Abstract
The organizer, the signaling center that specifies vertebrate axial polarity and the nervous system, is a dorsal midline mesodermal domain in the gastrula that will form prechordal plate and anterior notochord. We show that in zebrafish the organizer is not a single domain when it first arises in the nascent mesoderm at the onset of gastrulation. Rather, in the presumptive prechordal plate region, the organizer is subdivided into two side-by-side cellular fields. Within minutes, concurrent medial and anterior cellular movements merge, or ‘coalesce’, the two fields to form the well-known singular midline field. Coalescence forms a symmetrical domain because the cell movements on the left and right sides initiate simultaneously, and occur synchronously. However in embryos with reduced function of the T-box transcription factor Tbx16 (Spadetail), or its genetic target Paraxial protocadherin (Papc), synchrony is lost, coalesence is disrupted, and the midline domain is misshaped. Furthermore, with combined loss of Tbx16 and Wnt11 (Silberblick), coalesence is essentially absent. Possibly as a consequence, both the anterior movement of presumptive prechordal plate and organizer function, as assayed by eye-field separation, are disrupted. Our findings thus reveal that Tbx16, in combination with Wnt11, are critical components not only in morphogenesis but also in initial assembly of the organizer.
Keywords: gastrulation, T-box transcription factors, planar cell polarity
Introduction
Germ layer development in a vertebrate occurs during gastrulation, with cells that will form endoderm and mesoderm segregating internally to prospective ectoderm to occupy deep regions of the embryo. Among the first cells to internalize are dorsal midline cells of the organizer, a critical region discovered in classical grafting experiments to specify embryonic polarity and dorsal tissue fates, including the central nervous system (Spemann, 1924) and which we now understand to function by releasing extracellular signaling molecules including BMP antagonists (Solnica-Krezel, 2005). Organizer activity is focused in cells that will develop a transient axial head mesodermal domain, the prechordal plate. Therefore, characterizing prechordal plate morphogenesis and formation, and their control, provides essential background for understanding the global patterning of the embryo.
Results and Discussion
Presumptive Prechordal Plate Formation Involves Coalescence of Two Apposed Domains
In the zebrafish, the presumptive prechordal plate internalizes at the dorsal margin of the blastoderm prior to the formation of a structure called the shield, a thickening of cells on the dorsal aspect of the embryo that represents one of the first overt signs of gastrulation (Kimmel et al., 1995). We observed that the presumptive prechordal plate forms not from a single domain of cells at the midline, as previously had been assumed, but from two domains (Fig. 1). Early expression of the prechordal plate marker gsc was frequently manifested as two apposed, oblong marginal domains (Fig. 1B). Examining the live embryo with Nomarski DIC optics, we observed a demarcation, or boundary, approximately at the midline, where cells of the left and right side of the presumptive prechordal plate lined up in apposition. The demarcation (arrowhead, Fig. 1C) persisted for approximately 5 minutes after which the internalized field of cells appeared uniform. To characterize the cellular rearrangements during this period, we fluorescently labelled cell membranes and made time-lapse recordings with which we could track movements of presumptive prechordal plate cells in 3 dimensions (Fig. 1D–F, and Movie 1 in Supporting Information). Newly internalized cells make two separate inward bulges into underlying yolk syncytial layer (Fig. 1D). The cells transiently line up at the midline to form the demarcation (Fig. 1E), which is then erased by medial and anterior cell movement (Fig. 1E, F). Therefore, assembly of the zebrafish organizer involves the merging of two side by side populations of presumptive prechordal plate cells into one domain just following the onset of gastrulation. We refer to the merging process as coalescence.
Tbx16 is required for synchronous anterior and medial movement across the dorsal midline
How is the process of coalescence regulated? We find that in embryos with severe loss of function of the T-box transcription factor Tbx16 (Spadetail), morphogenesis accompanying coalescence is highly abnormal. A role of Tbx16 in prechordal plate morphogenesis has not been reported until now, however previous work has shown that tbx16 is expressed in presumptive prechordal plate cells beginning in the blastula, and that its function is required in the late blastula for dorsal cells (putative prechordal plate and notochord precursors) to undergo compaction and acquire extensive cell-to-cell contacts (Warga and Nusslein-Volhard, 1998).
Complementing these reports, we observe that tbx16 mutants, or embryos injected with a tbx16 morpholino (MO), frequently displayed prominent asymmetry of the newly internalized prechordal plate. In time-lapse recordings, the wild-type presumptive prechordal plate shows mirror-image symmetry across the midline, before (Fig. 2A, Movie 2), during, and after (Fig. 2C) coalescence. In contrast, Fig.s 2B and D (Movie 3) are from a recording of a tbx16 mutant in which the left side of the presumptive prechordal plate is several cell diameters broader than the right side. The same defect is apparent in embryos in which the presumptive prechordal plate is specifically labeled with a gsc-GFP transgene; we observe a symmetric prechordal plate domain soon after internalization in the wild type (Fig. 2E), and an asymmetric one in the tbx16 mutant or tbx16 MO-treated embryo (Fig. 2F). In the example shown, the more anteriorly positioned field of labelling is on the right side, in contrast to the case in Fig. 2C where it is on the left. We did not observe any consistent left or right sidedness to the aberrant expression pattern. Because we observe asymmetry in the null tbx16 mutant (which of course lacks functional Tbx16 in all cells), the asymmetry phenotype cannot be accounted for simply by heterogenous knockdown of function, which might possibly occur in morphants.
The more anteriorly-positioned side of the asymmetrical domain was consistently larger than the opposite, more posterior one, suggesting that the initiation of anteriorly-directed movements of the internalized presumptive prechordal plate cells occur asynchronously on the two sides. We tracked individual cells through the period of coalescence to examine this possibility directly. We observed that normally, following internalization, nearly all presumptive prechordal plate cells exhibit directional medial and anterior movement (Fig. 2G; such directed tracks color-coded blue for clarity of presentation). In the tbx16 MO-treated embryo shown in Fig. 2H, the left side of the presumptive prechordal plate initiated anterior movement before the right. On the left (advanced) side, most of the cell movements were directional, comparable to the uninjected control. Strikingly, only a fraction of the cells on the right (delayed) side exhibited the same behaviour. Aberrantly moving cells (color-coded red) meandered non-directionally during at least the early part of the recording. Some of these aberrant cells recovered directional anterior movement during the recording period, others did not. Thus, we conclude that Tbx16 function is required for the synchronous initiation of coherent, directional cell movement on the two sides of the presumptive prechordal plate during coalescence. We note that synchronous movement does not necessarily imply that the left and right sides communicate with one another. Instead, with the presence of Tbx16 function, the movements could simply be regulated with high fidelity, making the timing of coalescence very precise.
Papc Mediates the Regulatory Function of Tbx16 in Presumptive Prechordal Plate Morphogenesis
Failure of coherent directed movement might be due to loss of adhesive contacts (Gumbiner, 2005) and/or signaling interactions among prechordal plate cells, and a candidate that could mediate both functions is Paraxial protocadherin (Papc), a genetic target of tbx16 (Yamamoto et al., 1998) and a homophilic adhesion molecule (Kim et al., 1998). In Xenopus laevis, Xpapc is necessary for polarized movements of explanted mesodermal cells, and signals through RhoA to mediate separation behaviour in explanted tissue (Medina et al., 2004; Unterseher et al., 2004). Mutations in papc are unavailable, and to carry out loss-of-function analyses we used a dominant negative construct (dn-papc) that lacks both transmembrane and intracellular domains and thus forms a secreted peptide (Yamamoto et al., 1998). In a subset of embryos injected with a low dose of dn-papc, gsc expression in the early gastrula was both closer to the margin than in controls and the expression domain was asymmetrically shaped, phenocopying the defect described above with loss of Tbx16 (Fig. 3A, B). Reducing Papc function more severely, with a higher dose of dn-papc causes substantially more severe mispatterning of gsc expression, in fact the reduction is more substantial than when Tbx16 function itself is eliminated (quantification in Supporting Fig. 1). These findings show that Papc is necessary for proper cell movements of the presumptive prechordal plate, but do not explain why movement is asynchronous with loss of Tbx16. Furthermore, it is unclear why the loss of Papc phenotype is more severe than loss of Tbx16, because previous work demonstrated that papc expression and function requires Tbx16 during gastrulation (Yamamoto et al., 1998). Neither partial function nor maternal contribution of Tbx16 can resolve this issue because we used a null allele of tbx16 and tbx16 mRNA is not maternally supplied (Griffin et al., 1998). However, because Lim family transcription factors initiate papc expression in mouse and frog, (Hukriede et al., 2003) we considered the possibility that papc expression might be initiated independently of Tbx16, by examining papc expression in the tbx16 mutant.
In agreement with Yamamoto et al. (1998), we find that Tbx16 is required for papc expression following the onset of gastrulation (data not shown). However, at the time of earliest expression in the late blastula, papc expression was indistinguishable among embryos derived from a clutch of heterozygous tbx16 parents, among which 1/4 are expected to be mutant (data not shown). Therefore, a factor in addition to Tbx16 must be prominently involved in the initiation of papc expression. Within ten minutes of the expression of the earliest transcripts (about 15 minutes before internalization begins), 76% of the embryos (38/50) strongly expressed papc around the margin (Fig. 3C), whereas 24% of the embryos (12/50), the putative tbx16 homozygotes, displayed weak, patchy expression, that frequently was asymmetric, stronger on one side of the midline than the other (Fig. 3D). The level of gsc expression was not reduced in tbx16 mutants at this stage (data not shown), arguing that the loss of papc expression was not due to cell loss, but to misregulation of transcription.
Hence early expression defects of papc correlate with, and we propose, cause incoherent, nonuniform cell movement and disrupted coalescence in tbx16 mutants. This hypothesis predicts that following internalization, in tbx16 mutants in which anterior movement is asymmetric, we should observe papc expression to be asymmetric as well, with the side showing higher papc expression consistently advanced farther anteriorly than the side with low papc expression. We tested this prediction by examining papc expression in embryos about 35 minutes after the onset of presumptive prechordal plate internalization. Expression in tbx16 mutants at this stage is patchy and substantially reduced in comparison to wild type (Fig. 3D, E, 24/98 embryos from a clutch of tbx16 heterozygous parents displayed reduced papc expression). Supporting our hypothesis, in mutants where expression of papc is substantially greater on one side of the dorsal margin than the other, the side with greater expression was advanced farther anteriorly than the cells on the weakly expressing side (n=8/24; 16/24 mutants did not have a recognizable left-right bias in expression, consistent with our earlier observation that not all tbx16 mutants display asymmetric emergence of the presumptive prechordal plate). We did not observe embryos displaying the converse phenotype, greater anterior displacement on the side with weak papc expression (n=0/24). Thus, we argue that Tbx16 plays a critical function in the coherent initiation of directed anterior and medial movement of presumptive prechordal plate cells by regulation of full expression of papc.
Loss of Both Tbx16 and Wnt11 Blocks Coalescence Nearly Completely and Disrupts Organizer Function
Whereas loss of Tbx16 substantially disturbs early morphogenesis of the presumptive prechordal plate, coalesence nevertheless occurs, albeit abnormally. Following the onset of gastrulation, the prechordal plate domain advances anteriorly more slowly than in wild-type embryos, and is broader, as judged by expression of gsc (Fig. 4A, B; quantified in Supporting Fig. 1). The expression domain often remained asymmetrically shaped at this stage in tbx16 MO-treated embryos. In addition, we observe that gsc is downregulated in posterior prechordal plate cells in tbx16- embryos and tbx16-MO embryos, similar to what has been reported for pitx2c expression at mid-gastrulation (Essner et al., 2000). By the end of gastrulation, morphogenesis has apparently regulated, for we were not able to detect any difference in the position or shape of the gsc expression domain between wild types and tbx16 mutants (Fig. 4E, F). After another twelve hours of development when the primary organs have formed, eye field separation, a read-out of proper prechordal plate movement (Ulrich et al., 2003), appeared normal (Fig. 4I, J; quantified in Supporting Fig. 2).
Another protein, Wnt11 (Silberblick), is known to play a critical signalling function during prechordal plate morphogenesis (Ulrich et al., 2003; Ulrich et al., 2005). Surprisingly, we observed no defect in coalescence in wnt11 mutants or MO-treated embryos, even though presumptive prechordal plate cells lacking Wnt11 move more slowly and are less directed than in the wild-type (Ulrich et al., 2003), as we confirm for the early gastrula. In particular, we observe that in wnt11 mutants the gsc expression domain is broad and nearer the margin than in wild-type or tbx16 MO-treated embryos (Fig. 4C). Unlike the tbx16 mutant, we do not observe recovery by the end of gastrulation in the wnt11 mutant. Instead, the prechordal plate remains short and wide relative to wild type (Fig. 4G), as previously described (Heisenberg et al., 2000). In the 1-day embryo the eyes are not well separated (Fig. 4K); a characteristic wnt11− phenotype revealing defective organizer function due to disrupted prechordal plate morphogenesis (Marlow et al., 1998).
Strikingly, a substantially more severe phenotype arises when function of both Tbx16 and Wnt11 are lost in the same embryo than when the function of each is lost separately. At the same early gastrula stage when anterior advance of the prechordal domain can readily be appreciated with loss of either function singly, losing both Tbx16 and Wnt11 results in a wide gsc expression domain positioned just at the margin, resembling the early expression pattern we see prior to coalescence in the wild type (Fig. 4D, compare with Fig. 1B). By the end of gastrulation, in tbx16−; wnt11− embryos, we observe a significant gap between the gsc expression domain and the anterior edge of the neural plate (marked by expression of dlx3b), indicating that the prechordal plate is posteriorly mispositioned in the double mutants (Fig. 4H). gsc expression appears as two strongly stained lateral domains with weak expression in the midline (Fig. 4H), rather than as the singular midline domain observed in wild types and the single mutants (Fig. 4E–G). We suggest that the weak midline expression means that the early coalescence movements had almost completely failed, resulting in two, largely separate fields of gsc expressing cells throughout gastrulation, an interpretation supported by time-lapse analysis (Movie 4).
Furthermore, in the 24 hpf tbx16−; wnt11− double mutant, there is a dramatic enhancement of the wnt11− single mutant eye field separation defect (Fig. 4L; also see quantification in Supporting Fig. 2), revealing a previously uncharacterized role of Tbx16 in eye field separation. A function of Tbx16 in head mesoderm morphogenesis following coalescence seems unlikely because the pattern of gsc expression in tbx16 mutants recovers to that of wild type at the end of gastrulation. Our collective data set suggests that the role of Tbx16 in organizing the organizer is in fact the regulation of Papc-mediated coalesence at gastrulation onset.
In this study, we sought to understand how the organizer region of the zebrafish embryo arises morphogenetically. We show that deep cells within the organizer, the presumptive prechordal plate cells, become a singular field after initially being composed of two domains, and that Tbx16 and its genetic target, Papc, are necessary for this to occur properly. We call the merging process coalescence and show that coalescence depends on the combined activity of Tbx16 and Wnt11. Biochemical studies have recently demonstrated that Xpapc and the Wnt receptor, Fz, physically interact and signal through common downstream effectors (Medina et al., 2004). Therefore, by blocking the function of Tbx16, Papc, and Wnt11 in the zebrafish presumptive prechordal plate, we may disrupt signalling through a conserved set of morphogenetically critical downstream effectors. Alternatively, Tbx16, Papc, and Wnt11 may signal in parallel through distinct downstream targets. Future studies will be needed to distinguish between these two possibilities. This recent work also showed that the combined loss of Xpapc and Fz leads to a dramatic failure of explanted X. laevis tissue to undergo cell intercalation, behaviour which is necessary for proper elongation of the notochord (Medina et al., 2004; Unterseher et al., 2004). Thus, the interaction of the non-canonical Wnt pathway and Papc is critical for morphogenesis not only in the zebrafish presumptive prechordal plate, but in other developmental contexts as well.
An unresolved question in this study is how do the two distinct coalescing domains originate? It has been proposed that the Nodal signalling pathway prevents cells at the dorsal margin from taking on neural fates, thus promoting the internalization of mesendodermal precursors (Dougan et al., 2003). Are Nodal signals and the establishment of the two initially distinct prechordal plate domains somehow related? For example, might there be a Nodal inhibitor at the precise midline position (overlying the future demarcation) that initially blocks the internalization of cells at this location? Alternatively, might a source of Nodal signal emanate from cells adjacent to the midline? In this model, the prospective future mesendodermal cells positioned at the midline would receive lower levels of Nodal signal than cells closer to the laterally positioned source, and hence would be the least likely to internalize (because Nodal is thought to promote internalization.) The presence of a source of Nodal signal on either side of the midline is supported by the observation that in mutants with reduced Nodal activity, gsc expression, which is dependent on Nodal signals, is often observed as two distinct, weakly expressing domains adjacent to the midline at a time when mesendodermal cells are beginning to internalize, unlike wild type in which gsc is expressed as a solid midline domain (Dougan et al., 2003). Testing the validity of these two models will be an exciting future challenge.
Experimental Procedures
Staging
Early gastrulation embryos were staged as follows: embryos at the sphere to dome (S-D) transition (Kimmel et al., 1995) were isolated and used for experiments at set time points after the transition. Thus, the notation, S-D 0:45, indicates 45 minutes after the sphere to dome transition, for example. We include corresponding percent epiboly stages from (Kimmel et al., 1995) for reference; however, because these standard stages represent windows of developmental time lasting several minutes, rather than discrete time points in development, different S-D times can fall within a single standard epiboly classification.
Recordings and 4D Analysis
Recordings were made as previously described (Glickman et al., 2003) with the exception that we used a Zeiss LSM Pascal confocal microscope. We tracked cells in an h2a-GFP transgenic strain which allowed us to readily distinguish adjacent cells by the nuclear GFP expression. We also tracked cells using FM4-64 labeled embryos. Tracks were made with the polyline tool in Zeiss LSM Image Browser software.
Membrane labelling using FM4-64
Membranes were labeled using FM4-64 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). For recordings, FM4-64 was diluted (1ug/uL) in DMSO. Approximately 20 minutes prior to imaging, FM4-64 was injected into the animal pole with special care being taken not to inject into the yolk but also to enter the enveloping layer (EVL). FM4-64 diffused rapidly throughout the embryo and remained predominantly membrane-localized for approximately 3 hours following injection. After this period, staining was observed primarily as punctate dots within the cell; these are likely internalized vesicles.
Morpholino and mRNA injections
To facilitate time-lapse analysis of embryos lacking Tbx16, we used morpholino antisense oligonucleotides (MOs) which, in our hands, completely abolish expression of Tbx16 antigen when viewed in whole mount immunocytochemistry. Tbx16-MO was injected as previously described (Tribulo et al., 2003). wnt11-MO sequence was 5′-ACTCCAGTGAAGTTTTTCCACAACG-3′. dn-papc mRNA injection were performed as previously reported (Yamamoto et al., 1998), using the following RNA concentrations [50 pg/embryo=(lo); 250 pg/embryo=(hi)].
In situ hybridization and antibody staining
in situ hybridization and Ntl antibody staining was performed as previously described (Amacher et al., 2002).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marnie Halpern and Gage Crump for transgenic zebrafish lines and Carl-Philipp Heisenberg for constructs. We wish to express our sincerest thanks to Gage Crump, Judith Eisen and Bruce Bowerman for valuable comments during the preparation of this manuscript. John Dowd provided expert animal care. JBM was supported by an NIH Developmental Biology Training Grant (5T32HD07348). The research was funded by NIH Grant HD22486.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Reference List
- Amacher SL, Draper BW, Summers BR, Kimmel CB. The zebrafish T-box genes no tail and spadetail are required for development of trunk and tail mesoderm and medial floor plate. Development. 2002;129:3311–3323. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.14.3311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dougan ST, Warga RM, Kane DA, Schier AF, Talbot WS. The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm. Development. 130:1837–1851. doi: 10.1242/dev.00400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essner JJ, Branford WW, Zhang J, Yost HJ. Mesendoderm and left-right brain, heart and gut development are differentially regulated by pitx2 isoforms. Development. 2000;127:1081–1093. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.5.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glickman NS, Kimmel CB, Jones MA, Adams RJ. Shaping the zebrafish notochord. Development. 2003;130:873–887. doi: 10.1242/dev.00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffin KJ, Amacher SL, Kimmel CB, Kimelman D. Molecular identification of spadetail: regulation of zebrafish trunk and tail mesoderm formation by T-box genes. Development. 1998;125:3379–3388. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.17.3379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gumbiner BM. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:622–634. doi: 10.1038/nrm1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heisenberg CP, Tada M, Rauch GJ, Saude L, Concha ML, Geisler R, Stemple DL, Smith JC, Wilson SW. Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 2000;405:76–81. doi: 10.1038/35011068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hukriede NA, Tsang TE, Habas R, Khoo PL, Steiner K, Weeks DL, Tam PP, Dawid IB. Conserved requirement of Lim1 function for cell movements during gastrulation. Dev Cell. 2003;4:83–94. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00398-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim SH, Yamamoto A, Bouwmeester T, Agius E, Robertis EM. The role of paraxial protocadherin in selective adhesion and cell movements of the mesoderm during Xenopus gastrulation. Development. 1998;125:4681–4690. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.23.4681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marlow F, Zwartkruis F, Malicki J, Neuhauss SC, Abbas L, Weaver M, Driever W, Solnica-Krezel L. Functional interactions of genes mediating convergent extension, knypek and trilobite, during the partitioning of the eye primordium in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 1998;203:382–399. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medina A, Swain RK, Kuerner KM, Steinbeisser H. Xenopus paraxial protocadherin has signaling functions and is involved in tissue separation. Embo J. 2004;23:3249–3258. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solnica-Krezel L. Conserved patterns of cell movements during vertebrate gastrulation. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R213–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spemann HaMH. Uber induction von embryonalanlagen durch implantation artfrender organisatoren. Wilh Roux Arch Entw Mech Org. 1924;100:599–638. [Google Scholar]
- Tribulo C, Aybar MJ, Nguyen VH, Mullins MC, Mayor R. Regulation of Msx genes by a Bmp gradient is essential for neural crest specification. Development. 2003;130:6441–6452. doi: 10.1242/dev.00878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ulrich F, Concha ML, Heid PJ, Voss E, Witzel S, Roehl H, Tada M, Wilson SW, Adams RJ, Soll DR, Heisenberg CP. Slb/Wnt11 controls hypoblast cell migration and morphogenesis at the onset of zebrafish gastrulation. Development. 2003;130:5375–5384. doi: 10.1242/dev.00758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ulrich F, Krieg M, Schotz EM, Link V, Castanon I, Schnabel V, Taubenberger A, Mueller D, Puech PH, Heisenberg CP. Wnt11 functions in gastrulation by controlling cell cohesion through Rab5c and E-cadherin. Dev Cell. 2005;9:555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unterseher F, Hefele JA, Giehl K, De Robertis EM, Wedlich D, Schambony A. Paraxial protocadherin coordinates cell polarity during convergent extension via Rho A and JNK. Embo J. 2004;23:3259–3269. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warga RM, Nusslein-Volhard C. spadetail-dependent cell compaction of the dorsal zebrafish blastula. Dev Biol. 1998;203:116–121. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto A, Amacher SL, Kim SH, Geissert D, Kimmel CB, De Robertis EM. Zebrafish paraxial protocadherin is a downstream target of spadetail involved in morphogenesis of gastrula mesoderm. Development. 1998;125:3389–3397. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.