Abstract
Administration of donor-derived immature dendritic cells (DC) treated with transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) to prevent allograft rejection is not applicable for clinical use. We therefore attempted to explore the use of recipient-derived DC pulsed with donor antigens via the indirect pathway (cross-priming). DC were propagated from C3H (H2k) bone marrow (BM) with GM-CSF and IL-4. TGF-β (0.2ng/ml) was added at the initiation of culture and the resultant (TGF-β DC) were pulsed with B10 (H2b) splenocyte lysate. Expression of MHC class I and II were not affected, while CD40, CD80 and CD86 co-stimulatory molecules on DC was significantly inhibited by treatment with TGF-β. C3H DC pulsed with B10 antigens stimulated proliferate responses in C3H T cells was inhibited when DC were treated with TGF-β, and the CTL activity was also inhibited. This correlated with reduced IFN-γ and increased IL-10 production. A single injection of TGF-β DC prolonged allograft survival (MST 18 days vs. 10 days in no-DC treatment control, p<0.05). These data indicate that an approach utilizing recipient DC as a “vaccine” strategy is possible.
Keywords: dendritic cell, Antigen presentation, TGF-β, transplantation
INTRODUCTION
The induction of immunity or tolerance by dendritic cells appears to be related to their state of functional maturation. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) has been implicated as a key factor in the regulation of tolerance. 1 Administration of TGF-β -modified donor-type DC resulted in significant prolongation of organ allograft survival in the absence of immunosuppression. 1,2 Prevention rather than treatment will be the best approach to this problem; induction of cross-tolerance is one resolution. We have explored the use of recipient-derived DC pulsed with donor spleen cell lysate, in which the donor antigens were presented to host T cells via an indirect pathway (cross-priming).3 A single injection of NF-κB ODN DC pulsed with donor antigens significantly prolonged allograft survival in an antigen-specific manner. 3 However, the effect of recipient TGF-β DC pulsed with donor antigens on allograft survival is still unknown.
We demonstrated that a single injection of bone-marrow derived DC treated with TGF-β pulsed with alloantigen increased cross tolerance after heart transplantation in mice and induced antigen-specific T cell hyporesponsiveness in this study.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
DC were isolated from femurs of C3H mice and propagated in GM-CSF plus IL-4 cells (both from Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ). To generate immature (i) DC, TGF-β (0.2ng/ml, R & D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was added at the initiation of culture of DC (BM TGF-β iDC). These BM TGF-β DC were pulsed with B10 spleen cell lysates at 1/1 to 1/10 of DC/spleen ratio for 48 hours.3 DC phenotype was examined by flow cytometry. The spleen T cell response was determined by one-way MLR and generation of CTL assay. We analyzed for the presence of cytokines (IL-10, IFN-γ levels) using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems) and performed RNase protection assay to determine levels of mRNA. Fully allogeneic intraabdominal vascularized heart transplantation was performed. Graft survival was assessed by daily transabdominal palpation of heart. Cessation of heartbeat indicated rejection of the allograft.
RESULTS
As demonstrated previously, the most effective cross-presentation of T cells is achieved by pulsing DC with B10 spleen lysate at a concentration 5 times the number of dendritic cells. 3 While, MHC class I/II expressions were not impaired after treatment with TGF-β plus alloantigens, there was significant inhibition of CD40, CD80 and CD86 expression. TGF-β DC-pulsed with alloantigens induced allogeneic donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in mixed leukocyte reaction, and significantly inhibited CTL activity against allospecific EL4 (H-2b) targets. Mature (m) DC pulsed with B10 antigens elicited high IFN-γ but low IL-10 production in syngeneic T cells, while T cells after stimulation by TGF-β iDC produced low IFN-γ but high levels of IL-10. Compared with the control group receiving no DC pretreatment (median survival time [MST] 10 days), pretreatment with mDCs significantly accelerated B10 heart allograft rejection (MST 7 days, p< 0.05). In contrast, administration of TGF-β iDCs prolonged survival of cardiac allografts (MST 18, p< 0.05). The immunosuppressive effect of TGF-β DC is donor-specific, as they failed to prolong survival of alloantigen from third party (BALB/c, H-2d MST 13 days) strain.
DISCUSSION
The immune responses associated with the capture and presentation of cell-derived antigens by host APC play an important role in chronic rejection. 4 TGF-β is a potent immunosuppressive cytokine which has been shown to block the maturation of GM-CSF-stimulated mouse BM-derived DC.5,6 It has also been shown to arrest DC maturation and promote the growth of immature, costimulatory molecules signaling B7 which have been demonstrated to be involved in the induction of peripheral tolerance. 5,6 In this study, pulsing with alloantigens did not elicit up-regulation of costimulatory molecule expression on TGF-β DC, indicating that TGF-β arrested DC maturation.
In vitro, we have maintained DC of an immature phenotype which is associated with significantly reduced allostimulatory capacity. 1 In vivo, it has been previously reported that TGF-β prolongs rodent cardiac allograft survival.7 In our study, with one single injection of TGF-β-treated recipient DC pulsed with alloantigen, we have achieved prolongation of allogeneic heart survival. Tolerance that results from MHC-mismatched recipients in the absence of any immunosuppression, has been called cross-tolerance. In our study, alloantigen pulsed TGF-β DC induced antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness of T cells in MLR, with increased levels of IL-10 and reduced levels of IFN-γ production. We propose that the immature TGF-β DC may be beneficial for graft acceptance, with inhibiting Th1 type cytokine production and progression of Th0 cells to Th2.
Immunosuppressants have led to considerable improvement in survival rates although patients must continue to receive these drugs for life. 8 Using our TGF-β approach clearly results in significant suppression of immune function, at the level of cytokine production and the concomitant induction of immunologic tolerance. These data indicate that an approach to use recipient DC as a “vaccine” strategy provides a feasible approach for establishing long-term survival in organ transplantation. As was illustrated in our studies, cross tolerance plays a significant role in the long-term induction of graft survival. But, recipient-derived iDCs treated with TGF-β did not induce longer graft survival than those treated with NF-κB ODN.3,9 In the future, we propose treating recipient-derived DC with both NF-κB ODN and TGF-β.
Table.
CD40 | CD80 | CD86 | IL10 (pg/ml) | IFN-γ (pg/ml) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mDC | 72.9% | 68.6% | 60.2% | 100.5 ± 16.7 | 665.0 ± 107.1 |
mDC + Ag | 72.2% | 65.4% | 53.4% | 70.8 ± 10.8 | 1096.1 ± 305.6 |
TGFβ iDC | 37.7% | 37.6% | 26.9% | 201.0 ± 80.7 | 569.0 ± 53.3 |
TGFβ iDC + Ag | 56.6% | 52.3% | 27.7% | 1185.0 ± 379.7 | 441.0 ± 28.2 |
DC, dendritic cell; Ag, antigen
Footnotes
Supported by grants from NIH (DK058316) (S.Q.), CMRP1137 & CMRPG8048 (M-M T.) and Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation (L.L).
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Verbanac KM, Carver FM, Haisch CE, et al. Transplantation. 1994;57:893. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199403270-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lu L, Rudert WA, Qian S, et al. J Exp Med. 1995;182:379. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tiao MM, Lu L, Tao R, et al. Ann Surg. 2005;241:497. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000154267.42933.5d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu Z, Sun YK, Xi YP, et al. J Exp Med. 1993;177:1643. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.6.1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu L, Li W, Fu F, et al. Transplantation. 1997;64:1808. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199712270-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Health WR, Kurts C, Miller JFAP, et al. J Exp Med. 1998;187:1549. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.10.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raju GP, Belland SE, Eisen HJ. Transplantation. 1994;58:392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sayegh MH, Turka LA. N Eng J Med. 1998;338:1813. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806183382506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tiao MM, Lu L, Tao R, et al. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:1592. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]