Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Aug;28(2):181–184. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.181-184.1974

Growth Rates of a Pseudomonad on 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and 2,4-Dichlorophenol

J E Tyler 1,1, R K Finn 1
PMCID: PMC186683  PMID: 4852192

Abstract

The growth of a pseudomonad on 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 2,4-DCP (2,4-dichlorophenol) was studied in batch and continuous culture. The optimum growth rate using 2,4-D was 0.14/h at 25 C in a pH range from 6.2 to 6.9. Highest specific growth rate using 2,4-DCP was 0.12/h at 25 C in a pH range from 7.1 to 7.8. Growth was strongly inhibited by 2,4-DCP above a concentration of 25 mg/liter whereas no appreciable inhibition was observed with 2,4-D at concentrations up to 2,000 mg per liter. Growth on 2,4-DCP was described by Monod kinetics at subinhibitory concentrations but the inhibition by 2,4-DCP exhibited an unusual linear response to substrate concentration, and did not fit a model based on noncompetitive inhibition. The lag phase of batch cultures was found to depend on both 2,4-DCP concentration and prior adaptation of the inoculum. A study such as this on the kinetics of growth on related substrates may be useful as a method of finding the rate-limiting step in a metabolic sequence.

Full text

PDF
181

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOON B., LAUDELOUT H. Kinetics of nitrite oxidation by Nitrobacter winogradskyi. Biochem J. 1962 Dec;85:440–447. doi: 10.1042/bj0850440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards V. H. The influence of high substrate concentrations on microbial kinetics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1970 Sep;12(5):679–712. doi: 10.1002/bit.260120504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans W. C., Smith B. S., Fernley H. N., Davies J. I. Bacterial metabolism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate. Biochem J. 1971 May;122(4):543–551. doi: 10.1042/bj1220543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingols R. S., Gaffney P. E., Stevenson P. C. Biological activity of halophenols. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1966 Apr;38(4):629–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Judis J. Mechanism of action of phenolic disinfectants. VII. Factors affecting binding of phenol derivatives to Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells. J Pharm Sci. 1966 Aug;55(8):803–807. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600550810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. WEINBACH E. C., GARBUS J. THE INTERACTION OF UNCOUPLING PHENOLS WITH MITOCHONDRIA AND WITH MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN. J Biol Chem. 1965 Apr;240:1811–1819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WILD D. G., HINSHELWOOD C. The development of drug resistance in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: resistance 2.4-dinitrophenol and to brilliant green. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1955 Nov 29;144(916):287–297. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1955.0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES