Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
letter
. 2002 Nov;54(5):548–552. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01685.x

Prevalence of factitious hypoglycaemia associated with sulphonylurea drugs in France in the year 2000

T Trenque 1, C Frances 1, H Millart 1, G Hoizey 1, M L Germain 1
PMCID: PMC1874458  PMID: 12445037

Hypoglycaemia presents important diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Severe and repetitive hypoglycaemic episodes without treatment may be difficult to explain. Failure to identify factitious hypoglycaemia may lead to laparotomy or pancreatectomy [1, 2].

To estimate the prevalence of factitious hypoglycaemia due to sulphonylurea drugs in patients with unexplained severe hypoglycaemia, we conducted a prospective study during the year 2000. Hypoglycaemic patients were recruited throughout France. Plasma was assayed for oral hypoglycaemic agents on the clinician's request, using h.p.l.c. with u.v. detection. Fifty-six patients with unexplained hypoglycaemia were recruited. In seven of these patients (five women, two men), a sulphonylurea oral hypoglycaemic agent was detected (Table 1).

Table 1.

Plasma concentrations observed.

Hypoglycaemic agent Maximal concentrations observed Therapeutic range Elimination half-life
Glibenclamide (n = 4) 696 µg l−1 25–50 µg l−1 5 h−10 h
Glimepiride (n = 2) 418 µg l−1 300 µg l−1 5 h−9 h
Gliclazide (n = 1) 2.1 mg l−1 1.5 mg l−1 8 h−12 h

Plasma concentrations were usually supra-therapeutic and concentrations up to 15 times the upper limit of the therapeutic range were observed.

In one 45-year-old patient, during hospitalization, we identified glibenclamide concentrations of 529 µg l−1 at 11.00 h (therapeutic concentration 25–50 µg l−1), of 696 µg l−1 at 22.00 h, of 154 µg l−1 at 06.15 h and of 367 µg l−1 at 08.00 h over a 2 day period.

Insulinoma has been suspected in such patients due to continued surreptitious consumption of medication during hospitalization.

Cases of factitious hypoglycaemia from oral hypoglycaemic agents have been published [14], and may be a manifestation of Munchausen's syndrome [5]. Factitious hypoglycaemia due to sulphonylurea drugs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of insulinoma.

References

  • 1.Duncan GC, Jensen W, Eberly RJ. Factitious hypoglycemia due to chlorpropamide. JAMA. 1961;175:904–906. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.63040100019020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grunberger G, Weiner JL, Silverman R, Taylor S, Gorden P. Factitious hypoglycemia due to surreptitious administration of insulin. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:252–257. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jordan RM, Kammer H, Riddle MR. Sulfonylurea-induced factitious hypoglycemia. Arch Intern Med. 1977;137:390–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walfish PG. Sulfonylurea-induced factitious hypoglycemia in a non-diabetic nurse. Can Med Ass J. 1975;112:71–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Charlton R, Smith G, Day A. Munchausen's syndrome manifesting as factitious hypoglycemia. Diabetologia. 2001;44:784–785. doi: 10.1007/pl00022653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES