Abstract
Background
We have previously reported that tolerance to class I disparate lung allografts in miniature swine could be induced using an intensive 12-day course of tacrolimus and that pre-transplant sensitization with immunogenic MHC class I allopeptides failed to block the induction of tolerance. We also have previously reported the importance of the presence of the thymus in the induction of tolerance to isolated heart, kidney, and combined heart-kidney transplants. In this study, we examined the impact of thymectomy on tolerance induction.
Methods
Orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed using MHC class I-disparate donors. The recipients received a 12-day course of high-dose tacrolimus (n = 6). Total thymectomies were performed in three of the swine, 21 days prior to transplantation. Lung grafts were monitored by chest radiography and serial open lung biopsy.
Results
All euthymic recipients maintained their grafts over one year. None of the thymectomized recipients has shown graft loss in the six to ten months following transplantation. Although isolated lesions of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) were occasionally seen in one thymectomized animal on biopsy, donor-specific unresponsiveness has been observed on assays of cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity (CML) in all recipients. Moreover, co-culture CML assays have shown that recipient lymphocytes can strongly inhibit the normally robust response of naïve recipient-matched lymphocytes to donor antigen. This inhibition was not seen when using stimulators primed with third-party antigens against appropriate targets.
Conclusions
These data suggest that thymus-independent peripheral regulatory mechanisms may be sufficient to induce and maintain long-term acceptance of the lung allografts.
INTRODUCTION
We have previously reported that tolerance to class I disparate lung allograft could be induced using an intensive 12-day course of tacrolimus in miniature swine1 and that pre-transplant sensitization with immunogenic MHC class I allopeptides failed to block the induction of tolerance2. These long-term acceptors developed donor-specific cellular and humoral unresponsiveness. However, this in vitro cellular unresponsiveness could be reversed by donor class-I matched, class-II mismatched skin grafting without concomitant pulmonary graft rejection2. These data suggest that clonal deletion was not the main immunologic mechanism of long-term graft acceptance, and that anergy or peripheral regulation might be the principal mechanism of the tolerance observed in this model. Previous studies in miniature swine in our laboratory have shown that a functioning thymus is required for the induction of tolerance to isolated kidney3, heart4, and combined heart-kidney5 transplants. In this study, we examine the impact of pre-transplant thymectomy on tolerance induction in a preclinical, large-animal model model.
METHODS
Animals
Transplant donors and recipients were selected from our herd of partially inbred miniature swine at 4–7 months of age. The immunogenetic characteristics of this herd have been described previously6. Swine lymphocyte antigen (SLA)gg (class Ic/IId) donors and class I disparate homozygous SLAdd (class Id/IId) recipients were used to achieve a 2-haplotype class I mismatch. Genotyping has been controlled by strict pedigree breeding and confirmed by microcytotoxicity testing using allospecific antisera. All animal care and procedures were in compliance with the "Principles of Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (revised 1996).
Experimental Groups
Twelve swine were used in this study to conduct 6 class I-disparate orthotopic left lung allografts. Tacrolimus (Fujisawa, Deerfield, IL) was administered to all recipients for 12 consecutive days, starting on the day of transplantation (0.15 mg/kg/day, as a continuous IV infusion; target level = 35 to 50 ng/ml). Three recipients underwent complete thymectomy, 21 days prior to lung transplantation.
Complete Thymectomy in the Recipient
Complete thymectomies were performed as previously described3. Briefly, the pretracheal muscles were retracted, exposing the cervical thymus and trachea from the cervicothoracic junction to the mandibular area. The cervical thymus was excised, and then the mediastinal thymus was removed through a sternotomy.
Lung Transplantation
Orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed as previously described 7. Briefly, under general anesthesia, two indwelling silastic central venous catheters were placed into external jugular veins in order to facilitate tacrolimus administration and frequent blood sampling for in vitro assays and for monitoring of whole-blood tacrolimus levels. The recipient's chest was entered through a left thoracotomy, and the hilar structures of the native lung were isolated. After heparinization (300 U/kg), the native lung was removed. The donor lung was approached through a median sternotomy. After heparinization (300 U/kg), the heart–lung block was topically cooled with iced saline and flushed in situ with 4 L of cold Euro-Collins solution (Fresenius Medical Care AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) containing prostaglandin E1 (500 μg/L). Immediately after harvesting, the left lung was surgically prepared and transplanted.
Rejection Monitoring
In all experiments, lung allografts were monitored for rejection by a combination of daily physical examination, serial chest radiography and open lung biopsies. The timing of the open lung biopsies was protocol-driven. Immune responses were monitored with cell-mediated lympholysis (CML). Graft loss (our principal endpoint) is defined as high-grade histologic rejection in association with loss of graft aeration as observed on chest radiograph, and/or loss of graft perfusion or compliance as observed intra-operatively at the time of open lung biopsy.
CML Assays
Primary CML assay was performed as described previously8. Secondary co-culture CML assay was described in detail previously8. Briefly, this assay was performed in two sequential phases, consisting of a priming phase (day 0–6), and a co-culture phase (day 7–13). In the priming phase, 4 × 106 peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) drawn from experimental or control animals were first primed for 6 days with 4 × 106 stimulator cells (irradiated with 2500 rads) at 37 °C in 7.5% CO2. After 6 days, the cells were harvested and rested overnight at 4 × 106 cells/mL in CML media at 37 °C in 7.5% CO2. These cells were then used as the experimental or control population in a co-culture CML assay.
RESULTS
As previously reported1, all euthymic animals accepted their lung grafts for over one year. Likewise, none of the thymectomized recipients have yet to reject their grafts (>307, >272, >168 days; experiment in progress). In the thymectomized recipients, only minimal mononuclear cell infiltration has been seen (Figure 1) although one thymectomized recipient showed isolated lesions of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) on the post-operative day (POD) 150 biopsy. However, similar lesions have not been observed on subsequent biopsies. All thymectomized recipients demonstrated significant in vitro anti-donor cytotoxic activity (>30% percent specific lysis) prior to transplantation and exhibited donor-specific hyporesponsiveness, after transplantation. In co-culture CML assays, PBLs from long-term lung acceptors that were primed with donor antigen completely suppressed the CTL response of naïve recipient-matched PBL to donor antigen. This inhibition was not seen when using third party-primed stimulators with appropriate targets.
Figure 1.

Histology of lung allografts from thymectomized swine #16639 on POD 250; no mononuclear cell infiltration (H&E staining, × 100).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that thymus-independent mechanisms may be sufficient to induce and maintain long-term acceptance of the lung allograft in tacrolimus-treated MHC class I mismatched pulmonary allografts. Moreover, a state of in vitro donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and the generation of thymus-independent regulatory T cells, as seen in the co-culture CML assays, suggest that the differs from the heart and kidney in its ability to induce strong peripheral regulation. Further experiments are required to determine the nature of these putative regulatory cells, and to test whether these findings can be extended to a fully allogeneic model.
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by grants from the Thoracic Surgery Foundation for Research and Education (Sahara/Allan), the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (Shoji), the American Surgical Association Foundation (Allan), and the National Institutes of Health 1RO1-HL67110-01-A1 (Allan).
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errorsmaybe discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Shoji T, Muniappan A, Guenther DA, et al. Long-Term Acceptance of Porcine Pulmonary Allografts without Chronic Rejection. Transplantation Proceeding. 2005;37:72–74. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shoji T, Sahara H, Muniappan A, et al. Pulmonary Allograft Tolerance Can Be Induced across a Class I MHC Barrier in Swine Sensitized to MHC Class I Allopeptides Prior to Transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. 2005;5:213. (abstracts) [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamada K, Gianello PR, Ierino FL, et al. Role of the Thymus in Transplantation Tolerance in Miniature Swine. I Requirement of the Thymus for Rapid and Stable Induction of Tolerance to Class I-Mismatched Renal Allografts. J Exp Med. 1997;186:497–506. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamamoto S, Teranishi K, Kamano C, et al. Role of the Thymus in Transplantation Tolerance in Miniature Swine: V. Deficiency of the Graft-to-Thymus Pathway of Tolerance Induction in Recipients of Cardiac Transplants. Transplantation. 2006;81:607–613. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000198735.17555.f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamada K, Choo JK, Allan JS, et al. The effect of Thymectomy on Tolerance Induction and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in a Miniature Swine Heart/Kidney Transplantation Model. Transplantation. 1999;68:485–491. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199908270-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sachs DH, Leight G, Cone J, Schwarz S, Stuart L, Rosenberg S. Transplantation in miniature swine. I Fixation of the major histocompatibility complex. Transplantation. 1976;22:559–567. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197612000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allan JS, Wain JC, Schwarze ML, et al. Modeling chronic lung allograft rejection in miniature swine. Transplantation. 2002;73:447–453. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200202150-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ierino FL, Yamada K, Hatch T, Rembert J, Sachs DH. Peripheral tolerance to class I mismatched renal allografts in miniature swine: donor antigen-activated peripheral blood lymphocytes from tolerant swine inhibit antidonor CTL reactivity. J Immunol. 1999;162:550–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
