Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1983 May 1;128(9):1079–1082.

The role of deputizing agencies in the delivery of primary health care services.

T Novak, H Pross
PMCID: PMC1874854  PMID: 6839257

Abstract

When not available to their patients, family practitioners in large cities can "sign out" to deputizing agencies, which coordinate the activities of part-time physicians on call. The physicians making use of one such agency in Toronto appeared to be representative of family practitioners in the region. One thousand of their patients seen consecutively by one physician were asked a series of questions. The majority of the 811 evaluable patients were considered to have problems justifying an after-hours call, although 16% of the problems were of a trivial nature. However, almost half of the patients with trivial problems would have gone to the local emergency room, as would 85% of all the patients. Although virtually all (94%) of the visits with the elderly were justified, 34% of the patients in this age group said they probably or definitely would not have sought emergency room care if a physician had not been available. The use of deputizing agencies should reduce the overuse of emergency room facilities and provide optimal after-hours primary medical care.

Full text

PDF
1079

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bentzen N., Russell I., Spark M. G. Deputising services in Denmark--some implications for Great Britain. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Jan;26(162):37–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curtis P., Talbot A., Liebeseller V. The after-hours call: a survey of United States family practice residency programs. J Fam Pract. 1979 Jan;8(1):117–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall D. W. The off-duty arrangements of general practitioners in four European countries. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Jan;26(162):19–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hilditch J. R. Changes in hospital emergency department use associated with increased family physician availability. J Fam Pract. 1980 Jul;11(1):91–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huntley H. C. Emergency department visits--a statewide survey. JACEP. 1977 Jul;6(7):296–299. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(77)80072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Steele R., Lees R. E., Latchman B., Spasoff R. A. Cost of primary health care services in the emergency department and the family physician's office. Can Med Assoc J. 1975 May 3;112(9):1096-8, 1113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vayda E., Gent M., Hendershot A. Emergency department use at two Hamilton hospitals. Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Apr 19;112(8):961–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES