Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1975 Jul;30(1):66–71. doi: 10.1128/am.30.1.66-71.1975

Membrane Filter Technique for Enumeration of Enterococci in Marine Waters

M A Levin 1, J R Fischer 1, V J Cabelli 1
PMCID: PMC187115  PMID: 807165

Abstract

A membrane filter procedure is described for the enumeration of enterococci in marine waters. The procedure utilizes a highly selective and somewhat differential primary isolation medium followed by an in situ substrate test for identifying colonies of those organisms capable of hydrolyzing esculin. The procedure (mE) was evaluated with known streptococci strains and field samples with regard to its accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, precision, and comparability to existing methods. Essentially quantitative recovery was obtained with seawater-stressed cells of Streptococcus faecalis and S. faccium. Neither S. bovis, S. equinus, S. mitis, nor S. salivarius grew on the medium. The selectivity of the medium was such that a 10,000-fold reduction in background organisms was obtained relative to a medium which contained no inhibitors and was incubated at 35 C. About 90% of those typical colonies designated as enterococci confirmed as such and about 12% of the colonies not so designated were, in fact, identified as enterococci. Plate to plate variability across samples approximated that expected by chance alone. Verified recoveries of enterococci from natural samples by the mE procedure, on the average, exceeded those by the KF method by one order of magnitude.

Full text

PDF
66

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buck J. D. Selective detection of enterococci in marine waters. Am J Public Health. 1972 Mar;62(3):419–421. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Facklam R. R., Moody M. D. Presumptive identification of group D streptococci: the bile-esculin test. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Aug;20(2):245–250. doi: 10.1128/am.20.2.245-250.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Geldreich E. E., Kenner B. A. Concepts of fecal streptococci in stream pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1969 Aug;41(8 Suppl):R336+–R336+. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hajna A. A., Perry C. A. Comparative Study of Presumptive and Confirmative Media for Bacteria of the Coliform Group and for Fecal Streptococci. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1943 May;33(5):550–556. doi: 10.2105/ajph.33.5.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Isenberg H. D., Goldberg D., Sampson J. Laboratory studies with a selective Enterococcus medium. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Sep;20(3):433–436. doi: 10.1128/am.20.3.433-436.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KENNER B. A., CLARK H. F., KABLER P. W. Fecal Streptococci. I. Cultivation and enumeration of Streptococci in surface waters. Appl Microbiol. 1961 Jan;9:15–20. doi: 10.1128/am.9.1.15-20.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KJELLANDER J. Enteric streptococci as indicators of fecal contamination of water. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl. 1960;48(Suppl 136):3–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LITSKY W., MALLMANN W. L., FIFIELD C. W. A new medium for the detection of enterococci in water. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1953 Jul;43(7):873–879. doi: 10.2105/ajph.43.7.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LITSKY W., MALLMANN W. L., FIFIELD C. W. Comparison of the most probable numbers of Escherichia coli and enterococci in river waters. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1955 Aug;45(8):1049–1053. doi: 10.2105/ajph.45.8.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levin M. A., Cabelli V. J. Membrane filter technique for enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Dec;24(6):864–870. doi: 10.1128/am.24.6.864-870.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MALLMANN W. L., SELIGMANN E. B., Jr A comparative study of media for the detection of streptococci in water and sewage. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1950 Mar;40(3):286–289. doi: 10.2105/ajph.40.3.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PAPAVASSILIOU J. Species differentiation of group D streptococci. Appl Microbiol. 1962 Jan;10:65–69. doi: 10.1128/am.10.1.65-69.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SLANETZ L. W., BARTLEY C. H. Numbers of enterococci in water, sewage, and feces determined by the membrane filter technique with an improved medium. J Bacteriol. 1957 Nov;74(5):591–595. doi: 10.1128/jb.74.5.591-595.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SWAN A. The use of a bile-aesculin medium and of Maxted's technique of Lancefield grouping in the identification of enterococci (group D streptococci). J Clin Pathol. 1954 May;7(2):160–163. doi: 10.1136/jcp.7.2.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sabbaj J., Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Comparison of selective media for isolation of presumptive group D streptococci from human feces. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1008–1011. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1008-1011.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Switzer R. E., Evans J. B. Evaluation of selective media for enumeration of group D streptococci in bovine feces. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Dec;28(6):1086–1087. doi: 10.1128/am.28.6.1086-1087.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES