Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2007 Mar;10(3):219–229. doi: 10.2174/138620707780126697

Fluorous-Enhanced Multicomponent Reactions for Making Drug-Like Library Scaffolds

Wei Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC1857346  NIHMSID: NIHMS20259  PMID: 17346120

Abstract

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) generate multiple bonds in a single reaction process, which is highly efficient to construct relatively complex molecules. Conducting post-MCR modification reactions further increases the molecular complexity and diversity. MCR has become a powerful approach to make drug-like molecules in lead generation chemistry. In fluorous MCR (F-MCR), one of the starting materials is attached to a fluorous tag and used as the limiting agent. After the MCR, the fluorous component is fished out from the reaction mixture and used for post-MCR modifications. The fluorous tag can be finally removed in traceless fashion by displacement or cyclization reactions. Unique fluorous technology such as fluorous solid-phase extraction (F-SPE) facilitates the separation process. Other techniques such as microwave irradiation and plate-to-plate SPE can also be used to make the F-MCR even more efficient. Syntheses of unique heterocyclic and natural product-like library scaffolds using Ugi/de-Boc/cyclization, MCR/Suzuki coupling, and [3+2] cycloaddition/de-tag/cyclization protocols are described in this paper.

Keywords: diversity-oriented synthesis, drug-like molecules, fluorous synthesis, library scaffolds, microwave reactions, multicomponent reactions, solid-phase extraction

INTRODUCTION

Since the late 1980’s, a significant amount of effort on lead generation chemistry has been spent on solid-phase organic synthesis (SPOS) of compound libraries [1,2]. SPOS has advantages of simple product separation and production of large number of libraries. However, the inherent disadvantages such as heterogeneous reaction environment, long method development times, and difficulty to analyze attached intermediates have limited the further development of SPOS [3,4]. In last years, many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have redirected the lead generation chemistry to parallel solution-phase synthesis and emphasized production of smaller libraries with high molecular diversity, bigger quantity, and higher purity [4]. Fluorous technology combines the characteristics of a solution-phase reaction with solid-phase separation techniques. It has high combinatorial potency like the adoption of existing reaction conditions, less dependent on specialized instruments, easy analysis of attached intermediates, and quickly produces pure compounds [510]. As such it emerges as a new broad-based technology platform for organic synthesis and drug discovery chemistry.

FLUOROUS MULTICOMPONENT REACTION AND PURIFICATION

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) have high efficiency for rapid assembly of complex molecules [1116]. However, the number of known MCRs is limited. In order to produce novel library scaffolds, it usually requires performing post-MCR modifications to increase the molecular complexity and also the molecular diversity. In fluorous MCRs (F-MCRs) (Fig. 1), one of the starting materials containing a fluorous tag is used as the limiting agent. After the condensation reaction, the fluorous component is separated from the reaction mixture containing many non-fluorous components by fluorous tag-based separation [17]. The fluorous component is then subjected to post-MCR modifications and the fluorous tag is finally removed in traceless fashion by conducting displacement or cyclization reactions. The purification of intermediates and final products can be achieved by simple fluorous solid-phase extraction (F-SPE) (Fig. 2) [1820]. The fluorous silica gel with -Si(Me)2CH2CH2C8F17 as a stationary phase selectively retains the fluorous molecules when the mixture is eluted with a fluorophobic solvent such as 80:20 MeOH-H2O. The fluorous molecule is released from the SPE cartridge when washing with a fluorophilic solvent such as 100% MeOH. For parallel synthesis of compound libraries, the F-SPE can be performed in 24-, 48-, or 96-well plate-to-plate formats [21] to increase the throughput (Fig. 3, left picture). Automated F-SPE has also been developed using the RapidTrace SPE workstation [22]. The large scale intermediate purifications can be accomplished on flash chromatography systems available from Biotage or Isco and equipped with fluorous cartridges (Fig. 3, right picture). Other techniques such as microwave irradiation can be used to reduce the reaction time and to make F-MCRs even more efficient [2327].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Conceptual figure of fluorous MCR and post-MCR modification

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cartoon of fluorous solid-phase extraction

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Pate-to-plate and flash column F-SPE systems

Amines, benzaldehydes, and carboxylic acids are popular reagents for MCRs. Similar reagents attached to fluorous protecting groups [28,29] have been employed for F-MCRs. Syntheses of structurally diverse library scaffolds using Ugi/de-Boc/cyclization, MCR/Suzuki coupling, and [3+2] cycloaddition/de-tag/cyclization approaches are described in this paper (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Fluorous multicomponent synthesis of diverse library scaffolds

UGI/DE-BOC/CYCLIZATION PROTOCOL

The Ugi/de-Boc/cyclization approach to synthesize quinoxalinones 1 and benzimidazoles 2 was originally developed by the Hulme group (Fig. 5) [30,31]. The Ugi reactions were conducted at room temperature and required 36–48 h for completion. The condensation products 3 and 4 were purified by double scavenging with polymer-supported tosylhydrazine and diisopropylethylamine to remove excess aldehydes and unreacted acids, respectively. Final products produced by de-Boc/cyclization were purified by flash chromatography. A microwave-assisted fluorous approach has been developed to reduce the reaction time and simplify the purification (Fig. 5) [32]. The Ugi reactions were finished in 20 min under microwave irradiation using F-Boc-protected diamine as the limiting agent. The original double scavenging step was replaced by a simple F-SPE. The de-Boc/cyclization step was also conducted under microwave heating and products 1 and 2 were purified by F-SPE. We have noticed that the F-Boc group is slightly more stable towards TFA deprotection. A higher concentration of TFA-THF (1:1) was used for Boc cleavage under the microwave heating conditions.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Syntheses of quinoxalinones 1 and benzimidazoles 2

The benzodiazepine-quinazolinone ring skeleton 9 can be found in many natural alkaloids such as circumdatins [33], benzolmalvin [34,35], asperlicin [36], and sclerotigenin [37,38]. This scaffold has been synthesized by the Ugi/de-Boc/cyclization protocol (Fig. 6) [39]. The regular Boc group was used to protect the anthranilic acid, and fluorous benzyl amine (F-Bn) was used as the limiting agent to generate Ugi condensation product 5. TFA-THF (1:1) was used for selective de-Boc/cyclization to form benzodiazepinedione 6. A small amount of de-Bn compound was also detected. The compound 6 was acylated with 2-nitrobenzoyl chloride. The nitro group of 7 was then reduced with zinc dust in acetic acid under sonication. The resulted amino group spontaneously cyclized to form benzodiazepine-quinazolinone ring system 8. The F-Bn was removed by treatment with 90:5:5 TFA-H2O-dimethylsulfide to give final product 9.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Synthesis of benzodiazepine-quinazolinones 9

MCR/SUZUKI COUPLING PROTOCOL

Perfluorosulfonyl-attached benzaldehydes 10 are a valuable synthon for F-MCRs (Fig. 7). They can be easily prepared by reaction of readily available perfluorooctanesulfonylfluoride with hydroxybenzaldehydes under a general reaction condition [40]. In a multistep synthesis, the perfluorooctanesulfonyl tag has three functions: 1) protection of the hydroxyl group; 2) introduction of fluorous tag for F-SPE; and 3) activation of the hydroxyl group for Suzuki-type coupling reactions. In addition to the Suzuki coupling reactions, other Pd-catalyzed coupling reactions can also be used for tag cleavage [4143]. Aryl perfluorooctanesulfonyl group is a good aryl iodide and aryl bromide alternative.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Fluorous benzaldehydes 10 for F-MCRs

In a three-component MCR, a fluorous benzaldehyde was reacted with isonitrile and 2-aminopyridine or 2-aminopyrazine to form imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine or imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine ring systems 11 [44]. The condensation products were then employed for Suzuki-type reactions with boronic acids or thiols to form compounds 12. A library prepared by parallel synthesis using four sets of building blocks is shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines and imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazines 12

Fluorous benzaldehydes have been used for one-pot, three-component 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azomethine ylides to form proline-fused heterocyclic systems 13 (Fig. 9) [45]. The cycloaddtion products were subjected to the Suzuki coupling reactions to displace the tag and introduce an additional functional group. Four sets of building blocks were used for a two-step parallel synthesis of diaryl-substituted proline derivatives 14 which have four points of diversity.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Synthesis of diaryl-substituted proline derivatives 14

The spirooxindole ring exists in several natural products which have desirable biological activities [46]. The ring skeleton can be easily assembled by a three-component reaction involving fluorous α,β-unsaturated ketone 15, amino acid, and N-phenyl isatin [47]. The fluorous tag attached to 16 was removed by the Suzuki coupling reaction for post-MCR modification to further decorate the scaffold (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Synthesis of a spiroheterocyclic system 17

[3+2] CYCLOADDITION/DE-TAG/CYCLIZATION PROTOCOL

Another important synthon for F-MCRs are fluorous aminoesters 18. They have been used in [3+2] cycloaddition/de-tag/cyclization protocol for making library scaffolds (Fig. 11). A fluorous aminoester as the limiting agent can react with aldehydes and alkenes for one-pot, three-component cycloaddition through azomethine ylides. This reaction can be conducted under conventional or microwave heating. The cycloaddition was highly stereoselective and generated bicyclic pyrrolidines 19 [48]. The X-ray crystal structure analysis of compound 19 is shown in Fig. 12. The [3+2] cycloaddition product can be easily separated from the reaction mixture containing unreacted non-fluorous starting materials by F-SPE. The 1H NMR spectra of compound 19 before and after F-SPE are shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Diversified library scaffolds produced from fluorous aminoesters 18

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Synthesis of compound 19 and its X-ray crystal structure

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

1H NMR spectra of compound 19 before (top) and after (bottom) F-SPE

Proline derivatives generated from the [3+2] cycloaddition have been used for diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) of hydantoin-, piperazinedione-, and benzodiazepine-fused heterocyclic scaffolds 21, 23, and 25 (Fig. 14) [48]. Each of these three scaffolds has four stereocenters on the central pyrrolidine ring and up to four points of diversity (R1 to R4). The structure of compound 21 is similar to tricyclic thrombin inhibitors [49], the structure of compound 23 is similar to diketopiperazine-based inhibitors of human hormone-sensitive lipase [50], while compound 25 contains a privileged benzodiazepine moiety which has a wide range of pharmaceutical utilities.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

[3+2] cycloaddition/de-tag/cyclization protocol for DOS

Synthesis of scaffold 21 was accomplished by reaction of 19 with 5 equiv. of phenylisocyanate in the presence of catalytic amount of N,N-4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to give urea 20. Compound 20 was mixed with K2CO3 and heated under microwave for fluorous tag cleavage and formation of hydantoin-fused product 21. Piperazinedione-fused tricyclic scaffold 23 was synthesized by acylation of 19 with chloroacetyl chloride followed by chlorine displacement with BuNH2 to from 22. The detag/cyclization reaction was promoted by 1,8-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene (DBU) under microwave heating to give 23. Synthesis of benzodiazepine-fused scaffold 25 was accomplished by a three-step post-MCR modification. N-acylation of 19 with 2-nitrobenzoyl chloride followed by zinc-acetic acid reduction under sonication gave compound 24. The fluorous tag cleavage promoted by DBU produced benzodiazepinedinone-fused scaffold 25. The chemistry developed for scaffolds 21 and 25 has been applied to fluorous mixture synthesis of libraries [51].

In the synthesis of a bridged-tricyclic ring system 28 (Fig. 15) [52], fluorous aminoester reacted with a slightly excess amount of N-alkylmaleimide and N-phthalimidoacetaldehyde to form 26. After the cycloaddition product 26 was acylated to form 27, it underwent hydrazinolysis to give the desired product 28. This three step synthesis produced a unique heterocyclic compound with three points of diversity [53].

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

Synthesis of bridged-heterocycle scaffold 28

In the development of [3+2] cycloaddition reactions using fluorous aminoesters as the starting material, we discovered an unprecedented reaction sequence which produced a novel hexacyclic ring system 29 (Fig. 16) [54]. One-pot, double intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction using 4 equiv. of an O-allyl salicyladehyde and one equiv. of a fluorous aminoester under microwave heating generated the polycyclic ring in stereoselective fashion. The structure of the major diastereomer has been confirmed by X-ray crystal structure analysis. This is a highly efficient reaction which generates four new rings, six bonds, and seven diastereocenters in an one-pot reaction.

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

One-pot synthesis of a novel hexacyclic ring system 29 and proposed mechanism

CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

Although the landscape of drug discovery chemistry had signifcant changes recently, new synthetic techniques which reduce reaction time, increase yield and selectivity, simplify product purification, and that can be easy automated are well appriciated by organic and medicinal chemists. The development of solution phase-based fluorous technology is targeted to meet those demands. As a newcomer to the family of combinatorial chemistry, fluorous technology has demonstrated a good “combinatorial capability” for embracing other high-throughput synthesis and purification techniques. F-MCR protocols for synthesis of drug-like molecules described in this paper examplify the integration of MCR, microwave reaction, and F-SPE technique to improve the efficiency of existing chemistry and to explore new chemistry as well. The broad fluorous technology platform generates more and more impacts on synthesis, purification, immoblization, microarray, and screening of small melocules and biomolecules for life scince applications [28,55].

Acknowledgments

Author thanks Ms. Christine Chen, Mr. Yimin Lu, and Dr. Tadamichi Nagashima for their research contributions. Parts of the research work were supported by National Institutes of General Medical Sciences SBIR Grants (2R44GM062717-02 and 2R44GM067326-02).

References

  • 1.Dorwald FZ. Organic Synthesis on Solid Phase. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burgess K. Solid Phase Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geysen HM, Schoenen F, Wagner D, Wagner R. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2003;2:222. doi: 10.1038/nrd1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baldino CM. J Comb Chem. 2000;2:89. doi: 10.1021/cc990064+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gladysz JA, Horvath IT, Curran DP, editors. Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Curran DP. Aldrichimica Acta. 2006;39:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang W. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:4475. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang W. Chem Rev. 2004;104:2531. doi: 10.1021/cr030600r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoshida JI, Itami K. Chem Rev. 2002;102:3693. doi: 10.1021/cr0103524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Studer A, Hadida S, Ferritto SY, Kim PY, Jeger P, Wipf P, Curran DP. Science. 1997;275:823. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5301.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu J, Bienayme H, editors. Multicomponent Reactions. Wiley; Weinheim: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Domling A. Chem Rev. 2006;106:17. doi: 10.1021/cr0505728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramon DJ, Yus M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:2. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hulme C, Gore V. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:51. doi: 10.2174/0929867033368600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ulaczyk-Lesanko A, Hall DG. Curr Opin Chem Bio. 2005;9:266. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Armstrong RW, Brown SD, Keating TA, Tempest PA. In: Combinatorial Chemistry Synthesis and Application. Wilson SR, Czarnik AW, editors. John Wiley; New York: 1997. pp. 153–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.First example of F-MCR; Studer A, Jeger P, Wipf P, Curran DP. J Org Chem. 1997;62:2917. doi: 10.1021/jo970095w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Curran DP. Synlett. 2001:1488. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Curran DP. In: Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry; Gladysz JA, Curran DP, Horvath IT, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. pp. 101–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang W, Curran DP. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:11837. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.08.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang W, Lu Y, Nagashima T. J Comb Chem. 2005;7:893. doi: 10.1021/cc050061z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang W, Lu Y. J Comb Chem. 2006;8:890. doi: 10.1021/cc0601130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang W. Chimica Oggi (Chem Today) 2005;23(3):XI–XIII. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang W. Microwave Methods in Organic Synthesis. In: Larhed M, Olofsson K, editors. Topics Curr Chem. Vol. 266. Springer; 2006. pp. 145–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kappe CO, Stadler A. Microwaves in Organic and Medicinal Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Loupy A, editor. Microwaves in Organic Synthesis. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Swamy KMK, Yeh WB, Lin MJ, Sun CM. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:2403. doi: 10.2174/0929867033456594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang W. Curr Opin Drug Disc Dev. 2004;7:784. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang W. In: Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry. Gladysz JA, Curran DP, Horvath IT, editors. Wiley-VCH; 2004. pp. 222–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tempest P, Ma V, Kelly MG, Jones W, Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:4963. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nixey T, Tempest P, Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:1637. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang W, Tempest P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:6757. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grieder A, Thomas AW. Synthesis. 2003:1707. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sugimori T, Okawa T, Eguchi S, Yashima E, Kakehi A, Okamoto Y. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:7997. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sugimori T, Okawa T, Eguchi S, Yashima E, Okamoto Y. Chem Lett. 1997:869. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.He F, Foxman BM, Snider BB. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:6417. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Joshi BK, Gloer JB, Wicklow DT, Dowd PF. J Nat Prod. 1999;62:650. doi: 10.1021/np980511n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Snider BB, Busuyek MN. Total synthesis of Circumdatin F and Sclerotigenin. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:3301. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.For a related paper, see:; Zhang W, Williams JP, Lu Y, Nagashima T, Chu Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:563. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.11.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang W, Chen CHT, Lu Y, Nagashima T. Org Lett. 2004;6:1473. doi: 10.1021/ol0496428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang W, Lu Y, Chen CH-T. Mol Diversity. 2003;7:199. doi: 10.1023/b:modi.0000006825.12186.5f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang W, Nagashima T, Lu Y, Chen CHT. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:4611. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang W, Nagashima T. J Fluorine Chem. 2006;127:588. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2005.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lu Y, Zhang W. QSAR Comb Sci. 2004;23:827. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.23-827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang W, Chen CHT. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:1807. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ganguly Seah AKN, Popov V, Wang CH, Kuang R, Saksena AK, Pramanik BN, Chan TM, McPhail AT. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:8981. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang W. unpublished results. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang W, Lu Y, Chen CHT, Curran DP, Geib S. Eur J Org Chem. 2006:2055. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200600077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Olsen J, Seiler P, Wagner B, Fisher H, Tschopp T, Obst-Sander U, Banner DW, Kansy M, Muller K, Diederrich F. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:1339. doi: 10.1039/b402515f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Slee DH, Bhat AS, Nguyen TN, Kish M, Lundeen K, Newman MJ, McConnell SJ. J Med Chem. 2003;46:1120. doi: 10.1021/jm020460y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang W, Lu Y, Chen CHT, Zeng L, Kassel DB. J Comb Chem. 2006;8:687. doi: 10.1021/cc060061e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Blaney P, Grigg R, Rankovic Z, Thornton-Pett M, Xu J. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:1719. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang W, Nagashima T. unpublished results. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang W, Lu Y, Geib S. Org Lett. 2005;7:2269. doi: 10.1021/ol0507773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang W. Fluorous chemistry for synthesis and purification of biomolecules: peptides, oligosaccharides, glycopeptides, and oligonucleotides. In: Soloshonok VA, Mikami K, Yamazaki T, Welch JT, Honek J, editors. ACS symposium series book: Current fluoroorganic chemistry. New synthetic directions, technologies, materials and biological applications. Oxford University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES