Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
editorial
. 2007 Mar;91(3):269–270. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.107805

Safety and efficacy of manual small incision cataract surgery for phacolytic glaucoma

Geoffrey Tabin
PMCID: PMC1857655  PMID: 17322458

In this issue Venkatesh and coworkers (see page 279) from The Aravind Eye Hospital in Pondicherry, India present their results of utilizing a manual sutureless extracapsular cataract surgery (MSICS) technique to treat thirty three consecutive cases of phacolytic glaucoma.1 Pre‐operatively the mean intraocular pressure was 46.2 mmHG. Post‐operatively the IOP was 22 mmHg or less in all cases and 87.9% achieved a post‐operative visual acuity of 20/60 or better! They had no major complications. There were no expulsive hemorrhages and not a single case of posterior capsule rupture. These results are spectacularly good and point out the efficacy of sutureless manual extracapsular cataract extraction. The surgical technique they describe is not only much faster and far less expensive than phacoemulsification for mature cataracts, but it may well be a better and safer technique in the most advanced cases, particularly when phacolytic glaucoma is present. The definitive treatment for phacolytic glaucoma is surgery to remove the lens. However, phacolytic glaucoma presents a very challenging problem for the surgeon. In most cases the lens changes are very advanced. The pathology includes micro‐leakage of high molecular weight proteins through an intact anterior lens capsule. This leads to inflammation and obstruction of aqueous outflow causing a rise in intraocular pressure. The high intraocular pressure increases the risk of a suprachoroidal hemorrhage during surgery. In addition, the residual nucleus is usually rock‐hard with little or no epinucleus remaining. These factors increase the risk of posterior capsule rupture or corneal damage with ultrasound emulsification of the lens. Finally, zonulysis often accompanies the lens changes making the surgery and lens implantation even more difficult. The self sealing tunnel incision of the surgical technique described in this paper maintains the anterior chamber and intraocular pressure during surgery providing the same safety against expulsive hemorrhage as a clear corneal phacoemulsification wound. The continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis, performed after trypan blue staining, allows for “in the bag” intraocular lens placement and use of a capsule tension ring when needed. The gentle visco‐irrigation of the residual nuclear disc from the bag and out of the eye protects both the lens capsule and the corneal endothelium. As the reported results attest, MSICS is an excellent approach to these challenging cases. Morgagnian cataracts, phacomorphic‐glaucoma, black cataract nigra and brown cataracts with leathery capsules fused to the nucleus all present unique challenge that may also be better addressed with MSICS techniques rather than phacoemulsification. A report from Pradhan and Hennig from the Sagarmartha Choudhary Eye Hospital in Lahan, Nepal reported a series of 413 cases of lens induced glaucoma. Of these, 72% were phacomorphic.

At the Tilganga Eye Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, we also experience many more cases of phacomorphic glaucoma than phacolytic glaucoma. Our preferred technique for this condition is a modification of the MSICS technique where we use a previously described “V” capsulotomy that allows an easy and safe hydro‐irrigation technique of the huge lens out of the capsular bag and into the anterior chamber. This is followed by hydroexpression of the lens through the self sealing tunnel incision and out of the eye. We use a similar technique to approach leathery capsules in which a continuous capsulorrhexis is not possible, often employing a Vaness scissor to open the capsule under a bed of viscoelastic.

Finally, we experience a large number of Morgagnian cataracts where the entire cortex has been reabsorbed, leaving only a small hard nuclear disc that sinks inferiorly within the capsular bag. Very frequently these advanced lens changes are again accompanied by severe zonular compromise. We utilize a MSICS technique where we make a small slit in the capsule under viscoelastic and often implant a one piece PMMA lens into the capsular bag prior to irrigating the nucleus out of the capsule. The MSICS techniques allow a safe surgical approach to treat many of the most difficult and complex problems one faces when dealing with mature and hyper‐mature cataractous lenses. A previous article from the same authors in The British Journal of Ophthalmology reported the excellent outcomes and incredible speed of their MSICS technique for routine cases. A single doctor often performed more than 100 surgeries in a single day. Similarly we have reported on our delivery technique from the Tilganga Eye Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal where we achieve similar efficiency at a cost of less than twenty US dollars per case. In much of the ophthalmology world there has been a bias towards phacoemulsification as being the current best method to remove cataracts. The presumption has been that phacoemulsification may be more expensive and equipment dependent, but that it yields superior results. In order to answer the question of whether there is indeed a difference in the quality of outcomes between the two methods for treating advanced cataracts in the developing world, we conducted a prospective randomized trial in Nepal. We brought one of the leading teachers and innovators of phacoemulsification technology and skills from the United States and equipped him with all of the instruments and equipment he uses in his California practice. We then performed a trial at an outreach microsurgical clinic in Nepal. Patients randomized to receive phacoemulsification or MSICS. The results which will be presented at the 2006 meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and published in the December issue of the “American Journal of Ophthalmology” show no statistical difference in corrected or uncorrected visual acuity when analyzed at the 20/40 level at any time from one week to six months. The cost and speed for the MSICS surgery was much less than for the phacoemulsification. According to the most recent WHO estimates there are now well over 20 million people on our planet who are blind from cataracts. These are people with a best visual acuity, in the better eye, of worse than 20/400. There is a great need for efficient, safe, affordable, and high quality cataract surgery. MSICS is an important surgical technique that can address the most complex and difficult cataract cases and has great advantages in speed and cost over other techniques.

References

  • 1.Venkatesh R, Tan C S H, Kumar T T.et al Safety and efficacy of mancial small incision cataract surgery for phacolytic glaucema. Br J Ophthalmol 200791279–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Epstein D L, Jedziniak J A, Grant W M. Obstruction of outflow by lens particles and by heavy‐molecular‐weight soluble lens proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 197817272–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flocks M, Littwin C S, Zimmerman L E. Phacolytic glaucoma: a clinicopathologic study of one hundred thirty‐eight cases of glaucoma associated with hypermature cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 19555437–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gogate P M, Deshpande M, Wormald R P.et al Extracapsular cataract surgery compared with manual small incision cataract surgery in community eye care setting in western India: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 200387667–672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gogate P M, Kulkarni S R, Krishniah S.et al Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small incision cataract surgery by a randomized control clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2005112(5)869–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lane S S, Kopietz L A, Lindquist T D.et al Treatment of phacolytic glaucoma with extracapsular extraction. Ophthalmology 198895749–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muralikrishnan R, Venkatesh R, Prajna N V.et al Economic cost of cataract surgery procedures in an established eye care centre in southern India. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 200411369–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Natchiar G, DabralKar T. Manual small incision sutureless cataract surgery: an alternative technique to instrumental phacoemulsification. Operative Techniques Cataract Refract Surg 20003161–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pradhan D, Hennig A, Kumar J.et al A Prospective study of 413 cases of lens‐induced glaucoma in Nepal. Indian J Ophthalmol 200149103–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prajna N V, Ramakrishnan R, Krishnadas R.et al Lens induced glaucomas – Visual results and risk factors for final visual acuity. Indian J Ophthalmol 199644149–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruit S, Paudyal G, Gurung R.et al An Innovation in developing world cataract surgery: sutureless extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 200028274–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ruit S, Tabin G C, Nissman S A.et al Low‐cost high‐volume extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in Nepal. Ophthalmology 1999106(10)1887–1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ruit S, Tabin G C, Changet al Phacoemulsification versus manual sutureless cataract surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006, in press [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Singh G, Kaur J, Mall S. Phacolytic glaucoma—its treatment by planned extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol 199442145–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Speaker M G, Guerriero P N, Met J A.et al A case‐control study of risk factors for intraoperative suprachoroidal expulsive hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 199198202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Venkatesh R, Das M R, Prashanth S.et al Manual small incision cataract surgery in white cataracts. Indian J Ophthalmol 200553181–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Venkatesh R, Muralikrishnan R, Civerchia L.et al Ourcomes of high volume cataracty surgeries in a developing country. Br J Ophthalmol 2005891079–1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES