Summary
Breakdown of the pollination barrier of self-incompatibility (SI) in older flowers, a phenomenon known as pseudo self-compatibility or transient SI, has been described as an advantageous reproductive assurance strategy that allows selfing after opportunities for out-crossing have been exhausted [1-9]. Pseudo self-compatibility is quite prevalent as a mixed mating strategy in nature, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are not known. We had previously shown that Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits cryptic natural variation for pseudo self-compatibility, which is uncovered by transformation of different accessions with SI specificity-determining SRK and SCR genes from its self-incompatible sister species A. lyrata [10-11]. Here, using this transgenic A. thaliana model, we show that pseudo self-compatibility is caused by a hypomorphic allele of PUB8, an S-locus linked gene encoding a previously uncharacterized ARM repeat- and U box-containing protein that regulates SRK transcript levels. This is the first gene underlying pseudo self-compatibility to be identified and the first report in which cryptic natural variation unveiled by a transgene enabled the cloning of a gene for a complex trait.
Results and Discussion
A. thaliana is a highly self-fertile species that has non-functional alleles of the S-locus receptor (SRK) and S-locus cysteine-rich protein (SCR) genes [12], which are, respectively, the stigma and pollen determinants of SI specificity in the Brassicaceae. In self-incompatible species, allele-specific interactions between SRK and SCR allow recognition of self pollen, activation of the receptor, and initiation of a signaling cascade that leads to rejection of self pollen at the stigma surface [13]. We previously showed that different geographical accessions of A. thaliana exhibited significant differences in the ability of their stigmas to sustain a strong SI response over the course of their development when transformed with SRK and SCR genes isolated from the Sb haplotype of self-incompatible A. lyrata [10, 11]. In C24, stigmas showed a strong SI phenotype that persisted throughout flower maturation and these plants did not set seed [11]. In contrast, in Col-0 and RLD, stigmas exhibited pseudo self-compatibility, with breakdown of SI at later stages of flower development resulting in full, albeit delayed, seed set [10,11]. Because these differences were observed in several independent SRKb-SCRb transformants and are independent of transgene insertion site or copy number (Experimental Procedures), they are due to polymorphisms among accessions.
Genetic analysis of a C24 SRKb-SCRb x RLD cross identified a recessive allele at one genetic locus as the major determinant of pseudo self-compatibility in RLD, with minor effects exerted by recessive alleles at other loci. Preliminary mapping using 138 F2 plants located this major-effect locus to chromosome 4 between marker g3883 and SSLP marker D (Figure 1A, Table S1 in the Supplemental Data available online). A major locus underlying pseudo self-compatibility in Col-0 was also mapped to the same region using 240 F2 plants from a C24 SRKb-SCRb x Col-0 cross. To eliminate the influence of minor-effect loci from the C24 SRKb-SCRb x RLD-derived population, a mapping population was created by selfing a recombinant inbred line (RIL) heterozygous for the major-effect locus. Fine-scale mapping using 3,210 plants delimited this locus to an interval that encompasses the relic A. thaliana S locus [12] (Figure 1B). In Col-0, this interval is 34.1 kb and contains 6 annotated open reading frames (ORFs), including ψSRK (At4g21370) and ψSCR sequences [12], a small inverted repeat of part of the ψSRK kinase domain (At4g21366), two transposon-related ORFs (At4g21360 and At4tg21363), and an armadilllo (ARM) repeat-/U box-containing ORF (At4g21350) (Figure 1B), all of which are also found in RLD. In C24, this genomic region is only 8.6 kb and lacks all of the aforementioned ORFs except At4g21350 (Figure 1B; [14]).
Figure 1.
- Mapping the target gene to a region of chromosome 4 within a BAC contig containing BAC T6K22, which spans the S locus. Molecular markers used for mapping are shown above the map (see Table S1 for amplification primers) along with the number of recombinant plants observed.
- Structural comparison of the S-locus region in Col-0 and C24, showing the annotated ORFs, the ψSRK and ψSCR sequences, and recombination breakpoints identified in fine mapping. The S haplotype of Col-0 and that of RLD, which has been determined to be very similar if not identical to Col-0 [14], are structurally very different from the C24 S haplotype as a result of deletions (ATREP3 helitron and LTR retrotransposon), a duplication (ARK3), and inter-haplotypic recombination (presence of ψSRK remnants of two distinct alleles ψSRK-A and ψSRK-C). The recombination breakpoint (R), which defines one limit of the mapped region, and the site of the large deletion in C24 (Δ), which is located 3,602 bp upstream of the At4g21350 coding region, are shown as landmarks for polymorphism studies. The DNA fragments 4K7 and 4K6 were derived from a C24 genomic clone and used for complementation of the pseudo self-compatibility trait.
- Nucleotide polymorphisms in the PUB8 coding region (thick line, with arrow indicating orientation) and 3,602 bp of 5' sequence (thin line) extending from the ATG initiating codon to deletion point Δ. Only variable nucleotides are shown, with numbers indicating positions relative to the “A” in the ATG initiating codon (position “1”, with positions upstream of the ATG depicted as negative numbers and positions within the coding region downstream of the ATG depicted as positive numbers). Polymorphisms that distinguish C24 from Col-0 and RLD (shaded residues) may represent sites underlying pseudo self-compatibility. Asterisks indicate two SNPs that create two transcription factor-binding sites unique to C24: one for Dof (PLACE ID: DOFCOREZM) and another for MYB (PLACE ID: MYBCORE) proteins.
A pseudo self-compatible (PSC) SRKb-SCRb recombinant inbred line (RIL200; Experimental Procedures) was transformed with C24-derived genomic fragments containing At4g21350 (4K7) or At4g21340 (4K6) as control (Figure 1B). While 4K6 transformants exhibited full seed set, 4K7 transformants exhibited phenotypes ranging from full to no seed set, likely due to positional effects and copy number of the transgenes. Self-pollinations of 13 randomly-chosen 4K7 transformants revealed reduced pollen tube growth on late-stage stigmas relative to PSC SRKb-SCRb plants and 4K6 controls (Figure S1). Microscopic analysis of self-pollinated stigmas in two transformants exhibiting pronounced reduction in seed set and one transformant that failed to set seed established that reduced seed set was due to an expansion of the window of SI expression into late-stage stigmas relative to PSC SRKb-SCRb plants (Figure 2). This trait co-segregated with the transgene (Table S2) in T2 progenies of primary transformants. Thus, At4g21350, also known as PLANT U-BOX8 (PUB8) [15, 16], is the gene responsible for the difference in age-dependent pseudo self-compatibility between RLD/Col-0 and C24.
Figure 2.

- Micrographs of self-pollinated stigmas of SRKb-SCRb plants from just-opened flowers (+1) and progressively older flowers (+2, +3, and +4). Pollinations were performed using pollen from mature flowers and stigmas from developing floral buds and flowers along an inflorescence. For all plants, reciprocal pollinations to SCRb-expressing and wild type plants established that stigmas and pollen were functional. SI: plants expressing developmentally stable SI; PSC: plants exhibiting age-dependent pseudo self-compatibility (breakdown of SI starting from stage +2 stigmas); TC-1 and TC-2: plants transformed with the PUB8C24 allele and exhibiting complete (TC-2) or partial (TC-1) complementation of pseudo self-compatibility.
- Quantitation of the SI response in developing stigmas from SI and PSC plants, and from three independent PUB8C24-complemented plants (TC-1, TC-2, TC-9). The number of pollen tubes formed per stigma is shown with standard errors.
- Seed setting in PSC and PUB8C24-complemented plants. Note the fully-expanded and seed-filled siliques of a PSC plant and the largely unexpanded (TC-1 and TC-2) or partially expanded (TC-9) siliques of PUB8C24-complemented plants.
Consistent with previous observations that At4g21350 and its A. lyrata orthologue exhibit much higher levels of nucleotide diversity than other loci [17, 18], as expected for genes tightly linked to the highly polymorphic S locus, the predicted PUB8C24 protein differs from PUB8RLD and PUB8Col-0 by 6 and 7 substitutions, respectively (Figure 1C and Figure S2). These polymorphisms are not responsible for differences in pseudo self-compatibility between C24 and RLD or Col-0, however. Sequence analysis of a recombinant (R378) recovered in our mapping population determined that the recombination breakpoint occurred between 1,175 bp and 1,695 bp upstream of the PUB8 initiating codon (Figures 1B and 1C), producing a chimeric segment consisting of the PUB8C24 protein-coding region and 5' sequences from RLD (Figures 1C and 3A). Because the R378 recombinant and its progenies were PSC, the polymorphisms underlying differences for age-dependent pseudo self-compatibility must lie within a 5.9-kb 5' non-coding region between the two recombination breakpoints R and A3 (Figures 1B and 1C).
Figure 3.
- (A) The recombination breakpoint that implicates the PUB8 5' region in pseudo self-compatibility. The PUB8 coding region and its orientation are depicted by pentagons. Sequences 5' and 3' of the coding region are indicated by stippled boxes for C24 and white boxes for RLD, and the vertical arrows bracket the segment containing the recombination breakpoint. The phenotypes of plants carrying the parental and recombinant (R378) chromosomes are shown.
- (B) Expression of PUB8 in A. thaliana and A. lyrata. The left panel shows PUB8 expression in A. thaliana roots (R), stem (S), leaves (L), flowers from which pistils were removed (F), and stigmas (St). The right panel shows PUB8 expression in A. lyrata leaves (L) and stigmas (St).
- (C-E) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of stigmas at representative stages of development (−2, +1, and +3). The levels of PUB8 and SRKb transcripts (with standard deviations based on three replicates) are compared between SI and PSC RILs (C and D), and between PSC RIL and PUB8C24-complemented TC-2 plants. The rapid development of flowers in A. thaliana and the need to pool stigmas for isolation of sufficient amounts of RNA produce unavoidable variability in relative transcript levels between samples.
- (G) Diverged structures of the A. thaliana and A. lyrata PUB8 and Brassica napus ARC1 proteins.
PUB8 is expressed ubiquitously (Figure 3B; transcriptional data at www.genevestigator.ethz.ch). It exhibits preferential expression in stigmas, especially in self-incompatible A. lyrata (Figure 3B). Previous genome-wide transcriptional profiling of A. thaliana stigmas [19] did not show PUB8 to be more highly expressed in the stigma epidermis relative to other stigma cells, however. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of stigmas revealed reduced PUB8 transcript levels in PSC stigmas relative to SI stigmas, particularly at late stages of development (Figure 3C). Furthermore, restoration of SI in PUB8C24-complemented stigmas was accompanied by increased PUB8 transcript levels (Figure 3D). These results suggest that PUB8 gene expression may be limiting in PSC stigmas, consistent with the change from developmentally stable SI to pseudo self-compatibility being effected by modulation of PUB8 gene expression. Another example of a spontaneous mutation to partial self-compatibility caused by reduced gene expression was previously described in Brassica [20]. For PUB8, the reduced expression associated with pseudo self-compatibility might result from nucleotide substitutions in 5' cis-regulatory sequences that distinguish RLD and Col-0 from C24, or from the influence of retroelement and helitron sequences that are found in RLD and Col-0 but are missing in C24 (Figures 1B and 1C).
Interestingly, at the early −2 and +1 stages, the stigmas of PSC plants also expressed reduced levels of SRKb transcripts relative to the stigmas of SI plants (Figure 3E) and SRKb transcripts were increased concomitant with increased PUB8 transcripts in PUB8C24-complemented stigmas (Figure 3F). However, no significant differences were observed in PUB8 and SRKb transcript levels between PSC and PUB8C24-complemented stigmas at the late +3 stage (i.e. when SI breaks down in PSC stigmas), presumably because by this stage stigmas would have already accumulated PUB8 and SRKb proteins to the levels necessary for sustained inhibition of self pollen. Taken together, these results suggest that PUB8 regulates the levels of SRKb transcripts and that the breakdown of SI associated with reduced PUB8 expression is due in large part to reduced SRKb mRNA causing sub-optimal levels of SRKb protein at late stages of stigma development. PUB8 action cannot be specific to SRKb, however. Because expression of the SRKb transgene in A. thaliana C24 stigmas is a faithful recapitulation of SRKb expression in its native A. lyrata Sb stigma context, PUB8 must rather function as a general regulator of endogenous SRK transcript levels in the stigmas of self-incompatible Arabidopsis species.
Plant U-box proteins function in hormone signaling, defense, and cell death [21-24], but little is known about how they effect these biological roles [25]. The presence of a U-box domain having all of the canonical residues of functional U-box E3 ligases [15, 16] (Figure 3G and Figure S2) suggests that PUB8 functions in ubiquitination, while its ARM repeats suggest that it interacts with other proteins [20]. PUB8 might regulate SRKb transcript levels indirectly by ubiquitinating a factor required for transcription or for transcript stability, either causing its degradation or resulting in its subcellular redistribution [26]. In Brassica napus, the U-box/ARM protein ARC1 (BnARC1) is an E3 ligase that interacts with the SRK kinase domain and has been proposed to cause the degradation of a negative regulator of SI or of a factor required for successful pollen tube growth [27-29]. PUB8 differs from BnARC1 and its most closely related A. thaliana homolog At1g29340/PUB17 [15, 16] in several respects. PUB8 and BnARC1 share only ∼25% amino-acid sequence identity; PUB8 lacks the UND domain (Figure 4 and Figure S2), which in BnARC1 contains a functional nuclear localization signal, a coil-coil domain, and a leucine zipper domain [29]; PUB8 is expressed in all tissues analyzed (Figure 3A), unlike BnARC1, which is expressed specifically in stigmas [27]; and PUB8 does not interact with the SRKb kinase domain in yeast two-hybrid assays (data not shown). Thus, PUB8 represents a novel U-box/ARM repeat protein required for SI.
The location of PUB8 gene at the S locus of Arabidopsis species is intriguing. There are few if any known examples of tight genetic linkage between a regulatory gene and its target. Furthermore, because of reduced recombination in the S-locus region, a mutation at a modifier locus tightly linked to the SI recognition genes is likely to have a significant impact on the distribution of S haplotypes in natural populations. Indeed, the S haplotype carried by RLD and Col-0 is the most prevalent in the species [11, 17]. While maintenance of SI requires that matched alleles of the SRK and SCR genes remain in strict linkage disequilibrium, no such requirement dictates the linkage of other SI-related genes to each other or to the S locus. Indeed, the Brassica S locus, which occurs in a genomic context different from that in Arabidopsis species, is not flanked by a PUB8-like gene [30]. Although the linkage of PUB8 to the Arabidopsis S locus may be fortuitous, it is tempting to speculate that the SRK-SCR-PUB8 cluster represents a relic of a larger ancestral S locus that included not only the SI self-recognition genes but also other genes required for SI. Genes of this hypothetical SI supergene cluster would have subsequently been dispersed to different chromosomal locations by divergent genome rearrangements in the Brassica and Arabidopsis lineages.
Another intriguing question is whether PUB8-mediated pseudo self-compatibility produced a transitional phase of mixed mating in the evolutionary switch from out-crossing to inbreeding in the A. thaliana lineage, at least in some populations. This question is particularly important in view of empirical data [11, 14] and population genetic considerations [31] that do not support a previously-proposed view [17] of the switch to self-fertility as resulting from a complete loss of SI effected by a selective sweep of the Col-0 ψSCR1 allele (Figure 1B). There is increasing evidence for multiple origins of self-fertility in A. thaliana [14]. Because the S-locus recognition genes are the primary determinants of the out-crossing mode of mating, they are major targets of selection for self-fertility. Our results suggest that these genes were targeted directly via their mutational inactivation in some A. thaliana populations (e.g. C24) and indirectly via mutations at modifier loci that affect their expression, such as PUB8, in other populations. Using an SSLP marker (Table S1) within PUB8 5' sequences that distinguishes PUB8C24 from PUB8RLD/Col-0, we found that the PUB8RLD/Col-0 allele occurs in approximately one-third of 86 accessions tested (Table S3), including Mt-0, Nd-0, and Ws-0, all of which exhibit pseudo self-compatibility when transformed with SRKb-SCRb [11] (Table 1). Furthermore, the PUB8RLD/Col-0 allele is not restricted to the S haplotype found in Col-0 and RLD, but it also occurs in combination with the other two A. thaliana S haplotypes identified to date [14, 17]. Examination of SRKb-SCRb transformants in more accessions will be required to determine if the wide geographical distribution of PUB8RLD/Col-0 reflects a historic selective advantage of this allele.
Table 1.
Association of PUB8C24 and PUB8RLD/Col-0 alleles with self-incompatibility and pseudo self-incompatibility, respectively, in SRKb-SCRb transgenic plants of different A. thaliana accessions
| Accession | ABRC number | PUB8 allele | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|
| C24 | CS22620 | PUB8C24 | SI |
| RLD | CS913 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
| Col-0 | CS22625 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
| WS-0 | CS22623 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
| Mt-0 | CS6799 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
| Nd-1 | CS22619 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
| No | CS1394 | PUB8RLD/Col-0 | PSC |
The PUB8C24 and PUB8RLD/Col-0 alleles were identified using SSLP marker C (Table S1).
The PUB8 protein and its yet-to-be identified targets are clearly important determinants of a stable SI phenotype. Despite decades of intensive study in naturally self-incompatible species, PUB8 is the first gene underlying pseudo self-compatibility to be cloned in any species. The cloning of this gene underscores the value of using the transgenic A. thaliana SRKb-SCRb model and the cryptic natural variation it unveils for identifying novel factors required for SI and understanding how the SI response is orchestrated and maintained.
Experimental Procedures
Plant growth, pollinations, genetic analysis, and mapping
A. thaliana plants were grown at 22°C, 16 hour light/8 hour dark. A C24 SRKb-SCRb plant was crossed to wild type RLD and to wild type Col-0. The self-incompatible, kanamycin-resistant, and SRKb-SCRb containing F1 plants were subjected to forced self-pollination in immature buds before stigmas acquired the ability to reject self pollen. Kanamycin-resistant F2 plants segregated for SI and pseudo self-compatibility, as determined by pollination assays performed on pollen-free stigmas of developing floral buds and flowers [10, 11].
RILs homozygous for the SRKb–SCRb transgenes and heterozygous for the target locus were generated from the C24 SRKb-SCRb x RLD cross by repeated forced self-pollination for 8 generations. The progenies of one of these RILs were used for fine mapping of the major-effect locus underlying pseudo self-compatibility, and a PSC RIL, designated RIL200, was used for complementation with the PUB8C24 gene. Furthermore, RIL200 was also crossed to an untransformed C24 plant. All F1 plants derived from this cross exhibited developmentally stable SI, providing further evidence that pseudo self-compatibility is not caused by the position or copy number of the SRKb-SCRb transgenes.
DNA analysis
Genomic DNA was prepared from leaves [32] and analyzed by PCR using newly-generated markers (Table S1). The distribution of PUB8Rld/Col-0 and PUB8C24 alleles was analyzed using SSLP marker C (Table S3). The PLACE database [33] (http://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/index.html) was queried with PUB8 5' sequences for cis-acting regulatory motifs that distinguish PUB8C24 from PUB8RLD and PUB8Col-0.
Isolation of PUB8C24 fragments and complementation of the PSC trait
A λDASH II genomic library constructed from C24 DNA was screened using a PUB8 probe amplified from Col-0 DNA. For complementation of pseudo self-compatibility, the insert from a PUB8-positive clone (λ4) was used to generate two subclones (4K6 and 4K7, Figure 1) in pCAMBIA1300, which were introduced into A. thaliana by the floral dip method [10].
Because seed set is not correlated with reduced strength of SI when the number of germinated pollen tubes exceeds the number of available ovules, expansion of the SI window was assessed by self-pollination assays in randomly chosen PUB8C24-containing primary transformants. Subsequently, two lines exhibiting reduced seed set and one line with no seed were selected for detailed association studies of the phenotype and transgene. The observed variability in strength of complementation is consistent with similar studies of other plant genes, especially those underlying natural variation [34].
RNA analysis
Fifty stigmas were dissected from buds/flowers at different stages of development and combined into −2, +1, and +3 pools. Total RNA (1 μg) from each pool was reverse-transcribed using oligo(dT) primers and SuperScriptII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and subjected to quantitative real time RT-PCR using PUB8-specific primers and SRKb primers flanking the SRKb first intron (Table S1). Because the PUB8 gene lacks introns, total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNAse I and the effectiveness of DNase-treatment was confirmed by RT-PCR using intron-flanking primers for actin (Table S1) and no-reverse transcriptase control. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR green fluorescence and the iCycler iQ5 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The relative amount of transcripts, calculated from three replicates using the comparative CT (theshold cycle) method and normalized to the endogenous reference UBC (Table S1) and relative to a calibrator (any one of the samples), is given by 2−ΔΔCT, where ΔΔCT=[CT(PUB8 or SRKb)-CT(UBC)]-[CT(calibrator)-CT(UBC)].
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Michael Scanlon for use of the iQ5 real-time PCR detection system, Robert J. Elshire for help and advice with real-time PCR, and Fouad Zakharia for assistance with screening A. thaliana accessions. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. 0414521 and National Institutes of Health Grant No. GM057527.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert C. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating in plants: Occurrence, theory and empirical observations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. & System. 2005;36:47–79. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nasrallah ME, Wallace DH. The influence of modifier genes on the intensity and stability of self-incompatibility in cabbage. Euphytica. 1968;17:495–503. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levin DA. The evolutionary significance of pseudo-self-fertility. Am. Naturalist. 1996;148:321–332. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Good-Avila SV, Stephenson AG. The inheritance of modifiers conferring self-fertility in the partially self-incompatible perennial, Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae) Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution. 2002;56:263–722. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barrett SCH. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Rev. Genetics. 2002;4:274–284. doi: 10.1038/nrg776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vallejo-Marin M, Uyenoyama MK. On the evolutionary costs of self-incompatibility: incomplete reproductive compensation due to pollen limitation. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution. 2004;58:1924–1935. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brennan AC, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. Modes and rates of selfing and associated inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible plant Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species in the British Isles. New Phytol. 2005;168:475–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mable BK, Robertson AV, Dart S, Di Berardo C, Witham L. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in the perennial Arabidopsis lyrata (Brassicaceae) and its genetic consequences. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution. 2005;9:1437–1448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalisz S, Vogler DW, Hanley KM. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature. 2004;430:884–887. doi: 10.1038/nature02776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nasrallah ME, Liu P, Nasrallah JB. Generation of self-incompatible Arabidopsis thaliana by transfer of two S locus genes from A. lyrata. Science. 2002;297:247–249. doi: 10.1126/science.1072205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nasrallah ME, Liu P, Sherman-Broyles S, Boggs NA, Nasrallah JB. Natural variation in expression of self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana: implications for the evolution of selfing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:16070–16074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406970101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kusaba M, Dwyer K, Hendershot J, Vrebalov J, Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME. Self-incompatibility in the genus Arabidopsis: characterization of the S locus in the outcrossing A. lyrata and its autogamous relative A. thaliana. Plant Cell. 2001;13:627–643. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nasrallah JB. Recognition and rejection of self in plant self-incompatibility: comparisons to animal histocompatibility. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:412–418. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sherman-Broyles S, Boggs N, Farkas A, Liu P, Vrebalov J, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. S-locus genes and the evolution of self-fertility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048199. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Azevedo C, Santos-Rosa MJ, Shirasu K. The U-box protein family in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:354–358. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)01960-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mudgil Y, Shiu SH, Stone SL, Salt JN, Goring DR. A large complement of the predicted Arabidopsis ARM repeat proteins are members of the U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase family. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:59–66. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.029553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shimizu KK, Cork JM, Caicedo AL, Mays CA, Moore RC, Olsen KM, Ruzsa S, Coop G, Bustamante CD, Awadalla P, Purugganan MD. Darwinian selection on a selfing locus. Science. 2004;306:2081–2084. doi: 10.1126/science.1103776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hagenblad J, Bechsgaard J, Charlesworth D. Linkage disequilibrium between incompatibility locus region genes in the plant Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics. 2006;173:1057–1073. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.055780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tung CW, Dwyer KG, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. Genome-wide identification of genes expressed in Arabidopsis pistils specifically along the path of pollen tube growth. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:977–989. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nasrallah ME. Genetic control of quantitative variation in self-incompatibility proteins detected by immunodiffusion. Genetics. 1974;76:45–50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Amador V, Monte E, Garcia-Martinez JL, Prat S. Gibberellins signal nuclear import of PHOR1, a photoperiod-responsive protein with homology to Drosophila armadillo. Cell. 2001;106:343–354. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zeng LR, Qu S, Bordeos A, Yang C, Baraoidan M, Yan H, Xie Q, Nahm BH, Leung H, Wang GL. Spotted leaf11, a negative regulator of plant cell death and defense, encodes a U-box/armadillo repeat protein endowed with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2795–2808. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.025171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gonzalez-Lamothe R, Tsitsigiannis DI, Ludwig AA, Panicot M, Shirasu K, Jones JD. The U-box protein CMPG1 is required for efficient activation of defense mechanisms triggered by multiple resistance genes in tobacco and tomato. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1067–1083. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.040998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang CW, Gonzalez-Lamothe R, Ewa RA, Rowland O, Yoshioka H, Shenton M, Ye H, O'Donnell E, Jones JD, Sadanandom A. The E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of Arabidopsis PLANT U-BOX17 and its functional tobacco homolog ACRE276 are required for cell death and defense. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1084–1098. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Samuel MA, Salt JN, Shiu S-H, Goring DR. Multifunctional arm repeat domains in plants. Intern. Rev. Cytol. 2006;253:1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(06)53001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schnell JD, Hicke L. Non-traditional functions of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:35857–35860. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300018200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gu T, Mazzurco M, Sulaman W, Matias DD, Goring DR. Binding of a novel arm repeat protein to the kinase domain of the S-locus receptor kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:382–387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stone SL, Arnoldo M, Goring DR. A breakdown of Brassica self-incompatibility in ARC1 antisense transgenic plants. Science. 1999;286:1729–1731. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stone SL, Anderson EM, Mullen RT, Goring DR. ARC1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and promotes the ubiquitination of proteins during the rejection of self-incompatible Brassica pollen. Plant Cell. 2003;15:885–898. doi: 10.1105/tpc.009845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Conner JA, Conner P, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. Comparative mapping of the Brassica S locus region and its homeolog in Arabidopsis. Implications for the evolution of mating systems in the Brassicaceae. Plant Cell. 1998;10:801–812. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.5.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Charlesworth D, Vekemans X. How and when did Arabidopsis thaliana become highly self-fertilising. Bioessays. 2005;27:472–4766. doi: 10.1002/bies.20231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Konieczny A, Ausubel FM. A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 1993;4:403–410. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:297–300. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong b., Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000;289:85–88. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


