Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2006 Apr;90(4):488–490. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.084335

The role of mitochondrial haplogroups in primary open angle glaucoma

R Andrews 1,2, T Ressiniotis 1,2, D M Turnbull 1,2, M Birch 1,2, S Keers 1,2, P F Chinnery 1,2, P G Griffiths 1,2
PMCID: PMC1857003  PMID: 16547333

Abstract

Aim

To investigate a possible association between mitochondrial haplogroups and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from 140 POAG patients and 75 healthy individuals. Restriction enzyme digest analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified fragments was used to determine the mitochondrial haplogroup of each patient and control.

Results

The median age was 73 years for the POAG patients (range 51–87, SD 8.01) and 78 years for the controls (range 68–90, SD 4.4). Mean IOP was 20.8 mm Hg for the patients (SD 2.6) and 16.2 mm Hg for the controls (SD 3.4). Median cup/disc ratio was 0.8 and 0.3 for patients and controls respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the haplogroup distribution between the POAG patients and the healthy individuals (Fisher's exact test).

Conclusion

In this cohort, mitochondrial haplogroups do not appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of POAG.

Keywords: glaucoma, genetics, mitochondria, haplogroups


Epidemiological studies demonstrate that a significant proportion of typical late onset glaucoma is genetically determined. Although the prevalence of the disease in first degree relatives is greater than in the general population, it is not high enough to indicate a simple Mendelian pattern of inheritance, suggesting rather a polygenic or multifactorial mode of transmission.1

Some studies have shown the prevalence of a maternal family history is six to eight times greater than a paternal history.2,3,4 This occurs despite the prevalence of the disease being equal in both sexes5 and in the absence of any maternal influence upon IOP.3 It is difficult to explain this difference in strict Mendelian terms. Matrilineal inheritance is, however, a characteristic of mitochondrial genetics.6

Mitochondria are unique among organelles in that they contain their own DNA.7 Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has a number of unusual features which impart to mitochondrial disorders a novel set of genetic characteristics, one of which is that mtDNA is transmitted exclusively through the maternal line.8

During evolution, a number of mutations have accumulated on the mtDNA, representing specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), according to which human populations can be categorised into various mtDNA “haplogroups.”7,9 These haplogroups were recently found to influence energy dependent processes such as sperm motility and affecting the risk of developing late onset neurodegenerative diseases.8,10

Studies on the inheritance of glaucoma have concentrated on the nuclear genome. The higher prevalence of maternal compared to paternal transmission of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) observed in some family studies suggested to us that mtDNA haplogroups or polymorphisms could play a part in the pathogenesis of POAG. Other studies have also demonstrated influence of mtDNA on the pathophysiology of optic neuropathies such as Leber's disease11 and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (PD).10

More than 100 pathological defects in human mtDNA have now been described.12,13,14 Ophthalmic involvement is common.15 Optic atrophy is a prominent ocular manifestation and, in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), is the predominant and frequently sole presentation of the disease. Optic atrophy is also associated with a number of other defects in mtDNA.15,16 Chloramphenicol, a specific inhibitor of mitochondrial protein synthesis, may also produce a clinical picture virtually indistinguishable from LHON.17 This is also the case with tobacco‐alcohol amblyopia.18 Taken together, these observations suggest that the retinal ganglion cells are exquisitely sensitive to a variety of disruptions of mitochondrial metabolism.19 This propensity for optic nerve damage suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction could also contribute to the pathogenesis of other optic neuropathies in which the aetiology remains to be defined.

Methods

Case selection

To be included in the study all 140 affected white people from the north east of England had to meet the following criteria: presentation over the age of 60 years, untreated intraocular pressures (IOPs) all below 30 mm Hg, disc cupping, progressive nerve fibre bundle visual field loss, and open angles on four mirror gonioscopy. Individuals with high myopia,20 a history of severe blood loss and vascular hypoperfusion,21 or a past history of uveitis or topical steroid use were excluded from the study. In each case a full medical history and ophthalmic examination were undertaken. Ophthalmic assessment included refraction, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy, and Humphrey (24:2) visual field analysis.

The control group consisted of 75 individuals having no family history of POAG and, on examination by an experienced glaucoma specialist, had IOPs below 21 mm Hg with normal optic discs and visual fields, and no other ocular pathology. In each case a full medical history and glaucoma assessment was undertaken.

Mitochondrial haplogroup analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from 10 ml of venous blood drawn with informed consent from each patient and control subject following approval from our regional ethics committee.

Restriction enzyme digest analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified fragments spanning specific informative sites was used to determine the mitochondrial haplogroup of each patient and control. The haplogroup analysis was based on the phylogenetic network for European mtDNA, as described by Finnila et al.22 The details of the oligonucleotide primers, the polymorphic sites, the PCR conditions, and the restriction enzymes that were employed, are illustrated in table 1.

Table 1 mtDNA haplogroup analysis.

Haplogroup Primer Position PCR (bp) Anneal (°C) Digest RFLP + RFLP −
H F ATTTAGCTGACTCGCCACAC 6863–6882 14F 533 58 − 7025 Alu1 5, 188, 340 5, 31, 157, 340
R CATCCATATAGTCACTCCAGG 7396–7376 14R
T F GCCCTTCTAAACGCTAATCC 12940–12959 27F 513 58 + 13366 BamH1 87, 426 513
R GGAGGTTGAAGTGAGAGG 13453–13435 27R
J F AGTCTTGTAAACCGGAGATG 15914–15933 J (F) 301 58 − 16065 Hinf1 86, 215 65, 86, 150
R TGCTGTACTTGCTTGTAAGC 16215–16196 J (R)
UK F GCCACATAGCCCTCGTAGT 11633–11651 UK (F) 697 58 + 12308 Hinf1 22, 138, 221, 316 160, 221, 316
R TATTTGGAGTTGCACCAAGATT 12330–12309 UK (R)
K F ACCACCCAACAATGACTAATC 8656–8676 18F 545 58 − 9052 HaeII 545 145, 400
R GTTGTCGTGCAGGTAGAGG 9201–9183 18R
WI F TAACATCTCAGACGCTCAGG 7744–7763 16F 565 58 + 8249 AvaII 41, 524 565
R GTTAGCTTTACAGTGGGCTC 8309–8290 16R
I F CTCAACTATCACACATCAACTG 16223–16244 D2F 474 58 + 16389 BamH1 308, 166 474
R AGATACTGCGACATAGGGTG 129–110 D2R
V F GCAGGCACACTCATCACAG 4512–4530 9F 491 58 − 4580 NlaIII 355, 136 68, 136, 287
R GATTTTGCGTAGCTGGGTTTG 5003–4983 9R
X F ACTTAACTTGACCGCTCTGAG 1651–1671 3F 542 57 − 1715 DdeI 17, 28, 113, 156, 228 17, 28, 48, 113, 156, 180
R ATTGGTGGCTGCTTTTAGGC 2193–2174 3R
M F CAACACCCTCCTAGCCTTAC 1008–5–10104 21F 589 57 + 10397 AluI 75, 148, 164, 202 75, 148, 366
R TGGCGGCAAAGACTAGTATG 10674–10655 21R

Results

Our cohort consisted of 140 POAG patients and 75 controls. The median age was 73 years for the POAG patients (range 51–87, SD 8.01) and 78 years for the controls (range 68–90, SD 4.4). Mean IOP was 20.8 mm Hg for the patients (SD 2.6) and 16.2 mm Hg for the controls (SD 3.4). Median cup/disc ratio was 0.8 and 0.3 for patients and controls, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the haplogroup distribution between the POAG patients and the healthy individuals, as illustrated in table 2 (Fisher's exact test).

Table 2 Haplogroup distribution in POAG patients and healthy individuals.

POAG patients Controls p Value*
H 58 (41.4%) 37 (49.3%) 0.5226
T 20 (14.3%) 13 (17.3%) 0.6966
J 17 (12.1%) 5 (6.7%) 0.3449
U 28 (20.0%) 10 (13.3%) 0.3548
K 1 (0.7%) 4 (5.3%) 0.0571
W 4 (2.9%) 1 (1.3%) 0.6614
I 3 (2.1%) 1 (1.3%) 1
V 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1
X 3 (2.1%) 2 (2.7%) 1
M 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1
Others 6 (4.3%) 2 (2.7%) 0.7175
Number 140 75

*Fisher's exact test.

Discussion

Sequence variants defining mtDNA haplogroups have been regarded as benign polymorphisms. Haplogroup and phylogenetic analysis of LHON patients have, however, shown that two of the three primary LHON mutations, at np 11778 and 14484, tend to be associated with European mtDNA haplogroup J.11,23,24 Additional evidence supporting a role for mtDNA haplogroups as a risk factor in disease expression has also recently been reported with the observation that migraine associated stroke is more common in individuals belonging to haplogroup U than would be expected on a random basis.25 The site, or sites, within these haplogroups that influence penetrance or expression have not been identified.

Mitochondria play a crucial part in neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD. Complex I is the first site of the respiratory chain, produced by the assembly of 35–37 nDNA and 7 mtDNA encoded subunits. Decreased complex I activity has been found to cause parkinsonism and nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration in humans. Van der Walt and colleagues have reported that mitochondrial haplogroups J and K have a protective role in PD, where in another study, Pyle and colleagues attribute this reduced risk to the haplogroup cluster UKJT.26 In two smaller studies, however, haplogroup J was associated with increased risk for PD.27,28

POAG is a complex neurodegenerative disease, where cell death occurs by apoptosis, in a similar manner as in PD and Alzheimer's disease. Patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease may have an increased occurrence rate of glaucoma. In our study, a possible association between mtDNA haplogroups and POAG was investigated, but no such evidence was detected.

Our study does not preclude the possibility that mitochondrial DNA haplotypes could have a role in some matrilineal pedigrees though it seems unlikely. Though our study contained some members of larger pedigrees the numbers were too small to justify separate analysis.

The cause of the reported differential rates of maternal and paternal inheritance observed in glaucoma still remain to be defined. The greater life expectancy of females is one factor which could contribute to an apparently increased rate of maternal transmission in any late onset disease. Closer offspring contact with mothers than fathers is a further possible source of reporting bias. This influence would be expected to confer an apparent predominance of maternal eye history in other ophthalmic patient groups. While both Shin et al3 and Morgan and Drance2 found a predominant maternal eye history in patients with glaucoma, this parental bias was not observed in those with ocular hypertension drawn from the same population background. This suggests that closer maternal offspring contacts are also unlikely to contribute to the increased prevalence of a maternal family history.

Genetic influences other than haplotype variants of the mitochondrial genome that could account for this observation must be considered. Genomic imprinting is a plausible explanation29 and unstable expansions of trinucleotide repeats, involved in the pathogenesis of a number of neurological disorders, are now also known to display parental bias.30

Abbreviations

IOP - intraocular pressure

LHON - Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy

mtDNA - mitochondrial DNA

PCR - polymerase chain reaction

PD - Parkinson's disease

POAG - primary open angle glaucoma

SNPs - single nucleotide polymorphisms

References

  • 1.Lichter P R. Genetic clues to glaucoma's secrets. The L Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Part 2. Am J Ophthalmol 1994117706–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morgan R W, Drance S M. Chronic open‐angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. An epidemiological study. Br J Ophthalmol 197559211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shin D H, Becker B, Kolker A E. Family history in primary open‐angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 197795598–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Charliat G, Jolly D, Blanchard F. Genetic risk factor in primary open‐angle glaucoma: a case‐control study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 19941131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Quigley H A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 199680389–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giles R E, Blanc H, Cann H M.et al Maternal inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980776715–6719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anderson S, Bankier A T, Barrell B G.et al Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 1981290457–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wallace D C. Mitochondrial genetics: a paradigm for aging and degenerative diseases? Science 1992256628–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wallace D C, Ruiz‐Pesini E, Mishmar D. mtDNA variation, climatic adaptation, degenerative diseases, and longevity. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 200368479–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wallace D C. 1994 William Allan Award Address. Mitochondrial DNA variation in human evolution, degenerative disease, and aging. Am J Hum Genet 199557201–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lamminen T, Huoponen K, Sistonen P.et al mtDNA haplotype analysis in Finnish families with leber hereditary optic neuroretinopathy. Eur J Hum Genet 19975271–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wallace D C. Report of the committee on human mitochondrial DNA. Cytogenet Cell Genet 199055395–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schon E A, Bonilla E, DiMauro S. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and pathogenesis. J Bioenerg Biomembr 199729131–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Servidei S. Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies: gene mutation. Neuromuscul Disord. 1998;8: VIII–XI, [PubMed]
  • 15.Biousse V, Newman N J. Neuro‐ophthalmology of mitochondrial diseases. Curr Opin Neurol 20031635–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chinnery P F, Howell N, Lightowlers R N.et al Molecular pathology of MELAS and MERRF. The relationship between mutation load and clinical phenotypes. Brain 1997120(Pt 10)1713–1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Godel V, Nemet P, Lazar M. Chloramphenicol optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1980981417–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cullom M E, Heher K L, Miller N R.et al Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy masquerading as tobacco‐alcohol amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 19931111482–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sadun A A. Mitochondrial optic neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 200272423–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Drance S M, Schulzer M, Thomas B.et al Multivariate analysis in glaucoma. Use of discriminant analysis in predicting glaucomatous visual field damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1981991019–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Drance S M, Sweeney V P, Morgan R W.et al Studies of factors involved in the production of low tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 197389457–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Finnila S, Lehtonen M S, Majamaa K. Phylogenetic network for European mtDNA. Am J Hum Genet 2001681475–1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown M D, Sun F, Wallace D C. Clustering of Caucasian Leber hereditary optic neuropathy patients containing the 11778 or 14484 mutations on an mtDNA lineage. Am J Hum Genet 199760381–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Torroni A, Petrozzi M, D'Urbano L.et al Haplotype and phylogenetic analyses suggest that one European‐specific mtDNA background plays a role in the expression of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy by increasing the penetrance of the primary mutations 11778 and 14484. Am J Hum Genet 1997601107–1121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Majamaa K, Finnila S, Turkka J.et al Mitochondrial DNA haplogroup U as a risk factor for occipital stroke in migraine. Lancet 1998352455–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pyle A, Foltynie T, Tiangyou W.et al Mitochondrial DNA haplogroup cluster UKJT reduces the risk of PD. Ann Neurol 200557564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tan E K, Khajavi M, Thornby J I.et al Variability and validity of polymorphism association studies in Parkinson's disease. Neurology 200055533–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Autere J, Moilanen J S, Finnila S.et al Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms as risk factors for Parkinson's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia. Hum Genet 200411529–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hall J G. Genomic imprinting and its clinical implications. N Engl J Med 1992326827–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yvert G, Mandel J L. Variation on a trinucleotide theme. Nat Med 19995383–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES