Abstract
When three sheep were abruptly changed from a ration of 100% orchardgrass hay to 60% cracked corn-40% orchardgrass hay, fed at equal dry-matter intakes, significant increases in concentration were observed in the rumen microbial population. Bacterial numbers (colony counts) per gram of rumen contents did not appear to have stabilized within 21 days after the ration change; however, protozoan numbers per milliliter plateaued after 5 days. The concentration of cellulose-digesting bacteria varied considerably between animals and decreased in all animals with the change. Changes were observed in total and molar percentages of volatile fatty acids, which were typical for the two types of rations. Although the concentration of protozoa increased after the ration change, only minor differences were observed in their percent generic distribution. A significant decrease in rumen volume was measured in two of the three sheep with the change in ration; however, fluid turnover rates were not significantly affected. Rates of rumen dry-matter turnover were slower with the concentrate ration, although rumen dry-matter digestion was increased. Calculation of total bacterial numbers based on total rumen volume completely negated the effect of ration change in one animal, whereas total numbers in the other two animals were still significantly different between rations and very similar between animals. Adjustment of total protozoa numbers did not alter the trends seen previously with concentration values.
Full text
PDF








Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abe M., Shibui H., Iriki T., Kumeno F. Relation between diet and protozoal population in the rumen. Br J Nutr. 1973 Mar;29(2):197–202. doi: 10.1079/bjn19730094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akin D. E., Burdick D., Michaels G. E. Rumen bacterial interrelationships with plant tissue during degradation revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jun;27(6):1149–1156. doi: 10.1128/am.27.6.1149-1156.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehority B. A. Characterization of several bovine rumen bacteria isolated with a xylan medium. J Bacteriol. 1966 May;91(5):1724–1729. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1724-1729.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehority B. A. Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jul;99(1):189–196. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.1.189-196.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehority B. A., Scott H. W., Kowaluk P. Volatile fatty acid requirements of cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1967 Sep;94(3):537–543. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.3.537-543.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUNGATE R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1950 Mar;14(1):1–49. doi: 10.1128/br.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hungate R. E., Reichl J., Prins R. Parameters of rumen fermentation in a continuously fed sheep: evidence of a microbial rumination pool. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1104–1113. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1104-1113.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Latham M. J., Sharpe M. E., Sutton J. D. The microbial flora of the rumen of cows fed hay and high cereal rations and its relationship to the rumen fermentation. J Appl Bacteriol. 1971 Jun;34(2):425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1971.tb02302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura K., Kanegasaki S. Densities of ruminal protozoa of sheep established under different dietary conditions. J Dairy Sci. 1969 Feb;52(2):250–255. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86538-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WARNER A. C. Some factors influencing the rumen microbial population. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Apr;28:129–146. doi: 10.1099/00221287-28-1-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weller R. A., Pilgrim A. F. Passage of protozoa and volatile fatty acids from the rumen of the sheep and from a continuous in vitro fermentation system. Br J Nutr. 1974 Sep;32(2):341–351. doi: 10.1079/bjn19740087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]