Skip to main content
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 2006 Nov;92(11):1694–1700. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072595

Epidemiology and antibiotic treatment of infective endocarditis: an update

Bruno Hoen
PMCID: PMC1861255  PMID: 17041124

The epidemiological profile of infective endocarditis (IE) has changed dramatically over the last few years.1 Once a disease affecting young adults with previously well‐identified valve disease—mostly rheumatic disease—IE is now affecting older patients, a significant proportion of whom has no previously known valve disease and develop IE as the result of healthcare associated procedures.2

A CHANGING EPIDEMIOLOGY

Until the end of the 1970s, rheumatic valvulopathies and congenital cyanotic cardiopathies were the two most frequent predisposing factors for IE. Then, a few years after the effective eradication of rheumatic fever, post‐rheumatic valvulopathies gradually disappeared. However, other predisposing factors emerged, such as intravenous drug use, valve prostheses, degenerative valve sclerosis, and invasive procedures at risk for bacteraemia, which resulted in nosocomial and health care‐associated endocarditis.3 These changes had at least two consequences: (1) the absence of a reduction in the incidence of IE; and (2) major changes in the microbiological profile of IE. In a meta‐analysis of 26 articles published between 1993 and 2003, including a total of 3784 episodes of IE, Moreillon and Que showed that oral streptococci (also known as viridans streptococci) are now only second to staphylococci as the leading cause of IE.1 As a result, it is now critical to regard the epidemiology of IE as a set of various clinical situations sometimes differing greatly from one another. Thus, at least five categories of IE have been identified: native valve endocarditis; prosthetic valve endocarditis; endocarditis in intravenous drug users (IVDUs); nosocomial endocarditis; and healthcare‐related endocarditis resulting from invasive procedures such as endovascular investigations, haemodialysis, and implanted endovascular or intracardiac devices. Significant geographical variations have also been shown, with the highest increases in the rate of staphylococcal endocarditis being reported in the United States.4 In a prospective study of 1779 cases of IE collected in 16 countries, Staphylococcus aureus was the primary cause.5 In this study, S aureus IE was more frequent in the United States, and also in Australia/New Zealand and South America, than in Europe. In the USA, chronic haemodialysis, diabetes mellitus, and intravascular devices are the three main factors associated with the development of S aureus endocarditis.4,5 In other countries, the main predisposing factor for S aureus endocarditis is intravenous drug use.6

INCIDENCE OF INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS

The incidence of IE varies from country to country, which may reflect more methodological differences in surveys than true incidence variations. In an epidemiologic study conducted in Sweden from 1984 to 1988 the incidence of IE was 5.9 episodes/100 000 person‐years after adjusting for both age and sex.7 During a similar time period, the total incidence of IE was 9.29 episodes/100 000 person‐years in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, which fell to 5.02 episodes/100 000 person‐years when cases involving intravenous drug users were excluded.8 In the 1990s, French investigators performed two epidemiologic surveys in three regions of France that represented about 25% of the whole French population. In 1991 their survey found the crude incidence to be 2.24 episodes/100 000 person‐years, which increased to 2.43 episodes/100 000 person‐years after adjustment for age and sex.9 When this study was repeated in 1999 the crude and adjusted incidence rates were 3.0 and 3.1 episodes/100 000 person‐years.2 Of note, in these two surveys, as in others, the incidence of IE was very low in young patients whereas it increased dramatically with age. In France, the peak incidence was 14.5 episodes/100 000 person‐years in patients aged between 70–80 years.

MICROBIOLOGY

According to the contribution of blood cultures to the diagnosis of IE, the following classification can be proposed.

IE with positive blood cultures

This is the most important category, representing about 85% of all episodes of IE. Causative microorganisms are most often streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci.

IE caused by streptococci and enterococci

Oral streptococci form a mixed group of microorganisms, which includes species such as Streptococcus sanguis, S mitis, S salivarius, and S mutans, to which one usually adds Gemella morbillorum (formerly S morbillorum). Microorganisms of this group are almost always susceptible to penicillin G. Members of the “S milleri” or “S anginosus” group (S anginosus, S intermedius, and S constellatus) must be distinguished from the former group because they tend to form abscesses and cause haematogenously disseminated infection, which often requires a longer duration of antibiotic treatment. Likewise, nutritionally‐variant “defective” streptococci, which were recently reclassified into other species (Abiotrophia and Granulicatella), should also be distinguished because they are often tolerant to penicillin (minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) much higher than the mimimal inhibiting concentration (MIC)). Group D streptococci form the “Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equines” complex, which includes several commensal species of the human intestinal tract and were until recently grouped under the name of Streptococcus bovis. They are generally quite sensitive to penicillin G, like oral streptococci.

Among enterococci, Enterococcus faecalis, E faecium, and to a lesser extent E durans, are the three species that can cause IE.

Staphylococcal IE

Traditionally, episodes of native valve staphylococcal IE are caused by S aureus, which are most often susceptible to oxacillin, at least when the strains are community‐acquired. By contrast, in prosthetic valve IE, staphylococci are more frequently coagulase‐negative staphylococci and are often oxacillin‐resistant. However, in a recent study of 1779 cases of IE collected prospectively in 16 countries, S aureus was not only the principal cause of IE but also the main cause of prosthetic valve IE.5 Conversely, coagulase‐negative staphylococci can also cause native valve IE.10

IE with negative blood cultures because of prior antibiotic treatment

This is the usual situation in a patient in whom the diagnosis of IE was not considered and who received antibiotics for an unexplained fever before any blood culture was performed; the diagnosis is eventually considered in the face of relapsing febrile episodes following antibiotic discontinuation. Blood cultures may remain negative for many days after antibiotic discontinuation and causative organisms are most often oral streptococci or coagulase‐negative staphylococci.

IE with often negative blood cultures

These cases of IE are usually caused by fastidious organisms such as nutritionally‐variant streptococci, fastidious Gram‐negative bacilli of the HACEK group (Haemophilus parainfluenzae, H aphrophilus, H paraphrophilus, H influenzae, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae and K denitrificans), Brucella, and fungi.

IE with always negative blood cultures

These cases are caused by intracellular bacteria such as Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella, Chlamydia, and, as recently demonstrated, Tropheryma whipplei, the bacterium causing Whipple's disease.11 Altogether, they may account for up to 5% of all cases of IE. The diagnosis of such cases of IE relies on specific samples for cell culture or gene amplification.

ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT

Theoretical considerations

The vegetation that characterises IE is composed of a mixture of fibrin and platelets, contains a large inoculum of bacteria, and is often enclosed in a layer of exopolysaccharides that hampers antibiotic penetration. Thus antibiotic treatment should be bactericidal, and the bactericidal activity should ideally be obtained rapidly and maintained until cure is obtained. However, cure may be difficult to achieve for several reasons:

  • pharmacokinetic: the penetration of some antibiotics inside the vegetation may be very heterogeneous, which may explain why some antibiotics cannot eradicate the microorganism in large vegetations;

  • pharmacodynamic: the concentrations of antibiotics within the vegetation must be sufficiently high and sustained; the absence of post‐antibiotic effect of β‐lactams on Gram‐positive cocci makes it mandatory to maintain short intervals between doses of antibiotics in order to achieve permanent high serum concentrations, several‐fold higher than the MIC of the causative microorganism; furthermore, the high bacterial density and the slow metabolic activity of the bacteria inside the vegetation may result in an in vivo sensitivity lower than that predicted by standard in vitro tests; finally antibiotics active against actively growing bacteria (β‐lactams, glycopeptides) have a reduced activity against bacteria whose metabolic activity is reduced.

Practical aspects of antibiotic treatment of IE

The intravenous route for antibiotic administration is the best since it provides maximal bioavailability. Most antibiotics are administered as short infusions (30 minutes). There are some exceptions, however. Penicillin G is usually administered continuously because of the risk of seizures secondary to the high serum concentrations achieved with intermittent infusion. One‐ to two‐hour infusions of vancomycin improve the tolerability of the drug. For antibiotics with time‐dependent effects (β‐lactams), the interval between infusions must be adjusted to take the elimination half‐life into account. For antibiotics with concentration‐dependent effects (aminoglycosides), twice‐ or thrice‐daily administration is recommended. However, there are experimental and clinical data in favour of once‐daily administration of gentamicin or netilmicin in IE caused by penicillin‐sensitive streptococci.12,13,14

Both the efficacy and the tolerance of the treatment need to be carefully monitored. In terms of efficacy, apart from the absence of relapse at the end of the treatment, there is no totally reliable clinical or biological criterion. This emphasises the importance of clinical and biological surveillance (disappearance of fever, sterilisation of blood cultures, and normalisation of inflammation markers) during treatment and in the subsequent four weeks (period of maximal risk of relapse of IE). The determination of blood concentrations of antibiotics, especially aminoglycosides, is useful to verify both that the peak concentrations are high enough (efficacy objective) and that the trough concentrations are not excessively high (tolerance objective).

Recommendations for the antibiotic treatment of IE

The most recent recommendations for the antibiotic treatment of IE were issued by the European Society of Cardiology15 and the American Heart Association.16

Antibiotic treatment of streptococcal and enterococcal IE

We will only discuss in this section IE caused by oral streptococci, group D streptococci, and enterococci, for which there is a clear consensus in the literature (tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 Antibiotic treatment for infective endocarditis caused by penicillin susceptible (MIC <0.1 mg/l) or penicillin relatively resistant (0.1< MIC ⩽0.5 mg/l) streptococcal endocarditis.
No allergy to penicillin Allergy to penicillin Duration
Drug Dosage Drug Dosage
Penicillin‐susceptible streptococci (MIC <0.1 mg/l)
Non‐complicated native valve IE Penicillin G 200–300 000 U/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 2 weeks
or amoxicillin 100 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d combination
or ceftriaxone 2 g/d ± gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d or 4 weeks β‐lactam
± gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Complicated and/or prosthetic valve IE Penicillin G 200–300 000 U/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 2 weeks combination + 2–4 weeks β‐lactam
or amoxicillin 100 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d ± gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Penicillin‐relatively resistant streptococci G† (0.1< MIC ⩽0.5 mg/l)
Non‐complicated native valve IE Penicillin G 300–400 000 U/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 2 weeks combination + 2 weeks β‐lactam
or amoxicillin 200 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Complicated and/or prosthetic valve IE Penicillin G 300–400 000 U/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 2 weeks combination + 2–4 weeks β‐lactam
or amoxicillin 200 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d

*Other choice: netilmicin (5–6 mg/kg/d); for both drugs, once daily administration.

†Including tolerant streptococci (MBC/MIC >32) for which amoxicillin is to be preferred to penicillin.

IE, infective endocarditis; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration.

Table 2 Antibiotic treatment for enterococcal, nutritionally‐variant and penicillin‐resistant (MIC >0.5 mg/l) streptococcal endocarditis.
Condition No allergy to penicillin Allergy to penicillin Duration
Drug Dosage Drug Dosage
Enterococcal strain susceptible to penicillin, aminoglycosides, and vancomycin Amoxicillin or 200 mg/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 4–6 weeks†
penicillin G 300–400 000 U/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Enterococcal strain susceptible to penicillin, streptomycin, vancomycin, and resistant to gentamicin Amoxicillin or 200 mg/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 4–6 weeks†
penicillin G 300–400 000 U/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ streptomycin‡ 15 mg/kg/d + streptomycin‡ 15 mg/kg/d
Enterococcal strain resistant to penicillin (intrinsic resistance), susceptible to gentamicin and vancomycin Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 6 weeks
or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Enterococcal strain resistant to penicillin (β–lactam producing), susceptible to gentamicin and vancomycin Co‐amoxyclav 175 mg/kg/d amoxicillin Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d 6 weeks
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d or teicoplanin 6–10 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin* 3 mg/kg/d
Streptococcal and enterococcal strains with high‐level resistance to all aminoglycosides Amoxicillin >200 mg/kg/d Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d ⩾8 weeks
E faecalis resistant to penicillin, aminoglycosides and vancomycin Amoxicillin 200 mg/kg/d ⩾8 weeks
+ ceftriaxone or 2 g/d
imipenem 2 g/d
E faecium resistant to penicillin, aminoglycosides and vancomycin Linezolid, or 1200 mg/d Linezolid, or 1200 mg/d ⩾8 weeks
quinupristin‐dalfopristin 22.5 mg/kg/d quinupristin‐dalfopristin 22.5 mg/kg/d

*Two or three daily doses.

†Duration of aminoglycoside administration could be shortened to 2–3 weeks; the total duration of treatment should be 6 weeks when vancomycin or teicoplanin are used.

‡Two daily doses.

1. Native valve streptococcal endocarditis

In the absence of allergy to penicillin, the treatment of IE caused by highly penicillin‐susceptible streptococci (MIC ⩽0.1 mg/l)—most oral and group D streptococci—should combine penicillin G, 10–20 million units per day, with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin, 3 mg/kg/day, or netilmicin, 5–6 mg/kg/day, in one daily dose). The combination is administered for two weeks, provided that all the following conditions for short‐course therapy are fulfilled: highly penicillin‐susceptible streptococcal strain; native valve endocarditis; no heart failure, aortic insufficiency or conduction abnormalities; no evidence of extracardiac septic complications; vegetation diameter ⩽ 10 mm; clinical response within seven days (temperature returns to normal); and no surgical treatment of endocarditis. In patients with contraindications to aminoglycosides, penicillin alone for four weeks is as effective as the previous regimens. In patients with complicated IE, the combination is administered for two weeks followed by two weeks of penicillin alone. In all these regimens, penicillin G may be conveniently replaced by ceftriaxone (2 g once daily).13,14,17

For streptococci with reduced susceptibility to penicillin (0.1 < MIC ⩽0.5 mg/l), the same combination of penicillin and aminoglycoside is given, with higher doses of penicillin (30 million units per day in adults). Ampicillin and amoxicillin are alternatives to penicillin, 200 mg/kg/day in six infusions. This regimen should also be given for IE caused by tolerant streptococci. The combination should be given for two weeks and followed by β‐lactam monotherapy, with a total duration of treatment of at least four weeks, and up to six weeks in complicated IE.

IE caused by streptococci with MIC > 0.5 mg/l as well as IE due to nutritionally variant streptococci (Abiotrophia and Granulicatella) should be treated in the same way as enterococcal IE.

2. Native valve enterococcal endocarditis

Enterococci are now classified as an individual genus. E faecalis, E faecium and, to a lesser extent, E durans are most commonly responsible for IE. They are far less sensitive to penicillins than streptococci. MICs to β‐lactams are 10‐ to 100‐fold higher for enterococci than for streptococci. This is even more pronounced for E faecium than for E faecalis, with MIC50 to penicillin of 8 and 1 mg/l and to amoxicillin of 4 and 0.5 mg/l, respectively. In addition, E faecium strains are almost always penicillin‐tolerant. β‐lactamase producing strains of E faecalis have been described in the United States, but not yet in Europe.

High‐level resistance to aminoglycosides is found in about 10% of endocarditis strains of E faecalis. For management of endocarditis, enterococcal isolates must be routinely checked for high‐level resistance in order to avoid the use of aminoglycosides when no synergy with either β‐lactams or glycopeptides can be expected. In addition, netilmicin should not be used in E faecium IE because this species possesses a constitutive AAC6' enzyme that inactivates netilmicin.

Glycopeptide‐resistant enterococci were first described in the late 1980s. Most often these strains exhibit high‐level resistance to both vancomycin (MIC >64 mg/l) and teicoplanin (MIC >16 mg/l). This resistance profile (van‐A phenotype) is plasmid‐mediated—that is, potentially transferable from one strain to another. Occasionally (mostly in Europe) teicoplanin sensitivity is preserved despite presence of high‐level resistance to vancomycin (van‐B phenotype).

Optimal antibiotic prescribing for enterococcal IE requires that MICs of penicillin, amoxicillin, aminoglycosides, and glycopeptides be determined. When the strain exhibits only low‐level resistance to aminoglycoside, recommended therapy is a combination of high‐dose β‐lactam (30–40 million units/day penicillin or 200 mg/kg/day amoxicillin) plus gentamicin for 4–6 weeks. The aminoglycoside component should be administered in two or three equally divided doses; this recommendation is based on results of experimental studies.18

In the case of high‐level resistance to gentamicin, cross‐resistance may be expected with all other aminoglycosides, except sometimes streptomycin. If the strain shows low‐level resistance to streptomycin, the latter can be used in combination with high doses of a cell‐wall active agent, either a β‐lactam or a glycopeptide. If the strain shows high‐level resistance to streptomycin as well, the best treatment option is monotherapy with amoxicillin or a glycopeptide given at high dose for at least eight weeks. Even with such prolonged treatment, antibiotic therapy often fails, and surgery is likely to be required.

Glycopeptide‐resistant enterococci are often multidrug resistant, also exhibiting high MICs to β‐lactams and high levels of resistance to aminoglycosides. In vitro studies showed that combinations of cell‐wall active antibiotics may be synergistic in such strains without an added aminoglycoside. This was demonstrated for combinations such as teicoplanin–imipenem,19 ampicillin–ceftriaxone,20,21 and ampicillin–imipenem22 on E faecalis strains. Ampicillin (12 g daily)–ceftriaxone (2 g daily) and ampicillin (12 g daily)–imipenem–ceftriaxone (2 g daily) are now recommended for the treatment of multidrug resistant E faecalis IE.16

Combinations of cell‐wall active agents are, however, insufficient for the treatment of E faecium IE. Newer agents such as quinupristin‐dalfopristin and linezolid appear to be preferable options in this setting. Quinupristin‐dalfopristin (Q/D) (Synercid) is a new parenteral streptogramin combination which is potent against most Gram‐positive pathogens, including multidrug resistant E faecium, with the notable exception of E faecalis. In multidrug resistant E faecium endocarditis, Q/D was effective in an animal model and in anecdotal case reports.23 Linezolid is the first licensed representative of the oxazolidinones, a new class of antibiotics that acts by inhibiting protein synthesis. Linezolid has significant activity against mutiresistant Gram‐positive pathogens, including vancomycin‐resistant enterococci. Only a few studies have evaluated this compound in the treatment of IE. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential value of these two new drugs as well as newer glycopeptides (dalbavancin, telavancin) and lipopeptides (daptomycin) for the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis.

3. Prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by streptococci and enterococci

The same regimens as for native valve IE are recommended. The minimal duration of treatment is four weeks for highly susceptible streptococci and six weeks for enterococci, with at least two weeks and four weeks of β‐lactam–aminoglycoside combination, respectively. If the prosthetic valve is replaced during the course of antibiotic treatment, the duration of antibiotic treatment should be 4–6 weeks if valve culture is found to be positive. Otherwise, the total duration of treatment should not be prolonged.24

4. Streptococcal and enterococcal endocarditis in patients allergic to penicillin

In patients allergic to penicillin, vancomycin is the best alternative. Teicoplanin, another glycopeptide, can also be used (loading dose 6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 48–72 hours, followed by a once‐daily dose of 6–10 mg/kg.

Antibiotic treatment of staphylococcal IE (table 3)

Table 3 Antibiotic treatment for staphylococcal infective endocarditis (IE).
No allergy to penicillin Allergy to penicillin Duration
Drug Dosage Drug Dosage
Native valve IE
Oxa‐S strain Oxacillin† 150–200 mg/kg/d Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d 4–6 weeks (5 days combination)
+ gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d or cefamandole** 75–100 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d
Oxa‐R strain Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d 4–6 weeks (5 days combination)
± gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d ± gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d
Prosthetic valve IE*
Oxa‐S strain Oxacillin† 150–200 mg/kg/d Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d ⩾6 weeks combination (aminoglycoside no longer than 15 days)
+ gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d
+ rifampicin 20–30 mg/kg/d + rifampicin 20–30 mg/kg/d
Oxa‐R, genta‐S strain Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d ⩾6 weeks combination (aminoglycoside no longer than 15 days)
+ rifampicin 20–30 mg/kg/d + rifampicin 20–30 mg/kg/d
+ gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d + gentamicin‡ 3 mg/kg/d
Oxa‐R, genta‐R strain Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d Vancomycin§ 30 mg/kg/d ⩾6 weeks combination
+ rifampicin¶ 20–30 mg/kg/d + rifampicin¶ 20–30 mg/kg/d
+ other antistaphylococccal drug, if available + other antistaphylococccal drug, if available

*Valve replacement should be considered, inasmuch as IE develops early after valve implantation.

†Other choices: cloxacillin 100–150 mg/kg/d; cefamandole 75–100 mg/kg/d.

‡Other choice: netilmicin (5–6 mg/kg/d).

§Other choice: teicoplanin, target serum trough concentrations 25–30 mg/l.

¶If strain resistant to rifampicin, combine vancomycin with one or two other antistaphylococcal drugs, according to susceptibility pattern.

**The use of a cephalosporin is not recommended in patients with a history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin.

oxa, oxacillin; R, resistant; S, susceptible.

1. Native valve staphylococcal endocarditis

In the absence of allergy to penicillin, if the staphylococcal strain is oxacillin‐susceptible, oxacillin or cloxacillin (150 mg/kg/day in six intravenous infusions, maximal daily dose 6–8 g) should be used in combination with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin or netilmicin) for the first 3–5 days and then continued alone for a total of 4–6 weeks. In the case of allergy to penicillin, a combination of cefamandole and an aminoglycoside may be considered in non‐anaphylactic allergy. Otherwise, vancomycin is recommended. However, based on in vitro experiments, as well as on small clinical trials, vancomycin is less effective than β‐lactams where staphylococci are oxacillin‐sensitive,25 and therefore oxacillin or cloxacillin should be preferred.

The treatment of IE caused by oxacillin‐resistant staphylococci requires the use of vancomycin. Teicoplanin may be an alternative, provided that an adequate dosage is given. The goal is to obtain a residual serum concentration of 20–30 mg/l, which is usually obtained with a single daily dose of 10 mg/kg/day, after an induction phase at 6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3–4 days.26 The combination with an aminoglycoside should be reserved for the treatment of IE caused by staphylococci sensitive to aminoglycosides, for no more than 5–7 days.

In non‐complicated oxacillin‐susceptible native valve endocarditis in IVDUs, a two week course of intravenous cloxacillin, with or without an aminoglycoside, proved to be effective.25,27 When it is difficult to prolong in‐hospital and/or intravenous antibiotic treatment, the combination of oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) and rifampicin (300 mg twice daily) after a short period of intravenous treatment is efficacious,28,29 provided that the strain is susceptible to both drugs and compliance with treatment is high.

2. Prosthetic valve staphylococcal endocarditis

Such infections are often caused by coagulase‐negative staphylococci, which are often resistant to oxacillin. Vancomycin in combination with rifampicin and an aminoglycoside is the most effective combination, provided that rifampicin and the aminoglycoside are active in vitro. If not, an alternative triple association still seems warranted. According to the strain susceptibility, fusidic acid, a fluoroquinolone or fosfomycin may be used. The latter can be used only in the absence of heart failure since it contains a large amount of sodium (1 g of fosfomycin contains 14.4 mmol of sodium and the dose of fosfomycin is 8–12 g/day).

If the staphylococcal strain is oxacillin‐susceptible, the triple combination of oxacillin or vancomycin (in patients allergic to penicillin) plus an aminoglycoside and rifampicin is recommended. The duration of treatment should be six weeks, with at least two weeks of treatment with the aminoglycoside. Valve surgery is most often required.

Antibiotic treatment of IE with negative blood cultures

This is a challenging condition to treat and the diagnostic procedures used should be rigorous, based on close collaboration with the bacteriology laboratory30,31 (table 4).

Table 4 Causes of infective endocarditis with apparently negative blood cultures and suggestions for improving the diagnosis.
Causes Diagnostic
• Previous antibiotic treatment Discontinuation of antibiotics whenever possible
Blood cultures on specific media with adsorbent resins
• Fastidious bacteria Specific blood culture techniques
 Nutritionally variant streptococci
 HACEK* bacteria
Brucella species
Legionella species
Neisseria species
Nocardia species, mycobacteria
• Intracellular growing bacteria
Chlamydia species Serology
Coxiella burnetii Serology and PCR techniques
Bartonella species Serology and PCR techniques
Mycoplasma pneumoniae Serology
Tropheryma whipplei (Whipple disease) Gene amplification
• Fungi Specific blood culture techniques + serology
Candida species
Aspergillus species

*HACEK: Haemophilus parainfluenzae, H aphrophilus, H paraphrophilus, H influenzae, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae, K denitrificans.

In patients with native valve endocarditis, potential causative microorganisms include nutritionally variant streptococci, Gram‐negative HACEK coccobacilli, Brucella, and intracellular bacteria that do not grow on conventional media, including Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella, and Tropheryma whipplei. When blood cultures are negative because of prior antibiotic treatment, any other microorganism has to be considered, including staphylococci. While waiting for the results of special blood cultures and serology, treatment should consist of amoxicillin and an aminoglycoside.

Epidemiology and treatment of infective endocarditis: key points
  • Overall, Staphylococcus aureus has become the major pathogen responsible for infective endocarditis

  • This epidemiological shift results mainly from improved dental care and hygiene and from the growing incidence of nosocomial and healthcare‐related endocarditis

  • Antibiotic treatment of streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal endocarditis should strictly comply with updated experts' guidelines

  • Short‐course (14 days) β‐lactam + aminoglycoside treatment is a validated option for uncomplicated penicillin‐susceptible native valve endocarditis

  • A rifampicin‐containing triple combination is warranted for the treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis

Treatment depends on the time elapsed since the implantation of the prosthetic valve. In early‐onset IE (onset less than one year after insertion), staphylococci (especially oxacillin‐resistant coagulase‐negative staphylococci) are most likely to be responsible. A combination of vancomycin, rifampicin, and an aminoglycoside is recommended. Valve replacement should be considered rapidly if the clinical course is unfavourable. In late‐onset IE (more than one year after insertion), staphylococci are still potentially responsible but other microorganisms such as streptococci and the HACEK group of bacteria should also be considered. As first line therapy, a combination of vancomycin and an aminoglycoside is recommended. The addition of a third‐generation cephalosporin (cefotaxime, 100–200 mg/kg/day in six infusions) is recommended when the first line combination is unsuccessful.

Within “culture‐negative” endocarditis, some situations deserve special consideration because specific therapeutic regimens are to be used.

  • Coxiella burnetii is probably the most frequent cause of IE with negative blood cultures,32,33 although its incidence varies substantially from one geographical area to another. Doxycycline, rifampicin and fluoroquinolones are efficacious in vitro but none of these is bactericidal. The duration of treatment is very long, often several years. Serology appears to be the most reliable criterion of cure, when phase I IgG titres are < 200 and phase I IgA titres are undetectable. Doxycycline is the cornerstone antibiotic, and its efficacy is improved when combined with hydroxychloroquine, which acts as a lysosomotropic alkalinising agent.34 This combination helps decrease the duration of antibiotic treatment and the failure and relapse rates.

  • Bartonella, mainly B henselae and B quintana, and occasionally B elizabethae, are second to Coxiella burnetii as agents responsible for culture‐negative endocarditis.33 While B henselae is most commonly encountered in patients with previous valve disease and in subjects who have been in contact with cats, IE caused by B quintana occurs in homeless alcoholics with no previously known heart disease.35 Treatment consists of a combination of an aminoglycoside and a β‐lactam—for example, amoxicillin for at least two weeks.36

  • IE caused by Legionella is rare and occurs mainly in patients with prosthetic valves. The usual treatment regimen consists of a combination of a fluoroquinolone and rifampicin. The duration of treatment should be at least two months, and valve surgery is almost always required.

Footnotes

In compliance with EBAC/EACCME guidelines, all authors participating in Education in Heart have disclosed potential conflicts of interest that might cause a bias in the article

References

  • 1.Moreillon P, Que Y A. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 2004363139–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hoen B, Alla F, Béguinot I.et al Changing profile of infective endocarditis – results of a one‐year survey in France in 1999. JAMA 200228875–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Friedman N D, Kaye K S, Stout J E.et al Health care‐associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community‐acquired infections. Ann Intern Med 2002137791–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cabell C H, Jollis J G, Peterson G E.et al Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 200216290–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fowler V G, Miro J M, Hoen B.et al Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA 20052933012–3021.Recent large cohort study showing that S aureus has become the leading cause of IE in most parts of the world. In some of these regions, especially the United States, most of these cases of S aureus IE are the consequence of healthcare procedures (haemodialysis, intravascular devices, etc). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ribera E, Miro J M, Cortes E.et al Influence of human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection and degree of immunosuppression in the clinical characteristics and outcome of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users. Arch Intern Med 19981582043–2050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hogevik H, Olaison L, Andersson R.et al Epidemiologic aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population. A 5‐year prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 199574324–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berlin J A, Abrutyn E, Strom B L.et al Incidence of infective endocarditis in the Delaware Valley, 1988–1990. Am J Cardiol 199576933–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delahaye F, Goulet V, Lacassin F.et al Characteristics of infective endocarditis in France in 1991. A 1‐year survey. Eur Heart J 199516394–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chu V H, Cabell C H, Abrutyn E.et al Native valve endocarditis due to coagulase‐negative staphylococci: report of 99 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Clin Infect Dis 2004391527–1530.The results of this study emphasise that coagulase‐negative staphylococci are becoming a growing cause of native valve IE and highlights the potential for serious complications due to this condition. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richardson D C, Burrows L L, Korithoski B.et al Tropheryma whippelii as a cause of afebrile culture‐negative endocarditis: the evolving spectrum of Whipple's disease. J Infect 200347170–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blatter M, Fluckiger U, Entenza J.et al Simulated human serum profiles of one daily dose of ceftriaxone plus netilmicin in treatment of experimental streptococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993371971–1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Francioli P, Ruch W, Stamboulian D. Treatment of streptococcal endocarditis with a single daily dose of ceftriaxone and netilmicin for 14 days: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 1995211406–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sexton D J, Tenenbaum M J, Wilson W R.et al Ceftriaxone once daily for four weeks compared with ceftriaxone plus gentamicin once daily for two weeks for treatment of endocarditis due to penicillin‐susceptible streptococci. Clin Infect Dis 1998271470–1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Horstkotte D, Follath F, Gutschik E.et al Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary; the task force on infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 200425267–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baddour L M, Wilson W R, Bayer A S.et al Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Circulation 2005111e394–e434.Outstanding review on IE, with up‐to‐date recommendations for almost all aspects of clinical management of this condition. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sexton D J, Tenenbaum M J, Wilson W R.et al Ceftriaxone once daily for four weeks compared with ceftriaxone plus gentamicin once daily for two weeks for treatment of endocarditis due to penicillin‐susceptible streptococci. Clin Infect Dis 1998271470–1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fantin B, Carbon C. Importance of the aminoglycoside dosing regimen in the penicillin‐netilmicin combination for treatment of Enterococcus faecalis‐induced experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990342387–2391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hayden M K, Koenig G I, Trenholme G M. Bactericidal activities of antibiotics against vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium blood isolates and synergistic activities of combinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994381225–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gavalda J, Torres C, Tenorio C.et al Efficacy of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis strains highly resistant to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 199943639–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gavalda J, Onrubia P L, Gomez M T.et al Efficacy of ampicillin combined with ceftriaxone and gentamicin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis with no high‐level resistance to aminoglycosides. J Antimicrob Chemother 200352514–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brandt C M, Rouse M S, Laue N W.et al Effective treatment of multidrug‐resistant enterococcal experimental endocarditis with combinations of cell wall‐active agents. J Infect Dis 1996173909–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thompson R L, Lavin B, Talbot G H. Endocarditis due to vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium in an immunocompromised patient: cure by administering combination therapy with quinupristin/dalfopristin and high‐dose ampicillin. South Med J 200396818–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morris A J, Drinkovic D, Pottumarthy S.et al Bacteriological outcome after valve surgery for active infective endocarditis: implications for duration of treatment after surgery. Clin Infect Dis 200541187–194.Retrospective study of 358 patients with IE who underwent valve surgery during the course of antibiotic treatment, showing that relapse is rare (0.8%) following surgery and is unrelated to the duration of antibiotic treatment before or after surgery, positive valve culture results, positive Gram stain results, or perivalvular infection. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fortun J, Navas E, Martinez Beltran J.et al Short‐course therapy for right‐side endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus in drug abusers: cloxacillin versus glycopeptides in combination with gentamicin. Clin Infect Dis 200133120–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilson A P, Gaya H. Treatment of endocarditis with teicoplanin: a retrospective analysis of 104 cases. J Antimicrob Chemother 199638507–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ribera E, Gomez‐Jimenez J, Cortes E.et al Effectiveness of cloxacillin with and without gentamicin in short‐term therapy for right‐sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996125969–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dworkin R J, Lee B L, Sande M A.et al Treatment of right‐sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in intravenous drug users with ciprofloxacin and rifampicin. Lancet 198921071–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heldman A W, Hartert T V, Ray S C.et al Oral antibiotic treatment of right‐sided staphylococcal endocarditis in injection drug users: prospective randomized comparison with parenteral therapy. Am J Med 199610168–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mainardi J L, Vandenesch F, Casalta J P.et al Recommandations pour le diagnostic microbiologique et l'étude anatomopathologique des valves cardiaques au curs de l'endocardite infectieuse. Bull Soc Fr Microbiol 19951012–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Houpikian P, Raoult D. Diagnostic methods. Current best practices and guidelines for identification of difficult‐to‐culture pathogens in infective endocarditis. Cardiol Clin 200321207–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hoen B, Selton‐Suty C, Lacassin F.et al Infective endocarditis in patients with negative blood cultures: analysis of 88 cases from a one‐year nationwide survey in France. Clin Infect Dis 199520501–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture‐negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 200584162–173.A total of 348 cases of culture negative IE were investigated according to a standardised protocol, showing that the most frequent causative organisms are Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella species, which should therefore be tested for by serology in any case of culture negative IE. This study also demonstrates the paramount importance of PCR for the identification of rare, fastidious bacterial agents of endocarditis such as Tropheryma whipplei, Abiotrophia species, Mycoplasma hominis, and Legionella pneumophila. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Raoult D, Houpikian P, Dupont H T.et al Treatment of Q fever endocarditis – comparison of 2 regimens containing doxycycline and ofloxacin or hydroxychloroquine. Arch Intern Med 1999159167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Raoult D, Fournier P E, Drancourt M.et al Diagnosis of 22 new cases of Bartonella endocarditis. Ann Inter Med 1996125646–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Raoult D, Fournier P E, Vandenesch F.et al Outcome and treatment of Bartonella endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 2003163226–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES