Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2006 Dec 15;92(6):2041–2053. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.090266

High Apparent Dielectric Constant Inside a Protein Reflects Structural Reorganization Coupled to the Ionization of an Internal Asp

Daniel A Karp *, Apostolos G Gittis *, Mary R Stahley *, Carolyn A Fitch *, Wesley E Stites , Bertrand García-Moreno E *
PMCID: PMC1861777  PMID: 17172297

Abstract

The dielectric properties of proteins are poorly understood and difficult to describe quantitatively. This limits the accuracy of methods for structure-based calculation of electrostatic energies and pKa values. The pKa values of many internal groups report apparent protein dielectric constants of 10 or higher. These values are substantially higher than the dielectric constants of 2–4 measured experimentally with dry proteins. The structural origins of these high apparent dielectric constants are not well understood. Here we report on structural and equilibrium thermodynamic studies of the effects of pH on the V66D variant of staphylococcal nuclease. In a crystal structure of this protein the neutral side chain of Asp-66 is buried in the hydrophobic core of the protein and hydrated by internal water molecules. Asp-66 titrates with a pKa value near 9. A decrease in the far UV-CD signal was observed, concomitant with ionization of this aspartic acid, and consistent with the loss of 1.5 turns of α-helix. These data suggest that the protein dielectric constant needed to reproduce the pKa value of Asp-66 with continuum electrostatics calculations is high because the dielectric constant has to capture, implicitly, the energetic consequences of the structural reorganization that are not treated explicitly in continuum calculations with static structures.

INTRODUCTION

Ionizable residues sequestered from bulk water in the interior of proteins or at the interfaces between proteins and other molecules usually titrate with pKa values that are different from the normal pKa values of ionizable groups in water. This effect is primarily a consequence of the dehydration experienced by the ionizable groups in these relatively dry environments (1,2). It reflects the loss of favorable interactions between the ionizable groups and water that are not replaced by interactions with polar elements of the protein. Dehydration shifts the equilibrium between the charged and neutral species of a titratable group toward the neutral form. Therefore, the pKa values of internal acidic residues are usually elevated relative to their pKa values in water, and those of internal basic residues are usually depressed (1,36). The factors that determine the magnitude of these shifts in pKa values are not well understood.

The shifts are governed partly by the extent to which proteins and the solvent can reorganize or relax when the internal ionizable groups are charged. This reorganization can change the polarity and the electronic polarizability of the microenvironment surrounding the ionizable moieties. Fast local or slow global motions that reorient permanent dipoles and that establish or remove interactions with polar groups, with water, or with other charged groups can also be important determinants of the pKa values of internal groups. In general, the dielectric relaxation properties of proteins and the structural and physical determinants of the pKa values of internal ionizable groups are poorly understood. The central importance of internal ionizable groups and of charge transfer reactions to many key biochemical processes warrants continued investigation of this problem.

The pKa values of Glu and Lys buried at positions 66 and 92 of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) were reported previously (3,4,6,7). They are shifted by ∼4–5 pKa units relative to the normal pKa values of Glu and Lys in water. To reproduce these pKa values with structure-based calculations with continuum (1) and semimacroscopic (2) methods, it is necessary to treat the protein interior with high dielectric constants in the range 6–10. These apparent dielectric constants are much higher than the real dielectric constants of 2–4 measured experimentally with dry protein powders. The structural and physical origins of these high apparent protein dielectric constants remain unclear.

The high apparent dielectric constants reported by internal ionizable groups in SNase were unexpected because in crystal structures, obtained under conditions of pH in which these groups are neutral, their ionizable moieties are surrounded by hydrophobic atoms. The only nearby polar atoms consistent with the high apparent polarizability are from internal water molecules, which have been observed in contact with the carboxyl group in the structures of the Glu-66 and Glu-92 variants obtained at 100 K (3,6). The presence of these internal water molecules led to the hypothesis that water penetration is the source of the high polarizability reported by internal ionizable groups in SNase. This has been considered previously in computational studies (810).

This hypothesis has been challenged by two observations. First, relatively high apparent dielectric constants near 6 are necessary to reproduce the experimental pKa values of Glu-66 and Lys-66 in structure-based calculations, even when the internal water molecules are treated explicitly in the calculations and allowed to reorient when the internal groups are charged (2). Second, the internal water molecules observed in structures of the V66E and I92E variants obtained at 100 K, under conditions of pH where the internal ionizable groups are neutral, are absent in structures obtained at 298 K (6,11). The internal water molecules are also absent in both cryogenic and room temperature structures of the variants with Lys-66 or Lys-92 (4,6,7), and these internal Lys residues report apparent polarizability as high as Glu at these positions. Furthermore, magnetic relaxation dispersions studies with the V66E and V66K variants found no evidence of buried water molecules near these internal ionizable groups (11).

It is more likely that the high apparent polarizability reported by the pKa values of internal residues in proteins reflect conformational reorganization or other relaxation processes, and is not related to the presence of internal water molecules. This conformational reorganization has not been detected previously in spectroscopic studies of the V66E and V66K variants of SNase. The intrinsic fluorescence and near and far-UV CD signals of these proteins suggest that the conformation of these proteins remains essentially unperturbed and nativelike under conditions of pH where the internal groups are ionized. Whatever reorganization takes place concomitant with the ionization of the internal Glu-66 and Lys-66 must be limited to discrete, local events that are invisible to these optical spectroscopic methods.

Here we report on the effects of pH on the conformation and equilibrium thermodynamic properties of a nuclease variant with an internal aspartic acid at position 66. What is unique about the V66D variant is that with this protein we have detected, for the first time in SNase, conformational reorganization concomitant with the ionization of an internal ionizable group. The significance of these data is that they suggest that the apparent protein dielectric constants needed to reproduce the pKa values of internal ionizable residues with continuum methods are high because the calculations with static structures do not treat the structural reorganization triggered by the ionization of the internal groups explicitly. Computational methods for structure-based calculations of pKa values and electrostatic energies can neither be improved nor applied to study biological processes driven by electrostatics until the coupling between ionization of internal groups and conformational reorganization can be treated rigorously. Several computational methods have been proposed recently to simulate structural reorganization coupled to ionization reactions (1219).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Staphylococcal nuclease

The QuikChange kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) was used to introduce Asp at position 66 in the hyperstable variants of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) known as PHS (after the P117G, H124L, and S128A substitutions) and Δ+PHS (PHS with additional G50F and V51N substitutions and a 44–49 deletion). The mutagenesis was performed with clones of PHS and Δ+PHS engineered originally by Prof. David Shortle at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine using the λ-pL9 plasmid. Proteins were expressed and purified by the method of Shortle and Meeker (20) as modified by Byrne et al. (21). Protein concentration was determined using an extinction coefficient of 1.46 × 104 M−1 cm−1, determined using the method of Edelhoch, as refined by Gill and von Hippel (22,23). This corresponds to absorption of 0.87 for a 1 mg/ml solution of wild-type SNase. The background and variant proteins were treated with the same extinction coefficient.

pH titrations monitored by fluorescence and CD

The acid/base titrations monitored by changes in fluorescence were performed with an ATF-105 automated titration fluorometer (Aviv, Lakeland, NJ), following protocols described previously for wild-type SNase (24). The unfolding of Δ+PHS and its variants is much slower than that of wild-type. Therefore, the time allowed between the deliveries of consecutive doses of titrant in the automated acid/base unfolding experiments was extended to 5 min to allow the system to reach equilibrium. The delay between the deliveries of titrant in the automated titrations corresponds to seven lifetimes in the decay of the fluorescence signal after a jump from pH 7 to the pH of the unfolding transitions. All data were collected at 25°C in 100 mM KCl.

The buffer used for acid titrations monitored by fluorescence consisted of 5 mM MES, 5 mM HEPES, and 100 mM KCl. The titrant was 0.3 N HCl. The buffer for base titrations monitored by fluorescence was 5 mM HEPES with 100 mM KCl. Base titrations were performed with 0.3 N KOH. The base and acid titrations monitored by CD were performed in a buffer consisting of 100 mM KCl and 5 mM each of MES, HEPES, TAPS, CHES, and CAPS. CD scans at individual pH values were performed in 5 mM CHES. All buffers were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The experiments monitoring intrinsic fluorescence and CD at 222 nm were performed with a protein concentration of 50 μg/ml. Experiments that monitored CD at 275 nm were performed with protein at a concentration of 500 μg/ml.

The analysis of acid/base titrations to obtain the midpoints of the unfolding transitions (pHmid) or to describe the steepness of the transition (ΔνH+) was performed by nonlinear least-squares fit of two- or three-state unfolding models to the data. The equation used to describe a two-state process is

graphic file with name M1.gif (1)

In this expression, αN, mN, αD, and mD are the intercept and slope of the native and denatured state baselines. The equation used to analyze the unfolding reactions in terms of a three-state process is

graphic file with name M2.gif (2)

The value αI is the intercept for the intermediate state, and Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic represent the protons bound or released and midpoints of transitions for the primary (i.e., global unfolding) and the secondary (i.e., predenaturational) transitions.

Stability measurements by chemical denaturation

Protocols for the measurement of the Gibbs free energy of unfolding (Inline graphic) of SNase have been published previously (24). The Inline graphic values were obtained using GdnHCl as a denaturant (UltraPure grade, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), after the changes in intrinsic fluorescence with an ATF-105 automated fluorometer (Aviv, Lakeland, NJ). Because the unfolding of Δ+PHS and its variants is slower than the unfolding of the wild-type, 40–80 min were allowed for equilibration after each addition of denaturant in the transition region. Protein concentration in these experiments was 50 μg/ml. The buffers varied according to the pH of the experiment. They consisted of 100 mM KCl with 25 mM each of sodium acetate for pH 4–5.5, MES for pH 5.5–6.5, HEPES for pH 7–8, TAPS for pH 8–9, CHES for pH 9–10, and CAPS for pH 10–11. At the higher pH values, it is difficult to regulate the pH during the titration because GdnHCl shifts the pKa values of the buffer. The pH of the solutions at high pH drifted by as much as 0.1 pH units over the course of a titration. At the pH values where the GdnHCl titration curve did not reach a native state baseline, the fluorescence value obtained for the native state at other pH values was used to analyze the data to obtain the thermodynamic parameters. The pH of the samples was always checked at the end of each experiment. The final concentration of GdnHCl was also measured at the end of each experiment by refractometry (25). All data were collected at 25°C in 100 mM KCl.

Potentiometric H+ titrations

The procedure for the measurement of H+ titration curves of SNase with direct potentiometric methods has been presented elsewhere (1,24). The data were obtained with protein concentrations of 3–4 mg/ml. The protein and water samples were titrated with titrant of ∼0.15 N. Reversibility of the titration curves was tested routinely. All titration curves were measured in triplicate. All data were collected at 25°C in 100 mM KCl. The data were treated by linear interpolation.

X-ray crystallography

PHS/V66D nuclease was crystallized by the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method at 4°C at pH 6.0. The precipitating solution consisted of 33–36% (vol/vol) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol in 10% glycerol in 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer. The crystals that were used were obtained using a protein concentration of 9.4 mg/ml. Two milliequivalents of the inhibitor pdTp (3′, 5′ thymidine bisphosphate) and two milliequivalents of CaCl2 were also added to the protein solution before the drops were set. pdTp was synthesized in our laboratory (26). Crystals of PHS/V66D appeared in 1–2 weeks at 4°C. Diffraction data were collected in the resolution range 20.0–2.0 Å with a single crystal at each temperature condition using an R-AXIS IV image plate detector (Rigaku, Danvers, MA). For the low-temperature structure, the crystal was mounted in a thin loop with the crystallization buffer as cryosolvent, and flash-frozen under a stream of nitrogen at 100 K. For the room-temperature structure, the crystal was mounted in a thin-walled glass capillary in equilibrium with the well solution. Crystals were found to be isomorphous to those of PHS/V66E (3) and this structure was used as an initial model. Refinement for both crystals was carried out using the programs CNS and O (27,28). The low-temperature structure was refined to a final R-value of 20.75% and Rfree of 23.35%. The room-temperature structure was refined to a final R-value of 19.59% and a final Rfree of 22.17%. The electron density at the positions of the buried water molecules in the low temperature structure was very strong.

pKa calculations

The pKa values were calculated with the method based on the finite difference solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation, as described previously (1,29,30). The method was adapted from Antosiewicz and co-workers (3133). The University of Houston Brownian Dynamics package (34) was used to calculate electrostatic potentials. Polar hydrogen atoms were added to the protein in the neutral state with the HBUILD facility in CHARMm (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). The position of the hydrogen atoms was energy-minimized with 500 steps of steepest descent with CHARMm version 25.3, performed with all heavy atoms kept static. Hydrogen atoms were placed on OD2 of all Asp, and on the OE2 of all Glu. The tautomeric forms of His (Nɛ2 for His-8, Hδ1 for His-46, Hɛ2 for His-121, and Nδ1 for His-124) were selected from the best fit to the experimental pKa values. Partial charges were taken from the CHARMm polar-hydrogen-only topology file version 21 (35) and atomic radii from the OPLS parameter set (36). A water-accessible surface calculated with a probe radius of 1.4 Å was used in all calculations. The Stern layer was set at 2.0 Å, the temperature was 298 K, the dielectric constant of water was 78.5, and the dielectric constant of the protein, ɛin, was variable, as noted. Grid dimensions for focusing were set to 403 to reduce boundary effects near the buried charge. Calculations were performed to demonstrate that the results that are reported are independent of grid size. The cluster method of Gilson (37) was used to calculate ionization energies and mean charges. We have shown previously (1,29,30) that this method is appropriate for use with this protein; the pKa values of histidines calculated with this method are in agreement with the values that have been measured experimentally.

In some calculations crystallographic water molecules were treated explicitly as TIP3 waters (38). Only the five water molecules closest to the carboxyl oxygen atoms of Asp-66 were treated explicitly. Water hydrogen atoms were added using the HBUILD facility of CHARMm (Accelrys). To explore the effects of water reorientation in response to ionization of the buried group, the positions of water hydrogen atoms were relaxed by minimization in the presence of the internal group in the charged state, and all other ionizable groups in the protein in the neutral state. In this step the hydrogen atoms of protein polar atoms were also minimized. A second minimization step followed in which hydrogen atoms attached to protein polar atoms were allowed to relax with Asp-66 in the neutral state and with the water molecules fixed in the positions that resulted from the first minimization. To investigate further the effects of water relaxation, additional conformations were obtained from minimization as described above, in which the water oxygen atoms were also allowed to reposition. All minimization procedures consisted of 500 steps of steepest descent with CHARMm Ver. 25.3. A more rigorous analysis of solvation by internal water molecules (39) was not attempted because the experimental data demonstrate convincingly that internal water molecules are not the dominant source of polarizability reported by Asp-66 in SNase.

RESULTS

The substitution of core positions in proteins with ionizable residues is destabilizing. For this reason, the V66D substitution was engineered in the hyperstable variant of SNase known as Δ+PHS, which is more than twice as stable as wild-type SNase at pH 7 and also highly resistant to denaturation by acid or base (1,24). Use of Δ+PHS maximized the range of pH over which the V66D protein could be studied. All equilibrium thermodynamic studies were performed with the Δ+PHS/V66D protein.

Acid/base titration monitored by intrinsic fluorescence and by near-UV CD

The acid-base titration of Δ+PHS and Δ+PHS/V66D monitored by intrinsic fluorescence of Trp-140 is shown in Fig. 1. The midpoints of the acid/base unfolding transitions (pHmid) and the cooperativity (i.e., ΔνH+, the number of protons (H+) bound or release upon unfolding) of the transitions obtained by fitting three-state models to these titration profiles are listed in Table 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Acid/base titration of Δ+PHS (○) and Δ+PHS/V66D (•) monitored by changes in the intrinsic fluorescence of Trp-140. The line represents the fit of Eq. 1 or 2 to the data. All measurements at 298 K in 25 mM buffer, 100 mM KCl.

TABLE 1.

Thermodynamic parameters from acid and base titrations

Fluorescence
CD (275 nm)
CD (222 nm)
Val-66 Asp-66 Val-66 Asp-66 Val-66 Asp-66
Acid titrations
pHmid* 2.15 (0.01) 2.90 (0.01) 2.20 (0.04) 2.94 (0.01) 2.14 (0.02) 2.91 (0.01)
ΔνH+* 2.72 (0.14) 4.09 (0.11) 3.61 (0.92) 2.15 (0.01) 3.29 (0.28) 3.99 (0.23)
pHmid 4.15 (0.10) 4.28 (0.13) 5.75 (0.60) 5.35 (0.25)
ΔνH+ 0.96 (0.14) 0.67 (0.09) 0.90 (0.70) 0.55 (0.10)
Base titrations
pHmid* 10.9 (0.10) 11.10 (0.40) 9.11 (0.15)
ΔνH+* 0.66 (0.05) 0.76 (0.43) 1.09 (0.22)
pHmid 12.07 (0.02) 10.40 (0.03) 11.87 (0.01) 10.34 (0.02) 11.94 (0.03) 10.38 (0.03)
ΔνH+ 2.26 (0.27) 4.6 (0.90) 2.70 (0.20) 4.34 (0.70) 3.13 (0.53)

These parameters were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fit with Eqs. 1 and 2. The value pHmid refers to the midpoint of a transition. ΔνH+ refers to the cooperativity or to the number of H+ bound or released during the conformational transition.

*

Main, global unfolding.

Secondary, predenaturational transition.

The pH dependence of the fluorescence signal of the two proteins was identical in the pH range 3.4–8.3. The V66D substitution is destabilizing, therefore the V66D variant is stable over a narrower range of pH than the background protein. The V66D protein remained folded at pH values as high as 10, and both its acid and base unfolding were highly cooperative. This is significant in the basic branch—it suggests that the V66D substitution perturbed neither the conformation of the protein nor the pKa values of the Tyr and Lys residues that govern the base unfolding reaction.

The acid/base titration of Δ+PHS and Δ+PHS/V66D monitored by near UV-CD at 275 nm, is shown in Fig. 2. The thermodynamic parameters obtained from these titration curves are listed in Table 1. The acid/base titration curves monitored by near UV-CD and by intrinsic fluorescence differed mainly in the predenaturational transition in the acid unfolding range, which is more pronounced in the CD data for both proteins. In contrast, the predenaturational transition in the basic branch for the Δ+PHS protein was more pronounced in the fluorescence-monitored titration. The origins of these predenaturational transitions are not well understood. The one in the acidic range might reflect changes near Trp-140, as it was present in both intrinsic fluorescence and near UV-CD. The one observed by fluorescence in the basic region likely reflects contributions from tyrosinate.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Acid/base titration of Δ+PHS (○) and Δ+PHS/V66D (▪) monitored by near UV-CD signal measured at 275 nm. The line represents the fit of Eq. 1 or 2 to the data. All measurements at 298 K in 25 mM buffer, 100 mM KCl.

Despite the greater inherent scatter of the CD data, the overall titration behavior reported by both spectroscopic signals was comparable. The midpoints of the global and predenaturational unfolding transitions obtained from the two signals were within experimental error. Note that in the basic range of pH, where the destabilizing effects from the V66D substitution would be expected to be more significant, the titrations monitored by near-UV CD and by intrinsic fluorescence were coincident. The base unfolding of the V66D protein monitored by near-UV CD was highly cooperative. According to both near-UV CD and intrinsic fluorescence, the V66D protein was folded and nativelike at pH values as high as 9.7.

Local reorganization observed by far-UV CD when Asp-66 titrates

The acid/base titration of Δ+PHS and Δ+PHS/V66D monitored by far-UV CD at 222 nm is shown in Fig. 3. The thermodynamic parameters for acid and base unfolding obtained from these data are listed in Table 1. The main acid unfolding transition monitored by far-UV CD was as cooperative as the one monitored by intrinsic fluorescence and by near-UV CD. The pHmid and ΔνH+ of the global acid-unfolding transition monitored by near- and far-UV CD and by fluorescence were nearly identical. Excellent agreement was also found in the pHmid and ΔνH+ of the global unfolding transitions in the basic range of pH obtained by the three different spectroscopic signals.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Acid/base titration of Δ+PHS (○) and Δ+PHS/V66D (▪) monitored by far UV-CD signal measured at 222 nm. The line represents the fit of Eq. 1 or 2 to the data. The inset shows the data for Δ+PHS/V66D represented as mean molar ellipticity per residue × 103 (deg cm−2 dmol−1 res−1). All measurements at 298 K in 25 mM buffer, 100 mM KCl.

There is one notable feature in the titration monitored by far-UV CD that was not observed in fluorescence or near-UV CD monitored titrations. At pH 8.5 and above, the far-UV signal of the Δ+PHS/V66D protein begins to decrease relative to the Δ+PHS background protein. This predenaturational transition has a midpoint at pH 9.11 and a slope corresponding to ΔνH+ of 1. H+-linked loss of far-UV CD signal has never been observed in any of the variants of SNase with internal ionizable groups that have been studied previously.

Scans of the V66D protein in the far- and near-UV CD between pH 6.55 and 11.35 are shown in Fig. 4, a and b, respectively. In the pH range 6.55–9.93, the near-UV CD scans are almost pH-independent. At pH values above 10.4, the near-UV CD signal was comparable to the signal of the protein in 6 M GdnHCl, where it is known to be completely denatured and unstructured (20,24,4043). In contrast, the far-UV CD of the V66D protein was highly pH-sensitive. The signal decreased significantly with increasing pH between pH 6.55 and 11.35. However, even at pH 11.35, the signal did not reach the values obtained in high concentrations of GdnHCl. The spectra in Fig. 4 a show that at pH 10, where the base-induced predenaturational transition of the Δ+PHS/V66D leveled off and the global unfolding transition began, the signal was ∼12% lower in the V66D protein than in the background protein. If the far-UV CD signal at 222 nm reflected solely the α-helical content of the protein, this would correspond to the loss of at least 1.5 turns of α -helix in the V66D protein between pH 8.5 and 10.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

pH dependence of the mean molar ellipticity per residue of Δ+PHS/V66D (A) in the far UV-CD region and (B) in the near UV-CD region. The lines are only meant to guide the eye. The spectra were collected at pH 6.55 (•), 7.85 (○), 8.58 (▪), 9.01 (□), 9.43 (▴), 9.93 (▵), 10.36 (♦), 10.86 (⋄), and 11.35 (▾) (note that this last pH is not shown in B). Also included for reference is the signal measured at pH 7 in 7 M GdnHCl (+++++). All measurements at 298 K, 25 mM KCl.

pH dependence of stability

The stability (Inline graphic) of the V66D variant was measured by GdnHCl denaturation monitored by changes in intrinsic fluorescence over the pH range 3–10.25 (Figs. 5 and 6). The thermodynamic parameters of unfolding obtained by analysis with a two-state model are listed in Table 2. The midpoints of the unfolding transition (Cm) and the Inline graphic show that the stability of the V66D protein was highly pH-sensitive. The protein was most stable near pH 4. Below this pH value the stability of both Δ+PHS and Δ+PHS/V66D decreased significantly, as expected from the known pH-dependence of stability of SNase (24). The m-values of the V66D protein (in Table 2) and of Δ+PHS (data not shown) change at pH 4.5, suggesting that the character of either the denatured or the native state or both changes at this pH. The m-values >pH 4.5 were all similar despite the significant effects of the V66D substitution on the stability and pH-sensitivity of this protein. This suggests that the V66D substitution did not alter the conformation of the protein significantly.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

GdnHCl titrations of Δ+PHS/V66D monitored by intrinsic fluorescence. Solid lines and open circles identify data from pH 10.5 to 4.5 in steps of 0.5 pH units (left to right). Dashed lines and solid circles refer to data from pH 3 to pH 4 (left to right). The lines represent fits to a two-state model of reversible denaturation. All measurements at 298 K, 100 mM KCl.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

pH dependence of stability (Inline graphic) measured by GdnHCl denaturation monitored by changes in intrinsic fluorescence for Δ+PHS (○) and Δ+PHS/V66D (▪) at 298 K in 100 mM KCl. The error bars shown are the errors of the fit for the individual denaturation experiments. Also shown is the difference in stability (Inline graphic) between these two proteins (▵), shifted arbitrarily along the ordinate for display purposes. The dashed line through Inline graphic is the fit with Eq. 3.

TABLE 2.

Thermodynamic stability of Δ+PHS/V66D determined by fluorescence-monitored GdnHCl titrations

pH Inline graphic (kcal/mol) Cm m
2.96 0.63 ± 0.14 0.22 −2.92 ± 0.24
3.44 3.41 ± 0.04 0.80 −4.26 ± 0.04
3.90 5.52 ± 0.12 1.11 −4.97 ± 0.11
4.37 6.96 ± 0.08 1.29 −5.41 ± 0.06
4.84 7.26 ± 0.12 1.26 −5.78 ± 0.10
5.41 6.48 ± 0.14 1.16 −5.58 ± 0.12
5.96 5.69 ± 0.15 1.03 −5.55 ± 0.14
6.45 5.34 ± 0.12 0.95 −5.64 ± 0.12
6.99 4.93 ± 0.04 0.83 −5.95 ± 0.04
7.48 4.50 ± 0.04 0.77 −5.87 ± 0.04
7.95 3.71 ± 0.04 0.61 −6.06 ± 0.06
8.41 3.18 ± 0.08 0.54 −5.87 ± 0.11
8.90 2.77 ± 0.13 0.44 −6.25 ± 0.24
9.33 2.14 ± 0.09 0.37 −5.74 ± 0.19
9.77 1.18 ± 0.26 0.23 −5.20 ± 0.64
10.27 −0.36 ± 0.07 −0.06 −5.75 ± 0.10

Asp in water titrates with a pKa value of ∼4.0 (44). At this pH the V66D substitution destabilized the protein by 3.96 kcal/mol. This reflects primarily the cost of removing the Asp from water in the half-charged state, and burying it in the protein interior in the fully neutral state (see below). The substitution of Val with neutral Asp was surprisingly inexpensive considering that it involves the transfer of two polar groups from water into the protein interior. It is ∼0.26 kcal/mol more expensive than the cost of introducing neutral Lys at this location (1) and 1.29 kcal/mol more expensive than the cost of introducing neutral Glu (3).

Elevated pKa value of Asp-66

Fig. 6 illustrates the significant decrease in the stability of the V66D variant as a function of pH. The 5.2 kcal/mol values of stability are lost between pH 4.5 and pH 9.5. In this same range of pH, the stability of the Δ+PHS background remains unchanged. The difference in the stability between these two proteins (Inline graphic) over a wide range of pH is shown in Fig. 6. The slope of the linear portion of the Inline graphic versus pH curve was 1.1 kcal/mol, close to the theoretical value of 1.36 kcal/mol expected at 25°C if the Inline graphic resulted exclusively from an increase in the pKa value of the Asp-66 in the native state of the V66D protein relative to its value in the denatured state. The data were fully consistent with the presence of an acidic residue with a high pKa value, much higher than the normal pKa of 4.0 of Asp in water. This dramatic shift in the pKa of an Asp is consistent with the behavior expected from a carboxyl group that is fully sequestered from bulk water as a consequence of burial in the protein interior.

The pKa of Asp-66 in the native state was measured by two different methods. First it was measured by fitting the Inline graphic versus the pH curve in Fig. 6 with Eq. 3 (7):

graphic file with name M15.gif (3)

In this expression Inline graphic accounts for the energetic consequences of the Val-to-Asp substitution that are independent of the shift in the pKa value of the Asp carboxyl group. The rightmost term reflects the difference in the pKa value of Asp-66 in the native (Inline graphic) and in the denatured (Inline graphic) states of the V66D protein. The analysis with Eq. 3 assumes that the pKa values of the other ionizable residues are not affected by the V66D substitution.

The Inline graphic value of Asp-66 obtained by fitting with Eq. 3 was 8.73 (8.45, 9.03), which is 4.75 pKa units higher than the normal pKa of 4.0 of Asp in water. The Inline graphic value was 5.0 (4.7, 5.2), which is slightly higher than the normal pKa of Asp in water. The Inline graphic values of Glu-66, Lys-66, and Glu-92 are similarly shifted in a direction that favors the uncharged form. This could be rationalized in terms of native-like structure in the denatured state, but it is probably more likely that it reflects the enhanced pH sensitivity of the V66D protein and of the Δ+PHS background protein at the pH values where the Inline graphic values were determined.

The accuracy of the measured pKa value of Asp-66 was established by measuring it with a second, completely different equilibrium thermodynamic method based on the measurement of H+ titration curves with direct potentiometric methods (24). The accuracy and precision of potentiometric H+ titrations and their capacity to resolve the titration of an individual site have been demonstrated previously (1,3,24).

The H+ titration curve of Δ+PHS nuclease and of its V66D variant were measured independently. The data in Fig. 7 show that the H+ titration properties of Δ+PHS and its V66D variant were nearly identical at pH ≤ 8. At pH 8 the titration curves of these two proteins began to diverge. Protons were released preferentially from the V66D protein at pH > 8. Between pH 8 and 9.5, the difference H+ titration curve has the shape characteristic of a single-site isotherm, presumably reflecting the ionization of Asp-66. Above pH 9.5–10, the difference in H+ release increased dramatically. This coincides with the onset of base unfolding in the base titrations monitored by changes in intrinsic fluorescence and in near- and far-UV CD, and it reflects excess H+ binding by Lys and Tyr in the unfolded Δ+PHS/V66D relative to the folded Δ+PHS.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Potentiometric H+ titration of Δ+PHS (•) and Δ+PHS/V66D (○) at 298 K in 100 mM KCl. The solid lines through the experimental data represent fits with linear interpolation. The solid line in the inset shows the difference between the interpolated curves for these two proteins, and the dotted line represents the fit with Eq. 4 with the amplitude of the titration fixed at 1.

The difference titration curve (ΔνH+) in the inset of Fig. 7 suggests that the V66D substitution has no significant effect on the H+ binding properties of nuclease at pH ≤ 8.5. This supports the validity of the use of Eq. 3 to measure the pKa value of Asp-66 by linkage analysis of the pH dependence of stability, as well as use of the following modified Hill equation to extract the pKa value of Asp-66 from the ΔνH+ versus pH data:

graphic file with name M23.gif (4)

In this function, m represents the amplitude of the transition (i.e., number of H+ bound or released) and n is a coefficient that modifies the slope of the transition. The data at pH > 9.5, which reflect proton release by other groups owing to global unfolding, were not included in the fit so as not to bias the pKa value toward a higher value. In the best fit, when both m and n were not assigned fixed values, the pKa value of Asp-66 was 9.15 (9.13, 9.19), n was 1.31 (1.24, 1.37), and m was 1.40 (1.34, 1.46). When n was allowed to float and m was fixed as 1, the pKa value was 8.95 (8.92, 8.99) and when both m and n were fixed at 1, it was 8.89 (8.79, 9.00). These pKa values are in agreement with the pKa of 8.7 (8.45, 9.03) obtained by analysis of the pH dependence of stability.

Effects of temperature on the patterns of internal hydration observed crystallographically

The V66D variant of the PHS hyperstable nuclease was used for the crystallographic studies because PHS nuclease crystallizes more readily and produces crystals of higher quality than Δ+PHS nuclease. The truncation and point mutations in the Δ+PHS protein that are not present in the PHS protein are far from position 66. It is assumed that the microenvironment of Asp-66 is equivalent in the PHS/V66D and Δ+PHS/V66D variants.

Structures solved at 298 K and 100 K at pH 6, where Asp-66 is neutral, are shown in Fig. 8. The neutral side chain of Asp-66 is buried in the interior of the protein. The structures at 298 K and 100 K were almost identical and superimposable. The carboxyl oxygen atoms of the Asp-66 side chain were in slightly different orientations in the two structures (Fig. 8 b). They are related by a small rotation about the Cβ-Cγ bond. In the structure obtained at 100 K, the carboxyl oxygen atoms of Asp-66 are too far from the carbonyl oxygen of Thr-62 to establish a hydrogen bond. They are in a slightly less hydrophobic environment than in the structure obtained at 298 K. At low temperature, the OD1 atom is 4.09 Å from the carbonyl O of Thr-62, and 3.32 Å from the amide nitrogen of Asp-66. In the room temperature structure, the OD1 atom is surrounded by the hydrophobic side chains of Leu-14, Val-23, Met-65, Ile-72, Ile-92, Ala-94, and Val-99, and the nearest polar groups are >4.5 Å away. The OD2 atom is in a more polar environment, 2.71 Å from the carbonyl oxygen of Thr-62, and 3.54 Å from the backbone amide nitrogen of residue 66.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

(A) Stereo representation of the crystallographic structure of PHS/V66D obtained at 100 K. The side chain of Asp-66 is shown in red and the site-bound water molecules near Asp-66 are represented as light-blue spheres. The Trp-140 responsible for the intrinsic fluorescence in the neutral range of pH is shown in blue, and the Tyr residues that might contribute to the pH dependence of fluorescence at high pH are shown in green. (B) Stereo representation of a closeup of the network of hydrogen bonds between the backbone, the side chain of Asp-66, and the five structural water molecules nearest to it. The side chain of Asp-66 in the 100 K structure (purple oxygen atoms) and in the room-temperature structure (red oxygen atoms) are shown. (C) Superposition of structures with Glu, Lys, and Asp at position 66 to compare the conformation of this side chain. The ionizable moieties are color-coded: Lys (purple), Glu (green), and Asp (blue). Water molecules from the structure with Asp-66 are shown as blue spheres. The green spheres identify the waters seen in the structure with Glu-66. Connelly-surface calculated for the 100 K structure (D) and for the room temperature (E) structures with a probe of 1.4 Å. The water molecules observed in the 100 K are shown in the room-temperature structure for purposes of comparison.

The main difference between the structures obtained at the two temperatures is a string of water molecules observed at 100 K, which was absent at 298 K. The internal water molecules are within hydrogen-bonding distance of the OD2 atom of Asp-66. They are connected directly with bulk water through the chain they make among themselves. They also interact with backbone carbonyl oxygen atoms. Some of these internal water molecules have been observed previously in structures with Glu-66 (3) or Glu-92 (6). As shown in Fig. 8 c, three of the internal water molecules found in the cryogenic structure of Asp-66 are also present in the structures with Glu-66. However, there are several significant differences between the pattern of hydration observed for Glu-66 and Asp-66:

  1. The internal water molecules observed with Glu-66, W1, W2, W3, and W4 (see Fig. 8 c) penetrate the protein through a single entry channel. In the case of Asp-66, two different channels are occupied by penetrating water molecules.

  2. The two water molecules that hydrate the carboxyl group of Glu-66 (W1 and W2) make hydrogen bonds with the backbone to achieve a pentagonal hydrogen bonded array comparable to that seen for waters organized on the surfaces of proteins. In contrast, W5, the water that is hydrogen-bonded to the Asp-66 side chain, does not interact directly with the backbone. The pentagonal structures are absent in the V66D structure.

  3. W2, W3, and W4 in the structure with Glu-66 are present in the structure with Asp-66, but the innermost water, W1, observed in the structure with Glu-66, was not observed in the structure with Asp-66. Presumably, the hydrogen bond between W1 and the carboxyl oxygen of Glu-66 is essential for the stability of this internal water molecule. In contrast, W5, W6, and W7 in the structure with Asp-66 are absent in the structure with Glu-66. In fact, these water molecules have never been seen previously in any of the structures of SNase.

DISCUSSION

The protein interior is not as effective a solvent as water. Therefore, internal ionizable groups usually titrate with pKa values that are shifted, relative to the values measured in water, in the direction that favors the neutral form. This is illustrated clearly by the pKa of 8.9 of the internal Asp-66 in SNase. The ΔpKa ≈ 5 relative to the pKa value of 4.0 of Asp in water is equivalent to ∼7 kcal/mol at 298 K. Despite this being a large shift in pKa, it reflects relatively high apparent polarizability in this location in the interior of SNase. The shift would have been much greater if the protein interior behaved as a material with a dielectric constant of 4, as is commonly assumed in continuum representations of proteins (14,31,32,4449). Understanding the structural and physical origins of the high apparent polarizability reported by internal groups in proteins is central to understanding the structural factors that govern catalysis and other biochemical processes where charge separation or charge transfer is involved.

To interpret pKa values in terms of apparent protein dielectric constants (ɛapp), it is necessary to perform reverse pKa calculations. This entails calculation of pKa values as a function of the protein dielectric constant, ɛin, to identify the values of ɛin that reproduce the experimental pKa value. We define ɛapp as the value of ɛin that reproduces the experimental pKa value. It is important to emphasize that ɛapp does not represent the true dielectric constant of the protein. It is simply the coefficient necessary to reproduce a specific experimental quantity with a specific model. The value of ɛin itself is not universal, nor does it represent the true dielectric constant of the protein. It is a parameter meant to reproduce, implicitly, the contributions to the dielectric response that are not treated explicitly in a model (2). Not only is ɛin model-dependent, it is also likely that different values of ɛin will be necessary to calculate the different type of energetic contributions to pKa values (2). This remains to be established experimentally.

The data in Fig. 9 illustrate how the pKa value of Asp-66 was interpreted in terms of apparent dielectric constants. The pKa values in this figure were calculated with static structures using a continuum method based on the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann by the method of finite differences (50,51). In these methods the protein is treated with the dielectric constant ɛin, and permanent dipoles are treated explicitly with partial charges (52,53). The pKa values are determined by three energy terms:

  1. Coulomb interactions with other charged groups (54);

  2. Interactions with the background of charges from permanent dipoles (55); and

  3. Born energies related to differences in the reaction field energies of a charged group in water and in the protein (56).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

pKa values calculated with the finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann continuum method as a function of the protein dielectric constant (ɛin) with (dashed line) or without (solid line) explicit treatment of the internal water molecules observed in the structure obtained at 100 K. The horizontal lines describe the range of pKa values measured experimentally for Asp-66. The different calculations described by these data are: (•) all energy terms, room-temperature structure; (○) all energy terms, 100 K structure; (▪) Born term only, room-temperature structure; (▴) self-energy term (Born and background) only, room-temperature structure; (□) self-energy term only, 100 K structure, W5 included explicitly; (▵) self-energy term only, low temperature structure, W5 and W6 included explicitly; and (⋄) self-energy term only, low-temperature structure, W2, W3, W5, and W6 included explicitly.

The combined effects of the background and Born energies constitute the self-energy.

Previously we have shown experimentally that Coulomb interactions between the internal Lys-66 and surface-ionizable groups are weak; the pKa of Lys-66 is insensitive to the loss of charges on the surface, and the pKa of surface histidines that titrate in the same range as Lys-66 are insensitive to the ionization of the internal Lys-66 (1). It is well known that Coulomb interactions are exaggerated in finite difference calculations with static structures using low values of ɛin. For this reason, we routinely explore the dependence of ɛapp values on the different types of energy terms used in the calculations (1). When the Coulomb, Born, and background energies were used in the calculations, the experimental pKa of Asp-66 was reproduced when ɛin was in the range 7.0–8.4. When only the Born term was used, a value of ɛin = 7.2 was necessary to reproduce the experimental pKa value. The value ɛin = 6.0 was needed when the full self-energy, consisting of Born and background terms, was used. Values of ɛin in the range 6–8 are low relative to the dielectric constant of water, but they still represent a substantial dielectric response, comparable to that of a very polarizable material. Regardless of how the pKa calculations were performed, they all showed that the shift in the pKa value of Asp-66 is governed by the loss of hydration of the carboxylic group in the buried state that is not offset by interactions with charges or with polar atoms of the protein.

Calculations were also performed in which the water molecules that were observed in the crystal structures obtained at 100 K were treated explicitly, instead of accounting for their presence in terms of a dielectric continuum. In these calculations the position and orientation of the water molecules was energy-minimized with the carboxyl group of Asp-66 in the charged state. The value of ɛin needed to reproduce the experimental pKa values in these calculations decreased, as expected when the amount of microscopic detail treated explicitly in a continuum calculation increases (2). When the innermost water molecule (W5 in Fig. 8 c) was included explicitly in the calculation, the experimental pKa value of Asp-66 was reproduced with the self-energy evaluated at ɛin = 4.4. It is well known that ɛin ≈ 4 exaggerates Coulomb interactions between the internal and surface ionizable groups. For this reason, the Coulomb term was turned off in these calculations. When the two closest water molecules were used (W5 and W6, or W5 and W2), the experimental pKa was reproduced when ɛin = 3.7. When the three closest water molecules were treated explicitly (W2, W3, W5, and W6), a value of ɛin = 3.3 was needed. The calculations demonstrate unequivocally that, when the internal water molecules near Asp-66 are allowed to reorient in response to the ionization of this group, they can stabilize the internal Asp-66 in its charged state.

The equilibrium dielectric constants measured experimentally with polymeric amides, such as nylon, and with dry protein and peptide powders, are in the range 3.3–4.4. They are lower still in the high frequency limit (57,58). These values are consistent with estimates of the protein dielectric constants calculated from first principles (46), but lower than the estimates of the dielectric effect originating from dipole fluctuations near a charged group (59,60). Protein dielectric constants in this range are thought to reflect both electronic polarization and some degree of nuclear relaxation (i.e., discrete oscillations and reorganization of dipoles). The low values of ɛin necessary to reproduce the experimental pKa value of Asp-66 suggests that the internal water molecules observed in the low temperature structure of the V66D variant could contribute significantly to the high apparent polarizability reported by Asp-66. The matter is complicated by the fact that the internal water molecules are not observed in the structure of the V66D protein obtained at room temperature. In fact, with the exception of one internal water molecule observed in the room temperature of the structure with Glu-66, the internal water molecules that are observed in cryogenic structures of SNase with internal ionizable groups are not observed in structures obtained at room temperature (6,11). Furthermore, in the case of the V66E variant, which has more internal water molecules than the V66D variant at 100 K, the shift in the pKa value of Glu-66 could not be rationalized solely in terms of the internal water molecules.

The factors that determine the temperature-dependence in the observed patterns of hydration in the hydrophobic core of proteins are not obvious. In the specific case of the V66D protein, the absence of observable internal water molecules in the room temperature structure could be related to a constriction at this temperature in the channel that connects bulk solvent with the internal microcavity where the Asp-66 side chain resides (Fig. 8, D and E). As expected, the temperature factors at 298 K are higher than at 100 K (6163); in a 5 Å sphere surrounding the ionizable moiety of Asp-66, the median B factor is 19.86 in the low temperature structure and 27.21 in the room temperature structure. The high temperature factors suggest that disorder might be the reason that the internal water molecules are more difficult to detect crystallographically at higher temperatures. The presence of internal water molecules in structures obtained at 100 K could also represent an artifact of the flash-freezing used to protect crystals (64).

The internal water molecules may be present at room temperature in the internal microcavity near Asp-66, albeit in a disorganized state. This would be the situation if the thermal energy of the water molecules were higher than the energy of their hydrogen-bonding interactions in the internal locations. A flat binding surface near Asp-66 with multiple binding minima would also render the internal water molecules invisible in the crystallographic experiment. This would also be consistent with magnetic relaxation dispersion studies of variants with Lys-66 and Glu-66, which failed to detect internal water molecules at room temperature (11). What is clear is that the patterns of internal hydration observed crystallographically are highly sensitive to the temperature at which the diffraction data are collected. Caution should be exercised when interpreting details of internal water molecules, or the lack thereof, at active sites, cavities, and other internal locations in proteins.

Regardless of what the contributions by internal water molecules to the high apparent polarizability reported by Asp-66 might be, they are eclipsed by incontrovertible evidence of local conformational reorganization coincident with the ionization of Asp-66. If the conformational changes reported by far UV-CD reflected solely the loss of α-helical structure, the data would be consistent with at least 1.5 turns of α-helix becoming disorganized upon ionization of Asp-66. Because there is no evidence of conformational reorganization in the near UV CD or in the intrinsic fluorescence signal, and because Asp-66 is located near the C-terminus of a helix, where fraying is possible, we suspect that the conformational reorganization monitored by far UV CD reflects the loss of a small segment of the helix where Asp-66 resides. Unwinding of one turn of this α-helix would be sufficient to expose the charged form of Asp-66 to bulk water. A recent free energy perturbation simulation with a novel and ingenious overcharging procedure, suggests that a relatively modest conformational rearrangement in this helix is sufficient to allow the side chain of Glu-66 to gain access to bulk water (13).

The direct observation of a conformational transition linked to the ionization of Asp-66 has several implications. It suggests that internal water molecules are not as significant a source of polarizability in the protein interior as hypothesized previously based on low temperature crystal structures (1,3). The internal water molecules that might hydrate the carboxylic moiety are not as effective as bulk water in hydrating the charged form of Asp-66 in its buried location. The protein also seems to be unable to solvate Asp-66 when its side chain is buried in the charged state in this highly hydrophobic region of SNase. Studies with NMR spectroscopy are underway to describe in detail the character and amplitude of the subtle, local conformational reorganization triggered by ionization of this internal Asp residue.

The spectroscopic observation of local conformational reorganization linked to the ionization of Asp-66 is particularly significant in one important respect: it explains the structural basis behind the high protein dielectric constants needed to reproduce the pKa value of Asp-66 in continuum calculations with static structures. The dielectric constant reported by Asp-66 is high because the dielectric constant has to capture the energetic consequences of the local conformational reorganization associated with the ionization of Asp-66. These conformational rearrangements are not treated explicitly in calculations with static structures; therefore, they need to be treated implicitly with high dielectric constants. The pKa values of Glu-66 and Lys-66 in SNase are reproduced with similarly high protein dielectric constants of ɛin ≈ 10. We suspect that these apparent dielectric constants are high because they also have to account for local conformational reorganization concomitant with the ionization of these groups, although in the case of these groups, optical spectroscopic methods have been unable to detect these changes.

Local conformational changes coupled to ionization reactions of internal residues are central to many key biochemical processes in energy transduction, such as the conversion of light into mechanical energy by the photoactive yellow protein (65), the coupling of H+ gradients and the synthesis of ATP (66), the establishment of proton gradients by proteins such as bacteriorhodopsin (6770), and H+ transport in general (39). To elucidate the structural and physical origins of these important biochemical processes in detail, it is necessary to understand the coupling between ionization of internal residues and local conformational reorganization and fluctuations. Structure-based calculations of pKa values and electrostatic energies in proteins will be essential for this purpose, but they will not be useful until the methods are capable of treating the coupling between the ionization of internal residues and conformational reorganization rigorously. A variety of computational approaches have been proposed and are being used to study this problem (1219). The V66D variant of SNase constitutes an ideal model system for further development and benchmarking of computational methods that treat pH-linked local conformational reorganization and fluctuations rigorously and explicitly.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Prof. Maurice Bessman at Johns Hopkins for his invaluable help in the synthesis of pdTp.

This work was supported by a grant to B.G.M.E. from the National Institutes of Health (grant No. GM-061597). D.A.K. and M.R.S. were supported by predoctoral and REU fellowships, respectively, from the National Science Foundation.

References

  • 1.Fitch, C. A., D. A. Karp, K. K. Lee, W. E. Stites, E. E. Lattman, and B. García-Moreno E. 2002. Experimental pKa values of buried residues: analysis with continuum methods and role of water penetration. Biophys. J. 82:3289–3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schutz, C. N., and A. Warshel. 2001. What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 44:400–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dwyer, J., A. Gittis, D. A. Karp, E. E. Lattman, D. Spencer, W. Stites, and B. García-Moreno E. 2000. High apparent dielectric constants in the interior of a protein reflect water penetration. Biophys. J. 79:1610–1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.García-Moreno E., B., J. Dwyer, A. Gittis, E. E. Lattman, D. Spencer, and W. Stites. 1997. Experimental measurement of the effective dielectric in the hydrophobic core of a protein. Biophys. Chem. 64:211–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dao-pin, S., D. E. Anderson, W. A. Baase, F. W. Dahlquist, and B. W. Matthews. 1991. Structural and thermodynamic consequences of burying a charged residue within the hydrophobic core of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 30:11521–11529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nguyen, D. M., R. L. Reynald, A. G. Gittis, and E. E. Lattman. 2004. X-ray and thermodynamic studies of staphylococcal nuclease variants I92E and I92K: insights into polarity of the protein interior. J. Mol. Biol. 341:565–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stites, W. E., A. G. Gittis, E. E. Lattman, and D. Shortle. 1991. In a staphylococcal nuclease mutant the side-chain of a lysine replacing Valine 66 is fully buried in the hydrophobic core. J. Mol. Biol. 221:7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Langen, R., G. M. Jensen, U. Jacob, P. J. Stephens, and A. Warshel. 1992. Protein control of iron-sulfur cluster redox potentials. J. Biol. Chem. 267:25625–25627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Warshel, A., and S. Russell. 1986. Theoretical calculations of structure and energetics in the catalytic reaction of trypsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108:6569–6579. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Damjanovic, A., B. García-Moreno E., E. E. Lattman, and A. E. García. 2005. Molecular dynamics study of water penetration in staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 60:433–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Denisov, V. P., J. L. Schlessman, B. García-Moreno E., and B. Halle. 2004. Stabilization of internal charges in a protein: water penetration or conformational change? Biophys. J. 87:3982–3994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khandogin, J., and C. L. Brooks III. 2006. Towards the accurate first-principles prediction of ionization equilibria in proteins. Biochemistry. 45:9363–9373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kato, M., and A. Warshel. 2006. Using a charging coordinate in studies of ionization induced partial unfolding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110:11566–11579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alexov, E. G., and M. R. Gunner. 1997. Incorporating protein conformational flexibility into the calculation of pH-dependent protein properties. Biophys. J. 74:2075–2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alexov, E. 2003. Role of the protein side-chain fluctuations on the strength of pair-wise electrostatic interactions: comparing experimental with computed pKas. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 50:94–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Georgescu, R. E., E. G. Alexov, and M. R. Gunner. 2002. Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pKas in proteins. Biophys. J. 83:1731–1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuhn, B., P. A. Kollman, and M. Stahl. 2004. Prediction of pKa shifts in proteins using a combination of molecular mechanical and continuum solvent calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 25:1865–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koumanov, A., A. Karshikoff, E. P. Friis, and T. V. Borchert. 2001. Conformational average in pKa calculations: improvement and limitations in prediction of ionization properties of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:9339–9344. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khandogin, J., and C. L. Brooks III. 2005. Constant pH molecular dynamics with proton tautomerism. Biophys. J. 89:141–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shortle, D., and A. Meeker. 1986. Mutant forms of staphylococcal nuclease with altered patterns of guanidine hydrochloride and urea denaturation. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 1:81–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Byrne, M., R. Manuel, L. Lowe, and W. Stites. 1995. Energetic contribution of side chain hydrogen bonding to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 34:13949–13960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pace, C., F. Vajdos, L. Fee, G. Grimsley, and T. Gray. 1995. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 4:2411–2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gill, S. C., and P. H. Von Hippel. 1989. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequences. Anal. Biochem. 182:319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Whitten, S. T., and B. García-Moreno E. 2000. pH dependence of stability of staphylococcal nuclease: evidence of substantial electrostatic interactions in the denatured state. Biochemistry. 39:14292–14304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pace, C. 1986. Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. Methods Enzymol. 131:266–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tener, G. M. 1961. 2-cyanoethyl phosphate and its use in synthesis of phosphate esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83:159–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brunger, A., P. Adams, G. Clore, W. DeLano, P. Gros, R. Grosse-Kunstleve, J. Jiang, J. Kuszewski, M. Nilges, N. Pannu, R. Read, L. Rice, T. Simonson, and G. Warren. 1998. Crystallography and NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54:905–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jones, T. A., J. Y. Zou, S. W. Cowan, and M. Kjeldgaard. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A. 47:110–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee, K. K., C. A. Fitch, and B. García-Moreno E. 2002. Distance dependence and salt sensitivity of pairwise Coulombic interactions in a protein. Protein Sci. 11:1004–1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee, K. K., C. A. Fitch, J. T. J. Lecomte, and B. García-Moreno E. 2002. Electrostatic effects in highly charged proteins: salt sensitivity of pKa values of histidines in staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 41:5656–5667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Antosiewicz, J., J. A. McCammon, and M. K. Gilson. 1994. Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238:415–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antosiewicz, J., J. A. McCammon, and M. K. Gilson. 1996. The determinants of pKas in proteins. Biochemistry. 35:7819–7833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Antosiewicz, J., J. M. Briggs, A. H. Elcock, M. K. Gilson, and J. A. McCammon. 1996. Computing ionization states of proteins with a detailed charge model. J. Comput. Chem. 17:1633–1644. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davis, M. E., J. D. Madura, B. A. Luty, and J. A. McCammon. 1991. Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution—simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program. Comput. Phys. Commun. 62:187–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Neria, E., S. Fischer, and M. Karplus. 1996. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105:1902–1921. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jorgensen, W. L., and J. Tirado-Rives. 1988. The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110:1657–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gilson, M. K. 1993. Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 15:266–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jorgensen, W. L., J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein. 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79:926–935. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Burykin, A., and A. Warshel. 2004. On the origin of the electrostatic barrier for proton transport in aquaporin. FEBS Lett. 570:41–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meeker, A. K., B. García-Moreno E., and D. Shortle. 1996. Contributions of the ionizable amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 35:6443–6449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shortle, D., W. E. Stites, and A. K. Meeker. 1990. Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 29:8033–8041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shortle, D., and A. K. Meeker. 1989. Residual structure in large fragments of staphylococcal nuclease: effects of amino acid substitutions. Biochemistry. 28:936–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Green, S. M., A. K. Meeker, and D. Shortle. 1992. Contributions of the polar, uncharged amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease: evidence for mutational effects on the free energy of the denatured state. Biochemistry. 31:5717–5728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Matthew, J. B., F. R. N. Gurd, B. García-Moreno E., M. A. Flanagan, K. L. March, and S. J. Shire. 1985. pH-dependent properties in proteins. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 18:191–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tanford, C., and J. G. Kirkwood. 1957. Theory of protein titration curves. I. General equations for impenetrable spheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:5333–5339. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gilson, M. K., and B. H. Honig. 1986. The dielectric constant of a folded protein. Biopolymers. 25:2097–2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bashford, D., and M. Karplus. 1990. pKas of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. Biochemistry. 29:10219–10225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yang, A.-S., and B. Honig. 1993. On the pH dependence of protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 231:459–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang, A.-S., M. R. Gunner, R. Sampogna, K. Sharp, and B. Honig. 1993. On the calculation of pKas in proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 15:252–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Klapper, I., R. Hagstrom, R. Fine, K. Sharp, and B. Honig. 1986. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase: effects of ionic strength and amino-acid modification. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 1:47–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rogers, N. K., and M. J. E. Sternberg. 1984. Electrostatic interactions in globular proteins. Different dielectric models applied to the packing of α-helices. J. Mol. Biol. 174:527–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Warshel, A., and M. Levitt. 1976. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions—dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of carbonium-ion in reaction of lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 103:227–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Warshel, A., and S. T. Russell. 1984. Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Q. Rev. Biophys. 17:283–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Linderstrøm-Lang, K. 1924. The ionization of proteins. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg. 15:7. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Warshel, A. 1978. Energetics of enzyme catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 75:5250–5254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Warshel, A., S. T. Russell, and A. K. Churg. 1984. Macroscopic models for studies of electrostatic interactions in proteins—limitations and applicability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:4785–4789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Harvey, S. C., and P. Hoekstra. 1972. Dielectric relaxation spectra of water adsorbed on lysozyme. J. Phys. Chem. 76:2987–2994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pethig, R. 1979. Dielectric and Electronic Properties of Biological Materials. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • 59.King, G., F. S. Lee, and A. Warshel. 1991. Microscopic simulations of macroscopic dielectric constants of solvated proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 95:4366–4377. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sham, Y. Y., Z. T. Chu, and A. Warshel. 1997. Consistent calculations of pKas of ionizable residues in proteins: semi-microscopic and microscopic approaches. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101:4458–4472. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fraunfelder, H., G. A. Petsko, and D. Tsernoglou. 1979. Temperature-dependent x-ray diffraction as a probe of protein dynamics. Nature. 280:558–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tilton, R. F. J., J. C. Dewan, and G. A. Petsko. 1992. Effects of temperature on protein structure and dynamics: x-ray crystallographic studies on the protein ribonuclease-A at nine different temperatures from 98 to 320 K. Biochemistry. 31:2469–2481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Quillin, M. L., W. A. Breyer, I. J. Griswold, and B. W. Mathews. 2000. Size vs. polarizability in protein-ligand interactions: binding of noble gases within engineered cavities in T4 lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 302:955–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Halle, B. 2004. Biomolecular cryocrystallography: structural changes during flash-cooling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:4793–4798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hendricks, J., W. D. Hoff, W. Crielaard, and K. J. Hellingwerf. 1999. Protonation/deprotonation reactions triggered by photoactivation of photoactive yellow protein from Ectothiorhodospira halophila. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17655–17660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Raslogi, V. K., and M. E. Girvin. 1999. Structural changes linked to proton translocation by subunit c of the ATPase synthase. Nature. 402:263–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Luecke, H. 2000. Atomic resolution structures of bacteriorhodopsin photocycle intermediates: the role of discrete water molecules in the function of this light-driven ion pump. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1460:133–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Luecke, H., B. Schobert, H. T. Richter, J. P. Cartailler, and J. K. Lanyi. 1999. Structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin during ion transport at 2 Ångström resolution. Science. 286:255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Luecke, H., B. Schobert, H. T. Richter, J. P. Cartailler, and J. K. Lanyi. 1999. Structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 291:899–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shurki, A., M. Strajbl, C. N. Schutz, and A. Warshel. 2004. Electrostatic basis for bioenergetics. Methods Enzymol. 380:52–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES