–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. Aust NZ J Surg. 2001;71:641–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Luijendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg. 1996;223:242–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, et al. Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:467–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES