Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening has vast potential. Beyond considerations for cost and diagnostic accuracy, the effectiveness of any colorectal screening strategy will be dependent on the degree of patient acceptance. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography has been shown to be accurate regarding the detection of clinically relevant colonic polyps exceeding 10 mm in size, with reported sensitivity and specificity values exceeding 95%. To further increase patient acceptance, strategies for fecal tagging have recently been developed. By modulating the signal of fecal material to be identical to the signal characteristics of the enema applied to distend the colon, fecal tagging in conjunction with MR colonography obviates the need for bowel cleansing. The review will describe the techniques underlying MR colonography and describe early clinical experience with fecal tagging techniques.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (205.4 KB).
Figure 1.
For filling of the colon with 1000–2000 ml of a water based enema, the patient is placed in the prone position. The enema is administered using 100–150 cm of hydrostatic pressure.
Figure 2.
Colonic filling is monitored with a non-slice select 2D acquisition collecting one image every three seconds. The last image on the right demonstrates that enema has reached the caecum.
Figure 3.
The high contrast between the contrast filled colonic lumen and surrounding structures (on the left) is the basis for subsequent virtual colonic viewing (on the right).
Figure 4.
A single coronal section of a 3D dataset demonstrates a small filling defect in the sigmoid colon. Virtual endoscopic viewing confirms the presence of a polyp.
Figure 5.
Dark lumen MR colonography focuses on the colonic wall. After filling of the colonic lumen with warm tap water a 3D gradient echo dataset is collected over 20 seconds in apnea 75 seconds after the intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast. At this time there is avid enhancement of the colonic wall as well as of colorectal masses arising from it. In this case a large 15 mm polyp is identified arising from the sigmoid colon. The polyp is seen to clearly on the coronal source image (top left), the sagittal reformation (top right), the axial reformation (bottom left), and the virtual endoscopic view (bottom right).
Figure 6.
Single coronal section of a dark lumen MR colonography 3D dataset, which was acquired over 20 seconds in apnea 75 seconds after the intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast. A small 7 mm polyp is identified arising from the sigmoid colon. The polyp is seen clearly on the coronal source image (left) as well as on the virtual endoscopic view (right).
Figure 7.
Maximum intensity projection (MIP) display of a 3D MR colonography dataset collected after gadolinium based fecal tagging (left). After filling the colon with a gadolinium containing enema, the tagged stool is no longer seen because its signal intensity is similar to that of the applied rectal gadolinium/water enema. The intraluminal signal intensity is sufficiently homogeneous to permit virtual colonoscopic viewing (right).
Figure 8.
Images of two volunteers undergoing MR colonography based on the rectal administration of a barium enema in conjunction with the intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast. One volunteer did (right) and one volunteer did not (left) ingest barium for fecal tagging. In both cases the colonic wall is bright after the after application of paramagnetic contrast. Fecal material in the volunteer who had not received barium for fecal tagging is bright and can thus not be differentiated from the brightly enhancing wall. The presence of colonic polyps cannot be excluded with certainty. The colonic lumen of the volunteer who had ingested the barium tagging agent on the other hand is homogenously dark, thereby permitting a full analysis of the colon.
Figure 9.
Coronal source image (right) and virtual endoscopic rendering thereof (left) of 3D gradient echo dataset collected after the administration of a barium enema and the intravenous injection of gadobenate dimeglumine. A contrast enhancing colonic carcinoma close to the right colonic flexure is identified both on the coronal section as well as on the virtual endoscopic view.
Figure 10.
Axial reformatted image (right) and virtual endoscopic rendering (left) of a 3D gradient echo dataset collected after the administration of a barium enema and the intravenous injection of gadobenate dimeglumine. A contrast enhancing 10 mm polyp is identified in the sigmoid colon on both the single axial section as well as the virtual endoscopic rendering.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ahlquist D. A., Wieand H. S., Moertel C. G., McGill D. B., Loprinzi C. L., O'Connell M. J., Mailliard J. A., Gerstner J. B., Pandya K., Ellefson R. D. Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests. JAMA. 1993 Mar 10;269(10):1262–1267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angtuaco T. L., Banaad-Omiotek G. D., Howden C. W. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Mar;96(3):887–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becker C. R., Schätzl M., Feist H., Bäuml A., Brüning R., Schöpf U. J., Reiser M. F. Strahlenexposition bei der CT-Untersuchung des Thorax und Abdomens. Vergleich von Einzelschicht-, Spiral- und Elektronenstrahlcomputertomographie. Radiologe. 1998 Sep;38(9):726–729. doi: 10.1007/s001170050416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elwood J. M., Ali G., Schlup M. M., McNoe B., Barbezat G. O., North F., Sutton K., Parry B., Chadwick V. S. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for colorectal screening: a randomized trial of performance and acceptability. Cancer Detect Prev. 1995;19(4):337–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenlon H. M., Nunes D. P., Schroy P. C., 3rd, Barish M. A., Clarke P. D., Ferrucci J. T. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 11;341(20):1496–1503. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher J. G., Johnson C. D., Welch T. J., MacCarty R. L., Ahlquist D. A., Reed J. E., Harmsen W. S., Wilson L. A. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):704–711. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au41704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frommer D. J. What's new in colorectal cancer screening? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 May;13(5):528–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.tb00681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griswold M. A., Jakob P. M., Nittka M., Goldfarb J. W., Haase A. Partially parallel imaging with localized sensitivities (PILS). Magn Reson Med. 2000 Oct;44(4):602–609. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<602::aid-mrm14>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hara A. K., Johnson C. D., Reed J. E., Ehman R. L., Ilstrup D. M. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. Radiology. 1996 Jul;200(1):49–54. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landis S. H., Murray T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998 Jan-Feb;48(1):6–29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.48.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauenstein T. C., Herborn C. U., Vogt F. M., Göhde S. C., Debatin J. F., Ruehm S. G. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo. 2001 Sep;173(9):785–789. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauenstein T., Holtmann G., Schoenfelder D., Bosk S., Ruehm S. G., Debatin J. F. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Oct;177(4):823–827. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauenstein Thomas C., Goehde Susanne C., Ruehm Stefan G., Holtmann Gerald, Debatin Jörg F. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002 Apr;223(1):248–254. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2231010887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee P. Y., Fletcher W. S., Sullivan E. S., Vetto J. T. Colorectal cancer in young patients: characteristics and outcome. Am Surg. 1994 Aug;60(8):607–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman D. A., Smith F. W. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Aug;86(8):946–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman D. Colon cancer screening: beyond efficacy. Gastroenterology. 1994 Mar;106(3):803–807. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90718-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas D. J., Sood R. R., Graves M. J., Miller R., Hall N. R., Dixon A. K. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema--pilot study. Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):558–562. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma10558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Steiner P., Fried M., Krestin G. P., Debatin J. F. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet. 1997 May 3;349(9061):1288–1291. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11332-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Wildermuth S., Marincek B., Fried M., Debatin J. F. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology. 2000 Aug;216(2):383–388. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au11383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luboldt W., Steiner P., Bauerfeind P., Pelkonen P., Debatin J. F. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology. 1998 Apr;207(1):59–65. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcos H. B., Semelka R. C. Evaluation of Crohn's disease using half-fourier RARE and gadolinium-enhanced SGE sequences: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Apr;18(3):263–268. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrin M. M., Farrell R. J., Kruskal J. B., Reynolds K., McGee J. B., Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):765–771. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00nv42765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy K. J., Brunberg J. A., Cohan R. H. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Oct;167(4):847–849. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Brien M. J., Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Gottlieb L. S., Sternberg S. S., Diaz B., Dickersin G. R., Ewing S., Geller S., Kasimian D. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):371–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pappalardo G., Polettini E., Frattaroli F. M., Casciani E., D'Orta C., D'Amato M., Gualdi G. F. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology. 2000 Aug;119(2):300–304. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.9353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prince M. R., Arnoldus C., Frisoli J. K. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):162–166. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880060129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rex D. K., Rahmani E. Y., Haseman J. H., Lemmel G. T., Kaster S., Buckley J. S. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):17–23. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saar B., Heverhagen J. T., Obst T., Berthold L. D., Kopp I., Klose K. J., Wagner H. J. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2000 Sep;35(9):521–526. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200009000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vernon S. W. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406–1422. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.19.1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villavicencio R. T., Rex D. K. Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000 Oct;11(4):185–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weishaupt D., Patak M. A., Froehlich J., Ruehm S. G., Debatin J. F. Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet. 1999 Sep 4;354(9181):835–836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Ho M. N., O'Brien M. J., Gottlieb L. S., Sternberg S. S., Waye J. D., Schapiro M., Bond J. H., Panish J. F. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977–1981. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]