Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1997 Apr;150(4):1465–1471.

Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

T Kuukasjärvi 1, M Tanner 1, S Pennanen 1, R Karhu 1, O P Kallioniemi 1, J Isola 1
PMCID: PMC1858157  PMID: 9095001

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a direct precursor of invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). We combined tissue microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization to identify genetic changes in five DCIS lesions with no invasion and in two that were adjacent to IDC. Extensive genetic changes characterized pure DCIS cases with gains of 1q, 6q, 8q, and Xq as well as losses of 17p and chromosome 22 being most often involved. Except for the Xq gain, these changes are also common to IDC. Separate analysis of DCIS and IDC components in the same tumor revealed an almost identical pattern of genetic changes in one case, whereas substantial differences were found in another. We conclude that many of the common genetic changes in IDC may take place before development of invasive growth. However, a simple linear progression model may not always account for the DCIS-IDC transition.

Full text

PDF
1465

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bièche I., Lidereau R. Genetic alterations in breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1995 Dec;14(4):227–251. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870140402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davidoff A. M., Kerns B. J., Iglehart J. D., Marks J. R. Maintenance of p53 alterations throughout breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 1991 May 15;51(10):2605–2610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fearon E. R., Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990 Jun 1;61(5):759–767. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujii H., Marsh C., Cairns P., Sidransky D., Gabrielson E. Genetic divergence in the clonal evolution of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1996 Apr 1;56(7):1493–1497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Isola J. J., Kallioniemi O. P., Chu L. W., Fuqua S. A., Hilsenbeck S. G., Osborne C. K., Waldman F. M. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1995 Oct;147(4):905–911. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Isola J., DeVries S., Chu L., Ghazvini S., Waldman F. Analysis of changes in DNA sequence copy number by comparative genomic hybridization in archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Am J Pathol. 1994 Dec;145(6):1301–1308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kallioniemi O. P., Kallioniemi A., Piper J., Isola J., Waldman F. M., Gray J. W., Pinkel D. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994 Aug;10(4):231–243. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870100403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lagios M. D. Duct carcinoma in situ. Pathology and treatment. Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;70(4):853–871. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45185-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maguire H. C., Jr, Hellman M. E., Greene M. I., Yeh I. Expression of c-erbB-2 in in situ and in adjacent invasive ductal adenocarcinomas of the female breast. Pathobiology. 1992;60(3):117–121. doi: 10.1159/000163709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Muleris M., Almeida A., Gerbault-Seureau M., Malfoy B., Dutrillaux B. Detection of DNA amplification in 17 primary breast carcinomas with homogeneously staining regions by a modified comparative genomic hybridization technique. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994 Jul;10(3):160–170. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murphy D. S., Hoare S. F., Going J. J., Mallon E. E., George W. D., Kaye S. B., Brown R., Black D. M., Keith W. N. Characterization of extensive genetic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ by fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Nov 15;87(22):1694–1704. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.22.1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Piper J., Rutovitz D., Sudar D., Kallioniemi A., Kallioniemi O. P., Waldman F. M., Gray J. W., Pinkel D. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry. 1995 Jan 1;19(1):10–26. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990190104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Radford D. M., Fair K., Thompson A. M., Ritter J. H., Holt M., Steinbrueck T., Wallace M., Wells S. A., Jr, Donis-Keller H. R. Allelic loss on a chromosome 17 in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Res. 1993 Jul 1;53(13):2947–2949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Radford D. M., Phillips N. J., Fair K. L., Ritter J. H., Holt M., Donis-Keller H. Allelic loss and the progression of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1995 Nov 15;55(22):5180–5183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ried T., Just K. E., Holtgreve-Grez H., du Manoir S., Speicher M. R., Schröck E., Latham C., Blegen H., Zetterberg A., Cremer T. Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1995 Nov 15;55(22):5415–5423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Speicher M. R., Jauch A., Walt H., du Manoir S., Ried T., Jochum W., Sulser T., Cremer T. Correlation of microscopic phenotype with genotype in a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded testicular germ cell tumor with universal DNA amplification, comparative genomic hybridization, and interphase cytogenetics. Am J Pathol. 1995 Jun;146(6):1332–1340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanner M. M., Tirkkonen M., Kallioniemi A., Collins C., Stokke T., Karhu R., Kowbel D., Shadravan F., Hintz M., Kuo W. L. Increased copy number at 20q13 in breast cancer: defining the critical region and exclusion of candidate genes. Cancer Res. 1994 Aug 15;54(16):4257–4260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Watson P. H., Safneck J. R., Le K., Dubik D., Shiu R. P. Relationship of c-myc amplification to progression of breast cancer from in situ to invasive tumor and lymph node metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jun 2;85(11):902–907. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.11.902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiltshire R. N., Duray P., Bittner M. L., Visakorpi T., Meltzer P. S., Tuthill R. J., Liotta L. A., Trent J. M. Direct visualization of the clonal progression of primary cutaneous melanoma: application of tissue microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 1995 Sep 15;55(18):3954–3957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhuang Z., Merino M. J., Chuaqui R., Liotta L. A., Emmert-Buck M. R. Identical allelic loss on chromosome 11q13 in microdissected in situ and invasive human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1995 Feb 1;55(3):467–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES