Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron. 2007 Jan 1;63(1):37–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.10.027

Synthesis of Hydrodipyrrins Tailored for Reactivity at the 1- and 9-Positions

Han-Je Kim 1, Dilek Kiper Dogutan 1, Marcin Ptaszek 1, Jonathan S Lindsey 1,*
PMCID: PMC1857285  NIHMSID: NIHMS15496  PMID: 17464365

Abstract

A collection of 33 hydrodipyrrins (9 targets, 21 intermediates, and 3 byproducts) has been prepared. The hydrodipyrrins (dihydrodipyrrins, tetrahydrodipyrrins, and hexahydrodipyrrins) contain a pyrrole ring and a geminal-dimethyl substituted 1-pyrroline (or pyrrolidine) ring. The α-substituents on the pyrrole ring (H, Br, CHO) and pyrroline ring (H, CH3, CH(OR)2, OMe, SMe) provide different reactivity combinations (Nu, E+) and 0, 1, or 2 carbon atoms (which can give rise to the bridging meso-carbons in hydroporphyrins). Straightforward access to various hydrodipyrrins should facilitate development of syntheses of diverse hydroporphyrins.

Keywords: Hydrodipyrrin, 1-Pyrroline, Pyrrole, Hydroporphyrin

1. Introduction

Hydroporphyrins perform a wide variety of essential functions in living systems. Hydroporphyrins differ from porphyrins in having fewer π bonds along the perimeter of the macrocycle. Representative hydroporphyrins are shown in Chart 1. Chlorophyll a and b (chlorins) and bacteriochlorophyll a, b, and g (bacteriochlorins) serve as the principal light-absorbing pigments in plant and bacterial photosynthetic systems, respectively.1 Bonellin2 and tolyporphins3 are examples of non-photosynthetic chlorin and bacteriochlorin macrocycles, respectively. Siroheme and heme d1 (isobacteriochlorins) play an important role in the sulfur and nitrogen metabolism of numerous microorganisms.4 A wide variety of other naturally occurring hydroporphyrins (e.g., vitamin B125 and F4306) are known.

Chart 1.

Chart 1

Fundamental chemical studies, biological investigations, and materials chemistry applications require efficient routes for preparing the core hydroporphyrins. The simplest approach to chlorins, bacteriochlorins, and isobacteriochlorins entails hydrogenation of the porphyrin.7 The simplicity of this approach is offset by two problems: (1) reduction in any of the four pyrrolic rings yields regioisomers if a distinct pattern of peripheral substituents is present, and (2) the hydroporphyrin is susceptible to adventitious dehydrogenation. By contrast, the most complex approach entails the total synthesis of naturally occurring hydroporphyrins.8 Semisynthetic approaches also have been employed to manipulate chlorins without incurring the enormous effort required for total synthesis.9

A middle approach, which we have pursued, is to develop de novo syntheses of model hydroporphyrins that retain most of the essential physicochemical properties of the natural compounds yet have non-natural structural attributes that facilitate synthesis and handling.1015 A key structural feature that we have employed is the use of a geminal dimethyl group in each reduced ring. The geminal dimethyl group locks in the reduction level of the resulting hydroporphyrin, thereby precluding adventitious oxidative reversion to the porphyrin. Many naturally occurring hydroporphyrins have a geminal dialkyl group in each reduced pyrroline ring (e.g., bonellin, tolyporphin, siroheme, heme d1, F430, and vitamin B12). Although chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls lack the geminal dialkyl motif, synthetic analogues that contain a geminal dialkyl group in the pyrroline ring exhibit characteristic chlorin or bacteriochlorin features and are quite stable compounds.1015

The de novo syntheses that we developed of chlorins, which drew heavily on methods established in the total synthesis of bonellin,16,17 are shown in Scheme 1. Each de novo synthesis involves the convergent joining of an Eastern half and a Western half. Two Western halves, a dihydrodipyrrin (1)10 and a tetrahydrodipyrrin (2),12,18 were each synthesized in four to five steps from pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde. Acid-catalyzed condensation of a bromo-dipyrromethane-carbinol (Eastern half, 3a) and 1 or 2 followed by oxidative cyclization afforded the meso-disubstituted zinc chlorin 4a. The cyclization yield reached up to 45% depending on the presence of substituents in the components and the choice of Western half.1013 A related synthesis uses a formyl-containing Eastern half (3b) to give the fully unsubstituted zinc chlorin 4b.14

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The de novo synthesis of bacteriochlorins is shown in Scheme 2. A dihydrodipyrrin bearing an acetal moiety (5) undergoes self-condensation under acidic conditions at room temperature. Two bacteriochlorins (H-BC, MeO-BC) were obtained as well as the ring-contracted analogue, a tetradehydrocorrin (TDC).15

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

The strategy underlying each such “2 + 2” route to hydroporphyrins depends on the nature of the substituents at the α-positions of the hydrodipyrrins. In the chlorin synthesis,1014 the pyrrole unit and the α-methyl pyrroline unit of the hydrodipyrrin (Western half) both functioned as nucleophiles, the two complementary sites on the Eastern half (bromo-pyrrole, α-carbinol) functioned as electrophiles, and each half contributed one bridging meso-carbon atom (Scheme 1). In the bacteriochlorin synthesis,15 the pyrrole unit and the α-acetal-pyrroline unit functioned as nucleophile and electrophile, respectively, and the acetal provided the bridging meso-carbon atom (Scheme 2). In general, the development of new 2 + 2 reactions for preparing hydroporphyrins relies on access to hydrodipyrrins with suitable reactivity at the α-position of the respective pyrrole or pyrroline unit.

A wide variety of dihydrodipyrrin species bearing diverse α-substituents have been developed for syntheses of naturally occurring chlorins and isobacteriochlorins.16,17,1929 (By contrast, the tetrahydrodipyrrins prepared to date are fewer in number and typically contain the same α-substituents as those of 2.23,24,30) The representative collection of dihydrodipyrrins (AF) shown in Chart 2 illustrates the substituents at the pyrroline and pyrrole α-positions that have been employed to engender distinct nucleophilic or electrophilic reactivity features. The reactivity includes an electrophilic pyrrole (α-formyl: A,27 B,27 D,20,21,2326), nucleophilic pyrrole (no α-substituent: C;17 E27 and F27 upon decarboxylation), nucleophilic pyrroline (α-methyl, which forms an enamine: C, D), and electrophilic pyrroline via leaving groups (α-formyl: B, E; α-(thio)alkoxide: D, F; or α-triflate: F) or via an α-unsubstituted pyrroline N-oxide22 (not shown). The number of α-carbon atoms, which potentially confer bridging meso-carbon atoms upon hydroporphyrin formation, is two (A, B), one (C-E), or zero (F). Most of the dihydrodipyrrins bear substituents at one or both β-pyrrole positions as required for synthesis of naturally occurring hydroporphyrins.

Chart 2.

Chart 2

Synthetic hydroporphyrins with few or no substituents could serve as valuable benchmarks for understanding fundamental properties and reactivity. However, the syntheses of such sparsely substituted hydroporphyrins have proved to be more difficult than those bearing a full complement of pyrrole substituents, owing to the broader range of possible side reactions of the unsubstituted hydrodipyrrin precursors.

In this regard, the simple appearance of unsubstituted hydrodipyrrins can be deceptive, because the two different heterocycles (pyrrole, 1-pyrroline) exhibit distinct reactivity features.18 A number of these differences are quite obvious: the pyrrole in 1 or 2 is activated at three sites (7, 8, and 9-positions) for electrophilic substitution whereas the imine is susceptible to reduction and addition; the pyrrole is a weak acid whereas the pyrroline is a weak base. The coordination ability of hydrodipyrrins can thwart a number of metal-mediated reactions. Perhaps less obviously, tetrahydrodipyrrins lacking β-pyrrole substituents (e.g., 2) can undergo irreversible intramolecular cyclization in the presence of acid, forming a bicyclic, tropane-like structure.12 Thus, the scope of suitable synthetic methods for preparing and manipulating synthetic hydrodipyrrins, particularly those lacking β-pyrrole substituents, is somewhat constrained.

In this paper, we describe the synthesis of new hydrodipyrrins, chiefly tetrahydrodipyrrins, with a variety of groups at the pyrrole and pyrroline α-positions. The emphasis on tetrahydrodipyrrins stems from studies in chlorin chemistry12 where unsubstituted tetrahydrodipyrrins (e.g., 2) were found to have a substantially longer shelf-life than the corresponding dihydrodipyrrins (e.g., 1). The hydrodipyrrins lack β-pyrrole and meso-substituents. The availability of this set of compounds should provide a valuable toolkit for investigating the syntheses of a variety of hydroporphyrins.

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Approach

The target hydrodipyrrins are illustrated in Table 1. The hydrodipyrrins in each class differ in the pattern of reactivity (Nu/E+) and number of C1 synthons (0–2) attached at the 1- and 9-positions. While our chief focus centered on tetrahydrodipyrrins, we also examined dihydrodipyrrins and hexahydrodipyrrins to a limited extent. The following sections describe the routes that afforded the target compounds, protected analogues, and related derivatives.

Table 1.

Target hydrodipyrrins

Entry α-Carbons Reactivity type (substituent)
Pyrroline (−Y) Pyrrole (−X)
I 0 E+ (H, OMe, SMe) Nu (H)
II 1 E+ (CHO) Nu (H)
III 1 E+ (CHO) E+ (Br)
IV 2 E+ (CHO) E+ (CHO)
V 1 Nu (CH3) E+ (Br)
VI 2 Nu (CH3) E+ (CHO)

graphic file with name nihms15496f16.jpg

2.2. Synthesis of hydrodipyrrins

(I) E+/Nu Pyrroline-pyrrole units (0 α-carbons)

(i) Imines

An initial target was an analogue of 2 lacking a methyl group at the α-position of the pyrroline ring (6). Analogues of such “des-methyl” species bearing β-pyrrolic substituents were important precursors in Battersby’s synthesis of isobacteriochlorins.22 Thus, N-Boc-pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde (7-Boc)31 was converted via the intermediate nitrovinyl pyrrole 8-Boc to the nitroethylpyrrole 9-Boc in either a two-step or one-flask process (Scheme 3). The Michael addition of 9-Boc and 3-methyl-2-butenal (10a) gave the nitropentanal-pyrrole 11-Boc (36% yield), which upon cyclization in the presence of Zn and acetic acid afforded the expected N-oxide (12-Boc, 39%) and the deoxygenated N-Boc tetrahydrodipyrrin 6-Boc (16%). Two routes were investigated to obtain 6 from the N-oxide 12-Boc, which differ in the order of deoxygenation and cleavage of the Boc group. Removal of the Boc group upon treatment with NaOMe afforded the N-oxide 13, which proved to be slightly unstable. On the other hand, deoxygenation of 12-Boc with Ti(0) gave 6-Boc (41% yield), which upon subsequent treatment with NaOMe gave the target compound 6 in 34% yield.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

(ii) Imidates

The electrophilicity of the α-pyrroline position can be altered by introduction of a leaving group. The synthesis of the corresponding tetrahydrodipyrrin-imidate (14) is shown in Scheme 4. The Michael addition of 918 with methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate (10b) was examined under several conditions. The desired methyl nitropentanoate 16 was obtained upon reaction at 65 °C via a solventless synthesis with DBU (20% yield), with DBU in acetronitrile (20% yield), or CsF in acetonitrile (10% yield). On the other hand, the use of TBAF in acetonitrile at room temperature gave 16 in 43% yield (see Experimental Section).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

The reductive cyclization of nitroester 16 also was carried out under several conditions. Zn/HCO2NH418 or Zn/AcOH12 afforded the mixture of lactam 17 (9% or 30% yield) and hydroxamic acid 17-OH (18% or 10% yield), respectively. The cleanest reaction and the highest yield were obtained with Zn/HCO2H32 in EtOH at room temperature, affording 17 in 45% yield. The reaction of 17 with trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate in anhydrous CH2Cl2 containing N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) provided the O-methylated product 14 in 50% yield (together with the N-methyl lactam 15 in 10% yield).

(iii) Thioimidates

The greater reactivity of thioesters and thioimidates versus the oxygen analogues23,33 towards nucleophilic substitution prompted the synthesis of tetrahydrodipyrrin-thioimidates. Thus, treatment of lactam 17 with Lawesson’s reagent34 in toluene afforded thiolactam 18 in 43% yield. The attempted S-alkylation of 18 using Meerwein’s salt gave multiple products, whereas methyl iodide in the presence of silver(I) carbonate24 afforded the expected S-methylsulfanyl product 19 in 49% yield (Scheme 5).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

In summary, tetrahydrodipyrrins 6, 14, and 19 contain no α-carbons and meet the target criteria of E+/Nu reactivity at the 1- and 9-positions.

(II) E+/Nu Pyrroline-Pyrrole Units (1 α-Carbon)

(i) Hexahydrodipyrrin-dithiane

The synthesis of the dithiane analogue (20P) of 20 was initially attempted via 2-(2-nitroethyl)pyrrole (9) in the same manner as for 2. However, the Michael addition of 9 with the aldehyde 10a did not give the desired nitropentanal-pyrrole 11. To suppress the reactivity of 9 we turned to the p-tosyl protecting group.3537 The direct p-tosylation of nitroethylpyrrole 9 to give 9-Ts was unsuccessful, requiring introduction of the p-tosyl group at the outset of the synthesis (Scheme 6).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

The reaction of pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde (7) and p-tosyl chloride under phase-transfer conditions afforded the N-p-tosyl derivative 7-Ts (a known compound37 but with previously incomplete characterization data) in 86% yield. The subsequent nitro-aldol condensation and reduction were initially performed in two steps via the intermediate nitrovinylpyrrole 8-Ts to give N-p-tosyl nitroethylpyrrole 9-Ts. An alternative two-step, one-flask synthesis13 proved to be simpler and afforded a higher yield of 9-Ts (55% versus 28%). Michael addition of the latter with 10a in the presence of CsF at 55 °C gave the nitropentanal-pyrrole 11-Ts in 69% yield.

Reductive cyclization of 11-Ts in the presence of Zn in acetic acid and ethanol at 0 °C afforded the N-oxide 12-Ts in 45% yield. Deoxygenation of 12-Ts gave the N-protected 6-Ts in 47% yield. Dithiane addition38 to the imine of 6-Ts gave two separable diastereomers (20aP-Ts, 20bP-Ts) in 29% overall yield. The p-tosyl group of each diastereomer was removed using aqueous NaOH and 2-propanol. The resulting 20aP and 20bP are protected derivatives of target hexahydrodipyrrin 20. We note that 20 would contain an α-aminoaldehyde, a motif prone to tautomerization,39 but could provide a valuable precursor to bacteriochlorins if conditions are identified where condensation is a competitive process.

(ii) Tetrahydrodipyrrin- and dihydrodipyrrin-acetals

We examined the direct oxidation of the α-methyl group in pyrroline 2 to afford aldehyde 21 using SeO2,27 but were unable to identify suitable conditions for this apparently simple transformation. Given that the N-oxide in a pyrroline ring accelerates oxidative conversion of the α-methyl group to the aldehyde,40 we turned to the pyrroline N-oxide. Michael addition of 9-Ts with mesityl oxide (10c) gave 22-Ts, which upon reductive cyclization gave the tetrahydrodipyrrin N-oxide 23-Ts accompanied by the fully deoxygenated 2-Ts (Scheme 7). Treatment of 23-Ts with freshly prepared Ti(0)13 afforded 2-Ts in 75% yield. Oxidation of N-oxide 23-Ts with SeO2 gave the corresponding aldehyde 24-Ts in 79% yield. Attempted deoxygenation of both 2-Ts and 24-Ts failed to give 21-Ts.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

The failure of the direct deoxygenation of 24-Ts prompted investigation of aldehyde protecting groups. Use of 1,3-propanedithiol41 gave compound 25-Ts, which was unstable (e.g., decomposed after 24 h in CDCl3). Attempts to deoxygenate 25-Ts were not successful, which can be attributed to its instability. Use of neopentyl glycol42,43 gave N-oxide 27-Ts, which upon deoxygenation gave acetal 28-Ts in 92% yield. Although 28-Ts was stable, the subsequent hydrolysis to give 21-Ts also was unsuccessful. Finally, 24-Ts was converted to the more labile dimethyl acetal (29-Ts) using LaCl344 in methanol in 56% yield. Deoxygenation gave 21P-Ts in 84% yield. Conversion of 21P-Ts to 21-Ts was attempted using established methods for acetal hydrolysis [MoO2(acac)2 in aqueous acetonitrile;45 TFA/H2O (3:1) in CH2Cl242,46] but to no avail. 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude product obtained with aqueous TFA showed that 21P-Ts had indeed reacted with water, but with addition of water across the imine rather than hydrolysis of the acetal. In summary, all four approaches to the N-p-tosyl protected target tetrahydrodipyrrin-carboxaldehyde 21-Ts failed. On the other hand, removal of the p-tosyl protecting group in 21P-Ts upon basic treatment afforded the target compound 21P, the dimethyl acetal of 21.

An approach to 21P without use of N-protection is shown in Scheme 8. The Michael addition of 2-(2-nitroethyl)pyrrole (9)18 with α-keto acetal 10d15 in the presence of CsF afforded adduct 30 in 34% yield. Alternatively, Michael addition of acetal 10d with nitroethylpyrrole 9 in the presence of DBU18 under solventless conditions provided 30 in 53% yield. Reductive cyclization of acetal 30 with Zn/HCO2NH4 in THF caused simultaneous reduction of the acetal to the methyl group, affording tetrahydrodipyrrin 2 in 56% yield. To our knowledge, the reduction of the α-acyl acetal, while undesired, also is unprecedented under these conditions. On the other hand, reductive cyclization of 30 in the presence of Zn/acetic acid afforded (17% yield) the N-oxide 31, which upon deoxygenation with Ti(0) gave the tetrahydrodipyrrin-dimethyl acetal 21P, albeit in very low yield.

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

To compare the reactivity of the tetrahydrodipyrrin-acetal (21P) with that of a dihydrodipyrrin-acetal (32P), we investigated the synthesis of the latter following the same method employed in the synthesis of dihydrodipyrrin 1.10 Jacobi et al. described a related diformyl-dihydrodipyrrin (C, Chart 2),27 but given the difficulties we encountered in preparing the 1-formyl-tetrahydrodipyrrin 21, we elected to prepare an acetal-protected analogue. Thus, reductive cyclization of 30 upon treatment with NaOMe followed by a buffered solution of TiCl3 afforded 32P (Scheme 8). The yields in both routes to 32P and 21P (protected derivatives of 32 and 21) were quite low, but sufficient material was obtained for subsequent exploratory studies. Such studies indicated that the dihydrodipyrrin-acetal 32P was more reactive than the tetrahydrodipyrrin-acetal 21P toward forming the corresponding bacteriochlorin (lacking any β-pyrrole substituents).47

(iii) Tetrahydrodipyrrin-carbinol

The N-oxide aldehyde 24-Ts appeared to be a versatile intermediate given the masked pyrrolic nitrogen, the “protected” imine, and the free formyl group. To explore conversion of the aldehyde to the secondary carbinol, 24-Ts was treated with PhMgBr. The resulting diastereomers 33a-Ts and 33b-Ts were separated by column chromatography (34% total yield). The carbinols 33a-Ts and 33b-Ts were more stable than the corresponding dipyrromethane-based carbinols prepared previously48 (Scheme 9).

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

In summary, dihydrodipyrrin 32P, tetrahydrodipyrrin 21P, and hexahydrodipyrrin 20aP/20bP each contains one α-carbon and meet the target criteria of E+/Nu reactivity at the 1- and 9-positions.

(III) E+/E+ Pyrroline-pyrrole units (1 α-carbon)

The umpolung analogue of tetrahydrodipyrrin 2 (Nu/Nu) requires conversion of both nucleophilic units (pyrrole and methyl imine) to electrophilic units. In a previous chlorin synthesis,1013 an α-bromo-pyrrole in the Eastern half served as a key electrophilic unit in the carbon-carbon bond-forming cyclization process. Such an α-bromo-pyrrole and an α-formyl-pyrroline are obvious choices for the two electrophiles. However, direct conversion of the methyl imine to the aldehyde (e.g., 221) was not viable, prompting examination of the N-oxide of tetrahydrodipyrrin 2 (i.e., 23) as a surrogate for the corresponding conversion.

Treatment of the N-oxide 2312 with NBS in THF at –78 °C gave selective bromination at the α-pyrrole position, affording bromo N-oxide 34 in 79% yield. Oxidation of 34 with SeO2 gave the aldehyde 35 in 43% yield (Scheme 10). It is noteworthy that the opposite order of bromination and oxidation proved difficult owing to the instability of the pyrrole-N-oxide aldehyde. Compound 35 is the N-oxide derivative that satisfies the desired E+/E+ reactivity pattern and contains one α-carbon.

Scheme 10.

Scheme 10

(IV) E+/E+ Pyrroline-pyrrole units (2 α-carbons)

The nitroacetal 30 was formylated under standard Vilsmeier conditions to afford 36 in 35% yield. The reductive cyclization of 36 in the presence of Zn/NH4Cl18 provided tetrahydrodipyrrin 37 in 45% yield (Scheme 11). A small amount of a putative N-oxide analogue also was isolated. Compound 37 is the target compound with electrophilic units at both the 1- and 9-positions, and contains two α-carbons. Jacobi et al. prepared a related diformyl-dihydrodipyrrin bearing substituents at both β-pyrrole positions.27

Scheme 11.

Scheme 11

(V) Nu/E+ Pyrroline-pyrrole units (1 α-carbon)

The conversion of the pyrrole unit from a nucleophilic to electrophilic species can be accomplished by bromination. Thus, bromination of tetrahydrodipyrrin 2 with NBS proceeded selectively at the free α-pyrrole position, affording bromo-tetrahydrodipyrrin 38 in 83% yield (Scheme 12). Compound 38 bears the Nu/E+ reactivity pattern at the 1- and 9-positions and bears one α-carbon.

Scheme 12.

Scheme 12

(VI) Nu/E+ Pyrroline-pyrrole units (2 α-carbons)

The tetrahydrodipyrrin bearing an α-pyrroline methyl group and an α-pyrrole carboxaldehyde (39) was synthesized according to the route displayed in Scheme 13. Vilsmeier formylation of 2218 afforded formyl-nitrohexanone 40 in 64% yield as well as a putative cyclic byproduct (40′) in 32% yield. Reductive cyclization of 40 using Zn/HCO2NH4 in THF afforded 39 in 27% yield. It is interesting to note that use of Zn/AcOH12 caused reduction of the formyl group and provided 9-methyl substituted N-oxide 41. An alternative route to 39 entailed Vilsmeier formylation of 2, which afforded 39 in 55% yield together with diformylated 42 in 35% yield. Compound 39 contains the Nu/E+ reactivity pattern at the 1- and 9-positions and contains two α-carbons.

Scheme 13.

Scheme 13

3. Outlook

Three synthetic approaches to hydrodipyrrins that have been developed over the years include (1) stepwise synthesis beginning with a pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde and proceeding via nitroaldol condensation, reduction, Michael addition and metal-mediated reductive cyclization;16,17,20,22,23,30,49 (2) convergent synthesis utilizing a Wittig reaction of a pyrrole-derived phosphorus ylide and a thione;21,2426 and (3) palladium-mediated coupling of a halo-pyrrole with an ethynyl compound followed by cyclization.2729,50 The first method, while both the earliest and the most traditional of the three routes, has been exploited herein to gain access to a variety of hydrodipyrrin compounds.

Each new hydrodipyrrin described herein contains one pyrrole and one geminal-dimethyl substituted pyrroline (or pyrrolidine) unit. The α-pyrrole position is either unsubstituted or bears a bromo or formyl substituent; the α-pyrroline position is either unsubstituted or bears a methyl, formyl, acetal, methoxy, or methylsulfanyl substituent; the α-pyrrolidine substituent is a dithiane unit. Hydrodipyrrins bearing distinct groups (methyl, acetal, methoxide, methylsulfanyl, no substituent) at the α-pyrroline position were obtained by Michael addition of 2-(2-nitroethyl)pyrrolic compounds with α β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds (10a–d). The availability of stable tetrahydrodipyrrins with diverse 1- and 9-substituents should facilitate a variety of studies concerning the synthesis of hydroporphyrins.

4. Experimental

4.1. General

1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were collected at room temperature in CDCl3 unless noted otherwise. Melting points are uncorrected. Column chromatography was performed with flash silica or alumina (80–200 mesh). The CHCl3 contained 0.8% ethanol. THF was distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl as required. CH3CN was distilled from CaH2 and stored over powdered molecular sieves. Other solvents were used as received.

4.2. Noncommercial compounds

Compounds 2,12,18 7-Boc,31 9,18 10d,15 22,18 and 2312 were prepared according to literature procedures.

4.3. New synthetic compounds and procedures

4.3.1. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin (2-Ts)

Following a procedure for the deoxygenation of N-oxides12 with slight modification, TiCl4 (229 μL, 2.08 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (6.0 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (56.0 mg, 1.49 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. Triethylamine (TEA, 1.86 mL, 13.4 mmol) was added. The black mixture was poured into a solution of 23-Ts (107 mg, 0.297 mmol) in dry THF (60 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h in a water bath (~20 °C) and then water (40 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered. The filtrate was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The resulting yellow oil was purified by column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a pale yellow oil (76 mg, 75%): 1H NMR δ 0.88 (s, 3H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 1.96–1.99 (m, 3H), 2.27 (AB, 2J = 17.0 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (AB, 2J = 17.0 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.66 (ABX, 3J = 9.8 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (ABX, 3J = 4.2 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.72–3.75 (m, 1H), 6.21–6.23 (m, 1H), 6.23–6.25 (m, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 20.7, 21.8, 22.9, 27.3, 28.3, 42.4, 54.8, 78.2, 111.9, 113.7, 122.4, 127.0, 130.1, 134.3, 136.7, 144.9, 174.7; FAB-MS obsd 345.1649, calcd 345.1637 [(M + H)+, M = C19H24N2O2S]. Anal. Calcd. for C19H24N2O2S: C, 66.25; H, 7.02; N, 8.13. Found C, 65.93; H, 6.93; N, 8.00.

4.3.2. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (6)

Following a general procedure,11 a solution of 6-Boc (299 mg, 1.08 mmol) in anhydrous THF (4.32 mL) under argon at room temperature was treated with methanolic NaOMe (1.50 mL, prepared by dissolving 373 mg of NaOMe in 2.00 mL of MeOH). After 25 min, the reaction was quenched by the addition of a mixture of hexanes and water (20 mL, 1:1). The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed [alumina, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to give a pale yellow oil (64 mg, 34%): IR 3380, 2958 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 0.95 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 2.39–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.60 (ABX, 3J = 11.6 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (ABX, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 3.63–3.69 (m, 1H), 5.95–5.97 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.71 (m, 1H), 7.63–7.65 (m, 1H), 9.52–9.68 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 27.4, 28.0, 40.3, 52.5, 80.9, 105.5, 107.5, 116.7, 131.5, 166.7; EI-MS obsd 176.1305, calcd 176.1313 (C11H16N2).

4.3.3. N11-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-3,3-dimethyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydrodipyrrin (6-Boc)

Following a general procedure,12 TiCl4 (769 μL, 7.00 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (25.0 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (190 mg, 5.00 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 25 min. TEA (6.27 mL, 45.0 mmol) was added. The resulting black mixture was stirred for 10 min at room temperature, and then cooled at 0 °C. The black mixture was slowly poured into a solution of 12-Boc (292 mg, 1.00 mmol) in dry THF (15.0 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature, and then water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered. The filtrate was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a pale yellow oil (112 mg, 41%): IR 2958, 1740, 1333, 1126 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 0.97 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.58 (s, 9H), 2.39–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.88 (ABX, 3J = 10.4 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (ABX, 3J = 3.8 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.77–3.83 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.17–6.18 (m, 1H), 7.19–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 27.2, 28.3, 29.7, 40.7, 52.8, 78.6, 83.2, 110.4, 112.5, 121.1, 134.6, 149.8, 166.7; FAB-MS obsd 277.1917, calcd 277.1916 [(M + H)+, M = C16H24N2O2].

4.3.4. 3,3-Dimethyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin (6-Ts)

Following a procedure for the deoxygenation of N-oxides12 with slight modification, TiCl4 (3.18 mL, 28.9 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (100 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (784 mg, 20.7 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. TEA (25.9 mL, 186 mmol) was added. The black mixture was poured into a solution of 12-Ts (1.43 g, 4.13 mmol) in dry THF (60 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h in a water bath (~20 °C), and then water (40 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered. The filtrate was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a pale yellow oil, which upon cooling gave a white solid (635 mg, 47%): mp 80–82 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.89 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 2.36–2.37 (m, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.62 (ABX, 3J = 10.6 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (ABX, 3J = 3.8 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.73–3.79 (m, 1H), 6.22–6.25 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 23.0, 27.3, 28.3, 40.7, 52.7, 78.6, 112.0, 113.9, 122.6, 126.9, 130.2, 134.1, 136.8, 144.9, 166.9; FAB-MS obsd 331.1493, calcd 331.1480 [(M + H)+, M = C18H22N2O2S].

4.3.5. N-p-Tosylpyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde (7-Ts).37

Following a general procedure,35 a mixture of 7 (4.76 g, 50.0 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (1.70 g, 5.00 mmol) was added to aqueous NaOH [9.00 g (225 mmol) of NaOH in 30 mL of water]. The mixture was stirred for 10 min. p-Toluenesulfonyl chloride (10.5 g, 55.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added rapidly. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h, then water (200 mL) and brine (100 mL) were added. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, CH2Cl2) to give a light pink solid (10.7 g, 86%): mp 94–95 °C (lit.37 mp 94–96 °C); 1H NMR δ 2.42 (s, 3H), 6.39–6.41 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 9.98 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.9, 112.6, 124.6, 127.7, 129.6, 130.3, 133.7, 135.4, 146.2, 179.2. Anal. Calcd. for C12H11NO3S: C, 57.82; H, 4.45; N, 5.62. Found C, 58.03; H, 4.62; N, 5.64.

4.3.6. N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-2-(trans-2-nitrovinyl)pyrrole (8-Boc)

Following a general procedure,10 a solution of 7-Boc (772 mg, 3.70 mmol) in distilled methanol (11.0 mL) was treated with nitromethane (599 μL, 11.1 mmol), sodium acetate (334 mg, 4.07 mmol) and methylamine hydrochloride (275 mg, 4.07 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 21 h under argon. The methanol was removed in vacuo without heating to give a yellow solid. The solid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (100 mL) and the resulting solution was washed with water. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, CH2Cl2) to give a yellow solid (562 mg, 64%): mp 123–124 °C; IR 2965, 1748, 1504, 1368, 1331, 1123 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.65 (s, 9H), 6.29–6.31 (m, 1H), 6.82–6.83 (m, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.54 (m, 1H), 8.76 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR δ 28.2, 86.1, 112.4, 118.1, 126.3, 127.7, 130.1, 135.2, 148.7; FAB-MS obsd 239.1035, calcd 239.1032 [(M + H)+, M = C11H14N2O4]. Anal. Calcd. for C11H14N2O4: C, 55.46; H, 5.92; N, 11.76. Found C, 55.40; H, 6.01; N, 11.71.

4.3.7. 2-(Trans-2-Nitrovinyl)-N-p-tosylpyrrole (8-Ts)

Following a general procedure,10 a solution of 7-Ts (17.3 g, 69.4 mmol) in distilled methanol (300 mL) was treated with nitromethane (11.2 mL, 208 mmol), sodium acetate (6.26 g, 76.3 mmol) and methylamine hydrochloride (5.15 g, 76.3 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 38 h under argon. The methanol was removed in vacuo without heating to give a yellow solid. The solid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (150 mL), and the resulting solution was washed with water. The organic extract was dried (Mg2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, CH2Cl2) to give a yellow solid (18.3 g, 90%): mp 153–154 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 2.42 (s, 3H), 6.39–6.41 (m, 1H), 6.81–6.83 (m, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.51 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.6, 113.3, 118.6, 125.5, 126.9, 127.0, 128.3, 130.4, 135.0, 135.6, 146.1. Anal. Calcd. for C13H12N2O4S: C, 53.42; H, 4.14; N, 9.58. Found C, 53.44; H, 4.17; N, 9.53.

4.3.8. N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-2-(2-nitroethyl)pyrrole (9-Boc)

Following a general procedure,11 a solution of 8-Boc (490 mg, 2.06 mmol) in DMF/methanol (35.0 mL, 1:2) at 0 °C was treated with sodium borohydride (117 mg, 3.09 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min. Water (30 mL) was added followed by acetic acid (one drop). The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/CH2Cl2 (1:4)] to give a pale yellow oil (258 mg, 52%): IR 2980, 1736 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.60 (s, 9H), 3.57 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.66 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.05–6.07 (m, 1H), 6.07–6.09 (m, 1H), 7.19–7.21 (m, 1H); 13C NMR δ 27.1, 28.2, 75.0, 84.4, 110.5, 114.0, 122.2, 129.2, 149.5; FAB-MS obsd 240.1126, calcd 240.1110 (C11H16N2O4).

4.3.9. One-Flask Synthesis of N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-2-(2-nitroethyl)pyrrole (9-Boc)

Following a general procedure,13 a solution of 7-Boc (3.62 g, 18.5 mmol) in distilled methanol (62.0 mL) was treated with nitromethane (3.00 mL, 55.6 mmol), sodium acetate (1.67 g, 20.4 mmol) and methylamine hydrochloride (1.37 g, 20.4 mmol). Stirring at room temperature for 16 h under argon afforded a yellow mixture. DMF (100 mL) and methanol (138 mL) were added to the reaction mixture. Sodium borohydride (910 mg, 24.1 mmol) was added rapidly at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was neutralized with acetic acid (~0.5 mL) and then concentrated. The resulting residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (100 mL) and washed with water. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/CHCl3 (1:4)] to give a pale yellow oil (2.74 g, 61%). The characterization data were identical with those from above.

4.3.10. 2-(2-Nitroethyl)-N-p-tosylpyrrole (9-Ts)

Following a general procedure,10 a solution of 8-Ts (5.30 g, 18.1 mmol) in dry THF/methanol (180 mL, 19:1) at 0 °C was treated with sodium borohydride (1.71 g, 45.3 mmol) in portions. The mixture was stirred for 50 min, neutralized with acetic acid (~2 mL), and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (150 mL) and washed with water. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/CH2Cl2 (3:7)] to give a light yellow solid (1.64 g, 31%): mp 95–96 °C; 1H NMR δ 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.41 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 4.61 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 6.09–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.21–6.23 (m, 1H), 7.30–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13 C NMR δ 21.6, 25.4, 74.4, 111.8, 114.7, 123.6, 126.5, 128.4, 130.2, 135.8, 145.3. Anal. Calcd. for C13H14N2O4S: C, 53.05; H, 4.79; N, 9.52. Found C, 53.08; H, 4.82; N, 9.43.

4.3.11. One-Flask Synthesis of 2-(2-Nitroethyl)-N-p-tosylpyrrole (9-Ts)

Following a general procedure,13 a solution of 7-Ts (10.9 g, 43.7 mmol) in distilled methanol (250 mL) was treated with nitromethane (7.07 mL, 131 mmol), sodium acetate (4.30 g, 52.4 mmol) and methylamine hydrochloride (3.54 g, 52.4 mmol). Stirring at room temperature for 40 h under argon afforded a yellow mixture. DMF (200 mL) and methanol (250 mL) were added to the reaction mixture. Sodium borohydride (1.98 g, 52.4 mmol) was added rapidly at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 min, neutralized with acetic acid (~2 mL) and concentrated. The mixture was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (100 mL) and washed with water. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/hexanes (7:3)] to give a light yellow solid (7.00 g, 55%). The characterization data were identical with those from above.

4.3.12. 5-(N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-2-pyrrolyl)-3,3-dimethyl-4-nitro-1-pentanal (11-Boc)

A mixture of 9-Boc (2.50 g, 10.4 mmol) and 3-methyl-2-butenal (10a) (10.0 mL, 104 mmol, 10.0 mol equiv) in dry acetonitrile (10.4 mL) was treated with CsF (4.74 g, 31.2 mmol, 3.00 mol equiv, freshly dried under vacuum for 1 h and purged with argon). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h, whereupon the reaction was deemed to be complete by TLC. The reaction mixture was filtered through alumina (~5 cm). The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to give a pale yellow oil, which upon cooling gave a light brown solid (1.22 g, 36%): mp 73–75 °C; IR 2978, 1737, 1550, 1371, 1324, 1126 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.59 (s, 9H), 2.49–2.61 (m, 2H), 3.38 (ABX, 3J = 11.6 Hz, 2J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (ABX, 3J = 2.0 Hz, 2J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (ABX, 3J = 2.0 Hz, 3J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.99–6.00 (m, 1H), 6.02–6.04 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.15 (m, 1H), 9.83–9.85 (m, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.1, 24.3, 28.1, 28.2, 36.8, 51.7, 84.2, 95.6, 110.5, 114.3, 122.1, 129.3, 149.5, 200.7; FAB-MS obsd 325.1759, calcd 325.1763 [(M + H)+, M = C16H24N2O5]. Anal. Calcd. for C16H24N2O5: C, 59.24; H, 7.46; N, 8.64. Found C, 59.38; H, 7.46; N, 8.47.

4.3.13. 3,3-Dimethyl-4-nitro-5-(N-p-tosyl-2-pyrrolyl)-1-pentanal (11-Ts)

Following a general procedure,13 CsF (3.40 g, 22.4 mmol, 3.00 mol equiv, freshly dried by heating to 100 °C under vacuum for 1 h and then cooling to room temperature under argon) was placed in a flask under argon. A mixture of 9-Ts (2.20 g, 7.47 mmol) and 3-methyl-2-butenal (10a) (7.21 mL, 74.7 mmol, 10.0 mol equiv) in dry acetonitrile (75 mL) was cannulated into the flask containing CsF. The mixture was heated at 55 °C for 90 min, whereupon the reaction was deemed to be complete by TLC. The reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of silica (ethyl acetate). The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to give a pale yellow oil (1.96 g, 69%): 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.40–2.60 (m, 2H), 3.23 (ABX, 3J = 2.2 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (ABX, 3J = 11.4 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (ABX, 3J = 2.2 Hz, 3J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 6.02–6.06 (m, 1H), 6.17–6.20 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (m, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 9.80–9.82 (m, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.9, 24.2, 24.5, 27.0, 36.9, 51.5, 95.6, 112.4, 115.7, 124.2, 126.5, 128.8, 130.5, 136.3, 145.6, 200.4. Anal. Calcd. for C18H22N2O5S: C, 57.13; H, 5.86; N, 7.40. Found C, 57.12; H, 5.84; N, 7.20.

4.3.14. N11-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin N10-oxide (12-Boc)

Following a general procedure,12 a vigorously stirred solution of 11-Boc (364 mg, 1.12 mmol) in 5.50 mL of acetic acid and 5.50 mL of ethanol at 0 °C was treated slowly with zinc dust (1.83 g, 28.0 mmol) in small portions for 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min and then filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated under high vacuum. The resulting residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL), affording a solution that was washed with aqueous sodium carbonate (20%, 30 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The resulting light brown oil was purified by column chromatography [silica; CH2Cl2 → ethyl acetate → CH2Cl2/methanol (9:1)] to give a light brown oil (6-Boc, 49 mg, 16%) and the title compound as a light brown solid (127 mg, 39%). Data for the title compound: mp 116–118 °C; IR 3393, 2974, 1737, 1334, 1126 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.07 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.59 (s, 9H), 2.36–2.39 (m, 2H), 3.22 (ABX, 3J = 9.6 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (ABX, 3J = 5.2 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.05–4.10 (m, 1H), 6.07–6.11 (m, 2H), 6.84–6.86 (m, 1H), 7.19–7.21 (m, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 26.5, 28.2, 28.3, 39.6, 42.6, 79.2, 83.9, 110.2, 113.6, 121.6, 131.3, 132.8, 149.6; FAB-MS obsd 293.1875, calcd 293.1865 [(M + H)+, M = C16H24N2O3].

4.3.15. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (12-Ts)

Following a general procedure,12 a vigorously stirred solution of 11-Ts (1.94 g, 5.13 mmol) in a solution of acetic acid (24.0 mL) and ethanol (24.0 mL) at 0 °C was treated slowly with zinc dust (8.39 g, 128 mmol) in small portions for 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. The mixture was filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated under high vacuum. The resulting oil was purified by column chromatography [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (1:1) → CH2Cl2/methanol (9:1)] to afford a brown oil (796 mg, 45%): 1H NMR δ 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 2.38–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 3.17 (ABX, 3J = 10.6 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (ABX, 3J = 3.8 Hz, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 4.05–4.11 (m, 1H), 6.09–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.20–6.23 (m, 1H), 6.84–6.87 (m, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 23.3, 24.9, 29.0, 39.4, 42.7, 79.8, 111.8, 114.3, 123.2, 127.1, 130.3, 130.8, 133.3, 136.0, 145.3; FAB-MS obsd 347.1420, calcd 347.1429 [(M + H)+, M = C18H22N2O3S].

4.3.16. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin N10-oxide (13)

Following a general procedure,11 a solution of 12-Boc (413 mg, 1.41 mmol) in anhydrous THF (9.0 mL) under argon at room temperature was treated with methanolic NaOMe (1.40 mL of a solution prepared by dissolving 486 mg of NaOMe in 2.00 mL of MeOH). After 25 min, the reaction was quenched by the addition of a mixture of hexanes and water (40 mL, 1:1). The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a light brown oil (106 mg, 39%): IR 3255, 2962, 1590, 1236 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.15 (s, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 2.29–2.48 (m, 2H), 2.99 (ABX, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (ABX, 3J = 7.4 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.85–3.89 (m, 1H), 5.93–5.96 (m, 1H), 6.05–6.09 (m, 1H), 6.70–6.72 (m, 1H), 6.93–6.95 (m, 1H), 10.30–10.46 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 25.6, 27.8, 40.2, 42.6, 81.6, 106.5, 107.5, 117.8, 128.7, 135.5; EI-MS obsd 192.1265, calcd 192.1263 (C11H16N2O).

4.3.17. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1-methoxy-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (14)

Following a general procedure,23 a mixture of 17 (0.129 g, 0.670 mmol) and trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (0.109 g, 0.740 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.2 mL) was purged with argon for 10 min. A sample of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA, 0.130 mL, 0.740 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL), washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to afford a brown oil. The crude product was chromatographed [silica, ethyl acetate] to afford a brown solid (70 mg, 50%). A light pink byproduct also was isolated and identified as 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3,10-trimethyldipyrrin-1(10H)-one (15) (14 mg, 10%). Data for 14: mp 85–88 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 2.25 (AB, 2J =16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (AB, 2J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (ABX, 3J =11.6, 2J = 14.8, 1H), 2.77 (ABX, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.61 (m, 1H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 5.91–5.96 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.76 (m, 1H), 9.67–9.95 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.2, 27.6, 28.8, 42.2, 46.7, 55.2, 75.3, 105.4, 107.6, 116.5, 132.0, 172.2; FAB-MS obsd 207.1498, calcd 207.1497 [(M + H)+, M = C12H18N2O]. Data for 15: mp 92–95 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.01 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 2.02 (AB, 2J =16.2 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (AB, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (s, 3H), 2.73 (ABX, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (ABX, 3J = 5.4 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (ABX, 3J = 5.4 Hz, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.94–6.10 (m, 1H), 6.12–6.14 (m, 1H), 6.64–6.71 (m, 1H), 8.52–8.61 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 28.7, 29.1, 29.3, 37.1, 45.3, 70.4, 107.0, 109.1, 117.0, 128.1, 174.7. FAB-MS obsd 207.1498, calcd 207.1497 [(M + H)+, M = C12H18N2O]. Anal. Calcd for C12H18N2O: C, 69.87; H, 8.80; N, 13.58. Found: C, 69.93; H, 8.86; N, 13.33.

4.3.18. Methyl 3,3-dimethyl-4-nitro-5-(2-pyrroyl)pentanoate (16) via a solventless procedure with DBU

Following a general procedure,18 a mixture of 9 (0.220 g, 1.57 mmol) and methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate (0.96 mL, 7.9 mmol, 5.0 mol equiv) was treated with DBU (0.70 mL, 4.7 mmol, 3.0 mol equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at 65 °C for 16 h under argon. The crude reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (20 mL) and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. Excess methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate was removed under high vacuum. The crude product was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to afford a dark brown oil (80.0 mg, 20%): 1H NMR δ 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 2H), 3.10 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (ABX, 3J = 11.6 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 4.94 (ABX, 3J = 11.6 Hz, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.96–6.02 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.67–6.68 (m, 1H), 8.02–8.22 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.0, 24.8, 27.2, 36.8, 43.8, 52.1, 96.0, 107.5, 108.9, 118.1, 126.0, 171.6; FAB-MS obsd 255.1336, calcd 255.1345 [(M + H)+, M = C12H18N2O4].

4.3.19. Synthesis of 16 in acetonitrile with DBU

Following a general procedure,18 a mixture of 9 (4.2 g, 30 mmol) and methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate (10b, 37 mL, 300 mmol, 10 mol equiv) in CH3CN (75 mL) was treated with DBU (14 mL, 90 mmol, 3.0 mol equiv) under argon. The reaction mixture was stirred at 65 °C for 16 h under argon. The crude reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. Excess methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate was removed under high vacuum. The crude residue was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to afford a dark brown oil (1.43 g, 19%). The data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via the solventless method.

4.3.20. Synthesis of 16 in acetonitrile with CsF

Following a general procedure,12 CsF (9.11 g, 60 mmol, 3.0 mol equiv, freshly dried by heating at 100 °C under vacuum for 1 h and then cooling to room temperature under argon) was placed in a flask. A mixture of 9 (2.80 g, 20.0 mmol) and methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate (10b, 25.0 mL, 200 mol, 10.0 mol equiv) in CH3CN (100 mL) was transferred by cannula to the flask containing CsF. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at 65 °C under argon. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL) and washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. Excess methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate was removed under high vacuum. The crude product was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to afford a dark brown oil (0.56 g, 11%). The data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via the solventless method.

4.3.21. Synthesis of 16 in THF with TBAF

Following a general procedure23 with slight modification, nitroethylpyrrole 9 (4.20 g, 30.0 mmol) and powdered molecular sieves 4Å (100 g) were placed in a reaction flask and purged with argon. Methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate (10b, 37.0 mL, 300 mmol, 10.0 mol equiv) and TBAF (66.0 mL, 1 M in THF, ~66 mmol, 2.2 mol equiv) in THF (234 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature under argon. The reaction mixture was then filtered through a column (silica, ethyl acetate). The filtrate was concentrated, dissolved in ethyl acetate, washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. Excess methyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate was removed under high vacuum. Chromatography [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] afforded a brown oil (3.25 g, 43%). The data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via the solventless method.

4.3.22. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin-1(10H)-one (17) via Zn/HCO2NH4

Following a general procedure,18 a solution of 16 (0.153 g, 0.600 mmol) in ethanol (1.2 mL) was treated with HCO2NH4 (0.378 g, 6.00 mmol) and zinc dust (0.589 g, 9.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The crude reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and filtered. The filter cake was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrate was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to give a red oil. Chromatography [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate/methanol (8:5:2)] afforded a brown solid (10 mg, 9%) and a byproduct identified as 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (17-OH) (23 mg, 18%). Data for 17: mp 92–94 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 2.15–2.25 (m, 2H), 2.56 (ABX, 3J = 11.2 Hz, 2J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (ABX, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 2J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (ABX, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 2J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 5.62–5.78 (brs, 1H), 5.94–6.20 (m, 1H), 6.14–6.16 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.71 (m, 1H), 8.10–8.25 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.9, 27.6, 29.3, 38.7, 46.3, 64.5, 106.7, 108.9, 117.7, 128.5, 177.2; FAB-MS obsd 193.1337, calcd 193.1341 [(M + H)+, M = C11H16N2O]. Data for 17-OH: mp 120–122 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.13 (s, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.81 (AB, 2J =16.4 Hz, 1H), 1.96 (AB, 2J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (ABX, 3J = 3.7 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (ABX, 3J = 3.7 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.69 (m, 1H), 5.95–6.02 (m, 1H), 6.04–6.14 (m, 1H), 6.59–6.72 (m, 1H), 9.02–9.07 (brs, 1H) (the OH proton was not observed); 13C NMR δ 22.7, 26.5, 29.7, 35.1, 43.0, 69.9, 108.05, 108.09, 117.9, 126.9, 170.8; FAB-MS obsd 209.1291, calcd 209.1290 [(M + H)+, M = C11H16N2O2].

4.3.23. Synthesis of 17 via Zn/AcOH

Following a general procedure,12 a solution of 16 (0.255 g, 1.00 mmol) in ethanol (5.0 mL) was treated with AcOH (5.0 mL). The reaction mixture changed immediately from dark brown to dark red. Zinc dust (1.64 g, 25.0 mmol) was added in portions over 5 min. The resulting mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and filtered. The filtrate was neutralized with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, washed (water and brine), dried, and concentrated. The resulting light brown crude mixture was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate/methanol (8:5:2)]. The first fraction contained to the title compound, which was isolated and concentrated to afford light brown crystals (60 mg, 30%). The second fraction was isolated (41 mg) and found to contain a mixture of 17 and 17-OH. Further chromatography of the second fraction gave 17-OH as a red-brown solid (20 mg, 10%). The data for 17 and 17-OH (mp, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via reduction with Zn/HCO2NH4.

4.3.24. Synthesis of 17 via Zn/HCO2H

Following a general procedure,32 a solution of 16 (0.101 g, 0.400 mmol) in ethanol (3.6 mL) was treated with formic acid (0.9 mL) and zinc dust (0.65 g, 10 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and then filtered through a sintered glass funnel. The filtered material was washed with ethyl acetate (~20 mL). The filtrate was neutralized with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The crude product was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate/methanol (8:5:2)] to afford white crystals (35 mg, 45%). The characterization data (mp, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via reduction with Zn/HCO2NH4.

4.3.25. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin-1(10H)-thione (18)

Following a general procedure24 with slight modification, a mixture of 17 (0.0634 g, 0.330 mmol) and Lawesson’s reagent (0.154 g, 0.382 mmol) in anhydrous toluene (14 mL) was refluxed overnight. The reaction mixture was then concentrated and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (5:3)] to afford a white solid (0.029 g, 43%): mp 105–108 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 2.63 (ABX, 3J = 11.4 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (s, 2H), 2.84 (ABX, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 2J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (ABX, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 3J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 5.98–6.04 (m, 1H), 6.15–6.18 (m, 1H), 6.71–6.73 (m, 1H), 7.50–7.62 (brs, 1H), 8.02–8.18 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.4, 26.8, 28.2, 41.3, 58.4, 70.7, 107.0, 109.4, 118.0, 127.3, 204.9; FAB-MS obsd 209.1103, calcd 209.1112 [(M + H)+, M = C11H16N2S].

4.3.26. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1-methylsulfanyl-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (19)

Following a reported procedure,24 a solution of 18 (0.023 g, 0.11 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was treated first with Ag2CO3 (0.097 g, 0.35 mmol) and then dropwise with MeI (22 μL, 0.35 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 55 °C for 4 h under argon. The reaction mixture was washed (5% aqueous NaHCO3, water and brine), dried, and concentrated. Chromatography [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (1:1) afforded a white solid (0.012 g, 49%): mp 112–115 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.98 (s, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H), 2.41–2.45 (m, 1H), 2.50 (s, 3 H), 2.51–2.54 (m, 1H), 2.59–2.66 (m, 1H), 2.77–2.82 (m, 1H), 3.67–3.71 (m, 1H), 5.95–5.99 (m, 1H), 6.12–6.14 (m, 1H), 6.72–6.73 (m, 1H), 9.76–9.84 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 13.8, 22.8, 27.1, 28.2, 43.0, 53.8, 80.3, 105.6, 107.7, 116.7, 131.8, 172.7; FAB-MS obsd 223.1263, calcd 223.1269 [(M + H)+, M = C12H18N2S].

4.3.27. 1-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrromethane (20aP)

Following a general procedure,36 a mixture of 20aP-Ts (86 mg, 0.19 mmol) in 2-propanol (1.3 mL) and 10 N aqueous NaOH (2.0 mL) was stirred under reflux for 3 days. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure. The resulting residue was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a colorless oil (27 mg, 47%): 1H NMR δ 1.03 (s, 3H), 1.04 (s, 3H), 1.69–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.92 (m, 1H), 2.10–2.16 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.31 (brs, 1H), 2.40–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.67–2.72 (m, 1H), 2.82–2.88 (m, 5H), 3.40–3.47 (m, 1H), 4.10 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.88–5.91 (m, 1H), 6.09–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.71 (m, 1H), 9.40–9.67 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.0, 26.4, 28.3, 30.0, 30.2, 30.3, 41.5, 44.1, 54.8, 59.6, 68.4, 105.5, 107.7, 116.7, 131.6; FAB-MS obsd 297.1462, calcd 297.1459 [(M + H)+, M = C15H24N2S2].

4.3.28. 1-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrromethane (20bP)

Following a general procedure,36 a mixture of 20bP-Ts (210 mg, 0.466 mmol) in 2-propanol (3.00 mL) and 5 N aqueous NaOH (2.50 mL) was stirred at reflux for 3 days. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure. The resulting residue was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a light brown solid (61 mg, 44%): mp 108–110 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.89 (s, 3H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.69 (ABX, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.84 (ABX, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 2J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.82–1.93 (m, 1H), 2.04–2.17 (m, 2H), 2.41 (ABX, 3J = 10.4 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (ABX, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.80–2.88 (m, 4H), 2.95 (ABX, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 3J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 3.47–3.53 (m, 1H), 4.04 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.90–5.94 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.13 (m, 1H), 6.68–6.71 (m, 1H), 9.15–9.27 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.2, 25.8, 26.3, 28.2, 30.1, 42.4, 46.1, 55.0, 58.8, 67.4, 105.5, 108.1, 116.6, 130.7; FAB-MS obsd 297.1466, calcd 297.1459 [(M + H)+, M = C15H24N2S2].

4.3.29. 9-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-7,7-dimethyl-N10-p-tosyldipyrromethane (20P-Ts)

Following a procedure for organolithium addition to imines,38 a solution of 1,3-dithiane (919 mg, 7.64 mmol) in dry THF (8 mL) at –20 °C (salt ice bath) was treated with n-butyl lithium (3.10 mL, 2.5 M in hexane, 7.64 mmol) followed by stirring for 30 min at –20 °C. The flask was then cooled to –78 °C. A sample of 6-Ts (630 mg, 1.91 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at –20 °C. The flask was placed in a bath at –78 °C and stirred for 5 min. The reaction was quenched by addition of saturated aqueous NH4Cl (20 mL). The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. TLC analysis [silica, ethyl acetate/hexanes (9:1)] showed two components with Rf = 0.67 (20aP-Ts, minor) and Rf = 0.47 (20b-Ts, major). Column chromatography [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (7:3)] afforded each isomer as a light yellow oil. Each oil solidified upon cooling to give a light brown solid (20aP-Ts, 98 mg, 11%; 20bP-Ts, 151 mg, 18%). Data for 20aP-Ts: mp 103–105 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.97 (s, 3H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.59 (ABX, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.79 (ABX, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.84–1.93 (m, 2H), 2.03–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.48–2.55 (m, 1H), 2.77–2.95 (m, 6H), 3.21–3.27 (m, 1H), 3.90 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.11–6.13 (m, 1H), 6.18–6.20 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.28 (m, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.6, 24.5, 25.9, 27.7, 29.0, 29.3, 29.5, 39.1, 45.2, 53.2, 58.1, 66.2, 111.6, 113.5, 122.8, 126.5, 130.0, 133.9, 136.6, 144.7; FAB-MS obsd 451.1540, calcd 451.1548 [(M + H)+, M = C22H30N2O2S3]. Anal. Calcd. for C22H30N2O2S3: C, 58.63; H, 6.71; N, 6.22. Found C, 58.42; H, 6.75; N, 5.96. Data for 20bP-Ts: mp 126–128 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.90 (s, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 1.65 (ABX, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.77 (ABX, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 2J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.83–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.93–2.01 (brs, 1H), 2.03–2.10 (m, 1H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.39–2.46 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.86 (m, 5H), 3.02–3.05 (m, 1H), 3.42–3.48 (m, 1H), 3.90 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.15–6.18 (m, 1H), 6.18–6.21 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.5, 21.6, 25.9, 26.0, 28.8, 29.3, 29.4, 41.2, 45.5, 54.2, 57.7, 64.8, 111.6, 113.1, 122.5, 126.6, 129.9, 133.7, 136.5, 144.7; FAB-MS obsd 451.1556, calcd 451.1548 [(M + H)+, M = C22H30N2O2S3].

4.3.30. 1-(Dimethoxymethyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (21P)

Following a general procedure,36 a mixture of 21P-Ts (491 mg, 1.21 mmol) in 2-propanol (12 mL) and 5 N aqueous NaOH (12 mL) was stirred under reflux for 10 days. After cooling to room temperature, water (50 mL) was added to the mixture. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (4:1)] to give a colorless oil (131 mg, 43%): 1H NMR δ 0.96 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 2.39–2.51 (m, 2H), 2.64 (ABX, 3J = 11.4 Hz, 2J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (ABX, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 2J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 3.70–3.76 (m, 1H), 4.81 (s, 1H), 5.93–5.97 (m, 1H), 6.09–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.73 (m, 1H), 9.53–9.63 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.9, 27.4, 28.1, 41.4, 48.8, 54.7, 54.8, 80.6, 103.1, 105.6, 107.6, 116.8, 131.4, 174.2; FAB-MS obsd 251.1753, calcd 251.1760 [(M + H)+, M = C14H22N2O2].

4.3.31. 1-(Dimethoxymethyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (21P) from 31

Following a general procedure,12 a sample of TiCl4 (86 μL, 0.79 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (2.0 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (20 mg, 0.53 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. TEA (0.690 mL, 4.95 mmol) was added. The resulting black mixture was stirred for 2 min at room temperature. The black mixture was slowly poured into a solution of 31 (30 mg, 0.11 mmol) in dry THF (1.5 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, and then water (4 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4) and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (4:1)] to give a colorless oil (2.2 mg, 8%). The characterization data were identical with those described above.

4.3.32. 1-(Dimethoxymethyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin (21P-Ts)

Following a general procedure,12 TiCl4 (1.22 mL, 11.1 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (30 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (280 mg, 7.39 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. TEA (9.66 mL, 69.3 mmol) was added. The resulting black mixture was stirred for 2 min at room temperature. The black mixture was slowly poured into a solution of 29-Ts (648 mg, 1.54 mmol) in dry THF (25 mL). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, and then water (30 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (4:1)] to give a colorless oil (525 mg, 84%): 1H NMR δ 0.90 (s, 3H), 1.08 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.37–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.72 (ABX, 3J = 9.6 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (ABX, 3J = 4.8 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 3.81–3.85 (m, 1H), 4.79 (s, 1H), 6.21–6.24 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.29–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.8, 27.3, 28.2, 41.8, 48.7, 54.8, 54.9, 78.3, 103.2, 111.9, 113.9, 122.6, 127.0, 130.2, 133.9, 136.7, 145.0, 174.2; FAB-MS obsd 405.1840, calcd 405.1848 [(M + H)+, M = C21H28N2O4S]. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28N2O4S: C, 62.35; H, 6.98; N, 6.93. Found C, 62.20; H, 7.00; N, 6.70.

4.3.33. 4,4-Dimethyl-5-nitro-6-(N-p-tosyl-2-pyrrolyl)-2-hexanone (22-Ts)

Following a general procedure,12 CsF (526 mg, 3.47 mmol, 3.00 mol equiv, freshly dried by heating to 100 °C under vacuum for 1 h and then cooling to room temperature under argon) was placed in a flask under argon. A mixture of 9-Ts (340 mg, 1.16 mmol) and mesityl oxide (10c, 1.98 mL, 17.3 mmol, 15.0 mol equiv) in dry acetonitrile (12 mL) was cannulated into the flask containing CsF. The mixture was heated at 70 °C for 16 h, whereupon the reaction was deemed to be complete by TLC. The reaction mixture was filtered through a bed of silica. The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed [alumina, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to give a pale yellow oil, which upon cooling (~ –6 °C) gave a pale yellow solid (330 mg, 73%): mp 92–93 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.43, 2.57 (AB, 2J = 17.4 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (ABX, 3J = 2.2 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (ABX, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (ABX, 3J = 2.2 Hz, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 6.02–6.03 (m, 1H), 6.16–6.18 (m, 1H), 7.24–7.26 (m, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.9, 23.8, 24.3, 26.7, 32.0, 36.9, 50.9, 94.2, 112.2, 114.8, 123.9, 126.6, 129.4, 130.4, 136.4, 145.4, 206.4. Anal. Calcd. for C19H24N2O5S: C, 58.15; H, 6.16; N, 7.14. Found C, 58.21; H, 6.17; N, 7.10.

4.3.34. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (23-Ts)

Following a general procedure,12 a vigorously stirred solution of 22-Ts (225 mg, 0.574 mmol) in acetic acid (3.0 mL) and ethanol (3.0 mL) at 0 °C was treated slowly with zinc dust (932 mg, 14.3 mmol) in small portions for 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min and then filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated under high vacuum. The resulting oil was purified by column chromatography [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (1:1) → CH2Cl2/methanol (9:1)] to afford a pale yellow oil (2-Ts, 47 mg, 24%) and the title compound as a white solid (119 mg, 57%). Data for the title compound: mp 123–125 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.98 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 2.05–2.06 (m, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.39–2.41 (m, 2H), 3.15 (ABX, 3J = 10.4 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (ABX, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.08–4.12 (m, 1H), 6.08–6.09 (m, 1H), 6.20–6.22 (m, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 13.3, 21.8, 23.4, 25.0, 29.1, 36.8, 47.4, 79.6, 111.7, 114.2, 123.1, 127.1, 130.3, 131.1, 136.0, 143.2, 145.2. Anal. Calcd. for C19H24N2O3S: C, 63.31; H, 6.71; N, 7.77. Found C, 63.27; H, 6.71; N, 7.70.

4.3.35. 1-Formyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (24-Ts)

Following a general procedure,27 a solution of 23-Ts (590 mg, 1.64 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (20.0 mL) was treated with SeO2 (272 mg, 2.46 mmol) under argon. The mixture was stirred for 2.5 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was treated with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (9:1)] to give a light brown solid (448 mg, 73%): mp 140–142 °C; IR 2965, 1665, 1524, 1368 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 1.06 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.57–2.59 (m, 2H), 3.06 (ABX, 3J = 9.2 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (ABX, 3J = 4.4 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.38–4.43 (m, 1H), 6.13–6.15 (m, 1H), 6.23–6.25 (m, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 10.13 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.6, 24.9, 27.5, 38.1, 39.8, 83.0, 112.0, 115.6, 123.7, 127.0, 129.8, 130.3, 136.0, 141.7, 145.4, 183.4. Anal. Calcd. for C19H22N2O4S: C, 60.94; H, 5.92; N, 7.48. Found C, 60.91; H, 5.85; N, 7.51.

4.3.36. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-1-(1,3-dithian-2-yl)-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (25-Ts)

Following a general procedure,41 a solution of 24-Ts (100 mg, 0.27 mmol) and 1,3-propanedithiol (32 μL, 0.32 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) was treated with neat BF3·OEt2 (140 μL, 1.1 mmol) and powdered molecular sieves (4 Å, ~200 mg). The mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C, warmed to room temperature, and stirred for 40 h. Saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (~2 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The resulting residue was chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (4:1)] to give a pale yellow oil (52 mg, 42%): 1H NMR δ 1.01 (s, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.88–2.00 (m, 1H), 2.11–2.18 (m, 1H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.53–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.85–2.92 (m, 2H), 2.99–3.10 (m, 3H), 3.42–3.48 (m, 1H), 4.13–4.17 (m, 1H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 6.11–6.13 (m, 1H), 6.20–6.22 (m, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.9, 24.8, 25.2, 28.2, 30.3, 37.7, 41.2, 43.0, 80.0, 111.8, 115.0. 123.2, 127.1, 130.3, 130.6, 135.9, 141.0, 145.3. The limited stability of this compound prevented high-resolution mass spectrometric analysis.

4.3.37. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-1-(5,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (27-Ts)

Following a general procedure,43 a solution of 24-Ts (224 mg, 0.600 mmol) and neopentyl glycol (81.0 mg, 0.78 mmol) in benzene (30.0 mL) was treated with p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (11.4 mg, 0.060 mmol). The mixture was refluxed for 2.5 h and then cooled. The reaction mixture was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and water. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (1:1)] to give a light brown solid (140 mg, 51%): mp 64–65 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.75 (s, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.54–2.56 (m, 2H), 3.10 (ABX, 3J = 10.0 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (ABX, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.56–3.61 (m, 2H), 3.63–3.69 (m, 2H), 4.15–4.19 (m, 1H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 6.10–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.19–6.22 (m, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.1, 23.1, 24.7, 28.5, 29.9, 30.6, 37.5, 41.4, 77.5, 80.9, 94.3, 111.7, 114.7. 123.2, 127.1, 130.3, 130.8, 136.1, 141.6, 145.2; FAB-MS obsd 461.2100, calcd 461.2110 [(M + H)+, M = C24H32N2O5S].

4.3.38. 1-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin (28-Ts)

Following a general procedure,12 TiCl4 (222 μL, 2.02 mmol) was slowly added with stirring to dry THF (5.0 mL) under argon at 0 °C. The resulting yellow solution was slowly treated with LiAlH4 (51.0 mg, 1.35 mmol). The resulting black mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. TEA (1.78 mL, 12.8 mmol) was added. The resulting black mixture was stirred for 2 min at room temperature. The black mixture was slowly poured into a solution of 27-Ts (130 mg, 0.282 mmol) in dry THF (4.0 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, and then water (8.0 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (19:1)] to give a colorless oil (116 mg, 92%): 1H NMR δ 0.74 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.52–2.54 (m, 2H), 2.71 (ABX, 3J = 9.6 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (ABX, 3J = 4.4 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48–3.52 (m, 2H), 3.63–3.68 (m, 2H), 3.79–3.84 (m, 1H), 5.04 (s, 1H), 6.20–6.22 (m, 1H), 6.22–6.24 (m, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.0, 22.7, 23.1, 27.1, 27.8, 30.5, 41.7, 48.6, 77.2, 78.3, 99.8, 111.8, 113.8, 122.4, 127.0, 130.1, 133.9, 136.6, 144.9, 173.8; FAB-MS obsd 445.2152, calcd 445.2161 [(M + H)+, M = C24H32N2O4S].

4.3.39. 1-(Dimethoxymethyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (29-Ts)

Following a general procedure,44 aldehyde 24-Ts (287 mg, 0.766 mmol) was dissolved in a methanolic solution of LaCl3·H2O (0.40 M, 1.9 mL). The resulting mixture was treated with trimethyl orthoformate (758 μL, 6.93 mmol) and stirred for 3 h at room temperature. The mixture was poured into 5% aqueous NaHCO3 (16 mL). The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (4:1)] to afford a white solid (180 mg, 56%): mp 108–109 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.01 (s, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.47–2.49 (m, 2H), 3.06–3.13 (m, 1H), 3.47 (s, 6H), 3.46–3.51 (m, 1H), 4.18–4.22 (m, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 6.10–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.20–6.22 (m, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 23.1, 24.8, 28.4, 37.7, 42.1, 55.4, 55.7, 80.7, 97.9, 111.8, 114.8. 123.3, 127.1, 130.3, 130.7, 136.0, 142.8, 145.3. Anal. Calcd for C21H28N2O5S: C, 59.98; H, 6.71; N, 6.66. Found: C, 59.82; H, 6.70; N, 6.50.

4.3.40. 1,1-Dimethoxy-4,4-dimethyl-5-nitro-6-(2-pyrrolyl)-2-hexanone (30)

Following a general procedure,12 CsF (8.97 g, 59.1 mmol, 3.00 mol equiv, freshly dried by heating to 100 °C under vacuum for 1 h and then cooling to room temperature under argon) was placed in a flask under argon. A mixture of 9 (2.76 g, 19.7 mmol) and acetal 10d (13.7 g, 86.6 mmol, 4.40 mol equiv) in 170 mL of dry acetonitrile was cannulated into the flask containing CsF. The mixture was heated at 65 °C for 14 h, whereupon the reaction was deemed to be complete by TLC. The reaction mixture was filtered through a bed of alumina (ethyl acetate). The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (3:1)] to afford a brown oil containing some impurities. Chromatography (silica, CH2Cl2) gave a light brown solid (1.99 g, 34%): mp 74–75 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 2.60, 2.72 (AB, 2J = 18.6 Hz, 2H), 3.03 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (ABX, 3J = 11.8 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 4.36 (s, 1H), 5.15 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 3J = 11.8 Hz, 1H), 5.97–5.99 (m, 1H), 6.08–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.65–6.67 (m, 1H), 8.00–8.13 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.4, 24.5, 26.9, 36.6, 45.3, 55.4, 95.0, 104.9, 107.5, 108.9, 117.9, 126.2, 203.8; FAB-MS obsd 299.1605, calcd 299.1607. Anal. Calcd for C14H22N2O5: C, 56.36; H, 7.43; N, 9.39. Found: C, 56.44; H, 7.57; N, 9.38.

4.3.41. Solventless Synthesis of 30

Following a reported procedure,18 a sample of 9 (1.44 g, 10.0 mmol) was treated with 10d (1.90 g, 12.0 mmol) and DBU (4.57 g, 30.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h and then diluted with CH2Cl2. The mixture was washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated, and chromatographed (silica, CH2Cl2) to give a light-brown oil, which solidified to a pale-brown solid (1.75 g, 53%). The characterization data were identical as those described above.

4.3.42. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1-(dimethoxymethyl)-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin N10-oxide (31)

Following a general procedure,12 a vigorously stirred solution of 30 (60 mg, 0.20 mmol) in acetic acid (1.0 mL) and ethanol (1.0 mL) at 0 °C was treated slowly with zinc dust (330 mg, 5.0 mmol) in small portions for 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min and filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated under high vacuum. The resulting oil was chromatographed [alumina, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (9:1)] to afford a white solid (9.0 mg, 17%): mp 68–70 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.11 (s, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 2.47, 2.53 (AB, 2J = 17.8 Hz, 2H), 2.96 (ABX, 3J = 1.6 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (ABX, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.46 (s, 3H), 3.95 (ABX, 3J = 1.6 Hz, 2J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 5.92–5.95 (m, 1H), 6.06–6.09 (m, 1H), 6.68–6.71 (m, 1H), 10.31–10.45 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.8, 25.5, 27.3, 38.4, 42.2, 55.3, 55.5, 82.9, 97.6, 106.4, 107.5, 117.8, 128.9, 145.1; FAB-MS obsd 266.1630, calcd 266.1630 (M = C14H22N2O3).

4.3.43. 2,3-Dihydro-1-(dimethoxymethyl)-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (32P)

Following a general procedure,10 a solution of acetal 30 (149 mg, 0.500 mmol) in dry THF (5.0 mL) was treated with sodium methoxide (135 mg, 2.50 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under argon for 1 h to form the nitronate anion. TiCl3 (8.6 wt% TiCl3 in 28 wt% HCl, 3.74 mL, 2.50 mmol, 5 mol equiv) was placed in a flask to which 20 mL of water was added. Ammonium acetate (15.4 g, 200 mmol, 400 mol equiv) was added to buffer the solution to pH ~6 (pH meter) and then 1.2 mL of THF was added. The nitronate anion in THF was added to the buffered TiCl3 solution. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4.5 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed [aqueous NaHCO3 (10% w/v, 40 mL) and water], dried and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting oil was purified by column chromatography [alumina, packed in hexanes and eluted with hexanes/ethyl acetate (2:1)] to give a yellow oil (17 mg, 14%): 1H NMR δ 1.21 (s, 6H), 2.61 (s, 2H), 3.45 (s, 6H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 5.88 (s, 1H), 6.15–6.18 (m, 1H), 6.83–6.86 (m, 1H), 10.59–10.70 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 29.3, 40.2, 48.3, 54.8, 103.0, 107.7, 108.7, 109.4, 119.6, 130.9, 159.5, 174.1; λabs (CH2Cl2) 341 nm. The limited stability of this compound thwarted high-resolution mass spectrometric analysis.

4.3.44. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1-(α-hydroxy-α-phenylmethyl)-3,3-dimethyl-N11-p-tosyldipyrrin N10-oxide (33-Ts)

A solution of 24-Ts (573 mg, 1.53 mmol) in dry THF (23.0 mL) at 0 °C was treated with PhMgBr (1.84 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 1.84 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. The reaction was quenched by addition of H2O/hexanes (20 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water and brine. TLC analysis (silica, ethyl acetate) showed two components with Rf = 0.65 (33a-Ts) and Rf = 0.49 (33b-Ts). Column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate) afforded the two isomers as a light brown solid (33a-Ts, 113 mg, 16%) and a white solid (33b-Ts, 126 mg, 18%). Data for 33a-Ts: mp 62–64 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.89 (s, 3H), 1.01 (s, 3H), 2.18, 2.32 (AB, 2J = 17.6 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 3.07 (ABX, 3J = 9.8 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (ABX, 3J = 4.2 Hz, 2J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 4.21–4.25 (m, 1H), 5.62 (s, 1H), 6.07–6.09 (m, 1H), 6.18–6.20 (m, 1H), 6.86–6.97 (brs, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.29–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.32–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.7, 24.7, 28.1, 37.9, 44.0, 70.9, 80.3, 111.9, 114.9, 123.3, 126.5, 127.0, 128.5, 128.9, 130.3, 130.4, 135.9, 139.5, 145.3, 148.2; FAB-MS obsd 453.1854, calcd 453.1848 (C25H28N2O4S). Data for 33b-Ts: mp 156–158 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.96 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H), 2.23–2.26 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 3.15 (ABX, 3J = 9.8 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (ABX, 3J = 4.0 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.13–4.19 (m, 1H), 5.60–5.62 (m, 1H), 6.09–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.20–6.22 (m, 1H), 7.01–7.03 (m, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.32–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 21.8, 22.9, 24.8, 28.3, 37.9, 44.2, 71.4, 80.7, 111.9, 114.8, 123.3, 126.6, 127.0, 128.6, 129.0, 130.3, 130.5, 136.0, 139.5, 145.4, 148.0; FAB-MS obsd 453.1859, calcd 453.1848 (C25H28N2O4S).

4.3.45. 9-Bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyldipyrrin N10-oxide (34)

Following a general procedure,10 a solution of 23 (413 mg, 2.00 mmol) in dry THF (20.0 mL) was cooled to –78 °C under argon. NBS (356 mg, 2.00 mmol) was added in two portions. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C. Hexanes (25 mL) and water (25 mL) were added. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), concentrated under vacuum without heat, and chromatographed (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a white solid (453 mg, 79%): mp 124–125 °C (dec.); 1H NMR δ 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.19 (s, 3H), 2.07–2.08 (m, 3H), 2.32, 2.48 (AB, 2J = 17.6 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (ABX, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (ABX, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.84–3.91 (m, 1H), 5.85–5.87 (m, 1H), 5.96–5.98 (m, 1H), 10.92–11.03 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 13.4, 23.0, 26.2, 27.8, 37.4, 47.2, 81.1, 96.8, 108.1, 109.4, 130.5, 146.3. Anal. Calcd. for C12H17BrN2O: C, 50.54; H, 6.01; N, 9.82. Found C, 50.48; H, 6.05; N, 9.65.

4.3.46. 9-Bromo-1-formyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin N10-oxide (35)

Following a general procedure,27 a solution of 34 (29 mg, 0.10 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (1.0 mL) was treated with SeO2 (14 mg, 0.13 mmol) under argon. The mixture was stirred for 2.5 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then treated with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (1.0 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extract was washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (1:1)] to give a light brown solid (13 mg, 43%): mp 115–117 °C (dec.); 1H NMR δ 1.09 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 2.60 (AB, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (AB, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (ABX, 3J = 2.2 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (ABX, 3J = 8.2 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.06–4.11 (m, 1H), 5.88–5.90 (m, 1H), 5.99–6.01 (m, 1H), 9.64–9.74 (brs, 1H), 10.20 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.2, 25.2, 26.4, 38.9, 39.9, 85.4, 97.4, 108.7, 110.0, 129.8, 142.7, 183.1; FAB-MS obsd 299.0385, calcd 299.0395 [(M + H)+, M = C12H15BrN2O2].

4.3.47. 6-(5-Formylpyrrol-2-yl)-1,1-dimethoxy-4,4-dimethyl-5-nitrohexan-2-one (36)

A sample of 30 (0.289 g, 1.00 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and DMF (1 mL) was added. The resulting solution was treated dropwise at 0 °C with POCl3 (0.100 mL, 1.09 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h, and then poured into ice-cooled 10% aqueous NaOH (20 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min, and then extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. Chromatography (silica, CH2Cl2) afforded a yellow oil, which solidified to a yellow solid (0.111 g, 35%): mp 103–104 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 2.64 (AB, 2J = 18.4 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (AB, 2J = 18.4 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 2J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.42 (s, 3H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.45 (m, overlapped, 1H), 4.35 (s, 1H), 5.23 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 2J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 6.10–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.86–6.88 (m, 1H), 6.38 (s, 1H), 10.42–10.46 (br, 1H); 13C δ 24.2, 24.3, 27.1, 36.8, 45.0, 52.47, 52.51, 94.0, 105.0, 111.0, 122.9, 133.0, 136.8, 179.1, 203.6; FAB-MS obsd 327.1569, calcd 327.1556 [(M + H)+, M = C15H22N2O6].

4.3.48. 9-Formyl-2,3-dihydro-1-(dimethoxymethyl)-3,3-dimethyldipyrrin (37)

Following a general procedure,18 a sample of 36 (32.6 mg, 0.100 mmol) in THF/H2O (1 mL, 1:1) was treated with NH4Cl (16.0 mg, 0.300 mmol) and zinc dust (98.0 mg, 1.50 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Ethyl acetate (10 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was filtered. The filtrate was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. Chromatography [silica, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (1:2)] afforded a white solid (12.5 mg, 45%): mp 69–71 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.09, (s, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 2.44–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.98 (ABX, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (ABX, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (s, 3H), 3.49 (s, 3H), 3.98–4.00 (m, 1H), 5.50 (s, 1H), 6.07–6.08 (m, 1H), 6.81–6.82 (m, 1H), 9.42 (s, 1H), 11.36–11.44 (br, 1H); 13C NMR δ 22.9, 25.7, 27.3, 29.9, 38.4, 41.9, 55.8, 56.1, 81.7, 110.4, 121.0, 133.2, 138.0, 145.5, 178.6; FAB-MS obsd 279.1696, calcd 279.1709 (M = C15H22N2O3).

4.3.49. 9-Bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyldipyrrin (38)

Following a procedure for the α-bromination of pyrroles,10 a solution of 2 (95 mg, 0.50 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was cooled to –78 °C under argon. NBS (89 mg, 0.50 mmol) was added in two portions. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 1 h at –78 °C. Hexanes (6.0 mL) and water (6.0 mL) were added, and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The organic layer was extracted with ethyl acetate, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under vacuum without heating. The resulting residue was purified by gravity column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate) to give a white solid (112 mg, 83%): mp 102–104 °C (dec.); 1H NMR δ 0.92 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 2.04–2.06 (m, 3H), 2.26–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.49–2.57 (m, 1H), 2.69–2.71 (m, 1H), 3.55–3.62 (m, 1H), 5.85–5.87 (m, 1H), 5.98–6.00 (m, 1H), 9.84–10.00 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 20.7, 23.0, 27.4, 28.3, 42.0, 54.5, 80.2, 95.7, 107.2, 109.4, 133.4, 175.0; FAB-MS obsd 269.0641, calcd 269.0653 [(M + H)+, M = C12H17BrN2].

4.3.50. 9-Formyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyldipyrrin (39) by reductive cyclization

Following a general procedure,18 a solution of 40 (0.226 g, 1.00 mmol) in THF was treated with HCOONH4 (0.996 g, 15.8 mmol) and zinc dust (0.981 g, 15.0 mmol). The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and filtered. The filter cake was washed with ethyl acetate (~20 mL). The filtrate was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The crude product (dark red) was chromatographed [silica, ethyl acetate/methanol (10:1)] to afford a dark orange solid (60 mg, 27%): mp 72–74 °C; 1H NMR δ 0.93 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.30 (AB, 2J = 17.0 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (AB, 2J = 17.0 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (ABX, 3J = 11.2 Hz, 2J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (ABX, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 2J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.62–3.65 (m, 1H), 6.09–6.10 (m, 1H), 6.85–6.86 (m, 1H), 9.39 (s, 1H), 10.72–10.95 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 20.7, 23.1, 27.3, 28.3, 42.2, 54.6, 79.2, 109.9, 121.9, 132.5, 141.7, 175.3, 178.4; FAB-MS obsd 219.1491, calcd 219.1497 [(M + H)+, M = C13H18N2O].

4.3.51. Synthesis of 39 by Vilsmeier formylation

A solution of 2 (0.380 g, 2.00 mmol) in DMF (0.70 mL) and CH2Cl2 (16.0 mL) at 0 °C under argon was treated dropwise with POCl3 (0.229 mL, 2.50 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then brought to room temperature. The reaction mixture was poured in 2.5 M NaOH (10 mL) at 0 °C. Water was added (250 mL), and the resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The crude product (red-brown) was chromatographed [silica, ethyl acetate/methanol (10:1)] to afford a yellow solid (0.24 g, 55%). A brownish yellow oil byproduct also was obtained and identified as 1,11-diformyl-2,3-dihydro-1,3,3-trimethyldipyrromethane (42, 0.17 g, 35%). The data for the title compound (mp, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FAB-MS) were consistent with those obtained from samples prepared via an earlier route. Data for 42: 1H NMR δ 1.01 (s, 3H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.93 (s, 3H), 3.0 (ABX, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (ABX, 3J = 4.4 Hz, 2J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.34–4.37 (m, 1H), 4.77 (s, 1H), 6.11–6.12 (m, 1H), 6.86–6.87 (m, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 9.35 (s, 1H), 10.52–10.65 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 12.8, 22.4, 28.1, 30.6, 43.8, 66.0, 110.6, 120.9, 122.7, 132.3, 133.8, 140.0, 157.8, 178.5; FAB-MS obsd 247.1439, calcd 247.1447 [(M + H)+, M = C14H18N2O2].

4.3.52. 6-(5-Formyl-2-pyrrolyl)-4,4-dimethyl-5-nitrohexan-2-one (40)

A solution of 22 (2.74 g, 11.5 mmol) in DMF (3.7 mL) and CH2Cl2 (85 mL) at 0 °C under argon was treated dropwise with POCl3 (1.25 mL, 13.6 mmol). The reaction mixture changed from light brown to dark red. The residue was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then brought to room temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was poured in 2.5 M aqueous NaOH (60 mL) at 0 °C. Water (250 mL) was added, and the reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. Chromatography [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate (1:1)] afforded a yellow solid (1.97 g, 64%). A light pink byproduct also was isolated (0.090 g, 32%) and identified as 2,3,4-trihydro-4,4,6-trimethyl-3-nitrocycloheptene[b]pyrrole (40′). Data for 40: mp 105–107 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.13 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 2.43 (AB, 2J = 18.0 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (AB, 2J = 18.0 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (ABX, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 2J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (ABX, 3J = 2.4 Hz, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 6.11–6.14 (m, 1H), 6.87–6.88 (m, 1H), 9.39 (s, 1H), 10.20–10.32 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.1, 24.6, 27.0, 32.0, 37.1, 51.5, 93.7, 111.1, 123.1, 132.9, 136.8, 179.1, 206.9; FAB-MS obsd 267.1353, cald 267.1345 [(M + H)+, M = C13H18N2O4]. Data for 40′: mp 182–185 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 3.42 (ABX, 3J = 3.8 Hz, 2J = 18.0 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (ABX, 3J = 3.8 Hz, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (ABX, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 3J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 6.92–6.93 (s, 1H), 9.42 (s, 1H), 10.12–10.23 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 23.0, 24.2, 29.0, 29.5, 29.8, 39.0, 89.4, 121.6, 123.6, 127.6, 131.4, 134.3, 179.3; FAB-MS obsd 249.1226, calcd 249.1239 [(M + H)+, M = C13H16N2O3].

4.3.53. 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1,3,3,9-tetramethyldipyrrin N-oxide (41)

Following a general procedure,12 a vigorously stirred solution of 40 (0.26 g, 1.00 mmol) in acetic acid (5.0 mL) and ethanol (5 mL) was treated slowly with zinc dust (1.64 g, 25.0 mmol) in small portions over 5 min at 0 °C. The starting material was consumed in 2 h at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was filtered. The filter cake was washed with ethyl acetate (~20 mL). The filtrate was neutralized with aqueous NaHCO3, washed (water and brine), dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The resulting red oil was chromatographed [silica, hexanes/ethyl acetate/methanol (8:5:2)] to afford a light brown solid (39.0 mg, 18%): mp 98–100 °C; 1H NMR δ 1.11 (s, 3H), 1.18 (s, 3H), 2.04–2.05 (m, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.29 (AB, 2J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (AB, 2J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 2.91–3.01 (m, 2H), 3.84–3.86 (m, 1H), 5.66–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.77–5.79 (m, 1H), 10.10–10.24 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR δ 13.38, 13.41, 23.0, 26.1, 26.6, 28.0, 37.3, 47.2, 81.6, 105.0, 106.3, 127.6, 145.7; FAB-MS obsd 220.1562, calcd 220.1567 (C13H20N2O).

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the NIH (GM36238). We thank Dr. Man Nyoung Kim for the synthesis of 38 and exploratory studies on reactions of 9.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.(a) Vernon LP, Seely GR. The Chlorophylls. Academic Press; New York, USA: 1966. [Google Scholar]; (b) Scheer H, editor. Chlorophylls. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Agius L, Ballantine JA, Ferrito V, Jaccarini V, Murray-Rust P, Pelter A, Psaila AF, Schembri PJ. Pure Appl Chem. 1979;51:1847–1864. [Google Scholar]; (b) Helaja J, Montforts FP, Kilpeläinen I, Hynninen PH. J Org Chem. 1999;64:432–437. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Prinsep MR, Caplan FR, Moore RE, Patterson GML, Smith CD. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:385–387. [Google Scholar]; (b) Prinsep MR, Patterson GML, Larsen LK, Smith CD. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:10523–10530. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Crane BR, Getzoff ED. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:744–756. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nakayama M, Akashi T, Hase T. J Inorg Biochem. 2000;82:27–32. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(00)00138-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Dolphin D, editor. B12 Vol. 1: Chemistry. Wiley-Interscience; New York, USA: 1982. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dolphin D, editor. B12 Vol. 2: Biochemistry and Medicine. Wiley-Interscience; New York, USA: 1982. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kräutler B, Arigoni D, Golding BT, editors. Vitamin B12 and B12-Proteins; Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ragsdale SW. In: The Porphyrin Handbook. Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R, editors. Vol. 11. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 2003. pp. 205–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Dorough GD, Miller JR. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74:6106–6108. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dorough GD, Huennekens FM. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74:3974–3976. [Google Scholar]; (c) Whitlock HW, Jr, Hanauer R, Oester MY, Bower BK. J Am Chem Soc. 1969;91:7485–7489. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Eschenmoser A, Wintner CE. Science. 1977;196:1410–1420. doi: 10.1126/science.867037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Flitsch W. Adv Heterocyclic Chem. 1988;43:73–126. [Google Scholar]; (c) Woodward RB, Ayer WA, Beaton JM, Bickelhaupt F, Bonnett R, Buchschacher P, Closs GL, Dutler H, Hannah J, Hauck FP, Ito S, Langemann A, Le Goff E, Leimgruber W, Lwowski W, Sauer J, Valenta Z, Volz H. Tetrahedron. 1990;46:7599–7659. [Google Scholar]; (d) Montforts FP, Gerlach B, Höper F. Chem Rev. 1994;94:327–347. [Google Scholar]; (e) Montforts FP, Glasenapp-Breiling M. Prog Heterocyclic Chem. 1998;10:1–24. [Google Scholar]; (f) Montforts FP, Glasenapp-Breiling M. Fortschr Chem Org Naturst. 2002;84:1–51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6160-9_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Riether D, Mulzer J. Eur J Org Chem. 2003:30–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balaban TS, Tamiaki H, Holzwarth AR. Top Curr Chem. 2005;258:1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Strachan JP, O’Shea DF, Balasubramanian T, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2000;65:3160–3172. doi: 10.1021/jo991942t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Balasubramanian T, Strachan JP, Boyle PD, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2000;65:7919–7929. doi: 10.1021/jo000913b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taniguchi M, Ra D, Mo G, Balasubramanian T, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2001;66:7342–7354. doi: 10.1021/jo0104835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Taniguchi M, Kim HJ, Ra D, Schwartz JK, Kirmaier C, Hindin E, Diers JR, Prathapan S, Bocian DF, Holten D, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2002;67:7329–7342. doi: 10.1021/jo025843i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laha JK, Muthiah C, Taniguchi M, McDowell BE, Ptaszek M, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2006;71:4092–4102. doi: 10.1021/jo060208o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim HJ, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2005;70:5475–5486. doi: 10.1021/jo050467y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dutton CJ, Fookes CJR, Battersby AR. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1983:1237–1238. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Battersby AR, Dutton CJ, Fookes CJR. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1988:1569–1576. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ptaszek M, Bhaumik J, Kim HJ, Taniguchi M, Lindsey JS. Org Process Res Dev. 2005;9:651–659. doi: 10.1021/op050087e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Inhoffen HH, Petrovicki W, Gossauer A. Liebigs Ann Chem. 1973:1067–1074. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harrison PJ, Fookes CJR, Battersby AR. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1981:797–799. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arnott DM, Battersby AR, Harrison PJ, Henderson GB, Sheng ZC. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1984:525–526. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Battersby AR, Reiter LA. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1984:2743–2749. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harrison PJ, Sheng ZC, Fookes CJR, Battersby AR. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1987:1667–1678. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arnott DM, Harrison PJ, Henderson GB, Sheng ZC, Leeper FJ, Battersby AR. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1989:265–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Battersby AR, Block MH, Fookes CJR, Harrison PJ, Henderson GB, Leeper FJ. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1992:2175–2187. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Battersby AR, Block MH, Leeper FJ, Zimmerman SC. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1992:2189–2195. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jacobi PA, Lanz S, Ghosh I, Leung SH, Löwer F, Pippin D. Org Lett. 2001;3:831–834. doi: 10.1021/ol006983m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Neal WG, Roberts WP, Ghosh I, Jacobi PA. J Org Chem. 2005;70:7243–7251. doi: 10.1021/jo050907l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O’Neal WG, Roberts WP, Ghosh I, Wang H, Jacobi PA. J Org Chem. 2006;71:3472–3480. doi: 10.1021/jo060041z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Battersby AR, Fookes CJR, Snow RJ. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1984:2725–2732. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tietze LF, Kettschau G, Heitmann K. Synthesis. 1996:851–857. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheruku SR, Padmanilayam MP, Vennerstrom JL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:3701–3703. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park KH, Marshall WJ. J Org Chem. 2005;70:2075–2081. doi: 10.1021/jo047798f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cava MP, Levinson MI. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:5061–5087. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anderson HJ, Loader CE, Xu RX, Le N, Gogan NJ, McDonald R, Edwards LG. Can J Chem. 1985;63:896–902. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Settambolo R, Lazzaroni R, Messeri T, Mazzetti M, Salvadori P. J Org Chem. 1993;58:7899–7902. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abell AD, Nabbs BK, Battersby AR. J Org Chem. 1998;63:8163–8169. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hasegawa M, Taniyama D, Tomioka K. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:10153–10158. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.(a) Jurczak J, Golebiowski A. Chem Rev. 1989;89:149–164. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gerspacher M, Rapoport H. J Org Chem. 1991;56:3700–3706. [Google Scholar]; (c) Reed PE, Katzenellenbogen JA. J Org Chem. 1991;56:2624–2634. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lubell WD, Jamison TF, Rapoport H. J Org Chem. 1990;55:3511–3522. [Google Scholar]; (e) Myers AG, Kung DW, Zhong B, Movassaghi M, Kwon S. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:8401–8402. [Google Scholar]; (f) Lubell WD, Rapport H. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:236–239. [Google Scholar]; (g) Bonini BF, Comes-Franchini M, Fochi M, Gawronski J, Mazzanti G, Ricci A, Varchi G. Eur J Org Chem. 1999:437–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Black DStC, Strauch RJ. Aust J Chem. 1988;41:183–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Patrocínio AF, Moran PJS. J Organomet Chem. 2000;603:220–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lindsey JS, Brown PA, Siesel DA. Tetrahedron. 1989;45:4845–4866. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nagata T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1991;64:3005–3016. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Luche JL, Gemal AL. J C S Chem Comm. 1978:976–977. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kantam ML, Swapna V, Santhi PL. Synth Commun. 1995;25:2529–2532. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lindsey JS, Prathapan S, Johnson TE, Wagner RW. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:8941–8968. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim H-J. PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.(a) Lee CH, Li F, Iwamoto K, Dadok J, Bothner-By AA, Lindsey JS. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:11645–11672. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rao PD, Dhanalekshmi S, Littler BJ, Lindsey JS. J Org Chem. 2000;65:7323–7344. doi: 10.1021/jo000882k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Battersby AR, Dutton CJ, Fookes CJR, Turner SPD. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1988:1557–1567. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ghosh I, Jacobi PA. J Org Chem. 2002;67:9304–9309. doi: 10.1021/jo026510o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES