Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1996 Oct;149(4):1193–1199.

Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of isolated nuclei and routine histological sections from paraffin-embedded prostatic adenocarcinoma specimens.

J Qian 1, D G Bostwick 1, S Takahashi 1, T J Borell 1, J A Brown 1, M M Lieber 1, R B Jenkins 1
PMCID: PMC1865198  PMID: 8863668

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool for quantitative analysis of chromosomes and genes and can be applied in a variety of specimens, including cell cultures, isolated nuclei from fresh and fixed tissues, and histological tissue sections. However, the results of FISH analysis of isolated nuclei in prostate cancer have not been previously compared with those from histological sections from the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. To compare these methods, we studied isolated nuclei derived from 50-microns sections and adjacent 5-microns tissue sections from 10 cases of benign nodular hyperplasia of the prostate and 16 cases of prostatic carcinoma. FISH analysis employed centromere-specific probes for chromosomes 7, 8, 11, and 12. In benign tissue, the percentage of nuclei with three or more signals for chromosomes 7, 8, 11, and 12 was less than 3% for both isolated nuclei and tissue sections. However, the percentage of nuclei with no and one signals was less than 8% for isolated nuclei and more than 24% for tissue sections. In prostatic carcinoma, numeric chromosomal anomalies were found in 75% of cases by both FISH methods. However, isolated nuclei had more chromosomal tetrasomy than tissue sections (mean, 9.2 to 11.0% versus 5.1 to 5.6%, respectively). Conversely, intratumor heterogeneity of chromosomal anomalies was identified in 5 cases by FISH analysis of tissue sections but not in isolated nuclei. Cancer ploidy analysis by FISH correlated well with ploidy analysis by flow cytometry, although FISH was more sensitive for aneuploidy. We conclude that FISH analysis of isolated nuclei and histological tissue sections from paraffin blocks are reliable methods for detection of chromosomal anomalies in archival tissue of prostate cancer, although each method has advantages and disadvantages.

Full text

PDF
1193

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alcaraz A., Takahashi S., Brown J. A., Herath J. F., Bergstralh E. J., Larson-Keller J. J., Lieber M. M., Jenkins R. B. Aneuploidy and aneusomy of chromosome 7 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization are markers of poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1994 Aug 1;54(15):3998–4002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alers J. C., Krijtenburg P. J., Vissers K. J., Bosman F. T., van der Kwast T. H., van Dekken H. Interphase cytogenetics of prostatic adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions: analysis of 25 radical prostatectomies and 17 adjacent prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1995 Apr;12(4):241–250. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870120402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandyk M. G., Zhao L., Troncoso P., Pisters L. L., Palmer J. L., von Eschenbach A. C., Chung L. W., Liang J. C. Trisomy 7: a potential cytogenetic marker of human prostate cancer progression. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994 Jan;9(1):19–27. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870090105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bostwick D. G., Brawer M. K. Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia and early invasion in prostate cancer. Cancer. 1987 Feb 15;59(4):788–794. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<788::aid-cncr2820590421>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bostwick D. G., Qian J. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Relationship with carcinoma in 217 whole-mount radical prostatectomies. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995 May;19(5):506–518. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199505000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emmert-Buck M. R., Vocke C. D., Pozzatti R. O., Duray P. H., Jennings S. B., Florence C. D., Zhuang Z., Bostwick D. G., Liotta L. A., Linehan W. M. Allelic loss on chromosome 8p12-21 in microdissected prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1995 Jul 15;55(14):2959–2962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kallioniemi O. P., Visakorpi T., Holli K., Heikkinen A., Isola J., Koivula T. Improved prognostic impact of S-phase values from paraffin-embedded breast and prostate carcinomas after correcting for nuclear slicing. Cytometry. 1991;12(5):413–421. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990120506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qian J., Bostwick D. G., Takahashi S., Borell T. J., Herath J. F., Lieber M. M., Jenkins R. B. Chromosomal anomalies in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res. 1995 Nov 15;55(22):5408–5414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Qian J., Jenkins R. B., Bostwick D. G. Chromosomal anomalies in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):837–842. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80354-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shackney S. E., Smith C. A., Miller B. W., Burholt D. R., Murtha K., Giles H. R., Ketterer D. M., Pollice A. A. Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors. Cancer Res. 1989 Jun 15;49(12):3344–3354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Takahashi S., Alcaraz A., Brown J. A., Borell T. J., Herath J. F., Bergstralh E. J., Lieber M. M., Jenkins R. B. Aneusomies of chromosomes 8 and Y detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization are prognostic markers for pathological stage C (pt3N0M0) prostate carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Jan;2(1):137–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahashi S., Qian J., Brown J. A., Alcaraz A., Bostwick D. G., Lieber M. M., Jenkins R. B. Potential markers of prostate cancer aggressiveness detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in needle biopsies. Cancer Res. 1994 Jul 1;54(13):3574–3579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson C. T., LeBoit P. E., Nederlof P. M., Gray J. W. Thick-section fluorescence in situ hybridization on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue provides a histogenetic profile. Am J Pathol. 1994 Feb;144(2):237–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES