Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1975 Jun;29(6):814–818. doi: 10.1128/am.29.6.814-818.1975

Method for Detecting Small Numbers of Vibrio cholerae in Very Polluted Substrates

I Sechter 1, ChB Gerichter 1, D Cahan 1
PMCID: PMC187085  PMID: 239631

Abstract

A method is presented for the indirect detection of Vibrio cholerae by the multiplication of two specific bacteriophages: ϕH74/64 for El-Tor vibrios, and phage group IV (Mukerjee) for classical vibrios. The product to be examined is seeded in alkaline tryptone water for enrichment, as in the classical method, and is then incubated for 6 h at 37 C. Thereafter, a loopful is transferred to each of two nutrient broth (pH 9) tubes. One of these receives a drop of phage ϕH74/64; the other receives a drop of phage group IV. The stock phages are diluted so as to contain about 3,800 plaque-forming units in one drop; this is the maximum amount which, when added to 10 ml of broth, will not be detected in a loopful of 1 mm diameter. The tubes containing phage φH74/64 are incubated at 42 C; those with phage group IV are incubated at 37 C. After 18 h the cultures are killed by agitation with chloroform, and a 1-mm loopful is deposited on a layer seeded with the detector strains: Makassar 757 for El-Tor phage and V. cholerae 154 for classical cholera phage. After 4 to 5 h at 37 C, lysis appears on the spot areas if there has been phage multiplication in the respective broth tubes. With experimentally contaminated sewage water, vegetables, or stools, 1 to 10 cholera vibrios were detected in every sample. In rare cases, false-positive results were obtained by multiplication of the phage on non-cholera vibrios.

Full text

PDF
814

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barui R. K., Mosley W. H., McCormack W. M. A comparison of purging and multiple rectal swabs in the detection of inapparent cholera infections. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;46(2):257–262. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basu S., Mukerjee S. A specific phage for pathogenic Vibrio cholerae, biotype E1 Tor (phi-H74-64). Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(3):509–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benenson A. S. The control of cholera. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1971 Oct;47(10):1204–1210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dodin A., Wiart J., Duguet M. Les antigènes précipitants de: Vibrio cholerae. Leur rapport avec les antigènes agglutinants et immunofluorescents. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1971 Sep-Oct;64(5):596–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerichter C. B., Sechter I., Cahan D. Laboratory diagnosis of cholera during the Jerusalem outbreak, August-September 1970. Isr J Med Sci. 1972 Apr;8(4):531–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TIMAKOV V. D., GOL'DFARB D. M. Bakteriofag i problema indikatsii patogennykh bakterii. Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR. 1956;11(2):28–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WAHL R. La semi-résistance aux bactériophages. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1953 Jan;84(1):51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES